The Spirit and
the Word
By
Michael Krall
There
are many that claim that the work of the Spirit cannot be separated from the
Word of God in the work of redemption. As a result they claim that the work of
regeneration, although the sole work of the Holy Spirit, cannot and does not
happen except under either the preaching of the word of God or at least the
hearing of the word read or read by the individual in need of regeneration.
This sounds all well and good, as far as the natural mind is concerned, and appears to be what the Bible teaches but
we intend to show that not only can this not be supported by the Word of God
but those that hold to this view rarely if ever take it to its biblical, logical conclusion, supported by a
“thus sayeth the Lord”.
This will not be an exhaustive
study to defend what we call immediate regeneration, i.e., without assistance
from any human, meaning that the Holy Spirit regenerates without means, but we
will show that most that hold to this are not consistent with their own view,
thereby, making it self evident the short comings of their contentions.
To start with let us examine one
verse that is always quoted by those that claim that one condition to be met by
the sinner in order for regeneration to take place is the hearing of the gospel
preached. The verse used is Romans 10:17 “so then faith cometh by hearing and
hearing by the word of God.” Those holding to the doctrine of unconditional
election acknowledge that regeneration
precedes faith. But those not believing in unconditional election say that this
verse in its context of Romans 10 shows
that one must HEAR the word of God in order to have faith, thereby, proving
that the hearing of the word is when the Spirit regenerates and one of the
fruits of this regeneration is faith.
But is that what this verse
teaches? What many fail to look at in
this text is the verse that immediately follows verse 17. In verse 18 Paul asks a question “But I say,
Have they not heard?..” This is important because the word translated “word” in
verse 17 is the word rhema not logos. And the word rhema carries with it more
of the idea of utterance (spoken) than of the written word. So with that in
view lets look at verse 18. Paul says after saying that faith comes by hearing and
hearing comes by the “utterance” of God. He
then mentions how the unbelieving Israelites, which is the context of
this chapter, did hear (naturally and not Spiritually hearing) and still did
not believe. In verses 14-15 the idea
of one hearing through a preacher must be looked at in this context, but who is
the preacher of verse 18? Who did the Israelites hear preach the Gospel? We
know that Israel had the prophets and the law to proclaim the Gospel in the Old
Covenant. Yes, but Paul never refers to
that when bringing condemnation to these unbelieving Israelites. Verse 18 of Romans 10 is a direct quote from Psalm 19. In Romans 10:18 we read, “But
I say, have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.” Who is the “their” in this context? The
quote out of Psalm 19:4 makes it clear. The first verses in Psalm 19 are: “The heavens declare the glory of God; and
the firmament sheweth His handiwork. Day unto day uttereth speech, and night
unto night sheweth knowledge. There is
no speech or language, where their voice is not heard. Their line is gone out through all the
earth, and their words to the end of the world….” It is quite clear from the
context of Psalm 19 that Paul is signifying that the words preached in God’s creation to be equal to the
preached word, else why quote this Psalm? Is this not the same as in Romans
1:20 where Paul says, “for the invisible things of Him from the creation of the
world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal
power and Godhead”? In that very
chapter he says a few verses earlier (Romans 1:16) that the Gospel is the power
of God unto salvation for believers. So is
not His eternal power, that is revealed in creation, the Gospel?
Some will ask at this point how
is the gospel revealed in creation. We do not begin to question as to whether
or not God has the how and the way in
which this is done. We merely bow to
His sovereign word and acknowledge that
He has so revealed this to be the case.
But what does this say and what
does it mean? What we are trying to
show is that the hearing of the Gospel and the act of believing are
manifestations of the work of salvation already done in the life of one of God’s
elect. The Gospel comes to those whom God has already giving Spiritual life,
not the means to give Spiritual life. If we say that the hearing of the Gospel
is necessary and the cause of the imparting of Spiritual life this leaves us
with some implications that cannot be ignored.
Implication number one is that
for one to be consistent with this position one must fully acknowledge that for
those dying in infancy or without mental capabilities to believe, such as a
mentally retarded individual, there is absolutely no hope that they were
numbered among the elect. God has not given us two ways of salvation: one for
those with rational faculties and another for those without. If hearing the
Gospel is absolutely necessary for one to be regenerate and that the hearing must
be understood then that leaves out those two groups just mentioned. But if the
hearing of the Gospel is merely the
means whereby God manifests what He has already done (and it is this way),
bringing life and immortality to light
(2 Timothy 1:10) rather than into being, then we have a biblical warrant not
to write off either those dying in
infancy nor the mentally incapable. There is no getting around this conclusion without being inconsistent
with the position that regeneration comes only under the Gospel. The Arminians
know this and that is why they have conjured up this unbiblical idea of an age
of accountability, something not taught in the written Word .
The second implication is that
if one must hear preaching to be saved there is no hope for one who is dying who is incapable of hearing the
Gospel while on their death bed. We were told by a well know sovereign grace
Baptist preacher that one must either hear a sermon preached or read a sermon
to be saved; one cannot be saved by reading the Bible. Now some do not go to
this extreme, but, nonetheless, if one needs to hear the Word in some way to be
regenerate, since God’s word cannot be separated from His Spirit, then that
leaves a real problem which has produced a real inconsistency in those espousing such a thing.
Here is a hypothetical scenario.
One has a grandfather that he hopes and prays would believe on Christ. So he
takes his grandfather to hear the Gospel and he sits under the preaching and
hears the gospel clearly preached with
his natural ear and he fully understands it with his natural ear but goes away
never believing on Christ as the Savior of sinners (God’s elect). This person
even witnesses over and over again to him but to no avail. Then some time later
the grandfather is stricken with a stroke, he has lost his hearing and is in
intensive care in the hospital. (We have never known of anyone that had an
unsaved loved one in such a condition that did not ask for prayer for that
person.) BUT WHY? If he is now incapable of hearing or reading the Gospel how
can the Spirit all of a sudden work
independently of the Word? “Ah, but he heard the word at one time”, some
will say. But are we to say that there is something magical about the dead letter that gives God the
permission now to do his work of regeneration. Does God now have permission
(liberty) to regenerate someone even if the word was heard 85 years earlier as
was the case with Luke Short who heard Puritan John Flavel preach when he was
15 and supposedly got converted at age 100? Mr. Short said that it was what he
heard at 15 that never left his memory and when the Spirit quickened him he
then embraced the Christ that he had heard of at age 15.
This sounds like a good
testimony (and it is a good testimony from and going to a natural mind) for the
idea of the Spirit needing the Word to regenerate, but we believe it is just
the opposite. Yes, the preached word was used to bring the truth to the mind,
but prior to the preached word being delivered to a child of God, the Holy
Spirit had already been there and worked an effectual work of Grace within/upon
the child of God by implanting within them the new birth. God sent the Spirit sovereignly to do the
work as He sees fit. To limit God to the work of men, in preaching and
witnessing, to impart Spiritual life to a sinner is to try and put God in a
box, the same way the Arminians have
tried to do. The inconsistency of those embracing this view is proof that they
cannot take their view to its logical conclusion, to be proven by a “thus sayeth
the Lord”.
In closing we want to point out
one more Scripture that supports the view that the Spirit quickens before the
work of the Gospel comes, and that is
the parable of our Lord of the four soils. The seed was the word in that
parable and the soil was the heart. We know of no one that will deny that the
changing of the soil is the changing of the heart of stone into a heart of
flesh in regeneration. So are we to say that the seed changed the soil? To some
they would be forced to say yes because they think that you just give the word
to the hardened sinner and let the seed
do its work. But the fact is that the seed did not change the way side hearer
into a good hearer. That had happened prior to the sowing of the seed.
Are we saying that we are not to
preach the Gospel to lost sinners (lost sheep)? Nothing of the sort! What we
are saying is that the subject of the Gospel address is those that God has
imparted Spiritual life, and the preaching of the Gospel is that which calls
the regenerate sinner to the fold, or works knowledge upon and within the child
of God wherein he realizes God’s Spirit has already performed a wonderful work.
We like to look at the work of regeneration pictured in the raising of Lazarus
and the removing of the graves clothes by those standing by to be the work of the Gospel ministry that
removes the grave clothes of sin. But this is an ongoing process that continues
throughout the Christian’s life. Paul said in Romans 16:25 “Now to him that is
of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus
Christ…” It is through the preaching of
Christ and the Gospel that the born again children of God are established and
maintained throughout their life on earth. We also read that the Gospel is the
power of God unto salvation “to every one that believeth (Romans 1:16)”, NOT to
everyone that WILL believe (as was quoted to me by someone recently). The word
“believeth” is a present participle (something that has already taken place) as
it is in 1 Cor 1:21: “it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save
them that believe”, (literally to save those believing, a present participle)
implying that the Gospel is the means of establishing the Spiritually living
children of God in the faith. When the
Gospel of Christ is preached to the Spiritually born child of God, therein is
the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith (Romans1:17). Meaning that the Spirit itself beareth
witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God (Romans 8:16). And this faith-to-faith revealed knowledge
of Christ harmonizes with the Spirit bearing witness with our spirit, even when
the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be
uttered (Romans 8:26), showing that ye have received the Spirit of adoption,
whereby we cry, Abba, Father (Romans 8:15).
We are to preach the gospel
knowing that those that God has given Spiritual ears to hear will indeed
believe on Christ, evidencing that they are numbered among those for whom
Christ purchased with His own blood. It is this teaching that not only gives
all the credit to God for the salvation of His people, “so by the obedience of
ONE (not 2 or 3: Christ plus the sinner and the Gospel preacher) shall many be
made righteous (Romans 5:19)”, but one can now preach the Gospel with full
faith that God will indeed call His Spiritually living children by and to
Himself.
To Him be all praise, honor and
glory.
Please direct your comments to
Mike Krall.
BACK TO MAIN MENU