Pollution Credits perpetuate a fraud against citizens

The privilege of putting unwanted materials into the air and water as a way to get rid of them places burdens on the other users of the air and water. This privilege is valuable to industry. The users of the air and water who degrade this publicly owned resource ought to compensate the owners, ought to pay the people in proportion to how much they use it.

A government that issues a 'Pollution Credit' that allows the bearer to emit pollution at a specified rate in perpetuity would seem to be usurping a right of the people who will inhabit this earth in the future to decide what levels of pollution they will consider acceptable. But I suppose that any government that can decree that a permit allows, say, ten tons of emissions per year, can also decree that that same permit will subsequently allow only one ton of emissions per year.

The apparently standard practice of government granting permits to pollute to those entities which have historically been big polluters is a travesty. It ought not be true that someone who has a history of fouling the air and water is awarded official permission to continue for some period into the future simply by virtue of their past tresspass on the commons. These permits ought to be valid only for limited periods of time, and they ought to be sold at auction to the highest bidder, to ensure that the limited resources are only used for those purposes that the people consider important enough that they are willing to actually pay the price involved.

The problem with 'pollution credits' which give the bearer the right to pollute at a specified rate in perpetuity is that the market in pollution credits will not involve the public at large, the ultimate owners of the natural resources in question. Any trading of these 'credits' would only reflect changes in activity among polluters and users of resouces. The market would not reflect actual use. The system of fees for the taking of resources and putting of pollution that involve time-limited permits avoids this problem. The transaction is between the user of resources and the public at large. The market reflects actual use of resources, and it includes the people as a party to the transaction. (If ownership of 'perpetual rights' permits were taxed at a rate close to the return earned on well-invested money, then a 'perpetual rights' system can be effectively transformed into a system of payment to the people in proportion to actual use.)


A Capitalism-Communism Synthesis
Walter Cronkite at the first World Court
Cronkite for President - Can we find someone, (someone over 35 years old), who we could most all agree on for our next President? Someone who we would want to vote for?
List of Cronkite Links at this site.
Gaia Brain: democratic ownership and free market management of natural resources

Sign Guestbook - View Guestbook

© 1998 gaiabrainearths@oocities.com

to the center of the Gaia Brain/Cronkite Draft page