The Threat to Civil
Liberties Newsletter of the MENSA Bioelectromagnetics Special
Interest Group
Source: NEXUS Magazine ** She has stated that her interest is in objective
reports only - not victim testimonials.**
Eleanor White's comments: This hard hitting article by
Judy Wall, who is NOT a mind control victim and in fact avoids victim
testimonials in favour of only factual objective material, contains
some POWERFUL items not widely known among involuntary mind control
experimentees. These items
in her article below have had the font size increased a notch so that
the visitor can scroll down and see just those items if time or
interest is short.
WAY TO GO, Judy!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
USAF COMMANDO SOLO: AERIAL MIND CONTROL BROADCASTS
The United States Air Force uses aerial mind-control
broadcasts against civilian population as well as enemy troops. Some
of these actions against civilians are done with the intent of
influencing public opinion and the outcome of elections.
In a previous article, we examined mind-control
technology, especially that utilizing Silent Sound [TM], in which
radio-frequency broadcasts carry subliminal patterns that entrain the
listener's brainwaves into a pre-selected emotional state. According
to ITV wire service reports, this technology was used during Operation
Desert Storm in 1991, as part of the US Psychological Operations
(PsyOps) directed against Iraqi
troops. [1,2]
To the Desert Storm offensive we can now add several
other incidents. Alex Horvat, editor of The Probe, calls to our
attention the 1998 video, Exotic Weapons of Mass Control, produced by
Bob Fletcher.
"The excerpt played on Fletcher's video is from TLC (The
Learning Channel) and clearly states that Commando Solo was used in
Haiti for what was called Operation Uphold Democracy. As the general
populace was violently opposed to Aristide and most in favor of his
ouster, it took nearly a year of this clandestine counter-programming
to get them to change their minds. Instead of butchering a population
physically, we
can no manipulate them mentally, virtually enslaving their thoughts
with a criss-cross pattern of flights by an EC-130 (which is just a
C-130 heavily laden with electronic hardware.) [3]
We were not at war with the citizens of Haiti, yet the
U.S. Government directed military weapons against this friendly, or at
least neutral, civilian population. The U.S. Government sanction the
"rigging" of the Haitian election by mental control of the people,
programming them to cast their votes for the Americans' favored
candidate. And they had the
nerve to call it "Operation Uphold Democracy". Some sense of humor!
Stalin would have loved it. Hitler would have loved it. Why is the
U.S. Government doing this? Who is behind this flagrant violation of
civil liberties? Is it the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
which has a long history of interfering in foreign government
politics? Or has this become standard military procedure?
The rationale is always the same: "to make the world
safe for democracy". Yet what is democracy if not freedom? Freedom to
think your own thoughts; freedom to express your own opinions;
freedome to vote for the candidate of your own choice.
Fletcher's video also mentions that the same technology
was used against the Bosnia population for a week to influence their
election. [4] This was probably done during Operation Joint Guard in
1995. [5]
The questions arise: If they have used mind-control
broadcasts against foreign civilian populations to influence
elections, will they use them against American citizens or have they
already? What other countries may be the recipients of this innovative
technology?
Just what is this EC-130E Commando Solo? The United
States Air Force has helpfully published a fact sheet that describes
the Lockheed built aircraft. [6] This 1995 bulletin states that the
"unit flyaway cost" is more than US $100 million each, and that there
are eight in the inventory. Its primary function is "Psychological
operations broadcasts". The crew consists of four officers (pilot,
copilot, navigator, control chief/EWO) and seven enlisted members
(flight engineer, loadmaster, five mission crew.)
According to the fact sheet:
"Air Force Mission: Commando Solo conducts psychological
operations and civil affairs broadcast missions in the standard AM,
FM, HF, TV and military communications bands. Missions are flown at
maximum altitudes possible to ensure optimum propagation patterns. The
EC-130 flies during either day or night scenarios with equal success,
and is air refuealable. A typical mission consists of a single ship
orbit which is offset from the desired target audience. The targets
may be either
military or civilian personnel.
"Secondary missions include command and control
communications countermeasures (C3CM) and limited intelligence
gathering.
"Air Force Features: Highly specialized modifications
have been made to the latest version of the EC-130. Included in these
modifications are enhanced navigation systems, self-protection
equipment, and the capability of broadcasting color television on a
multitude of world-wide
standards throughout the TV VHF/UHF ranges.
"Air Force Background: Air National Guard EC-130
aircraft flown by the 193rd Special Operations Group were deployed to
both Saudi Arabia and Turkey in support of Desert Storm. Their
missions included broadcasts of 'Voice of the Gulf' and other programs
intended to convince Iraqi soldiers to surrender.
"The EC-130 was originally modified using the mission
electronic equipment from the EC-121, known at the time as the Coronet
Solo. Soon after the 193rd SOG received its EC-130s, the unit
participated in the rescue of US citizens in Operation Urgent Fury,
acting as an airborne radio station informing those people on Granada
of the US military action.
"Volant Solo, as the mission is now known, was
instrumental in the success of coordinated psychological operations in
Operation Just Cause, again broadcasting continuously throughout the
initial phases of the operation."
Operation Just Cause? this is another propaganda name,
applied to the U.S. invasion of Panama to take out that country's
leader, General Noreiga, the CIA's erstwhile partner in drug
smuggling. Apparently the General had made someone mad--how else to
account for the massive invasion of this tiny tourist country? To wit:
"A superpower whipped the poop out of 10 percent of the police force
of a Third World nation. You are supposed to be able to do that. It
was done well, and I credit those who did it. But it is important that
we draw the right lessons from it" according to an anonymous US
Marine. [7]
Our Commander-in-Chief had another point of view:
"...the roll call of glory, the roster of great American campaigns --
Yorktown, Gettysburg, Normandy, and now Panama." MILITARY PSYOPS AGAINST CIVILIANS
In a phone call to the USAF Special Operations Command
Public Affairs Office, I questioned the legitimacy of using these
subliminal broadcasts against civilian populations. [9]
[Judy Wall's article on Silent Sound for details.]
I was told that it was all perfectly legal, having been
approved by the U.S. Congress (!). It may be okay by Congress, but I
sincerely doubt that it would be approved by the recipient
populations.
That conversation also elicited more information
concerning the Commando Solo units. For instance, the Air National
Guard of the individual states in the U.S. can also operate Commando
Solo aircraft, should the Governor of a state request assistance. That
means the PsyOps mind-control technology can be directed against U.S.
citizens.
The Commando Solo aircraft have participated in the
following missions--possibly more, as the early missions of Volant
Solo 1 were not known to this spokesperson:
- Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada, Oct-Nov 1983, Jan-Jun
1985) Other countries are known to have a similar aircraft,
but the PR officer declined to identify them, suggesting that I check
out Jane's Defence Weekly for such information. Not having access to
that particular publication, I searched through my copy of Jane's
Radar and Electronic Warfare Systems 1993094. [10]
The Commando Solo unit was not listed, but a browse
through the book was informative as to the numerous types of
electronic offence and defence systems available. These include
stationary and mobile land units (many housed in large trucks),
shipboard and airborne models as well as well as space-based
technology. If the military is spending US $100 million
per airborne unit (times eight, we're talking US $800 million here), I
think it is safe to assume that they have tried out mind control
equipment with less expensive, roving land units (trucks), but use the
airplanes to cover wider areas and hard-to-reach locations of the
world.
And I might add, we can asume that they have tried out
the efficacy of this mind-control technology. Even the US military
would not waste $800 million on something unless it has been proven to
work, and work effectively, even under the adverse situation of
military combat. This is an important point.
The initial research into mind control in the USA was
conducted udner the auspices of the CIA. The flagrant abuse of human
rights in experimenting on unsuspecting persons was based on the
supposition that the veracity of experiments would be compromised if a
subject knew that he was participating in an experiment. In the case
of mind-control technology, this supposition might very well be true.
But that does not justify its use -- or so said the Nuremburg Code,
the tenets of which
were used as a legal basis to prosecute Nazi scientists for war
crimes. However the US seems to have excused its own military and
scientific community from adhering to that Code. [11]
MANIPULATING MIND AND BODY BY SATELLITE
The next logical step in mind control would be to
incorporate this technology into satellite communications. Since other
countries are known to have similar capabilities, there could occur a
sitution in which electronic mind control warfare is waged against a
civilian population, receiving conflicting mental manipulation from
both sides. What would be the mental state of individuals so
targetted? Would it cause a rise in mental aberrations and
schizophrenia? And what are the limits of mind manipulations? Can
people be forced to commit suicide?
Can physical ailments or psychosomatic illnesses be induced?
A March 1990 report from Bosnia-Herzegovina in the
former Yugoslavia suggests the latter may have already happened. The
report concerns 2,990 ethnic Albanians who were admitted to hospital
with complaints of lung and skin problems for which doctors could find
no physical cause. [12]
It is not a far step from manipulating a person's
emotional state to influencing bodily functions. Indeed, much of the
literature on documenting microwave effects on biological systems
deals with precisely this phenomenon. In fact, studies of the physical
effects of microwave exposure (including radio frequencies) generally
preceeded studies of mental effects.
A meeting sponsored by Defense & Foreign Affairs and the
International Strategic Studies Association was held in Washington DC
in 1983. High-level officials from many countries met for this
conference. They discussed psychological strategies related to
government and policymaking. A summary of the agenda reads: "The group
will be discussing the essence of future policymaking, for it msut be
increasingly clear to all that the most effective tool of government
and strategy is the mind...
If it's any consolation to the weapons-oriented among
defense policymakers, the new technologies of communications --
satellites, television, radio, and mind-control beams -- are 'systems'
which are more tangible than the more philosophically based
psychological strategies and operations.
[Eleanor White's comment: Anyone know where to get a
copy?]
"But we should make no mistake; it will be the
'psychologically based' systems which determine the world's fate in
coming years: the condition of the minds of populations and leaders.
And we should not ignore the fact that the USSR [this was in 1983] is
working on electronic systems to 'beam' messages directly into the
brain. What good, then, are conventional systems if these types of
weapons are not countered? And, on a more basic level, what good is a
weapon system if public opinion or political constraints prohibit its
deployment?" [13]
It is obvious that they found the answer to that last
question. If the public does not know about a weapon system, it cannot
prohibit its deployment. This is the situtation that applies to
mind-control technology.
MIND CONTROL AGAINST 'POTENTIAL' ENEMIES
The US military is aware that certain actions or
procedures may not be acceptable to the American public. Metz and
Kievit express these concerns in their paper, "The Revolution in
Military Affairs and Short Conflict War."[14]
"The use of new technology may also run counter to basic
American values. Information age -- and in particular, information
warfare -- technologies cause concerns about privacy... American
values also make the use of directed-energy weapons ... morally
difficult, perhaps unacceptable.
Later they state: "We must decide whether innovative
military capabilities are, in fact, acceptable and desirable. That can
only happen through open debate. The military must be a vital
participant, but not the sole one."
But there has been no open debate.
On July 21, 1994, the US Department of Defense proposed
that non-lethal weapons be used not only against declared enemies, but
against anyone engaged in activities that the DOD opposed. That could
include almost anybody and anything. Note that the mind-control
technology is classified under non-lethal weapons. [15]
A 1998 news item states that US Air Force General John
Jumper "predicts that the military will have the tools to make
potential enemies see, hear, and believe things that do not exist"
and that "The same idea was contained in a 15-volume study by the USAF
Scientific Advisory Board, issued in 1996, on how to maintain US air
and space superiority on the battlefields of the 21st century".
[16,17]
It seems that, in miltary parlance, a "prediction"
means: "Don't be surprised when you find out we've already got this,
but it's classified and we can't admit to it just yet."
Notice that General Jumper predicts that mind control
technology will be used against potential enemies. The military and
government agencies may apply this term to any group or individual
they perceive as a threat to their own interests. Potential enemies
may be counter-culture individuals, those of opposing political
viewpoints, economic or financial competitors, biological
undesirables, etc. It is part of the
military agenda to identify potential threats so as to be prepared to
meet them. Experience has shown that the US Government (the CIA and
FBI, for example) has moved against these people or groups,
slandering, harassing, even killing them, without adequate cause or
legal sanction.
A weapon that can be used in secret lends itself to
abuse by unethical individuals in positions of power. The military and
secret services have shown themselves often to be lacking in ethical
constraints. After all, the job of the military is war; it is killing
people; and so, just how this is accomplished may be considered
irrelevant. Lesser evils, like
mind control, pale by comparison.
Of course, it can be argued that it is far more humane
to brainwash a person via mind control technology than it is to
torture or kill them. Others vehemently deny this. They'd rather be
dead than a mental slave to Big Brother! That is what revolutions are
about. And if I recall correctly, that is the idea behind the US Bill
of Rights.
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WARNS OF DANGERS
Awareness of the existence of mind-control technology,
and hence its dangers and possibility for misuse, seems to be more
prevalent in Europe than in other areas. The European Parliament
recently passed a "Resolution on environment, security, and foreign
policy". [18] This document includes these articles:
"23. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new
'non-lethal' weapons technology and the development of new arms
strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions...
"27. Calls for an international convention introducing a
global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might
enable any form of manipulation of human beings."
The United States will ignore these resolutions, of
course, as it has other EP requests; for example, as mentioned in the
same document:
"24. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral
Research Project) by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the
environment to be a global concern and calls for it's legal,
ecological and ethical implcations to be examined by an international
independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the
repeated refusal of the United States
Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public
hearing or any subsequent meeting to be held by its competent
committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the
HAARP programme currently being funded in Alaska..."
One of HAARP's potential uses is a communications
system. The military officially acknowledges two
communications-related applications: (1) to replace the existing
Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communications system now
operating in Michigan and Wisconsin; (2) to provide a way to wipe out
communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the
miltary's own communications system working. [19]
As we have seen, the mind-control subliminal messages
are carried on radiofrequency broadcasts.
[Judy Wall's article on Silent Sound for details.]
The HAARP facility could be used to broadcast global
mind-control messages, or such messages could simply be inserted into
existing systems.
Dr. Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-correction
in Moscow, says in regard to this technology: "It is easily
conceviable that some Russian 'Satan', or let's say Iranian [or any
other 'Satan'], as long as he owns the appropriate means and finances,
can inject himself [intrude]
into every conceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio
or television broadcast, with relative technological ease, even
without disconnecting cables. You can intercept the [radio] waves in
the aether and then [subliminally] modulate every conceivable
suggestion into it. If this transpires over a long enough time period,
it accumulates in the heads of people. And eventually they can be
artificially manipulated with other additional measurements, to do
that which this perpetrator
wants [them to do]. This is why [such technology] is rightfully
feared." [20]
A WORLDWIDE MIND CONTROL MISSION
To return to the USAF Fact Sheet, it concludes: "In 1990
the EC-130 joined the newly formed Air Force Special Operations
Command and has since been designated Commando Solo, with no change in
mission. This one of a kind aircraft is consistently improving its
capabilities.
The next few years should see continued enhancements to
the EC-130 and its worldwide mission."
About the Author:
Judy Wall is the Editor of RESONANCE, the newsletter of
the Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group of American MENSA Ltd.
Viewpoints expressed here are her own personal views.
ENDNOTES
1. Wall, Judy, "Military Use of Mind Control Weapons",
NEXUS, 5/06, Oct-Nov 1998
2. "Psychological operations" are defined as: "Planned
operations to convery selected information and indicators to foreign
audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning,
and ultimately the behavior of foreign governments, organizations,
groups and individuals. The purpose of psychological operations is to
induce or re-inforce foreign attitudes and behavior favorable to the
originator's
objectives. Also called PsyOps." From "Joint Doctrine for Information
Operations", Joint publication 3-13, 9 October 1998. Thanks to Harlan
Girard of the International Committee on Offensive Microwave Weapons
(PO Box 58700, Philadelphia PA 19102-8700, USA) for the excerpt.
3. Horvat, Alex, "Commando Solo", The Probe, vol. 4, No.
1, Winter 1998/99, p.44; available from PO Box 905, St. Peters, MO
63376, USA.
4. Fletcher, Bob, Exotic Weapons of Mass Control; video
available from The Probe (see above) or Global Insights, A675 Fairview
Dr. #246, Carson City NV, 89701 USA, tel 1-800-729-4131.
5. An item of interest is that the US had a new type of
aerial reconnaissance plane positioned over the former Yugoslavia from
July 14, 1995, about six months before the US officially intervened.
The 10-million-dollar unmanned saucer-shaped spy craft is nicknamed
"Dark Star". Information from C-Com (Classified Communications >
3(12), Dec 1995; Erich A. Aggen, Jr., (editor), citing CE Chronicles
nos. 1 and 2 and Raising Awareness newsletter.
6. Fact Sheet, dated March 1995. The address on the
publication is AF Special Operations Command Public Affairs Office,
100 Bartley Street, Hurlburt Field, FL 32544-5273, USA. They no longer
supply printed copies, but you can access the document at
http://www.hurlburt.af.mi
7. Morrison Taw, Jennifer, "Operation Just Cause:
Lessons For Operations Other Than War", Rand Corp., 1996, p. vii;
quoting from "Some Questions Whether the US Is Ready for LIC", Navy
News and Undersea Technology, August 27, 1990, p.7.
8. Morrison Taw, Jennifer, ibid,. p.1.
9. Telephone conversation of February 26, 1999, with AF
Special Operations Command Public Affairs Office; voice (850)
884-5515, email paprhode@h...
10. Blake, Bernard (ed.) Jane's Radar and
Electronic Warfare Systems 1993-94, Jane's Information Group Inc.,
1340 Braddock Place, Suite 300, Alexandria VA 22314-1651, USA; also
Jane's Information Group, Sentinel House, 163 Brighton Road, Couldson,
Surrey CR5 2NH, UK.
11. (a) "US Nullifies Nuremburg Law", Earth Island
Journal, Winter 1996-97. (b) Hightower, Jim, "Unregulated Experiments
on Humans", New Times, June 19-25, 1997; cites Stolberg, Sheryl Gay,
"Unchecked Research People Raises Concern on Medical Ethics", New York
Times, May 14, 1997. (c) See "Ban on Medical Experiments Without
Consent is Relaxed", New York Times, November 5, 1996, p.1; copy
available for 50 cents from
David Park Brooks, 3456 17th St., San Francisco CA 94110. (d) Also
see Senator John Glenn's bill S-193, "Human Subjects Research
Protection Act of 1997", Congressional Record, US Senate, January 22,
1997. (e) "In 1994, a congressional subcommittee found up to 500,000
Americans between 1940 and 1974 were endangered by secred
defense-related tests including
radiation experiments, mustard gas, LSD and biological agents." See
Pitch Weekly, April 17-23, 1997.
12. Schaefer, Paul, "Experimentation and Warfare",
article citing The Kansas City Star, between March 25 and 31, 1990.
13. Summary, The Perth Corporation, Defense & Foreign
Affairs, November 1983.
14. Metz, Steven, and James Kievit, "The Revolution in
Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War", US Army War College,
Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-5050, USA, pp. 15-16 and 29. [See also
Krawczyk, Glenn, "Big Brother's Recipe for 'Revolution in Military
Affairs'", NEXUS 2/26, June-July 1995.]
15. Schaefer, Paul, "Psyops: Invisible Warfare", Zuni
Mountain Citizen (precise date unknown, late 1998/ early 1999), p.5.
16. "Microwave Weapons", Microwave News, March/April
1998; Louis Slesin (editor), citing Aviation Week, March 9, 1998.
17. Same article as above, citing Microwave News,
January/February 1997.
18. "Environment, Security, and Foreign Affairs",
Resolution A40005/99, Minutes of 28/01/99 - Provisional Edition,
European Parliament. For copy, thanks to Grattan Healy, Advisor on
Energy & Research, Green Group in the European Parliament, LEO 2C35,
Rue Wiertz Straat, B-1047 Bruxelles, Belgium, email ghealy@e...
19. For more info on HAARP, see Begich, Nick and Jeanne
Manning, Angels Don't Play This HAARP, Earthpulse Press, PO Box
201393, Anchorage AK 99520, USA, Tel. (907) 249-9111.
20. From a German documentary, "Geheimes Russland:
Moskau - Die Zombies dr roten Zaren" ("Secret Russia: Moscow - The
Zombies of the Red Czars") aired on German TV network ZDF on December
22, 1998. Script translation by Jan Weisemann. The full text is to be
published in Resonance, No. 35.
21. Reed, Chris, Lockheed C-130 Hercules and Its
Variants, Schiffer Publishing Ltd, Atglen, PA, 1999.
by Judy Wall
Editor/Publisher - Resonance
684 County Road 535
Sumterville FL USA 33585
October-November 1999
Vol. 6, No. 6
--President George Bush, March 1990 [8]
- Operation Just Cause (Panama, late December 1989)
- Operation Desert Shield (Kuwait, Iraq, from August 1990)
- Operation Desert Storm (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iraq, 1991)
- Operation Uphold Democracy (Haiti, 1994-1995)
- Operation Joint Guard (Part of a UN oepration in Bosnia-Herzegovina,
1995)
- Operation Desert Thunder (part of a UN operation in Iraq)
- Operation Desert Fox (Iraq, 2 to 3 days in December 1998)