THE MICHAEL DOUGLAS FAN PAGE:
FILM REVIEWS
Bringing Panache to a Deadly Game
By JACK MATTHEWS
Newsday
REMEMBER Gordon Gekko, Michael Douglas' morally emaciated broker in "Wall
Street"? Well, he's back, in cruel spirit at least, in "The Game," a
brain-twisting thriller by David Fincher, and he's getting what's coming to him.
His name here is Nicholas Van Orton, scion of the super-rich Van Ortons, of San Francisco.
Different coast, different job, different circumstances. But he's Gekko, an Armani Scrooge
feasting on his own melancholy while bah-humbugging associates, ex-wives, blood kin and
any weaker financial rival. This hard case needs more than visits from the ghosts of
Christmas past, present and future. He needs . . . Consumer Recreation Services.
CRS is an executive knockoff of the vacation resort in Michael Crichton's 1973
"Westworld," where adults venture into robot-serviced fantasies of their choice
and encounter genuine life-threatening adventure when the robots malfunction and try to
kill them. In "The Game," there are no robots, only actors. But for all Van
Orton and we know, they're clearly out to harm him.
Almost from the moment Van Orton's ne'er-do-well brother Conrad (Sean Penn) gives him a
CRS fantasy for his 48th birthday, Van Orton's life becomes a paranoid nightmare, with
enough shadowy figures, violent coincidences and near-death experiences to make Kafka give
up writing and move to Sunnybrook Farm.
The object of the game, so Van Orton is told by a smarmy CRS executive (James Rebhorn), is
to exhilarate and entertain the player with its unpredictability. The game is tailored to
his particular needs, determined by a grueling battery of psychological tests. It's highly
unlikely that a man as antisocial as Van Orton would sign on, but if you can't forgive the
filmmakers this much, you have no chance of swallowing all that follows.
"The Game," written by John Brancato ("The Net") and Andrew Kevin
Walker ("Seven"), is a neatly organized chain of events that seem totally random
to Van Orton. A man falls in front of him in the street, foaming at the mouth. A waitress
(Deborah Kara Unger) spills a tray of drinks on him and tells him later she was paid by a
stranger to do it. A runaway taxi plunges him into San Francisco Bay. Are these and other
events part of the game? And is it really a game, or as Van Orton begins to suspect, a
spectacular ruse to relieve him of his fortune?
Douglas is perfectly cast. Who else can blend moneyed arrogance, power and rank narcissism
with enough romantic flair, intelligence and self-deflating humor to make you enjoy his
defeats and his victories? What other major star is as much fun to watch when he's
cornered?
Van Orton at first seems a victim of his own making, but from the opening home-movie
sequence and occasional flashbacks, we get to know that his detachment from people is a
defense developed as a young boy after he'd witnessed his father's suicide. Four decades
later, he, too, is a disturbed middle-age man, perhaps predisposed to suicide himself.
Fincher has the touch of Hitchcock when it comes to creating tension and suspense, in
knowing just how far he can go in taunting the audience with distractions and red
herrings. But the movie ultimately is less a thriller than a maze - confined, geometrical,
hard to predict and inevitably forgettable.
There is no emotional resonance, because there are no convincing relationships. A romance
seems vaguely in the offing between Van Orton and the enigmatic waitress, until it defers,
like everything else, to the vagaries of the game. And intimations of bad blood between
the brothers aren't developed well enough for us to even choose sides. While Douglas is in
virtually every scene, Penn has only three.
Whether audiences come away from "The Game" feeling fulfilled or disappointed
depends on their reaction to the final twist of the last act. It's either one of those
movies, like "The Sting," where every detail is logically woven into the
resolution, or like "The Usual Suspects," where the ending seems to nullify all
that has gone before.
All we'll reveal here is that we wouldn't have missed the first two acts for anything.
Click Here to read
more film reviews.