MAGAZINE

Publisher's Page
P. Roger Elliott

Welcome to Our First Edition
"The Magazine for Artists and Crafters Around the World"
 
"A painting is a lie that tells the truth"
                                             Pablo Picasso
(See bottom of page for an interview with one of Australia's leading artists)
 
I am writing this introduction the day after Christmas 1998 and I am quite sure that by the time you read this my nerves will be a jagged mess!  Even now, it seems that I shall never get all of the loose ends together that will be required in order to get this first edition on the net.  
     Yet, in my heart, I know that I shall and I know that in spite of all the best efforts these first few editions will not be what I envision the magazine to be. We will struggle, get better, struggle some more, and get better yet. I only hope that you, our readers, will struggle with us and give me time to present a magazine worthy of your visits.  
     Some time ago when this was but a germ of an idea, I began to think what the objectives of an on-line magazine should be. What exactly would I want the effort to achieve. The biggest? The best?   
     It came to me that surely it couldn't be about being the biggest. While no venture of this type can exist without visitors, this cannot be about numbers. After all, the magazine must be about presenting information and ideas to the artists and crafters around the globe.  
     The best? I am not so presumptuous as to assume that me and my counterparts can produce the best art and craft magazine in one fell swoop. Let me assure you, though, that being the best is something that I will work very hard to become. I don't measure the "best" by the number of visitors, but by the sincere effort to publish a magazine that helps, entertains, and enlightens those who wish to be the practitioners of art in any form.  
     This magazine cannot exist without you. If we are to accomplish our goal it must be a sharing of ideas and cultures. All non-profit ventures can only exist and be as strong as the people who participate. I need your help. I can produce the forum but it is you who must make it go.  
 
     One of the great knocks on artists are that we are aloof, that we never share the knowledge that we possess. And, in some instances, we must plead guilty. But we MUST change. The internet brings us closer than ever before. The opportunities are before us as they have never been and only by sharing our ideas and knowledge can we move forward.  


...the opportunities are before us as they have never been and only by sharing our ideas and knowledge can we move forward.  


      It is the intent of this publication to include as many differing typed of visual arts as possible. Some of the things I most regard as "errors" by many museums and city art centers are that the center or museum tends to take on the personality of the director. If the administrator is an advocate of Impressionism then the organization takes on the look of an impressionist liar. Oh, they may throw in a few realist shows from time to time but the "roadshows", as I call them, are always of impressionistic works. The same is true for all types of preferences. 
     This cannot happen and expect to maintain a flow of non artistic people to your venture. I want this magazine to reflect various styles and ideas and not to reflect my preference in art. 
     I am an advocate of art...in all forms. While I maintain the right to control content ( there will be controversy, but not obscenity), when deciding upon the admittance of works into the magazine, I will likely err on the side of acceptance...I too hate censure. 
    It is my deep desire that you may enjoy these pages. I have taken careful steps to insure that none of the content or links lead to anything that may even be remotely close to commercial "flim-flam". 
All of the links have been juried by me personally and while no endorsement is given or intended, I have attempted to lead you only to sites that I hope to be clean and of good character. 
      Enjoy the magazine and I hope that you will be here again for the March edition.
 
 
 
Agug Rai Museum of Art
Ubud, Bali, 80571, Indonesia
The Agug Rai Museum of Art houses a remarkable collection of works by Balinese, Javanese and foreign artists. Situated in Peliatan, Ubud, Bali, the museum was officially opened on the 9th of June 1996. 
 
 
 
 
DOWNUNDER THUNDER
An Interview With One of Australia's Leading Artists
John Hagan is one of Australia's leading artists and a contributing editor for Artist World Magazine.... 
 
AWM: When did you first begin to paint seriously? 
Hagan: You can't paint seriously, you ninny. 
AWM: You know what I mean. 
Hagan: I'm a contrarian, so I figured I would give up burglary and try it. I quit climbing tall buildings at that point. 
AWM: Why? 
Hagan: I thought I made it clear -- because I wasn't fit enough for climbing, which you should write in the skeletal/suffering artist/ AIDS mode. I thought I might be fit enough for painting, ala Rothko, Warhol and other cultural clowns, past and present. You know what Rothko had? 
AWM: What? 
Hagan: He had a presence, what Balzac called a "high seriousness" that allowed us to be serious about him taking himself seriously, you know what I mean? 
AWM: No, I'm afraid not 
Hagan: Have you seen his pizza commercial? You take his elegantly overstuffed persona as a given; he's a man enjoying his pizza, and you trust that. 
AWM: And the point being? 
Hagan: That I can't take painting seriously anymore so I quit doing it seriously. I only paint superficially. I want people to be light about taking me lightly. But even my best pieces can't top what's actually being exhibited out there now, what I call "Trendy postmodern dialogue." 
AWM: "Huh?" 
Hagan: One-sided intimate canvases masquerading as paintings. 
AWM: Could you elaborate? 
Hagan: Yeah, you know, pieces that evoke the intimate, conversational tone that TV critics use, like you were inviting someone into your bathroom to see your bowl? Vulnerable but reassuring? Self-mocking to the point of humility, but no further, that would be uncivilized? 
All the top rags carry notes on this stuff. And when someone comes along with a classical piece, someone who can pull off prophetic pronouncements like a Hughes -- well it's just not warm and fuzzy enough anymore. I also call this tendency toward Jung's anima "the vaginalization of art." Instead of painting having a strong voice, it's become elastic and weak, near incontinent, as if burdened with a cystocoele. 
AWM: Could you extend yourself further? 
Hagan: No, the surgery's too expensive. Though I would like some liposuction around the base. But where have you been? You don't read these high-falutin journals on Australian Art. Whiny voices, neutered voices, they make Warhol look like Samson. Your art can't be black or white or male or female anymore, you've got to be this disembodied sniveling politically correct neutered democratic hemophilic grant-sucking, and thoroughly therapeutic invention of galleries and advertising men. It sickens me. Where can you see "Turner's Battle of Trafalga?" Or "Hannibal crossing the alps?" 
AWM: Could you give us some examples of this tendency? 
Hagan: No, I've already p----- too many people off. But I can give you an imitation. Let's repaint the Rape of the Sabine Women for a moment in the post modern deconstruction yuppie mode:.............and installation with the bisexual stained underpants, and urine simmered and plastic encased sliced livers shaped like crucifixes. 
AWM: That's rather good, I think. 
Hagan: You would. See, this instillation piece is not like the Titan's portrait of the pope, and it's not like the roof of the Sistine chapel, and it's not like one of Tiepolo ceilings -- it's blandly uninviting, intolerant, careful to offend, though every now and then these installations will pull an apple out of the hat just to shock you -- but for the most part, the voice of post-modern art has gone limp. 
AWM: Would you care to name some venues where you find this stuff prominent? 
Hagan: No, I'm in enough trouble already. 
AWM: So you won't name names? 
Hagan: Hell no. People love gossip but I'm below that. I prefer out and out libel but my lawyer says I can't afford it because I'm already in bankruptcy for investing in Warhol' memorabilia while the Nazi lugers I sold keep going up. How could I have known? And how should I presume? 
AWM: Would you venture an opinion about todays Galleries? 
Hagan: As an unprejudiced critic I always offer an ironclad guarantee that anyone who hangs me will be spared my ridicule. Curators, are you listening? It's kind of like the insurance the mob sells. So I have nothing but good things to say about Galleries since they hang more of my stuff than the thief next door. I say bite the hand that doesn't feed you and you'll never go hungry. Get my drift? 
AWM: I think so. That's all the time we have, though. Have any parting shots? 
Hagan: You mean you want to see my fetish collection? 
 

(About a week later by chance I ran into Hagan at a bar. He wore huge round sunglasses they gave his bulbous, scrofulous, wine-florid face the look of a diseased insect. I couldn't decide if his body was too big for his head or his head too small for his body. I recognized him chiefly by his pink paisley coat. He was drinking bourbon in a booth with Ron Van Gennip. I slipped under the faux wood table edges next to Ron. 

AWM: Remember me, Mr. Hagan? 
Hagan: Look, Ron, the rodent returns. 
Van Grennip: And the dog returns to his own vomit. He stirred his bourbon with his pinky and sucked it loudly. You know, Hagan, I feel sorry for you. You will never have my fame. 
Hagan: I don't want your fame, I prefer my own. 
Van Grennip: That's exactly my point. How do you expect anyone to take your work seriously when you go to popular movies? 
Hagan: Would it help if I went to unpopular ones? I just rented "The Postman" last night and loved it -- sort of a "Land world" sequel to the classic "Water World." 
Van Grennip: You don't take things seriously enough, so no one will ever take you seriously. You're just a Falstaff wannabe. 
                                                             (continued above) 
 
 

Hagan: Who the (deleted) is he? 
Van Grennip: Oh, never mind. You're hopeless. I'm outta' here. 
He stood and pulled a greasy trench coat around his frame. Then he pushed through the swinging doors, taking out two cigarettes as he left, and lit them both. 
AWM: What's with the cigarettes? 
Hagan: Ever since they passed that law about smoking inside he tries to make up for his deprivation afterwards as soon as possible. He's not a bad guy, if you like the guilty type. 
AWM: At least we're back on the topic of art and artists. 
Hagan: Ah yes, that vanishing species, terminally infected by the twin viruses of originality and profit. Better to be original than good; better to make a profit if you're not original --- or at least marketed as original, whatever the great unwashed believe, which amounts to the same thing. 
AWM: If I might change the subject, I think our readers would like to hear more about your condemnation of the "intimately conversational piece" in post-modern art. 
Hagan: You mean the social message art, VD art? 
AWM: How do you rank today's artists? 
Hagan: I won't pander to those who want me to name names, but think of the best selling artists; and any celebrity who paints the stuff -- from Sylvester Stallone to Prince, from Madonna to Michael Jackson. 
AWM: But would you call them artists? 
Hagan: What do you call them? They work in studios, for God's sake. Is there another requirement, some sort of cultural quality control? 
AWM: You mean you admire these people? 
What are you, dumber than a sawhorse? This is America. Of course I admire anyone who makes more money than me. 
AWM: Don't you think it strange, though, that no celebrity suddenly presents themselves as doctors or lawyers in the twilight of their careers, but to become an artist seems to require no training? 
Hagan: I see you are of the elitist school. Of course there's some truth to what you say, but given the money, most traditional artists sell out. 
AWM: What does that have to do with the skill of painting? 
Hagan: What are you, a conversational foil? Get some (deleted) lines. Who's writing this interview, anyway? As I was saying, publicity is more important than quality. Do you think Warhol or Pollock or Picasso made it on talent alone? Hell no, they massaged the public persona of an artist for their fame, much like Rubens did. Dali used to wander around with a billiard cue and bell diving helmet. All he needed was a feather up his butt to complete the outfit. These guys were shrewd publicity hounds. 
AWM: And what about you? 
Hagan: I'm a good painter but a bad actor. 
AWM: And your agent? 
Hagan: do you know how demeaning it is to remind a post modern artist of his two-dimensional existence? That's really rude! I have an agent but he just won't kiss up enough. 

To comfort himself Hagan sucked on a fried shrimp tail, from which the meat had been already removed. Then he chewed on its shell with annoying crackle. Hagan fidgeted, then slid toward the end of the booth while the table creased his gut as if it were making a muffin. 

AWM: Before you leave, Mr Hagan, could you just comment once more on---- 
Hagan: VD art? 
AWM: No, not that -- I mean our readers I think understand that by now -- 
Hagan: Understand that it's a terrible, terrible thing in the history of art, I hope. I could change my uncontroversial metaphor to something not politically correct, you know, and maybe make a splash in the academic world -- call it "the intimization of art, the gossipization of art, the nuclear socialization of art, the art that likes to get emotionally close so fast you feel guilty whether you spend the night or not, or something equally clever. 
AWM: Talking about spending the night what do you think of women's art? 
Hagan: Ha! feminine principle paints the social message, whining at third world poverty to attract pity and interest, while all the while attempting to reverse a man's aggressive instincts into a fathering mode. Thereby is a potential mate checked for requisite compassion. If the victim passes the test and expresses an interest in the work, the relationship may proceed as the woman planned. 
AWM: But, what does this have to do with art? 
Hagan: Everything, my boy, everything. Wait until we discuss the romance between the hemispheres, the ultimately narcissistic duo. 
Look, I must go I have fifteen minutes of lucid thoughts left and my Goodart news group deserves better than the crap I have been assailing them with of late. 

With that he bulled his way out the door. He left a rather exorbitant tip, but I had no idea how much he had eaten, or how many times the table had been bused before I arrived. I do know for a fact that Hagan did not eat salmon pate. He can't stand the stuff.