below...It Don't Mean a Thing...
Why Bush Lacked Compassion for a Fellow Human Being at His Meeting with the Daughter of James Byrd, Jr.
At the Democratic Convention on Wednesday Al Gore honored the memories of two 1998 hate crime victims, Matthew Shepherd, the gay man from Wyoming, Mr. Cheney's "home" state, who was beaten to death while tied to a fence, and James Byrd, Jr., the black man from Texas who was dragged to death from a chain behind a pick-up truck. Dennis and Judy Shepard, Matthew Shepherd's parents, and Renee Byrd Mullins, James Byrd, Jr.'s daughter, were members of a panel devoted to crime and victim's rights, an issue that Gore promises to focus on if he becomes president.
Shepherd and Byrd have been linked together as victims of hate crimes ever since their killings. In April of this year, Shepherd and Byrd survivors met at the Millenium March on Washington for Equality, a civil-rights demonstration. But one year earlier, Renee Byrd Mullins observed first-hand that the well-publicized talk of Governor George W. Bush's "compassionate conservatism" is a sham, a political play on words that has little meaning in the real world of Bush politics.
At the time of her ten-minute meeting with Bush in the solemnity of the Governor's Office in the Texas State Capitol, Mullins had come to Austin to lobby for a hate crimes bill that had been proposed by a Democratic legislator. Although the bill had passed the Dem House, Mullins had the opportunity to visit with Bush prior to a vote in the Republican Senate. Texas had a vague, toothless hate crimes law passed by a previous Democratic legislature and signed into law by Bush's Democratic predecessor, and Bush was determined that if he couldn't eliminate it, at least he could prevent if from being strengthened. First, the Governor let it be known in the Senate that he did not want the bill to reach his desk. (Republican senators who had previously voted for hate crimes legislation were told that the Governor wanted a "no" vote.) Then Bush did what he often does in such instances, he told the press that since the matter is being considered by the legislature, in order to be fair he would not comment upon it until it reached his desk. Given Bush's willingness to get behind bills that benefit his corporate friends, it's clear that his "fairness" is as selective as his "compassion."
Bush wanted to kill the proposed hate crimes bill, which was more specific about penalities as well as groups covered, such as homosexuals. First, he thought of the bill as affirmative action legislation, and he was on record as being against affirmative action bills. Secondly, for the first time a proposed bill of its kind specifically included gays, and his Christian Coalition backers were against that. Looking ahead to his run for president, it made good political sense to Bush not to rile his limited number of African-American backers by reminding them of his position on affirmative action. Later, after the bill was killed by the Senate, it became convenient to have his spokesmen in the Lege report that the bill would have passed if not for the inclusion of homosexuals in its language. This was a calculated, convenient excuse. Remember, though, when Byrd's daughter visited Bush, the Senate had not had its way with the hate crimes bill passed by the Dem House, and Bush was anxious to get it killed.
A pregnant Renee Byrd Mullins was able to get a short meeting with Bush through the help of Texas Rep. Senfronia Thompson (D-Houston), who accompanied her to the meeting. Later, the specifics of the meeting were reported by Mullins to Newsday columnist Marie Cocco, whose story of the meeting was published in the Austin American-Statesman on 2/14/00. "It didn't feel [like] a good greeting I had a very short handshake. In his essence, he was saying, 'OK, tell me what you want and get out.'...
He's a very hard person. He had a wall built up before I even got in there."
Bush told Mullins that he hadn't looked at the hate crimes bill but "he said he would look at it when it came out of the Senate."
Here, Cocco adds that Mullins already knew that Bush had instructed the Republican Senate to vote the bill down. At that point, "Mullins took out her own copy of the legislation. She placed it on a table in front of Bush. He didn't pick it up. She recounted her father's death, asked Bush if she were a homosexual, would she deserve to die?" She began to cry.
"The Governor did not offer a glass of water. Or a Kleenex. [Rep. Thompson] said
she waited to see what Bush would do. Then she dug out an exra tissue and walked across the room to offer it to Mullins. Bush offered Mullins and her family his condolences." While Bush has attended a funeral service for white victims of a Fort Worth hate crime, he did not attend the funeral service for James Byrd, Jr., nor did he visit the family at any time. He claims he called the family once, but the family says it never received any such call.
At the end of the Cocco story, the columnist points to Bush's behavior as a failure of leadership: "Bush runs on his record of leadership in Texas, saying it shows the world he would serve the nation well. Mullin's story is about how Bush showed leadership at that instant when the eyes of the world were upon him, but really could not see." We see Bush's behavior differently. While the idea of hate crimes legislation is open to debate, hate crimes is not what this story is about. It's about the maturity of a politician and it happened last year, not when he was "young and foolish." In his callous treatment of Renee Byrd Mullins, Bush showed the world that votes are more important to him than people. While he talks "compassion" in front of the camera, in the privacy of his own office he is anything but compassionate. --Politex, 8/16/00
Ads Don't Mean a Thing If They Ain't In a Swing State I spent some time watching the TV in my hotel room in St. Louis, and if you don't live in a "swing state" like Missouri, you are simply oblivious to this year's political contests. They keep telling me Washington State is in play. Baloney. Political ads on St. Louis TV are so thick it is spooky. They run every 10 seconds. Washington State is not getting 1/10th the media buy Missouri is seeing. I am totally serious. There is no comparison whatsoever. St Louis is seeing easily 10 times the amount of political advertising as my local channels. Pro Gore ads are being run by Handgun Control Inc. showing the tape of the NRA guy talking about the "unbelievable" access to the White House they will have if Bush is elected. Another pro-social security group is running an ad with a retired Texas school teacher talking about how Bush raided his pension fund. It is the best ad I've seen yet. A dagger right through Bush's heart. Then, late last night, the NRA ran a half hour "infomercial" on St. Louis TV, explaining how Gore is going to take all of our guns, then line us up and shoot us. I'm sorry, but Charlton Heston ought to be more media savvy. The whole production had the persuasive power of the Iraqi TV shots of Saddam Hussein with the little kid, right before Bush's dad bombed the crap out of Baghdad. Remember? "See, I am not holding him hostage as human shield. Look at his terrified smile, rest of world." But none of it matters, because even though he was going to lose anyway, Bush has decided to remove any pretense of drama and completely self-destruct even prior to October. Lets review, shall we? First, he loses the big Mo to the Democratic convention, guaranteeing the press will describe his campaign as "losing." If you knew what you were looking at, you realized it was over right there. But even then, Bush still could've run a slick campaign, and given us a show. But nooooooooooo, he had to throw a tantrum, and basically quit. First thing he does is to get simultaneously knocked way off message and pick a fight with the press by calling a New York Times reporter an "asshole." Hey, Karl, Karen and Ari. I have a suggestion. If you want to get good press, don't call them "assholes." Just a thought. Then, Bush is caught red handed running subliminal ads calling Gore a rat. How stupid are these guys? Did they think we wouldn't notice? Did they think the press wouldn't run it? Seriously, I almost believe them when they say it was inadvertent, because if it was deliberate, it was the dumbest, most boneheaded play they could have pulled. But Bush takes even this to the next level. Responding to reporter's questions about the ad, he proves beyond any credible doubt, that he simply does not know how to pronounce the word "subliminal." On the same day that he denies the charge that he is dyslexic! Don't give me mail. I've got nothing against dyslexics. It just occurred to me that even if it weren't true, he might have been better off saying he WAS dyslexic. Otherwise, we are forced to conclude that he is simply ignorant of how the word is pronounced when he was on Letterman saying "subliminable" over and over. But once we are forced to conclude that he is so well connected that he could make it through both Yale and the Harvard Business School with so little knowledge that he never learned how to pronounce the word "subliminal", we are left only to ask: This is the guy who is going to be in charge of over half the world's thermonuclear weapons? I don't think so. --The Brewmeister, 9/15/00
please hit your BACK BUTTON for the QUICKEST RETURN to BUSH WATCH |