"If the (drug) problem continues advancing as it is at the
moment, we’re going to be faced with some very frightening options. Either you have a
massive reduction in civil rights, as you try and drive the problem underground or you
have to look at some radical solutions. The issue has to be - can a criminal justice
system solve this particular problem?"Commander John Grieve, Criminal
Intelligence Unit, Scotland Yard,
Channel 4 1997
There are three methods of distributing drugs:
- Through licensed dealers.
- Through prescriptions.
- Through the illegal market.
Criminalising a certain set of substances and demonising the producers, suppliers and
users of those substances has created a criminal market of staggering proportions (8% of
world trade). It is dirty, dangerous and burgeoning.
As the illegal drug problem in the UK continues to worsen there is an ever more urgent
need for a reasoned public debate on the issue. This debate needs to be based on an
objective analysis of the facts. Unfortunately at present, the agenda tends to be led by
sensationalist tabloid scandals and fuelled by moralising politicians eager to appeal to
‘moral majority’.
This document is an attempt to redress the balance in the direction of common sense by
challenging some of the myths surrounding illegal drugs and by injecting a healthy dose of
reality.
"Prohibition...goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control
man’s appetite through legislation and makes a crime out of things that are not even
crimes...A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our Government
was founded."
- The link between illegal drugs and crime is primarily due to the fact that they are
illegal. The property crime associated with illegal drugs is directly related to the high
price, which is determined by the unregulated criminal market. An average heroin habit
costs about £300 a week. Stolen property sells for between a fifth and a third of its
real value. Around half of all property crime is committed by addicts who steal to support
a habit. It is pure economics that makes this so.
- Where controlled distribution of prescribed heroin to addicts has been tried, the
resulting reduction in offending has been dramatic.
- It is important to note that there is no crime link associated with the tobacco market
despite the fact that most smokers are addicts. This is purely because tobacco is cheap,
and the market is regulated and controlled
"The Drug War cannot stand the light of day. It will collapse as quickly as the
Vietnam War, as soon as people find out what’s really going on."
Joseph McNamara, former Police Chief, Kansas City and San Jose; Fellow, Hoover
Institution - DRCNet downloaded from Net
Q: Why are drugs dangerous?
- Alcohol kills 30,000 every year and yet according to the Department of Health "if
alcohol is consumed in sensible amounts and in appropriate situations it is not likely to
be harmful to a persons health".
- As a society we have no problem making the distinction between alcohol users and
misusers. The same criteria need to be applied to all drugs. As with safe sex education,
knowledge encourages responsible behaviour and reduces the risks. Poor information and
unknown strength and purity contribute significantly to the dangers of illegal drugs.
Q: Why are so many black people imprisoned under the drug laws?
- 45% of white people and 30% of Afro–Carribeans have used illicit drugs (1). The
myth of black people and drugs has been fostered by bias within both the media and the
criminal justice system.
(1) 1996 British Crime Survey.
- However, you are ten times more likely to be imprisoned under the drug laws if you are
black.
Q: Is drug use a human right?
- "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion…and in
public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and
observance". Universal Declaration on Human Rights - Article 18
- "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home
or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation". Universal
Declaration on Human Rights - Article 11
-
As long as we do not harm others we are free to do what we want with our bodies.
This includes reckless and dangerous behaviour e.g. sky diving, mountaineering, drinking,
smoking and so on.
- If we have rights to make personal choices regarding our bodies and our lifestyles this
must include all substances we may choose to put into our bodies, whether they are food,
medicines or drugs.
Q: How do drugs destroy communities?
People use drugs for two main reasons
- To feel good
- To stop feeling bad
The criminal justice system has spectacularly failed to stop people enjoying
themselves. It has also failed to stop people using drugs to relieve mental, emotional and
physical pain.
Of course drug misuse can exacerbate existing social problems. Problematic drug use is
invariably linked to social, economic or emotional deprivation of some kind. Therefor
those communities that are socially deprived are more likely to experience the worst
ravages of prohibition.
FAQs about prohibition
"The current policies are not working. We seize more drugs, we
arrest more people, but when you look at the availability of drugs, the use of drugs, the
crime committed because of and through people who use drugs, the violence associated with
drugs, it’s on the increase. It can’t be working."
Keith Hellawell (Guardian 23 May 1994) Then Chief Constable for W. Yorkshire,
now UK Anti-Drug Co-ordinator
Q: Is Prohibition working?
- Three figures show that criminalising drugs doesn’t work:
1 Seizures of drugs by customs and police are up,
2 The purity of drugs is up
3 The street price of drugs is falling.
- More young people are using drugs than ever before, drug related crime and illness are
rising, the prisons are bursting at the seams and the vast profits of organised crime
continue to mount up.
"So when I now say "let us legalise drugs", I hope I will not be accused
of being tolerant of the evils that drugs cause, or soft on the thugs and violent
criminals who push drugs, wreck lives, and are imperilling our society."
Edward Ellison, Former Head of Scotland Yard's Drugs Squad, Daily Mail 10/3/98
Q: Does Prohibition help to combat crime and helps keep our communities safe?
- Prohibition actually creates crime by pushing up the price of illegal drugs and forcing
addicts to steal to support their habits. Over half of property crime in the UK is
associated with addicts, some £2 billion a year. Street dealers and drug- related turf
wars are a direct result of allowing the criminal market to control the trade.
Q: Does prohibition reduce the profits of organised crime?
- The illegal drug market is worth £300billion a year - around 8% of world
trade. This is by far the largest source of income for organised crime and it continues to
grow.
Q: Was prohibition a success in the US during the 1980’s?
- Supporters of the US Drug War often point to the fall in teenage illicit drug use during
the 1980s as a mark of prohibition’s success. But in 1980 no one had heard of crack
cocaine and drug related HIV infection, both of which have now reached epidemic
proportions in American cities, largely due to prohibitionist economics and morals
indifferent to the human cost of the drug war.
- On any day in 1980, approximately 50,000 people were behind bars in the US for violating
a drug law. By 1997 the number had risen eight-fold to around 400,000.
- In the same period the federal budget for drug control has ballooned from $1billion to
$16billion, with two thirds for enforcement agencies.
FAQs about legalisation
Q: Would legalisation lead to a drugs ‘free for all’?
- The fact is we have a drugs ‘free for all’ now. Illegal drugs are
readily available in any UK city or town. Legalisation allows the drug market to be
controlled and regulated by the Government rather than the Mafia.
Q: Would legalisation lead to increased drug use?
- The drug market is demand-led and millions of people demand drugs for many different
reasons. The evidence shows that the increase in illegal drug use is beginning to slow
down. The market would appear to be saturated. Those who want to use illegal drugs are
using them. They are using despite some of the most punitive legislation in Europe. For
the most part people use drugs because they enjoy them. There is no evidence to suggest
that prohibition is a significant factor in influencing an individuals drug use.
- Prohibition has not discouraged 40% of children from trying an illegal drug.
- In Holland cannabis use amongst young people is lower than in the UK.
- The US has the worlds harshest drug laws and the worlds worst drug problem.
Q: Has Dutch drug policy has been a disaster
- Allowing Dutch citizens to buy cannabis in government regulated coffee shops has not led
to escalating cannabis use. Cannabis use amongst young people in Holland is about the same
as in the UK and the US.
- Prescribing heroin for addicts and not busting people for possession has led to one of
the lowest rates of heroin use in Europe. Unlike in the UK where heroin is on the increase
amongst teens, in Holland the average age of heroin users is 36 and rising. It is seen as
a loser’s drug amongst the young. The average age of heroin users in the UK is about
26 and falling.
Q: Would legalisation send out the wrong message?
Effective policy formation should neither condone nor condemn drug use but rather
accept the reality of the crisis we are facing and find effective ways to deal with it.
- The response to the AIDS crisis has involved safe sex education and handing out free
condoms and clean needles. Consequently the UK has one of the lowest HIV rates in the
world.
- People who do not practice safe sex are not imprisoned. On issues of personal lifestyle
choices, sending out the right message is the role of the public education system not
criminal justice
"Penalties against a drug should not be more dangerous to an
individual than use of the drug itself; and where they are they should be changed. Nowhere
is this more clear than in the laws against the possession of marijuana….Therefore I
support legislation to eliminate all federal penalties for the possession of up to one
ounce of marijuana"
President Jimmy Carter