AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF
MARXISM:
Is there an alternative to capitalism today?
Capitalism and the State continue to fail the
masses. Yet at the same time, key elements of the socialist tradition
are in irrevocable crisis. What we need to do is to reclaim and
identify with the tradition of anti-authoritarian, anti-State,
socialism from below: anarcho-syndicalism.
EXPLOITERS
Capitalism and the State have failed the majority of the world's
population: the workers, poor and peasants. According to recent
reports
*358 billionaires have more assets than the combined
incomes of countries home to 45% of the world's people.
*the richest 20% of the world's population gets 85% of the world's
income.
Capitalism and the State are based on the rich exploiting the
poor. They cause poverty, unemployment, homelessness and landlesness,
They are also the key cause of racism. Racism was created to divide
workers, and "justify" genocide, colonialism, and the
super-exploitation of Black workers under apartheid-capitalism.
CRISIS OF THE LEFT
Yet at the same time, we find the broad socialist movement in a
crisis both in the West and the East. Two key tendencies in the
socialist movement have entered a deep crisis : the reformist
socialists/ Social-Democrats/ Labour Parties the various sorts of
Marxists/ Communists/ Trotskyists.
They are paying for their betrayal of socialism in this century.
What they conceived socialism to be has been totally discredited. As
convinced socialists we need to identify with the revolutionary,
anti- authoritarian socialist tradition: anarcho-syndicalism.
SOCIAL-DEMOCRATIC FAILURE
Reformist socialists/ Social Democrats (like the Labour Party in
England) believe you get to socialism by slowly reforming the
capitalist system through voting in elections, making small reforms
(such as unemployment payments) and by getting trade unions to work
with the bosses to "promote" economic growth.
Many of these policies were put in place after 1945 in Europe- the
so-called "welfare states". These reforms were more due to workers
struggles than elections. Although progressive in that they provided
some material gains, these policies never challenged capitalism or
ended inequality and poverty. And they weakened the trade unions by
trying to get them to work with the bosses: this held back struggle
and undermined union democracy by promoting the development of a
full-time leadership.
Social-Democratic policies (the "welfare state") were only
possible while capitalism was going through an economic boom. Once
the boom ended in the 1970s, the bosses tried to keep up profits by
lowering taxes, privatising companies, and pushing down wages. And it
was the Social-Democrats who led this "free market" attack on workers
- in Britain, France, Australia and elsewhere.
Why? What the Social-Democrats did not realise (or chose to
ignore) was that the State apparatus- parliament, the police, the
government bureaucracy- is not the friend of the workers and the
poor. It is the tool of the bosses. Real power does not lie in
parliament, but in the big companies, the army and the top officials.
Therefore it will always act against the working class, no matter who
is elected. There can be no parliamentary road to socialism.
Since this time, the Social-Democrats have been in retreat from
progressive policies- for example, the "New" Labour party in Britain
no longer calls for nationalisation. And workers do not vote for them
because of all their broken promises.
MARXISM? WHY?
Revolutionary Marxism is another failed socialist strategy. The
main example of this tendency were the various Communist Parties.
There were also various small Trostkyite groups without a mass base.
Basing themselves on Marx, Lenin and sometimes Trotsky, these
groups believed that a revolutionary socialist party of "advanced
militants" (the so-called "vanguard party") should introduce
socialism by forcefully seizing State power. The masses would be led
into socialism which would come from above through the party and the
State: by nationalising the economy, by introducing central planning,
by suppressing forces seen as anti-revolutionary.
The model for this strategy was the Russian Revolution of 1917,
where the Communist Party of Lenin and Trotsky took State power and
introduced what they saw as socialism. This model of fighting for
socialism was applied in the Soviet Union, China and Cuba.
But these countries were never truly socialist. Power was in the
hands of a one-party State and elite led by the Communist party which
exploited the workers and peasants. We call this "State-capitalism".
This outcome was the direct result of Lenin and Trotsky's
authoritarian policies of suppressing worker control of factories,
repressing leftists, building a dictatorial State. This laid the
basis for Stalin's brutal rule in later years.
These regimes mostly collapsed in the late 1980s. One reason was
an economic crisis which resulted from the poor co-ordination of the
highly bureaucratic centrally planned economies, and short-ages,
particularly of high technology and basic consumer goods.
The other reason was mass discontent: millions of workers
mobilised to overthrow these governments because they were sick of
regular shortages, bad conditions and undemocratic regimes that
banned trade unions, used forced labour, suppressed freedom of speech
and political association, and conquered nearby countries such as
Afghanistan and Tibet.
The failure of the Communist parties was that they thought
socialism must come from above through a powerful State dominated by
one party.
ANARCHO-SYNDICALIST ALTERNATIVE
We need to recognise that much of what passed for socialism in the
last 70 years was nothing of the sort. Rather than see socialism as
"dead", we need to see these versions of socialism as flawed.
There is an alternative to capitalism and the State: anarcho-
syndicalism- the mass-based tradition of revolutionary
anti-authoritarian socialism.
We have always rejected Social Democratic reformism and Communist
dictatorship. Rather than see socialism as something handed out from
on high by a small minority using State power, we argue that
socialism must come from the ground up.
Socialism can only be created by the mass organisations of the
working-class and the poor- the trade unions and democratic civics-
taking over the land and factories and creating a democratic society.
Not by elections and leaders.
This revolution must remove both capitalism and the State.
Anything less will just pass power from one set of bosses to another.
The State is must be replaced by workers democracy organised in the
community and the workplace, defended by a democratic workers army.
THE WSF
The collapse of the traditional left points to the need for this
alternative. As a result, our movement is growing across the world.
We need to build an Anarcho-Syndicalist organisation with clear
politics and internal democracy, that will
*support all struggles against oppression
*win the working class and poor to the Anarcho-Syndicalist idea
*transform our unions into revolutionary fighting units.
*consistently fight against capitalism and its State
The WSF aims to build such an organisation. If you agree with what
we have said here then you should consider joining us.
This page hosted by Get your own
Free Home Page
Go to the
CapitolHill GeoPage