With this issue, my column beings its tenth year. Hard to believe. From a negative point
of view, I can't believe I haven't yet been picked up by one of the big boys by now
(although I surely, out of Grand Loyalty, would have continued contributing to ); from a positive point of view, I can't believe I'm still managing to turn out
a column every other month, and that Len Fulton is still allowing me to.
Every once in a while someone mentions in a letter to me that he's seen one of my
columns, and a couple of times a reader has written a letter-to-the-editor complaining of
the obscurity of the poets I champion or, in one case, getting on me for my grammar, so I
know the columns are not going entirely unread. Nonetheless, I feel pretty solipsistic
when I write them. That has its good side: it means I don't have to worry about satisfying
anyone but myself. Hence, this column, which may well be the most self-indulgent one
I've yet written, which is saying a lot.
I'm just too beat, who knows why, to even pretend to review anything this time around. I
do hope no one will be cruel enough to write me that it's therefore my first good column.
Anyway, I'm just going to shoot the breeze about me and Small Press Review. I first
came across it in some kind of rack in what I remember as a college library somewhere in
LA, where I spent the seventies and a few years at either end of them. I was taken by (1)
its coverage of literature not mentioned in the mainstream and (2) Robert Peters's pungent
column. This was some thirty years ago. I was around thirty--not that young, but
unpublished and with no literary friends, so I fantasized about someday being a Robert Peters, read by a slew of high-level readers, the way some small boy watching a light-
years-out-of-reach baseball star on television daydreams about one day playing on his
team.
I didn't keep up with SPR too well, as I was moving around a lot, and not fully committed
to Poetry. Of more pivotal importance to me were the Dustbook directories, one of which
was what finally got me into the Literary Scene. From it I got the address of Karl
Kempton This was in the early eighties. Karl was then and still is the editor of Kaldron,
the number one American visual poetry periodical of the last century. He rejected the
apprentice visual poems I sent him, but via a real letter! And he gave me names of other
editors and writers of visual poetry, such as Crag Hill, with whom I just recently co-edited
the first volume of Writing to be Seen, the only serious (300+ large pages) anthology of
visual and related poetry published in this country in the past thirty years. I'm not
bothering to indicate where it can be bought because, amazingly, there are just about no
copies left for sale. Perhaps not a surprise since we only had (only could afford) to have
500 copies printed, but a surprise considering it costs $24 and nothing else I've ever been
involved with has sold more than 200 copies--except, I guess, Richard Kostelanetz's A
Dictionary of the Avant-Gardes, now out in paperback, to which I contributed a dozen or
so short entries (some of them re-using material first published here, I might add). Oh,
there was also the volume of the Gale Contemporary Authors Autobiography Series that I
had an essay in, but that was sold in bookstores, I don't think.
I apparently started my still-continuing subscription to SPR with the June/July 1985 issue,
for that's the first one in my file. Odd to find names of people I barely noticed at the time
but later corresponded with such as Arnold Skemer and Bob Black in my earliest issues.
By 1990 Jack Saunders's name popped up! I only noticed one reviewer early on, even before she became a regular columnist (in the September 1986 issue): Laurel Speer. She
had a verve most of the other reviewers lacked--and seemed almost as distant from my
part of the galaxy as Peters had. As far as I can tell from my records, my first contribution
to SPR was a guest editorial about infraverbal poetry called, "Some Notes on a Relatively
New Form of Poetry" in the April 1992 issue. It is still one of the best things I've written
on poetry. A month later, my first review appeared--on the front page! It was on da levy,
"Cleveland's Warrior Poet." These two publications were a highlight in my literary life.
A mere year and a month later I had a column in Small Magazine Review! It was a
continuation of one I had had in Factsheet Five, whose editor had departed, leaving it with
another editor, who soon sold it to someone else. Along the way, everyone or just about
everyone, who had been writing for it was dumped, including me. So, for me, SMR came
along at just the right time.
My column appeared every other issue for a while, but then SPR and SMR combined and
became a bi-monthly. Since then, I've had a column in every issue. My hope, aside from
getting discovered, was to establish the kinds of poetry I write about here in the Big
World. That has not yet happened, but there's still hope. Writing To Be Seen has recently
had book launchings in the Miami area at Books & Books, and in New York at Printed
Matter. In September there will be a similar event for it at The New York Center for
Book Art. It was also featured at a visual poetry show in a gallery in Cincinnati and at the
end of July it will be part of the festivities at the Ohio State Avant Garde Symposium. So
we're making progress. Meanwhile, I'll keep plugging along with this column--and hope at
least a few young writers think of me the way I used to think of Robert Peters.
|
Go Back to the Comprepoetica Home Page.