How to Recycle:

There is no form of freedom or rights that result in the destruction of the environment:

Such destruction is the number one greatest violation of human rights possible!

Actually, no matter what people think, recycling is very simple, well, at least to the intelligent: The rest must be taught, perhaps by their children! Humans are slow to change, self-willed, hubris & vengeful; consequently, they will never do the right thing volitionally: Environmental Terrorists who publicly demonstrate indifference of their own progeny via spoiled living. This is not about the loss of freedoms, but the opposite. The goal is 100% recycling, terminating all landfills. This is almost occurring right now in selective cities such as Mesa, Arizona; that city has recycling trucks modified from regular trash collection trucks. They provide 2 different containers of differing colors which are designed for the truck’s mechanical arm to pick up, thus only 2 personnel per truck. Mondays is recyclable products pick-up, and Thursday is rubbish pick-up, but that too, can be eliminated: How?  By simple lifestyle changes and by living simply, coupled with laws and stiff penalties that would force all spoiled immature loveless people who must/will whine at such impositions to comply with recycling programs/laws. In other words, I do not care if they hate it, because if they are that selfish that they volitionally disease themselves and their progeny for their current minor conveniences, they should be flogged and forced to be employed at a landfill for a year (ok, we’ll skip the flogging)! Since most of the content taken to landfills originate from grocery stores, this is the major directive to address, though all issues such as the recycling of motor vehicles and construction/building materials from demolition is covered here as well. This is how it works:

 

First, packaging laws will impose heavy fines (used to build recycling centers) on businesses who use too much packaging, usually the package becomes a billboard such as in the packaging of CD ROMs; this includes any form of product containment that is excessive and illogical. This savings can be passed on to the consumer (you’re welcome!). Second, limit the resources that are used for packaging so that the recycling effort at the home or business is not so complicated. The 3 major categories would be 1: wood-based products (cardboard, paper, etc.), 2: plastics (polyethylene, Styrofoam and other easily recyclable poly), and 3: aluminum and other crucible compatible alloys. Glass as a disposable food container must end; it has already been replaced with plastic in most manufacturing, so it is a novelty more than a necessity, plus its heavy, dangerous when broken, and requires a metallic lid. Nonetheless it could be offered at restaurants and bars that sell glass bottled beer and other liquors, and they as a business would then return the bottles to their manufactures delivery teem for refill! Canning with tin would also have to be replaced, or reused only within those residences that still can. Since vacuum packing with plastics is so successful, this technology would be more widely employed, in both the shipping and packaging businesses, as well as in residential applications via appliance technology. Oh and paper towels/napkins and diapers? Try cloth, like our grandparents (and back) utilized. Remember, only the simple-minded thinks that proceeding forward in time equates to advancements in the human condition. Everything that was of the past does not render it ineffectual just because it was in the past! Such narrow-minded thinking needs to be de-programmed out of the human mindset during childhood schooling, as does the over-consumerism that infects our current social systems and ultimately the health of Earth and all its inhabitants!

 

Many still trying to justify their own greed agendas, must/will say that we do not have the ability to recycle properly, especially with the potential biohazard of excess products left inside of containers. They are the ones to mark, they that have so little faith in the Science technology and the humans that created the products to begin with. Lets be candid: They are just the excuse makers who will loose money in this necessary directive, but planet rapists should not just loose money, they should also loose their freedoms in prosecution for this criminal mindset, then forced to work at government-owned recycling centers. I will prove herein that in the long run, it will cost only a fraction of what we are now doing. But we first must change our operation, much like the aging automobile industry had to do after the introduction of imports placed a real challenge in the paths of US auto makers! Of course the recycling effort will include everyone; even other countries that wish to ship anything to the USA. Nothing would have to be biodegradable in design because landfills are extinct! When paper-products are no longer recyclable, it will be used as mulch, as will coffee grounds and other such bio-applicable bulk by-products. The recycling centers, operated on top of old landfills, will determine products and make these decisions. Since aluminum and plastics have longer recycle life-spans than even humans do, they will be less of a problem, with the only real challenge of eliminating air pollution from recycling plastics, a feat being conquered by research bio-engineers.

 

The US Government will operate Recycling Centers (USRC), much like they operate the post office, only without sluggard bureaucrats who I call anti-managers: grossly inefficient is still an understatement! They will employ a team of Scientists to oversee the national operation, with one Scientist at each major location, and the common labor force will be predominantly the appropriate qualifying candidate being rehabilitated from the prison population. The USRC will receive, recycle and then resell the core products at/from each station, with many stations logically distributed nationally, mostly where the current landfills are now (poetic justice?)! Again, the logic here is to simplify; the argument that may result which is that we will only be replacing one type of pollution with another, is of course absurd! Like this one: If everyone reads the newspaper from computer subscriptions rather than from paper sources, we will use more electricity. These moronic mentalities are why recycling is looked upon as a bad thing, but I guarantee that your own progeny will not think so. The shipping industry (both government and private) would reuse all shipping containers just like they already reuse pallets, crates, cargo containers and the like. Smaller cardboard boxes, which use up volumes of trees, would instead be thick seal-able plastic containers that will be the property of USPS and returned to them with outgoing mail or pick-up!

 

The disposal industry will modify all the trucks to use natural gas/propane for fuel, and will have mechanical arms to load the 3 designed color-coded containers provided by the city or county. They will still remain as the independent collection transport sector, just like they are now. The containers will be white for plastics, green for paper, and silver for aluminum. Biomaterial such as banana peels and other food drop-offs will be utilized as mulch and/or other agricultural needs, with small amounts run through the sinks disposal just as they are now. Again, a new technology will come out of this; home appliances that properly dispose of this biomaterial, and especially in large restaurants and other food producers. Obviously the USA needs to lead this as the global model, especially due to the fact that it is the number one over-consumer to begin with. If we have proven anything, it is our ability to adapt to new situations, and the evidence is taught in every American Economic History class (or PBS)!

 

Automobile recycling only needs to be modified (since steel is already recycled), but with new laws that make wrecking companies (junk yards) to strip all vehicles of the resell parts and warehouse them, with the remainder segregated into its base components and recycled appropriately (no more acres of ugly rusting cars). Rubber is their problem, but a huge mound of tires is insane and all those participating in this tire mountain agenda (that accidentally and conveniently catches fire) needs pulled from normal society and placed in a rubber room (recycled from tires) for Psychological analysis. This is pun but not humor; this is a serious problem plaguing humanity: greed mongers hell-bent on making money at any cost; this is a destructive behavioral mental illness and needs to be addressed as such. In fact the Government must also utilize the scientific community by giving them more power over the methodology of natural resource use, just like they did with Plutonium/Uranium! All competent humans were glad that this occurred with the refrigerant Freon (for 1 example), a devastating ozone contaminate. I remember as a young man, the auto parts store selling Freon in cans so shade-tree mechanics could change their own auto refrigerant. What happened? Multitudes of morons were releasing the old Freon into the biosphere because, well, they could. The government finally had to regulate it because of this mass of morons who were far too incompetent to possess such an ecological contaminate (thank God!). This same logic will have to apply to any and all such products. Spray paint will only be sold to those certified to handle it as a designated bio-product, and held accountable therein.

 

We must recognize as intelligent humans (morons will live and die in oblivion) that we cannot have the liberties once held, due predominantly to the fact that too many people with hazardous products in their possession is too potentially devastating to the biosphere to allow it. I do not like the idea of having no more aerosol canisters in my garage like I had shelved most of my life (like spray paint, refrigerants, solvents, etc.), but this is a minor sacrifice for me because it establishes ecological sanity to/for the whole. This same sanity must be forced upon corporations most of all. They cannot continue in their sedation: the Capitalist agenda at the expense of the biosphere…indeed they need to get psychological help for this clear and dangerous obsession that allows their anesthetized mind to justify global ecological destruction just for money! One billion quadrillion dollars will not buy back humanity, nor any extinct plant or animal species, and all sane intelligent people instantly cognizes this data! The mental disease of excessive materialism and over-consumerism (planet raping) must not continue to be looked upon as a lifestyle or a freedom that we must protect with US Military personnel globally, in fact just the opposite needs to occur: The Military utilized globally to defend the planet against its corporate rapists! This clearly destructive behavior is empirical fact supported via the Global Scientific community (Websites linked herein)!

 

Since the construction industry uses lots of wood and wood products such as plywood & other composites, this resource should never be land filled. It can all be recycled back into composite materials. At worse case, it could be burned for heat at power plants instead of all the polluting coal they currently abuse. Ask anyone at the USGS, the Forestry Service or Firefighters Union, they will all tell you that the mass burning of wood and other forest fuels (greenery) have been burning on Earth for millions of years, it is natural and even an established part of Earth’s biological cycle: Coal and fossil fuels are not: that is discussed in detail at the Fuels link! As for Construction’s metallic products such as structural iron and all HVAC, plumbing and electrical components; these need to be segregated and recycled appropriately. Hey, if people survive by digging cans from dumpsters, it stands to reason that a company dedicated to demolition recycling would do far better, since there is mega tons of debris therein. As for the bio-hazardous components such as asbestos (most of which is now exempt, and no longer used in new construction), this is already disposed of by the EPA! Corporations that clear-cut forests globally need to be shut down, its owners arrested and prosecuted, and their equipment seized and recycled. All fuel, mining and logging industries must first be educated by Scientists before they are even given certificates and appropriate business licenses globally, as prerequisites to being in those businesses. No normal human would even think to clear-cut a forest, and this act is not just grandiose rape, it is also sacrilege. Forests should be thinned out in such a way so as to leave the natural habitat and thus, eliminating all the fuel below the canopy that is so combustible (again, ask a firefighter)! I discuss new building practices, which greatly improve and even revolutionize the construction industry at the Construction link from this Website’s homepage.