The Experience of the Factory Committees in the Russian
Revolution
The Peasants Take The Land
While the workers and soldiers were issuing demands for others to
meet, and slowly realising that only they themselves could attain
their ends, the peasants were taking direct action. Peasant risings
and land seizures were widespread. The peasants carried out their own
agrarian reform measures and ignored the Provisional Government which
was set against the seizure of land. Peasant committees were formed
at the village, volost, uezd (district) and guberniya (regional)
levels. Decisions tended to flow upwards: those coming down were only
obeyed if they were agreed with. The arguments within the Social
Revolutionaries, the peasant party, were no longer of real concern to
the peasants. What mattered to them was that the decisions they were
taking and the regulations they were adopting on the land issue
should be irreversible.
The image of the peasants as a mass of ignorant anti-socialists,
in a sea of which Russia's workers would drown, is quite wrong. They
set to running their own affairs with enthusiasm: illiteracy was no
bar to their abilities. The 45 elected members of the Peasant
Committee of Novochastky uezd said they would "organize the new
society". The Peasant Convention of Penza on May 15th was composed of
illiterate peasants with a single literate teacher to take down their
resolutions. They called on owners "to apply its decisions and freely
give their property to the (volost) land committee so as to avoid
illegal occupation by individual peasants' " [15] The convention set out to control rents, sort
out the amounts of land each person or family unit could have,
supervise the harvests and ensure an efficient utilisation of the
land. The peasant assembly of Samara showed the peasants' great
impatience with the politicians over the land question. A peasant
shouted at a Menshevik "We always have to wait, you ass, don't play
the fool with us." They paid scant regard to the 'legality' of their
actions -- "That bunch of lawyers again," said one, "saying they're
on our side, but we know different; they'll betray us."
[16] Lenin's Decree on Land could do
no more than recognise a fait accompli : 65 out of 70 peasant soviets
had already divided the land.
The peasants were quick to throw off the shackles of religion. A
priest moaned: "My parishioners will nowadays only go to meetings of
the soviet, and when I remind them about the church, they tell me
they have no time." [17] A peasant
told a priest straight to his face why : ''For centuries a few nobles
and landowners subjected millions of poor people, bled and sweated
them -- and you priests said it was right, chanting in chorus 'Long
life to the Tsars and our leaders' ; yet, now that the people has
power and is trying to establish equality, you, the 'Holy men' will
not recognise us." [18]
The workers knew the importance of the peasantry for the success
of the revolution. The Petrograd conference of factory committees
debated the agrarian issue with a view to sealing relations with the
peasants. The Petrograd workers created special commissions in the
factories to gather scrap metals and damaged pieces for a project
they called 'Worker to Peasant', making agricultural tools for the
peasant committees. Delegates were sent into the countryside to
negotiate directly, worker to peasant, over grain deliveries. There
is no reason to suppose that workers and peasants could not have
developed a workable relationship: workers' self-management was no
threat to the peasants.
Notes
[15] quoted in Ferro (October),
p118.
[16] quoted in Ferro (October),
p120.
[17] quoted in Ferro (October),
p62.
[18] quoted in Ferro (October),
p65.