People generally agree and accept any enovation whatever it is just to be modern and not backward. That's not a good attitude. It is rather stupidity. We have to analyze and test this new enovation vis a vis our needs and our mode of life. If it is safe, we accept it. If it is not, we can either mend it or tune our norms to ajust to it. If all these aproaches prove a failure, in this case we have to reject it. I don't say that all new inventions are hurmful or not compatible with our norms are dangerous.They are not because we can eventually test them according to our scales. It is never a bad thing not to accept something without questioning it on all levels. No one accepts a person to work with him unless he knows for sure that the new comer is honest. We don't necessarilly have to fall in love with any new staff just because it is new and fantastic. Many are those things that suddenly invade our lives which have nothing to do with our pleasure or welfare. They are a product that may be beneficial for the producers but very hurting. I don't earge you to shan modernism. On the contrary, I'm inviting you in the making of it.
Once upon a time there was a rich man who always wanted to be the first to have anything new on the market, to get everything before anybody else. He was the ideal consumer seeking for anything new on the market to boast having got it the first. However; this habit began to fade with time and he began to feel fed up with all what the others invent for him, so he decided to invent something for the others, instead. He thought of a good unprecedented invention, yet nothing came into his mind. One day, while he was relaxing under a tree in his garden, he had a bright idea: He would never accept any new invention unless it is "perfect". He began to refuse all what the others invent for him justifying his refusal by the bad quality of the presented staff. The inventors try hard to improve their products. And step by step things get more perfect. He eventually reached his aim. He invented good things through the others. He said that consumers are the only people able to purify new inventions. Look at the first telephone for example. If people didn't criticize its weak sides, no one would ever have thought of the practical small-size cellular telephone in one's pocket taking it wherever one goes. Consumers, thus, are the best inventors, aren't they?
