By:
Helmut Lammer Ph.D.
Everybody who followed
the continuing debate about my research in alleged
military involvement
in alien abduction phenomena - so called MILAB cases,
will know now
which people try to ridicule this research, our book MILABS!
which will be available
in the USA this week [1] and of course me.[2,3,4]
I will not answer all
articles in the future which attack my
research or my person
since I believe it is more important if I use my time
for things which are
more meaningfull than answering such statements.
Interestingly, the sceptics
claim now that their responses addresses only
"my" MILAB cases. This
is important to know, since I do not "own" MILAB
abductees and some of
these people were also investigated by other
researchers like Budd
Hopkins, or researchers related to the MUFON Abduction
Transcription Project,
etc. It is not my problem if the well known
abduction researchers
have ignored such cases in their research articles
and books. Second there
are more MILAB abductees, which were investigated
by professional therapists
and psychiatrists than the few which are
known via the internet.
Therefore, this statement is a complete nonsense.
Another interesting aspect
in their criticism is that they try to convince
their readers that my
research concentrates only on tracking devices and
implants, that I claim
that all MILAB abductees are implanted with tracking
devices, etc. This is
certainly not the case. It is right that there are
"some" but not "all"
MILAB cases where there is evidence that the abductees
were implanted with
a terrestrial device. It is well known from zoology
and medical research
hat such devices are around for a long time.[5] Recently
there were many newspaper
articles in Europe about an implant with satellite
tracking applications
which was developed by the israeli intelligence agency
Mossad. This implant
is now distributed via a private firm in Italy. Since
the sceptics read the
MUFON UFO Journal, they should know about this,
because there was a
short notice about this implant in the November 1998
issue. It is common
knowledge that this now comercially available implant
will not be the latest
state of the art "military" or "black project"
technology.
I agree with the sceptics
that older implants would be easy to detect on
x-rays and MRIs, because
they are relatively large. This is the case, since
I know cases of people
who have x-rays, MRIs, medical statements from
independent doctors,
etc. where everybody can see that they were implanted
with such devices, but
nobody removes their implants![6,7]
Very interesting is the
claim by the sceptics that the proposed MILAB
projects fail a simple
test in comon sense, since there is just no reason
to conduct them and
the alleged victims are not extremely intelligent,
no Noble laurate is
involved, etc.[4]
It is known from declassified
CIA-MKULTRA subproject No. 94 documents,
that the CIA experimented
with miniaturized electrode implants 30 years
ago! The purpose of
subproject No. 94 was:[8]
"1. The purpose of this
subproject is to provide a continuation of activities
in selected species
of animals. Miniaturized stimulating electrode implants
in specific brain center
areas will be utilized.
2. Initial biological
work on techniques and brain locations essential to
providing conditioning
and control of activities in several species of
animals has been demonstrated...The
ultimate objective of this research is
to provide an understanding
of the mechanisms involved in the directional
control of animals and
to provide practical systems suitable for (censored)
application."
So much for the long
interest in implant research for mind- and behaviour
control purposes. Since
there is also evidence in the form of a declassified
research proposal of
MKULTRA subproject No. 94 [9] that selected elements of the
techniques developed
under this project were applicable to humans, one can
speculate if some of
the before mentioned cases were used in such an
experiment. If one reviews
the known MKULTRA subprojects from documents
which were released
via the FOIA one will find many projects where outsiders
would claim that there
is no reason for doing this, although some people
decided that there was
one.[10]
Further, they claim that
a reason for the former unwise government
experiments like the
cold war radiation experiments, MKULTRA, Tuskegee,
etc. could be made (of
course not for MILABs), although Alexander wrote
that he does not make
excuses or apologies for these experiments.
"In Tuskegee" doctors
wanted to determine how Syphilis would progress if
left untreated."[4]
I will not coment such statements about the former
illegal unethical cold
war experiments, because I believe they speak for
themselves.
In the so-called Tuskegee
experiments hundreds of Afro-Americans were
subjected to sexually
transmitted diseases through purposeful withholding
of appropriate medication
that could have cured their disease but was not
administered in order
to continue to collect information on the disease´s
degenerative impacts.
Beginning in 1932, the "Tuskegee Study of Untreated
Syphilis in the Negro
Male" subjected 412 Afro-American sharecroppers who
had contracted syphilis
to 40 years of monitoring aimed at documenting the
effects of the disease.
All the victims were permitted to pass the various
chronic stages of illness,
suffering from long-term disabilities such as
blindness, paralysis,
dementia and eventually premature death, even well
after penicilin was
found to be a highly effective treatment.[11]
So much for Tuskegee
and I would be interested to know what the
Tuskegee survivors have
to say after they know now that some designers
from an ueber-secret
agency conducted a risk-benefit analysis and chose to
proceed in this experiment.
Interestingly, there
were only black americans involved in this experiment
and there were no Nobel
laureate or persons of publicly acclaimed
accomplishments used
in this nazi-style-project. The reason is that they
used people who were
socially and politically outsiders. Tuskegee is a very
good example, where
one can see why it is better to use the average nobody,
ethical minorities,
or poor people for covert or secret unethical experiments,
than lawyers, academics
and Nobel laureate´s, etc.
I agree that some of
the people who claim that they hear voices, are used
in secret experiments,
are abducted by aliens, etc. are paranoid, have
delusions, are mentaly
ill, etc. But there are also some people who are not!
Therefore, it would
be locical to use natural phenomena, strange psychological
phenomena, unexplained
and generally ridiculed phenomena as a cover for
top secret experiments.
How easy such a cover
would work everybody can see from the the present
discussion and the statements
of the sceptics.
They claim that these
people are crazy, have hallucinations,
etc. but other abductees
(abductees who have only alien and not military
experiences) not, only
Lammer´s MILAB cases, etc. If this is
really going on than
the sceptics are right: "That is human, not alien
interventions."[4] An
alien cover would be so good that if alleged victims
go to the police as
the sceptics suggest and tell them that
people in military uniforms
experimented on them and the police officer
learns that the person
has also alien abduction experiences he/she will
be immediately ridiculed,
etc.
On the other hand there
are also MILAB cases which point in another
direction. These are
cases where it seems to me that the military
involved, or their officers
believe that "some alien abductions" may be
a true unexplained phenomenon.
These are cases where it does not seem
that they use the abduction
phenomenon as a cover for secret experiments
but they would like
to know whats really going on in some alien abduction
cases. On the other
hand it could be that these military unit are involved
in pseudo-alien abductions
for propagating an alien threat. Of course
this is speculation
and more data are needed.
Although the MILAB sceptics,
claim that one can see from my research that
I have a lack in understanding
of technical knowledge, the ability to
completely analyze information,
political science, military science, budget
and finance, organizational
sociology and psychology/psychiatry, I can only
say I trust the NASA
cameras and my scientific knowledge more than the stories
of the former military
remote viewers who are good friends and former
colleagues of our sceptics
and who claimed on public meetings, in magazines,
etc. that they remote
viewed Martians, artificial structures on the Martian
surface, machines under
the surface of Mars, the disappearence of the russian
Phobos 2 probe and other
nonsense.[12]
However, I exposed some
of this nonsense in the peer reviewed border science
Journal, "Journal of
Scientific Exploration."[13] Why were the MILAB sceptics
quiet as their friends,
former colleagues, etc. delievered mental food for
their estimated 10 million
people who suffer from paranoid delusions, not-real
entities, voices, bedroom-related
visions and hypnagogic experiences?
For the fields of knowledge
where I have no immediate training myself eg.
psychiatry, military
science, etc. I make a habit out of consulting with
experienced professionals
with many years of experience in these fields.
So the opinions I present
in my books and articles may have more weight
than these sceptics
want to believe.