SECOND ISSUE
Join the fight against cultural oppression
Overthrow the powers that be and install a new style Dictatorship
RAZOR SHARP
Propoganda for the fashion revolution
THESE SOUNDS LED THE WAY
When I first got on the scene in the late eighties Ska was very hard to come by. Especially in a small town which is where I was from. Therefore, anything I could get my hands on I thought was great and I listened to a small amount of music a lot. As my world expanded and I got more music I liked it all. I would read in zines about albums and album reviews would criticize an album that I liked. I never understood why a reviewer liked some albums and not others. Especially since I liked them all. Well I've been on the scene for a long time mow and now I am critical of albums that I liked before. Why this change? Let me try and explain.
When I was new to the scene I didn't really understand all of the implications of being a member of a subculture. Especially one that exists in the midst of a popular culture that is so different from it. I didn't know that there were authentic and fake versions of almost every element of subculture. I didn't know all of the traditions and styles that made up the subculture and so when I heard a song I didn't know if it was authentic to the meaning of subculture. The longer I stayed on the scene and the more I learned about my subculture the more discerning I became and soon I understood why many of the songs were being criticized by the reviewers. The first change came when I got a Skatalites album. It sounded less like the Ska I was listening to and more like jazz. At least to my uninitiated ears. But I persisted and the more familiar I became with the album the more I liked it and the less it sounded like jazz. Of course it didn't sound more like the Ska that I was listening to. I started to find sources for more sixties Ska. And the more I listened to it the more it sounded like a distinct genre, different from what was being called Ska in the early nineties. I started noticing similarities between some bands (Hepcat for example) but mostly I noticed differences. I became familiar with a good deal of sixties Ska and learned about the true authentic Rude Boy culture. The more I learned about it the less it seemed that the newer Ska bands knew about it. I met people in bands and they talked about their influences as being popular artists from american music history rather than Jamaican artists and in fact very few musicians I met knew even rudimentary things about authentic sixties Ska. So if these bands were not influenced by members of our subculture what were they contributing to our scene.
The final realization came when I bought an album that would change the way I thought about all music. Unfortunately the album did this by providing a bad example. It was “Devils Night Out” by the Bosstones. Remember that up to this point I liked all Ska. Every band that put the word on the cover I liked. And so as I listened to this album I thought to myself "this sucks!" Why all of the sudden do I not like a "Ska" album. I listened to it over and over again thinking that I would learn to like it but all I really learned was the specific reasons that I didn't like this album:
It was heavily sprinkled with heavy metal guitar (I knew little about my subculture then but I knew enough to know that heavy metal and all it represented had nothing to do with it).
The vocals sounded terrible (my familiarity with sixties Ska never provided any examples of Ska without very nice, if not harmonious vocals).
The rhythm was inconsistent (there were changes from the simplified Ska rhythm to rock rhythm to I don't know what else)
Why did this band call itself Ska if it sounded like this? It was something I only first realized: Ska was being misapplied to describe any band that has an upbeat drive. Now I had to look back at all of the music I had been listening to and re-assess whether or not I should like them. So for the first time I had to develop my own personal standard for determining which music was good and which was not.
The first thing I did was to make a decision. I had to decide if I wanted to enjoy all of this music regardless of the implications it had on authentic music styles or I had to decide if I was a part of the subculture that provided material for these bands to rip off. I chose subculture and have since refined my tastes for music even further. The more I get into authentic music styles the more I dislike a lot of the music that I liked before. And the more I discover good authentic music that props up and supports my culture rather than tear it down. I have learned some things and I want to describe the standards that I use to judge music by and which music will be judged by in this zine.
The basis is subculture. All music is produced from a cultural background and speaks best to that culture. Therefore music produced outside of the subculture doesn't communicate the same messages as that produced within. For Ska that means the standard was set when the Rude Boy subculture set the beat in the late fifties and early sixties. The best Ska is that that was produced in Jamaica by Rude Boys at the time Rude Boys were at their power. The elements which set sixties Ska apart from contemporary Ska are worth considering.
Real Ska is based in the rhythm section of the band. The drummer and the bassist alone make the primary distinction between a Ska rhythm and a counterfeit. Occasionally there are other percussion or instruments played rhythmically such as a beat guitar or a piano but these are the exception and not the rule. This is a fact many new bands do not realize when the only similarity is the guitarist playing "chunka chunka" over a rock drum pattern. The bassist is an essential element to the Ska. True Ska was recorded and played with a very predominant bass sound as that is the dancers best cue. The bassist also played walking bass progressions. This is an element almost completely absent in new so-called Ska bands. Even the hint of a funk bass line sets the true Ska fan on edge and is a sure sign that there is nothing of value to the true member of subculture. Funk and all of its elements go against the modern philosophy that produced cool subculture.
Tempo is also a good distinguishing factor between real and bad Ska. Many contemporary bands seem to feel that Ska is good because it is so upbeat and happy (which is a terrible misreading of Ska, like saying that because Platoon is about war that it glorifies it.) Ska originally held an optimistic view of pretty bad circumstances. While it may have been about the good things in life it wasn't ignorant of the bad things. Contemporary bands that try to dress it up by de-emphasizing the downbeats and quickening the tempo to a frantic pace do it a disservice.
A lot of Ska was instrumental. The Ska that had vocals, had well performed vocals sung by talented singers often with skilled vocal harmonies. This again is an unusual element to find in contemporary music. Something happened in the seventies that convinced us that any garage band who wanted could be successful independent of whether or not they developed musical skills. Any band can be successful but that doesn't mean that they are any good. The lyrics to authentic Ska dealt with certain themes. These themes are rarely dealt with in contemporary Ska. Contemporary Ska themes are embedded in the middle class. Authentic Ska expresses a triumph over poverty though it doesn't always express an escape from it. A future zine issue will focus on the themes in sixties Ska.
The melody is the final element of authentic Ska. True Ska melodies are simple and very much like American Rhythm and Blues from the sixties. Note however that like R&B Ska is a rhythm based music and the melody is truly secondary. The melody is simple and primarily provides a distinction between songs and a framework for vocals. So-called Ska relies far too heavily on melody at the expense of rhythm. It also is likely to be too complex and full of novelty elements.
Real Ska is an expression of a distinct culture and as such is free from influences that are contrary to the philosophies of that culture. Fake Ska is full of poor attempts to fuse incompatible musical styles. Heavy metal, funk, any jazz from after 1965, swing, polka and rock are contrary to the authentic meaning of Ska. On the other hand real Ska takes influences from fifties vocalists such as Frank Sinatra, jump blues, Rhythm and Blues, soul, and early jazz. Authentic Ska doesn't really take well to punk but punk has been known to borrow well from Ska as in the case of The Clash and Rancid. It is a popular thing to do by people who want to revolutionize the music world to want to create the next big music genre by mixing and matching musical styles. For the true member of subculture however this is just watering down or diminishing real subculture for a small variation on popular culture.
I hope that you understand why I don't like a lot of music that is misnamed Ska. The true value of subculture lies hidden in the details and it is these details that are lost in popular music. A television personality that I admire says "Life is a matter of taste." So it is with music and high standards in music leads to a high appreciation of life. Get rid of popular tastes because in order for something to be popular it also has to be insipid and life shouldn't be wasted on bland music.

Top Of Page/Home
THE SCOOTER SCENE
For the first Mods scooter ownership was not as essential as it is today. It was also less of an option for up-and-coming youth. While these first Mods were interested in Italian modern design, scooters themselves were not as readily available to youth who were not employed or paid little for their work. So it took a little money before scooters became a part of the scene. Originally as an unusual occurrence for only the top Mods, scooters eventually became more and more commonplace. Once the Mod subculture became stronger the scooter became standard transportation and soon became a rallying point for Mods. Scooters also became a point of distinction for Mods since the face could be distinguished not only by his clothes but also by his scooter and more importantly by the customizations done to it. By the end of the first Mod era scooters were an essential part of the scene. Scooter clubs were being formed and provided additional unity to groups of Mods. By the time of the beach riots scooters were the primary distinction that people recognized of the Mods. Riots occurred between the Mods that were mobile enough to get to the beach and the bikers. These riots became a distinctive occurrence that was remembered by the new Mods when the subculture was revived in the late seventies.
At the Mod revival that accompanied the "two tone" Ska revival (and joined with it) scooters were brought back into the mix. It was in fact scooters that were the most pervasive element of the revival and it outlasted the music and the fashion. The new Mods formed scooter clubs and resurrected many an old scooter. Customization was revived and brought to new levels. Beyond just bolt on chrome accessories customizers were Modifying body styles and doing amazing things with paint. This scooter revival has lasted to today with frequent rallies and events for scooterists and the publication of scooter magazines the most notable of which is Scootering. Even so, this revival took place primarily in England but soon after youth all over the world that admired the subculture of these British youth were adopting the love of scooters.
In Europe scenes formed and scooter clubs flourished. Some scenes stayed sharp long after the clothes had faded from the British scene and the scooters became the primary focus. The Skinhead phenomenon had adopted the scooter as well during the Mod revival and this became apparent at the rallies with the number of Skinheads attending and also in the type of customization done to the scooters. As Skinhead spread over the world so did the scooters and scooter clubs. Today almost every country has scooter clubs some adhering to the Mod origins and some to the Skinhead modifications. But all are going strong without showing any indication of lessening.
In America Mod traveled to our shores with the "new wave" of British music and culture that became popular in the early eighties. American Mod scenes formed first and some notable scootering began. Focused primarily on the East and West coasts the Mod scenes established a harder sharper alternative to the sloppy punk and cheesy pop that gained popularity in mainstream society. Along with the Mod subculture scooters became important. Slowly at first like the original Mods the scooters became increasingly pervasive until there were enough that clubs and scenes were established stateside. Some remarkable scooterists were the members of California's The Untouchables. The Untouchables helped the adoption of scooters into the subculture by their example and by their support of scooter clubs and rallies. The scooter scene grew even as Mod began to fade with diminishing music from overseas. The stalwarts stayed on but the scooter scenes were the strength of the culture until Skinhead made it's way into America's consciousness. Skinheads picked up where the Mods left off and scootering flourished with the new blood. As Ska began to gain ground in America the Rude Boy subculture joined the Skinheads and the stalwart Mods that stayed true to the scene. They also took up the love of scooters much like the "two tone" Ska revivalists.
Today the scooter scene persists encompassing all members of cool subculture. At a rally today Mods, Skinheads and Rude Boys all show up on their personalized scooters. And scooters show up at any show where the respective musical types of these subcultures, is played. There are scooter clubs in every major city in America and in most moderately large cities as well and some smaller towns even have a club or so. Rallies run all year in warmer climates and more frequently in the summer. Major events are held annually. Scooterists often have weekly or regular rides in their communities and especially at concerts and other scene events such as the occasional screening of Quadrophenia. Razor Sharp will focus on everything possible to strengthen and encourage scooter clubs and scenes. If you are looking for a scooter scene in your area let us know and we will do what we can to hook you up. We will also work on supporting independent riders and promoting and publicizing scooter events. We have a capable design and writing team that will be glad to assist in designing flyers etc. But we would also like your help by keeping us informed about your events and will even work with you to include information on your scene or events in the form of upcoming articles.
In addition to actual support of scenes we will also include articles that promote authenticity among scenes and include information about how to get things done. We also will include as much informational writing as possible, focusing on the history and resources available to the scene. Hopefully those of you who haven't yet joined the scooter scene will soon and with our assistance do it well. Ride Rude.

Top Of Page/Home

SUITING UP
During the winter of 1989 I had only been to a few concerts before and I wanted to be more a part of a scene. Of course being from a small town made this difficult but I was always posturing to appear more experienced then I was. Anyway it was winter and my older brother who was one of my role models was out of state attending college and I had the opportunity to visit him. Being naive and inexperienced in the ways of the scene I was excited to meet his friends who were in the scene in the college town he lived in and maybe get to a show or something. I don't remember seeing any shows there but I do remember meeting his friends. One in particular made a lasting impression on me by merely mentioning something off-hand. My brother and I and this individual were in my brother's dorm room and they were chatting and I would occasionally participate in this conversation that seemed very sophisticated to me. I asked about a picture of my brother and him from a show and he mentioned that he would never go to a show without a suit. This became my creed and to this day I have never gone to a show without a suit.
I would hope that this is second nature to you but judging from the people I see at shows it is not. Let me discuss why this is important. Our subcultures are all from an era when mainstream society was different that today. As the scenes began society was stratified by class. The wealthy maintained cultural control by establishing and changing arcane modes of dress and other cultural standards to maintain superiority. The Mod subculture was the first form of a culture bent on subverting the standards of mainstream society. By adopting and outdoing the wealthy in their own standards the Mods undermined the existing social stratification. The Mods proved that fashion was not the domain of the historically wealthy but the smart progressive individual instead. They took the standards of dress and modified them to reflect their own philosophy and ability to outdo others. Outdoing others meant dressing at a higher level of formality then them. The Mods were often said to be better dressed then their bosses. And as Mods became more common the subculture took the standards of the idealists who said that the face was the Mod who exemplarised the best in Mod subculture. To be seen at a show in old clothes was a sure sign of defeat and every effort was made for the Mod to be seen in public in only his best. This ethic has continued through Skinhead subculture and is today's standard as well. The biggest event to our music-based subculture is a concert and it is a mockery of this to come in anything less then our best. The standard has been set and only cheapening our Mod ideal with sloppy hippie ideology will change it.
Skinheads historically only wore suits to concerts but today the standard includes a jacket worn over a nice shirt such as a Ben Sherman or Fred Perry. Rude Boys may have not always had the money for suits but this ideal is easily seen in the bands that became successful. And this ideal is easier to attain for the contemporary Rude Boy.
Men’s:
The next issue of Razor Sharp will focus on men's fashion and gives a detailed description of scene appropriate clothing. But briefly the following is acceptable for a show: Suits or at least a jacket with complementary slacks are the minimum. Mods and Rude Boys wear ties and buttoning shirts. Skinheads can wear a more casual style of shirt. At more raucous show a jacket can be dropped but I have been to a lot of shows and never have I worried that a jacket could get damaged. The jacket should stay buttoned except maybe the bottom button. Any scene appropriate style of leather shoe (Docs for Skins and dress shoes for Mods and Rudies) will work. Any other questions on details are answered in the next issue of Razor Sharp which is a Men's Fashion special issue.
Women's:
Women have more options for shows since the standards for women's clothes are newer to the scene. Regardless nicer clothes for shows are standard. Dresses are ideal but skirts are also OK. Pants are too casual for most shows. For Skinheads a Fred Perry or a Ben Sherman can take the place of a blouse. Rude Girls can wear dresses such as can be seen in ska publicity shots from the sixties. Leather shoes are good (see the paragraph above). Tights are common for dressier occasions such as shows. This is a good opportunity for special hairstyles, a beehive or a bouffant and the like that are not convenient for everyday wear. Mod Girls should focus on vintage clothes with modern lines or similarly influenced newer clothes. Soon Razor Sharp will be compiling an issue on women's fashion as well and the details will be discussed.

Top Of Page/Home

THE HARDER THEY COME
Towards the end of the Rocksteady era a movie was made in Jamaica that documented the lifestyle of the archetypal Rude Boy. This movie was The Harder They Come and it found moderate success in the world. Success enough that now it is available at a good deal of video rental outlets. You might try and find a copy of it in your community. Though it was not a big influence on the original Rude Boy scene because it came too late in its history it documents well the plight of the original Jamaican street hustler.
For the Rude Boy of today it provides good insight into the origin of our culture and some of the standards by which we live. It shows the lifestyle as lived by the main character Ivan (played by Jimmy Cliff). He starts as a naive country boy who travels to Kingston in search of a better life but ends up in a shantytown having had all of his goods stolen by street thugs and alone without a place to stay. In order to survive he relies on periodic work and poor living conditions. His struggle to find a better life in the city never materializes because he doesn't have the skills to take the jobs available for blacks in Jamaica. After being unsuccessful at his attempts to escape abject poverty he chances upon a lucky break that gets him a gig in the cutthroat music industry. But after he cuts his single he is unable to promote his record because of the control over the music industry by producers. So even this chance at luck falls short and Ivan turns to crime to support himself. Selling marijuana and criticizing the music industry soon leads to confrontations with the corrupt police force, which turns Ivan into a fugitive. The movie plays out with Ivan's attempts to evade the law, which turn him into a folk hero to the Jamaican people.
The soundtrack of The Harder They Come has some notable tracks including "You Can Get It If You Really Want It" by Desmond Dekker. In fact the only really not good songs are the ones sung by Jimmy Cliff as part of the movie. Also “Pressure Drop” by Toots and the Maytalls. And there are several more obscure songs that go on in the background throughout. If it weren't for the title track the soundtrack alone would be worth picking up assuming it is available anywhere.
There are some good things that you can take from the movie The Harder They Come. Beware the fashion in the movie there are few if any good examples of cool clothes in the movie with the exception of a few sharp hats. At the end of the cool era of Jamaican fashion came the seventies era which favored bell-bottoms and tight shirts which are not respectable for a contemporary Rude Boy to be seen in. There are some dance scenes though, which are helpful for those who want some authentic moves to try out and a good way to see what dance clubs were like back in the day. It may surprise you to see how poor and disheveled things were then but despite this the shantytowns come across as a place of energy and emotional intensity. To quote a popular lyric "One man's love is another's misery". Another important element to the movie is the patois. Even though the dialog is all in English it is in such a dialect that they felt subtitles were necessary. Try and understand the dialect and you can incorporate it into the patois of a modern day Rude Boy. It is more than just a few slang words here and there but a style of speaking that runs things together and leaves sounds out that make the outsider struggle to comprehend. All Rude Boys should be able to speak like this to a certain degree. Another lesson to be learned from the movie is contained in the warped morality of the characters. Warped at least by mainstream societies' standards. Morality to the Rude Boy is rooted heavily in Justice and Individuality that often puts him or her at odds with the law. And you can see the factors that helped make up this sense of morality such as movies, music, and poverty that all contributed to the distinctive way that the Rude Boy looks at the world.

Top Of Page/Home

CASINO ROYALE
For those of you who are familiar with James Bond only through the movies you may be pleasantly surprised to read the books. Rather than the shallow cartoonish character James Bond has a little depth. A little mind you, not a lot. Anyway the books are free of most of the commercialism and trendiness that is the weakness of the movies. The first of the novels is Casino Royale and it was written in 1953 by Ian Flemming. James Bond is an important character in cool subcultures in many respects. He provides a sophisticated standard of cool that has been looked up to for decades. He is calm and cool in every situation and always comes out on top in a conflict (an easier feat in books than in reality). He provides a standard of moral ambiguity that reflects the more sophisticated view of the modern individual. He is a materialist in many senses reflected by his interest in clothes, food and cars and other material goods. For the modernist James Bond offers a good role model.
But unlike the movies the books express the conflict that James Bond suffers as he puzzles over the things that he does and that happen to him. He is not some goofy playboy that laughs over death but one that deals with morality on a modern level. But enough of my justification.
Casino Royale introduces the character and sets the standard for the novels that follow. James Bond is sent by the British secret service to stop Le Chiffe from getting the money he needs to continue the funding of his espionage activity. Le Chiffe is trying to win the money at the renowned French casino, Casino Royale. Bond is sent to beat him out on the tables. Between trying to determine who the criminal is, staying alive to beat him, beating him and uncovering double agents at the same time the short novel is pretty full. But bond still has time for gourmet food and black tie events and a love story mixed in that puts the movies to shame for their shallowness. Between discussing odds at casino games and his philosophies on such things as cars and violence Bond succeeds at stopping the bad guys and getting the girl but not in the way you would expect. This book is a must read. I don't want to give away the story line since it is pretty compelling but take my word for it even if you are inclined against the sexist egoist James Bond this book will be a pleasant surprise.
Beyond the obvious materialism there are some things that this book can give the member of cool subculture. For one thing James Bond lives the internationalist jet-setting lifestyle that Mods aspire to. He does it with class and sophistication that is a good model for us to try and live up to. Bond is world aware and he is aware of himself, both of which are important parts of cool. Having grown up reading Bond novels I tried to adopt the mannerisms and self-control that James Bond typified. James Bond also thinks about the things that he does and by reading the novels you can understand a certain type of modernist justification. Though the character James Bond is not a member of any subculture he does typify the standard that the modernist subculture seeks to attain in many ways. He is a symbol of the modernist philosophy that was gaining some mainstream popularity at the time the novels were written.

Top Of Page/Home

STANDING UP
In the previous issue Mannerisms and Gestures were mentioned as an important element of subculture. By mastering some basics it is easier to pass unhindered into authentic subculture. But the details are subtle and attention to detail is important. One of the most basic mannerisms is the way you stand. Standing seems like something that would be of little thought. You, regardless of culture, have been standing all your life even before you were part of cool subculture. So what is the deal? The fact that it is not obvious proves the importance. Poseurs are unable to see the difference that such a small thing makes but an authentic member of subculture knows that these details can identify who is and is not part of the scene.
WHEN TO STAND
Given this there are some basic ground rules that are supported by the history of cool subculture. First, there are times when it is appropriate to stand and times when it is not appropriate not to. It is uncool to be the only person sitting. If every one else is standing you should be too. Standing or dancing is the only appropriate stance for a concert, at least dependent on the venue. During a set of a band that is not lame cool people stand and support them even though dancing is preferable. If the band is lame you should only be seated if there are seats provided such as if the show is at a cafe with booths at the edges or in stadium seating. If your friends insist on standing don't be the only one in a seat. At restaurants, cafes and other public places sit when there are seats unless you are putting yourself in a difficult situation such as when your back is to the door and you have dangerous enemies. Generally in public it is best to remain standing. On the street or at gathering places like parks or scooter rallies is a public place. Only after careful consideration should you decide to sit in a place like this. If there are no seats then don't sit down. Never under any circumstance sit on the ground. Hippies sit on the ground their enemies do not. The only exception might be if your scooter is broken down and you have to get on the ground to fix it. But keep these rare by maintaining your scooter. Skinheads and Rude Boys are allowed the infrequent exception to this rule but only when there is a curb or step or other elevated place to sit and under the guise of hanging with friends. Sitting flat on the ground makes it difficult to get up in a hurry and you should never leave yourself unprotected. Mods never sit on the ground for reasons to be discussed later in this article. What you do in your own home is your own business.
HOW TO STAND
Generally stand on both feet with your hands relaxed to your sides. Leaning is acceptable but only when you have your back to a wall. Leaning can put you off balanced and slow your reaction in an emergency. You have all seen The Specials' album with the Walt Jabsco logo leaning with an elbow against a supposed wall and a foot crossed over the other with the toe to the ground. While this logo is cool standing in this way is not especially practical. Leaning against a wall on your elbow is insecure and uncomfortable and really there is no where to set your fist. It is best to lean your shoulder or back against a wall. Crossing your foot across like the Walt Jabsco logo is fine and in fact indicates a familiarity with the logo, which is a subtle and smart allusion. Don't stand with your back to doorways or other incautious practices. Even if there are no real threats to your safety part of the essence of the subculture is the fast and hard lifestyle that can become dangerous at any time. Though you should not be the only one sitting it is acceptable to be the only one standing especially if you know better than your peers do. Hands are an important concern when standing. Hands should be kept relaxed at your sides unless you are holding a prop of some sort. If you are wearing a suit jacket hands should only put in the jacket pockets (one hand at a time) not the pants pocket. Pants pockets are for when you are not wearing a jacket that naturally drapes over them (such as a flight jacket). It is okay to put both hands in pants pockets. When you put your hand in your pocket put all fingers in not your thumb.
WHY STAND
A Mod will always be wearing a suit that was created by a designer to be worn only standing or sitting in a standard chair. For this reason Mods never sit on anything lower then a chair. Mods need to realize the importance of maintaining the line of their suit. The line of the suit is the design principle that the prominent lines, such as creases, seams, and edges, converge to create the most aesthetic look. By squatting down or other unnatural postures you are disrupting the design of your suit. To a lesser degree this also applies to Skinheads and Rude Boys.

Top Of Page/Home

PLATTERS
In the mid-eighties the music industry did something that if it were better understood by the ignorant public would be considered ridiculous. They replaced vinyl records with compact disks. The industry provided some amount of reasoning for this. First they claimed that CDs sounded better. They claimed that CDs lasted longer than records. They claimed that CDs were more convenient than records. The truth however does not bear any of these claims out and the real reason is that because the public is so easily fooled they would not only accept the weaknesses of CDs as strengths (if they were told they were strengths) but that they would pay a lot more money for them.
CDs are recorded by changing the sounds of music into digital information that is replayed in the form of music after having read by a laser that reproduces the music as segments of sound that they claim cannot be distinguished by the human ear. Before you buy into this theory that CDs sound better compare them to the form of recording a record. Records are made by pressing grooves into a piece of vinyl. The needle of the record player reproduces music by changing the information into electrical signals like the CD but rather than the signals being computer interpretations of the music the needle is constantly producing music from the groove. This is called analog sound. Analog = continuous input. Digital = computer generated packets of sound. People with good ears can tell the difference between analog and digital sound. Analog recordings sound fuller and more complete and less unnatural. For those who are unable to tell the difference this is really not significant any ways. When was the last time you listened to a recording in a soundless environment? Most people who shell out for CDs listen to them in their car. The sound of the engine, the road, the air conditioner, the wind, and any other driving sound render the subtle difference negligible. There are also significant noises in your home such as air conditioner, clocks, electronic devices, noise outside, etc. so the nearly imperceptible difference between analog and digital sound is covered by the ambient sounds in our environment. Plus if you consider the purpose of a musical recording the insignificance of the difference becomes even more obscure. Recordings take the place of live performances of music by a band. But when was the last time you saw a real time performance by a band when there were not crowds of people yelling and tons of other sounds going on? These are all part of music that your mind tunes out. You don't pay attention to these noises but they are there and they render music imprecise in its precision. This precision is the only quality claim that can be made by CDs and as you can see this is a ridiculous point.
CD advocates also claimed that records wear out and get scratched a problem that is eliminated by CDs. This has not been born out by my experience. If it is not a scratch on the surface of the CD that causes skips and such it is the CD player that skips it. A record that is kept well lasts every bit as long as a CD. It is only records that are abused and mishandled that become damaged the same weakness that CDs have. I have records from before my parents were born that have no skips or scratches.
The last claim is that CDs are more convenient than records. Convenience is not a real issue but if you want to make the argument explain how a plastic case is any easier to open than a cardboard sleeve or a CD player is easier to load a CD into than putting a record onto a turntable. At least a record had a picture you could see and you didn't have to thread a book out of the plastic case to figure out the names of the members of the band.
A major factor in record superiority is the availability of good recordings. Sixties Ska is much easier to get on vinyl and in order to get it on CD you have to wait for music moguls to decide to release it in the form of some lame compilation CD that only has one song new from their last compilation CD. The same goes for all sixties or other pre-nineties recordings.
So if the recordings were better on CD (which they are not) they would be worth the extra eight bucks they charge for them right? Well not if you consider that CDs are no more expensive to produce than a record (usually less than two dollars). So why do CDs cost so much more? It is because of a concept in economics that says that the value people put on a product is dependent on how expensive the product is. So in order for the people who are saying that this product is better to prove their point they have to charge more so you think it must be true. What happens to all this increased profit they are making on each CD they sell? It goes straight into the pockets of the fat cats in the industry to buy minks and Jags and continue selling out the music that they are preying on.
How does this affect us? Well it means less money to spend on clothes and shows. But it also reduces our options. It isn't reasonable to refuse to listen to CDs (you have to listen to something in the car) but at the same time take advantage of opportunities to help out the record buying sect with your support. Many groups such as Hepcat produce vinyl recordings so take the option and pick the vinyl version up. Buy original sixties recordings rather than the CD compilation version. The record sounds better and is more authentic and you aren't putting extra money into the hands of parasites whose only skill is selling us stuff we don't need. Plus not to mention the seven dollars you save is about the amount you would spend on a suit or two dresses in a reasonably priced thrift store.

Top Of Page/Home

CONCERTS
After many years on the scene you will eventually have seen shows at a wide variety of venues. From big name stadium shows to house parties there are a wide variety of places to dance to the sounds that keep the beat. There are advantages and disadvantages to each. By choosing the place you see a show you can really improve the experience. The end of this article will give some ways you can help control where shows end up.
Stadium Shows
Occasionally some big name Ska band will come through and they will put on a stadium show. These only ever occur in bigger cities and are usually very well attended. Some American Ska acts might also produce stadium shows but only the very worse ones, so generally this will not be a temptation. Of all the venues available a stadium show is the worse type. There are a million people there most of which heard about the show on the local "alternative" radio station and think they are going to see some lame act like No Doubt only to be disappointed by a less pop act. The worse situation would be a seated concert. There is nothing more against the nature of cool music than sitting down during it. No music of the genres listened to by Mods, Skinheads and Rude Boys is easy listening music. It all demands dancing and seats are only getting in the way. If the stadium has no seating (general admission usually means no seating) then the million lame people mentioned above will immediately crush to the front of the stage and do anything except dance and even farther from dancing well. I don't know if this is wrong (I expect it is not) but I feel that the authentic scene members that are going to dance have the right to expect the best place on the dance floor immediately in front of the stage. In areas with a larger or at least a moderate sized scene the scenesters can often force a place up front for dancing and such but only in the not so huge shows. Regardless in these big shows the band is so far away you can hardly see them, there is usually an extremely overzealous security staff bent on getting a few good swings in, lame supporting acts (pop acts demand a larger variety to lure the biggest audience), the exorbitant cost of tickets (I'm inclined to never pay more then ten for a ticket to a show) and frequently lame decor and acoustics.
Medium Shows
The next venue would be a moderately sized show. Touring bands often book them. It gives smaller bands on opportunity to pull in a moderate sized crowd (which means a moderate amount of money) and allows them to play in smaller communities. These are all advantages of these medium sized venues over stadium shows. In the ideal situation the show would be well attended by the scene and losers would be kept to a minimum. This isn't often the case but it is worth risking. These shows are occasionally not well publicized so it is best that there are good sources for info about these shows. There are two types of places that these shows occur. Clubs that sponsor regular concerts for members of the scene usually draw a good scene turnout because we learn where to go for a good show. These clubs are more common in bigger or moderately sized cities. They are apt to have better decor and acoustics than the other type of medium sized show, which are those at rented halls. These can be at school auditoriums, American Legion Halls, community centers and the like where booking agents can rent a space for the band to play. These halls are in most communities so if you are from a small town these are the most likely location for a bigger show. This is a real advantage since it allows bands to play in any town. There are some occasional problems with these shows though. Other than the decor/lighting and acoustics these shows are more difficult to promote (which can mean a poor turnout and a loss of money), they tend to be more reliant on places without good scenes and they can run into problems with laws and the community (such as complaining neighbors, zoning regulations, liability risks, etc.)
Small Shows
Smaller shows are often the best shows. These shows are sometimes attended only by scenesters, can be in very cool places (such as bars and lounges with cool lighting, decor and acoustics), allow for more scene interaction and often mean more interactions between the bands and the audience. There is not often a problem with promotion on these shows since the friends of the band can often fill the venue. After the show the band usually chats with the crowd and during the set the band elicits a lot more audience participation. There is often better dancing going on etc, etc. The problem with these shows are that they are generally promoted only within the scene so there is less opportunity for the new scene member or the one traveling through to find out about the show. There is also less chance for the band and the venue to recoup the expenses of the show, which is a big risk. My ideal club is one of these kinds with a doorman that enforces the dress code and decor that represents the scene and very cool bands regularly. When I get the money I will open one.
House Parties
The last venue (of sorts) is a house party. This is a good way for new bands to get noticed and develop an entourage but there is rarely any compensation for the time and money they put into the show and promoting it and the damage that seems almost inevitable. These parties are not the kind like the bad eighties movies portray with parents out of town and destruction in the end. They are more likely a formal jam session. There are rarely good places to dance (if there is room then the floor has carpet or something), There is little control over what people show up and unless you have a very cool neighborhood the show usually gets shut down by the police and fines or threats of them ensue.
There are some things you can do to encourage shows in your community. The most important thing is to go to cool shows. By paying the cover fee you help pay the costs of putting the show on in the first place. This also helps to establish and strengthen scenes. The more regular the events are the stronger the scene becomes. The stronger the scene is the more incentive people have to put shows on. You can assist in promoting shows. Spread the word that the show is coming and do what you can to encourage people to come to it. Beyond telling people about the show by word of mouth you can produce flyers and post them in places scenesters will see them or pass out flyers that have already been produced. Talk up local bands that are good even to people without good taste in music because these people have money too and even lame people at a show is better than not having one. Even call around as the show nears to your fellow scene members because often people miss seeing flyers and word of mouth and miss out on shows without realizing it. If conditions are favorable offer to have shows at your house. Remember parents, neighbors and the police often object so be smart about this. Try and find additional cool venues in your community. Often times restaurants, bars and lounges or any other business with enough space are often open to having shows in their establishment as it can help improve their business. There can occasionally be problems with city regulations though so talk to people in the know and make sure that there will not be legal consequences. But even young people can influence business owners especially young business owners. Try and have a way for touring bands to get in touch with people in your community. If there is someone who promotes local shows find out who that person is and let them know that the scene has an interest in certain bands. They will probably be willing to have you help pass out flyers and such. If you have graphic art skills they may even let you design flyers and posters and the like. Local radio often is willing to promote local music so if you are putting on an event give them a call (focus on stations with similar audiences as the kind your band gathers) and see if they will announce the show on air. Become familiar with who provides the equipment bands will need such as mixing equipment and such and pass the word to friends that are trying to put shows together.
Razor Sharp also wants to help out. We are going to try to post events so let us know who is coming to your town, where they are playing and when and we will put the word out. Also let us know if you are in a band looking for venues or venues looking for bands and we will try to help. Let us know if you have a venue so that we can let other scenesters know. If we can help produce shows we will. As our capabilities increase so will the things we will do to help out. Our main incentive is for your scenes to grow and strengthen, so if there is anything you need then ask. Get in touch with us by sending e-mail to el_gatto_nero@yahoo.com.

Top Of Page/Home

ONE REASON FOR IDIOTS AT SHOWS
In the past few years Ska has come a long way as far as popularity is concerned. Unfortunately for every step closer to popularity it takes is one step farther from being good. Except for the rare Jamaican record success Ska had little American popularity until the Two Tone movement started invading our shores along with the New Wave pop that was popular during the early eighties. A few American bands started producing recordings namely bands such as The Untouchables and Not Bob Marley (later renamed The Toasters). These bands formed the genesis for the small subculture that benefited from the mainstream success of the import Ska bands from England. While The Specials and The English Beat became known to the average music fan in America their primary stateside consumers were people who listened to a wider variety of new wave music.
American subculture however did not fade out at the end of the new wave and even though the British bands became scarce. American bands picked up where they left off. One problem however with American Ska bands is that they were another step farther from their roots in Jamaica. And in order to continue producing new music they relied increasingly on American pop styles to fill in the sound. Another step farther and the bands that these musicians formed became influential to the next generation of musicians and another step away from the authentic Ska. By the early nineties bands played that never even knew The Specials. These bands were so many steps away from real Ska that there were all different influences melded in like some road rat biker that continually sticks more and more garbage onto his old motorcycle. Band students who sought popularity as Ska musicians added marching band sounds in. Stoned bassists bored with becoming talented turned instead to funk riffs and solos. Drummers trained on classic rock brought rock elements into the rhythm. The guitar became increasingly reminiscent of heavy metal or classic rock. All of these things were added at the expense of the traditional rhythm and soon you have bands like Sublime or The Bosstones that are more like rock with a little Ska mixed in then the other way around.
At the same time the music became increasingly marketable. The rhythm was sold to the naive mass public as a novelty happy sound to be tacked onto any crappy pop song. And so here we are today where the world thinks of No Doubt as a Ska band and in this guise Ska is very popular. But in reality this music is not Ska at all. It has little if any of the musical elements of traditional Ska. The less like Ska this music is the more popular it is. This should tell you something about the smarts of the average pop music fan (remember these are the same people who buy Hansen records by the billions). But either way why is this form of music popular? It is because the pop culture grasps on to a postmodern view that says all musical forms are of equal value since what standards can they be judged against. Any musical style that takes a stand saying "this type of music is the best or it is good because of some reason" is too confrontational for them to handle. And so they water it down until it is as insipid and boring as they are and in that form it is palatable to them. Postmodernists are also infamous for incorrectly defining and resurrecting past cultural elements and placing them incorrectly with other incongruous elements.
In order to avoid producing and supporting bands that are disloyal to our subculture ask your self, "What are the elements of this music that don't agree with the modernist philosophy?" This requires some knowledge of music styles and of the cultures that they are associated with. Funk for example is a product of the seventies that can never be added successfully to music that relies on a regular rhythm. So learn about popular music styles and their implications. Talk to your non-subcultural friends and get an idea for the meaning of different sounds in music and then compare these philosophies to the authentic meaning of Ska.

Top Of Page/Home

WHO I AM
I have seen a number of movies from the sixties or about the sixties where a character laments to an authority figure that is urging them to accept some responsibility "I am just trying to find myself!" The character is always a bedraggled dirty looking youth with long unkempt hair (I'm sure to represent the hippie element in them). It never seemed clear what they were searching for. They never found anything. But in the end they always ended up the poetic hero of the film. These films are stupid. It always seemed unclear what the point was. The search for identity is nothing new to the world even though hippies seem to feel they invented it. They are just the ones who confused the issue so much. Postmodernism said there were no reliable standards against which one could be judged and hippies were left with an inability to judge their own identity without any standards. So they searched around and read pseudo-intellectual novels most of which were over their heads. What they really needed instead of some revelation about their identity gleaned from philosophy or discovered in a journey to some country with a spiritualist reputation was standards against which they could determine their place in history and a way to change it.
Here are some basic standards to discovering identity:
Your identity is tied to your culture.
The elements of identity are the same elements that make up your culture. How you occupy your time, the ways that you communicate, what your priorities are, are all parts of your culture and your identity. Preference for Thai food is a part of your identity. It is also an expression of your culture. Mainstream American culture has allowed a certain amount of tolerance for certain types of food and your experimentation within these are part of how you express your individuality within the standards of mainstream society. Odds are good though that not many of you have as part of their identity a preference for West African food because it is beyond the dictates of mainstream culture. This is where subculture comes in and provides for the identities of those who cannot be described within the confines of mainstream. Food is only one element of culture. Dancing is another and fashion another. By understanding what the dictates of culture are one can control their identity within it rather than having no identity because of the ignorance of cultural dictates.
Your identity is a composite of your experiences.
Exposure to the above mentioned cultural elements helps to describe the level of one's identity. Your identity is bounded by your experience. You cannot be a Skinhead if you have never heard of one. You may have similar attitudes and appearance but until you discover Skinhead you cannot describe yourself within those terms. Once you have discovered the Skinhead phenomenon than you can decide if your identity fits within those confines. Say that you decide that you are a Skinhead and you are on the scene for a while and then you discover that skinheads are opposed to listening to country music but you really like country music. Then your experience has expanded and you can redefine your identity as a redneck. Experience is tied to your identity.
Your identity is something you can change.
When I first listened to The Skatalites I was a little put off by the Jazz elements I thought I heard in the music. But I decided that I didn't want to be defined by one chance encounter so I listened to the album several times. The more I listened it the more that I discovered in the music. The less it sounded like Jazz and the more that I was willing to make my life conform to the standards that this music implied. I changed my identity by the conscious decision to overcome my initial impression and submit to a new aesthetic.
Your identity has two perspectives from which it can be judged: from your perspective and from the perspective of others.
What you see in yourself is not the same thing that others see in you. Realize this and life gets a lot easier. If you think of yourself as being active on both of these fronts your identity is easier to control. No one lives the life that others have the impression that they live. Even the toughest individual has moments of weakness but this weakness is not part of their public identity it is part of their personal identity. By separating the two you can have control of how others see you. You can also change how you see yourself.
Your identity is not the most important thing to have a grasp of.
Don't give up and try and search for your identity in stupid places. Millions of hippies and dead-end people are still wasting their lives away because they have to stop participating in society why they read obscure philosophy. If you don't feel like you have a grasp of your identity don't worry. Only by continuing to live your life do you have an identity. As soon as you give up on society you cease to be significant to it so it makes it impossible to get anything from it. Continue to live in society and you can always change your position in it later.
This section of Razor Sharp will deal with issues of concern to subculture in relation to individuality. The army of cool subculture is an army of individuals who realize that their place in society is within the definition of our lifestyle.

Top Of Page/Home