本人近日收到一封令人痛心的E-MAIL,現懇請閣下
細心閱讀,並將它以E-MAIL或ICQ FORWARD給您的
朋友,讓他們也清楚印尼華人的實際苦況!
若有疑問,請E-MAIL給我,或以ICQ 聯絡我! JORDY上
MY HOMEPAGE: http://www.oocities.org/WallStreet/Exchange/5547/
MY E-MAIL: Jordy_wong@oocities.com
My icq#: 13155106
閣下是第位閱讀此信的人
以下是信的全部內容:
一封印尼華人請求散發的信 A Letter from the Chinese in
Indonesia
由一位朋友那裡傳來。現草譯為中文﹐供大家參考
To: All honorable members of the society
致全社會正直的有良知的公民們
Dear Sir, and/or Mdm,
親愛的先生/女士﹕
If you have watched TV, read newspapers, or turned on the
radio this past several days, you may heard of the riots
in Indonesia. News media are telling us the Indonesian
Pribumis (Malay) people are rising up against the Suharto
dictatorship. We are told that the Indonesia poor Malay
suffered a lot under Suharto's corrupted regime, and they
wanted change.
如果您最近幾天收看電視﹐看報紙﹐聽廣播﹐您可能已經聽說
了印尼發生的暴亂。新聞媒體傳播的消息是﹐印尼的Pribumis
（馬來人）正在反抗蘇哈托的專制。貧苦的馬來人在蘇的獨裁
統治下受難多年﹐現在是他們來改變這種狀況的時候了。
The Indonesia Pribumis (Malay) comprises over 80% of the
total population. Most of them are Muslims. The Indonesian
ethnic Chinese minority are mostly Buddhist or Christian.
The news media portrayed the Indonesian Malay as honest,
decent, peace loving people who rioted because they were
hungry, they were poor, and they were victimized by Suharto,
and his filthy-rich Indonesian Chinese allies.
印尼的馬來人佔總人口的80%。他們中的大多數是穆斯L。印
尼華人是當地少數民族﹐大多信仰佛教或基督教。新聞媒體把
印尼的馬來人描繪為誠實､正派､愛好和平的人﹐他們製造暴
亂是因為他們飢餓､貧窮﹐他們是蘇哈托和不正當地富有的印
尼華裔的犧牲品。
who is Suharto? Is Suharto an Indonesian Pribumi (Malay,)
or is he an Indonesian Chinese? Is Suharto a Muslim, or
is he a Christian or a Buddhist? Aren't you curious that
almost all reports about the Indonesian rioters savagely
attacking businesses owned by the Indonesian ethnic
Chinese minority come with the DISCLAIMER-like pseudo-
economic news attachment that reminds us of the
"disproportion wealth gap" between the Chinese and the
Malay in Indonesia?
誰是蘇哈托﹖是印尼的馬來人﹖是印妒熊堣H﹖是穆斯林﹖是
基督悚7b還是佛教徒﹖您對幾乎所有的報導都把對印尼華人的殘
暴行為跟華人與馬來人的貧富懸殊聯繫起來不感到奇怪嗎﹖
A disclaimer-like news attachment usually looks like this:
"The Indonesian ethnic Chinese minority only comprises
less than 4% of the Indonesian population, but they
controlled more than (70%, 75%, 80%,85%, 90%, take your
pick) of the entire Indonesian economy."
這類似乎非常客觀的經濟附加報導通常是以這樣的面目出現
的﹕
?印尼華人少數民族僅佔印尼總人口數量的4%不到﹐但他們卻
控制ぴ超過（70%､75%､80%､85%､90%﹐任由選擇）爾g濟
財富。?
Don't you find it strange the news media attach an ECONOMIC
disclaimer whenever they report the BLATANTLY RACIST RIOTS
in Indonesia perpetrated by people from the MAJORITY RACE
against people of the MINORITY RACE?
您沒有發現媒體的報導很奇怪嗎﹖無論什麼時候他們報導印尼
多數民族反對少數民族的種族主義暴亂﹐上面這樣的?客觀?
經濟報導總是附在後面﹗
Could it be possible that 4% of the population controlling
over 90% of the economy? Suharto and his family are
reported to have accumulated up to 40 BILLION USD in wealth.
Is Suharto and his family counted among the 4% of the
population? Is Suharto and his family ethnically CHINESE?
佔總人口4%的印尼華人有可能控制90%以上的經濟嗎﹖據報導
蘇哈托和他的家族累積財富達400億美元。蘇哈托算在4%的人
口裡面嗎﹖蘇哈托跟他的家人是華人嗎﹖
Is the World Press reporting from Indonesia consistent
with their reporting from elsewhere around the world? Here
are several recent world events, as reported to us by the
same International Media:
印尼的國際新聞（World Press）跟他們在世界其他地方的報
道一致嗎﹖下面是最近的幾起國際性事件﹐由同一家國際媒體
向我們報導。
In Rwanda, when the MAJORITY Hutus attacked and massacre
the minority Tutsis, the World Press reported it as a
racial-based tragedy. There was no mention of the economic
differences. In Bosnia, when the MAJORITY Serbs and/or the
Croats attacked and massacre the Bosnia Muslims, the
International Media told us it was religious-based.
在盧旺達﹐多數民族Hutus屠殺少數民族Tutsis﹐國際新聞報
道﹐這是基於種族主義的悲劇。沒有提到任何經濟差異。在波
西尼亞﹐多數民族塞族（Serbs）和/或克族（Croats）尾貌i
西尼亞的穆斯林﹐這家媒體告訴我們﹐這是基於宗教的殺戮。
The conflicts between the Albanian and Serbs in Kosovo are
being reported as race-based conflicts.Why then, whenever
the Indonesian Malay MAJORITY savagely attacked the
Indonesian Chinese minority, the World Media kept on
insisting that the attacks motivated by RACIST hatred were
ECONOMIC-related riots?
在科索沃（Kosovo）的阿爾巴尼亞人和塞族人之間的衝突﹐被
報導為基於種族主義的爭端。但為什麼﹐不論什麼時候印尼的
h數民族馬來人野蠻地攻擊印尼華人少數民族﹐這家新聞機構
都把眼光盯在經濟上﹐並稱種族主義者的仇恨跟經濟有關。
Have you heard any single news story that portrayed the
Indonesian Malay as racists for their attack on Chinese
owned businesses? Have you wonder why the Indonesian Malay
only attacked the Chinese shops, and not the Malay,
American, British, or Arabian businesses?
您曾經聽到過任何一條新聞﹐描繪印尼馬來人作為種族主義者
攻擊華人屬下企業嗎﹖您不奇怪印尼的馬來人為何只攻擊華人
店鋪﹐而不攻擊馬來人的､美裔印尼人的､英裔印尼人的､或
者阿拉伯裔印尼人的呢﹖
Are ALL Indonesian Chinese FILTHY-RICH? Of the Indonesian
Chinese, only 5% can be classified as wealthy. The rest
-NINETY-FIVE PERCENT (95%) - of them are either in the
medium or lower-income strata of the Indonesian economy.
Today, many Indonesian ethnic Chinese are still living in
wooden shacks because they can NOT afford brick houses.
Many of the poor Indonesian Chinese worked very hard but
they still find it extremely difficult to make enough money
to feed and house their family. Most of the really wealthy
Indonesian Chinese already LEFT Indonesia. Those stayed
behind in Indonesia are the poor Chinese who don't have
the economic means to escape. And they are those whose
businesses are being LOOTED, whose merchandizes are being
PLUNDERED, whose buildings are being TORCHED, whose women
are being RAPED, and whose children are being BRUTALLY
SLAUGHTERED.
所有的印尼華人都是不正當致富的嗎﹖在印尼華人中﹐僅有5%
能被歸入富人階級。其余的95%是中產階級或低收入者。今天﹐
許多印尼華人仍然生活在木制的房子裡﹐因為他們買不起磚瓦
房﹗許多貧窮的印尼華人艱辛工作﹐但仍然極其困難﹐缺乏足
夠的錢解決家人的溫飽。大多數真正富有的印尼華人已經離開
印尼。那些留在印尼的都是貧窮的華人﹐沒有經濟能力離開這
個地方。他們的財務被掠奪﹔他們的貨品被霸佔﹔他們的房子
被付之一炬﹔他們的女人被強暴﹔他們的孩子被沒有人性的屠
殺﹗
They are the ones made homeless by the Pribumis savagery
attacks, they are made even poorer for having their small
business totally destroyed by the rioters. The shops that
were destroyed were mostly mom-and-pop type of small
business. With their shops burnt to the ground, those
already poor Chinese gotten even POORER. They lost not only
their businesses, they lost their home, and they lost many
of their family members who were killed by the Indonesian
Malay rioters.
他們因為Pribumis的野蠻攻擊而無家可歸。他們因為連小本
芛N都蕩然無存而更加貧窮。那些被毀壞的商店絕大多數都是
小型的夫妻店。他們不僅失去了生存的依靠﹐失去了家園﹐更
失去了被印尼馬來暴亂者奪去了生命的親人。
How many of the news reports you have read regarding the
Indonesian riots mentioned all these facts? What is the
percentage of those news reports even talked about the
Chinese who were BRUTALLY BUTCHERED by the rioters?
有多少新聞報導提到上面的這些事實﹖有多少新聞報導談及被
暴亂者殘無人道地屠殺的華人﹖
Think back for a minute, of the many of the news reports
you have read about Indonesia, can you think of one which
mentioned the number of Chinese killed in by the Malay
rioters? How many of those news reports focused on the
plight of the Indonesian ethnic Chinese minority?
停下來想一想﹐在您看到熒s聞報導中﹐您能記得有哪一家提
到在暴亂中喪生的華人人數嗎﹖有多少家新聞報導把鏡頭對准
印尼華裔少數民族的生存狀況﹖
Did the News Media ever tell us how many Chinese were hurt?
媒體告訴我們有多少華人受到傷害了嗎﹖
Did they tell us how many Chinese women were RAPED?
媒體i訴我們釵h少華人婦女遭到強暴嗎﹖
Did they tell us how many Chinese were SLAUGHTERED?
媒體告訴我們有多少華人被殺戮嗎﹖
Did they described to us what type of HORRIBLE DEATHS the
Chinese had suffered by the hands of the BRUTAL HANDS of
the Malay rioter
媒體向我們描繪過華人遭到馬來暴亂分子的殘酷折磨後的恐怖
死相嗎﹖
Do you know the story of the innocent THREE-YEAR-OLD
Chinese GIRL who was BRUTALLY BUTCHERED by the Indonesian
Malay rioters when they broke into her parents house, in
Tanjong Pinang, of Indonesia? The rioters first broke into
her parents' house. They KILLED her grandmother. Then the
rioters RAPED and BUTCHERED her mother Finally they
MURDERED this INNOCENT 3 year-old Chinese GIRL, by smashed
open her skull, with a metal pipe.
您器D一個無辜的三歲女孩的故事嗎﹖她是在暴亂者闖入
Tanjong檳楫7d她的父母的房間時被殘無人道地殺害的C他們殺
了她的祖母﹐強暴並殺害了她的母親。最後這些殺人犯用一根
金屬管打開了她的頭蓋骨。
Has CNN reported this news?
CNN報導過這條新聞嗎﹖
Has BBC covered this event?
BBC揭露過這個事件嗎﹖
Has AP, UPI, or Reuters distributed this story?
AP､UPI或者路透社發佈過這條新聞嗎﹖
Wonder why none of the Wold Press is interested in
reporting the horrible death of an INNOCENT 3-year-old
GIRL? Was it because the little girl is from the Indonesia
ethnic Chinese
minority background? Was it because her family is
definitely NOT rich, which may jeopardized the "Indonesian
Chinese = FILTHY-RICH" image painted by so many
journalists reporting from Indonesia, for the World Media?
您很奇怪印尼的國際新聞為什麼不報導一個無辜的三歲女孩的
恐怖死狀﹖是因為她的印尼華裔背景嗎﹖還是因為她的家庭並
不富有﹐危害到眾多新聞機構渲染的所謂?印尼華人=不正當
富人?的說法﹖
Was it because she was a innocently sweet little girl,
unlike the "Indonesian Chinese = COLD-HEARTED, EVIL
BUSNESSMEN" image so many journalists would have us
believed?
是因為她是一個無辜的可愛的小女孩﹐跟眾多新聞媒體灌輸給
我們的?印尼華人=冷血邪惡的商人?形像不符﹖
Was it because her INNOCENCE may proved to us that
Indonesian Chinese are flesh-and-blood human beings, much
like the rest of the humanities,which again, may smash the
"Indonesian Chinese nON-HUMAN" image many members of the
World Press would like to plant deep into our minds?
是因為她的無辜可以向我們證明﹐印尼華人是有血有肉的人﹐
跟其他人一樣的人﹐而這會把國際新聞中的很多人想印在我們
腦子中的?印尼華人不是人?的標記撕個粉碎﹖
what motivated the International Press members to engage
in such a world-wide scale of DIS-INFORMATION campaign?
Why are so many journalists trying to make the Indonesian
ethnic Chinese minority into a "FILTHY-RICH," "COLD-
HEARTED," and "EVIL" people, and In the meantime they try
to portray the Indonesian pribumi (Malay) rioters, who
would NOT even spare the life of an INNOCENT 3-year-old
LITTLE GIRL, as "MILD-MANNERED"?
是什麼促使國際出版社（International Press）的人忙於散
布這樣一個世界性的謊言﹖陘偵穧p此多的新聞記者力圖把印
尼華人推進?不正當富人?､?冷血動物?､?邪惡者?之類的群
體﹖而與此同時又把印尼的Pribumi（馬來人）暴亂者﹐那些
甚至連一個三歲的無辜女孩的生命都不放過的人﹐描繪成?溫
和的守規矩人?﹖
The Indonesian Chinese are the VICTIMS, the Indonesian
Pribumis are the PETRATORS. But yet, every time a news
story of Chinese houses being burned, the same news story
also told us how WEALTHY those Chinese are. Did you ever
read a news report which scrutinized the wealth of the
victims who just had their house burned to the ground?
Every time there is a mention about Chinese business being
looted, there is also a mention of how much ECONOMIC POWER
those Chinese have.
每一次報導關於某個華人的房子被燒燬的新聞﹐同樣的新聞就
會告訴我們那些華人有多麼富有。您什麼時候看到過新聞報導
真得仔細調查過被燒了房子的華人的財產嗎﹖
How many time have you ever read a news report which linked
the economic status of a mug victim, to the crime (of
mugging) itself? just how credible are the news reports
from Indonesia? How ludicrous the journalists want to be?
How much DIS-INFORMATION they are allowed to pump out
before they are called to task to answer for all the
GARBAGES they have written? Are the Indonesian ethnic
Chinese minorities strong allies of Suharto?
印尼的新聞報導有多少是可靠滿S您能想象新聞機構製造的荒
謬可笑能到什麼程度嗎﹖印尼的少數民族華人真得是蘇哈托強
大的同盟軍嗎﹖
The Indonesian ethnic Chinese minorities had been
victimized under the Suharto-led Pribumi government..
Although they are ethnic Chinese, they are NOT allowed to
have a Chinese name. The Suharto-led Pribumi regime
dictated that NO Chinese in Indonesia can have Chinese name.
ALL Chinese in Indonesia MUST have Indonesian name, or they
will not be granted an Indonesian citizenship.
在蘇哈托專制統治下﹐印尼華人已經備受摧殘。儘管他們是華
裔﹐但他們不能起中國名字。所有的印尼華人必須用印尼名字﹐
否則沒有印尼公民身份。
This law only applies to the ethnic Chinese.A person with
Italian ancestry applying for an Indonesian citizenship
is allowed to keep his Italian name.
這條法律只對華人使用。一個祖先是意大利人的印尼人可以保
留他的意大利名字而同時得到印尼公民身份。
A person born in Indonesia by a Mexican parentage is
allowed to carry a Mexican name on his Indonesian
citizenship form. A Russian is allowed to keep his Russian
name as well. ONLY the Chinese are prohibited from having
a Chinese name. The law specifically discriminates against
the ethnic Chinese. Indonesian Chinese are NOT allowed
to learn the Chinese language.
一個在印尼出生的墨西哥血統的人同樣也可以墨西哥名字獲得
印尼國籍。俄羅斯血統的人也可以取俄羅斯名字。而唯獨華人﹐
不能取中文名字。法律還特別地歧視印尼華人﹐不准他們學習
漢語。
In Indonesia, a couple of from Nigeria can teach their
children the Nigerian language. Anyone interested in
learning French can enrolled into French courses offered
in several Indonesian colleges and universities. But if
a Chinese is caught learning the Chinese language in
Indonesia, [s]he may be thrown into jail for breaking the
anti-Chinese law.
在印尼﹐來自尼日利亞的夫婦可以教他們的孩子尼日利亞語。
任何對法語感興趣的人可以加入幾所印尼大學和法語班。但如
果華人在印尼Е葴~語﹐他（她）們將因破壞反中文法
（anti-Chinese law）被抓進監獄。