ISLAM 2
(A Fact Sheet)
Christianity |
Islam |
|
God |
|
|
Jesus |
|
|
Holy Spirit |
Third person of the Godhead |
The angel Gabriel |
Trinity |
God the Father is God Jesus is God The Holy Spirit is God |
|
Abraham |
|
|
Christianity |
Islam |
|
Adam |
|
|
Man |
|
|
Salvation |
|
|
Christianity |
Islam |
|
Hereafter |
|
|
Satan |
|
|
Polygamy |
Condemned |
Allowed . Up to four wives. |
Fornication and Adultery |
Condemned |
Condemned |
Homosexuality |
Condemned |
Condemned |
Bible |
The inerrant Word of God |
Has been corrupted over the years and superceded by the Qur’an |
Apostate |
Per the Qur’an, must be put to death if doesn’t repent |
Christianity |
Islam |
|
How Spread during the time of Jesus and Muhammad |
Spread non-violently by Jesus and His Disciples |
Spread by the sword by Muhammad and his Caliphs. Those who were conquered were given the option of accepting Islam or death. The "People of the Book" (Jews & Christians) given the options of choosing Islam, paying a tax or death. |
Lawful to shed the blood of a believer |
Never |
For (1) infidelity to the faith, (2) adultery after marriage and (3) killing a soul without a right |
Women |
The Bible commands husbands to love their wives . |
|
Christianity |
Islam |
|
Angels |
Believes in angels |
|
How revelation received |
Jesus received directly from God |
Muhammad received through the angel Gabriel |
Jesus vs. Muhammad
Jesus |
Muhammad |
Claimed to be God, Diety |
Never claimed to be God, only a prophet |
Performed miracles |
Did not perform miracles. Muslims say the Qur’an is his miracle |
Died and was resurrected |
Died and still dead |
Prophesied |
Never prophesied |
Jesus forgave sins |
Never forgave sins |
Was sinless |
Was a sinner |
Waged no war |
Waged war |
Ordered the death of no-one |
Ordered the death of many |
Will come again to rule |
Will not come back |
Mentioned in the Qur’an 97 times |
Mentioned in the Qur’an 25 times |
Qur’an Reliability
TO EVERY MUSLIM AN ANSWER |
by Joseph P. Gudel |
Preservation of the Qur’an?
Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall, in The Meaning of the Glorious Koran, tells us that at the time of Muhammad’s death the surahs (or chapters) of the Qur’an had not yet been collated. This was accomplished during the Caliphate of Abu Bakr.9
The second Caliph, Omar, "subsequently made a single volume (mushaf) that he preserved and gave on his death to his daughter Hafsa, the Prophet’s widow."10 Finally, under the Caliphate of Uthman all copies of the Qur’an were ordered to be brought in and any that deviated from Uthman’s text were burned.
We have no quarrel with the Islamic position that since the Recension of Uthman the Qur’an has remained intact. However, because of the destruction of all deviant copies no one can know with any certainty if the present Qur’an is exactly the same as what Muhammad gave them.
Islam teaches that the only reason Uthman had all the other collections of the Qur’an burned except his was that there were slight dialectical variations in the different texts. However, there is some evidence which tends to refute this.
First of all, it is very significant that the Qurra, the Muslims who had memorized the entire Qur’an, were vehemently opposed to the Recension. And second, the Shi’ites, who are the second-largest Islamic sect in the world, claim that the Caliph Uthman intentionally eliminated many passages from the Qur’an which related to Ali and the succession of leadership which was to occur after Muhammad’s death.
L. Bevan Jones, in his work The People Of the Mosque, succinctly answers the Muslim argument for the alleged miraculous preservation of the Qur’an: "But while it may be true that no other work has remained for twelve centuries with so pure a text, it is probably equally true that no other has suffered so drastic a purging."11
Bible Reliabiltiy
TO EVERY MUSLIM AN ANSWER |
by Joseph P. Gudel |
The Reliability of the Bible
For Muslims the Bible is virtually worthless as far as being an authentic revelation from God. They believe it has been totally corrupted and is therefore not trustworthy. However, if we examine the biblical documents, using the same thorough standards any historiographer would use, we discover that its reliability is unimpeachable.
The New Testament documents, for example, have more manuscript authority than any 10 works of antiquity put together. As mentioned earlier, we have over 24,000 manuscript copies of portions of the New Testament dating from before A.D. 350. In comparison, the number two book in all of ancient history for manuscript authority is the Iliad with 643 manuscripts.
Dr. John Warwick Montgomery, dean of the Simon Greenleaf School of Law and a noted theologian, comments on this: "To be skeptical of the resultant text of the New Testament books is to allow all of classical antiquity to slip into obscurity, for no documents of the ancient period are as well attested bibliographically as the New Testament."31
When we turn to the text of the New Testament itself we see that the writers of the New Testament books claimed that they were eyewitnesses, or close associates of eyewitnesses, of the events they narrated.32 We also have excellent external evidence confirming this. Papias, a disciple of the apostle John, confirms the fact that Mark did indeed write the Gospel which is ascribed to him, obtaining his information from the apostle Peter.33 Polycarp, another disciple of the apostle John, taught his own disciple Irenaeus that the men to whom the four Gospels are ascribed were in truth their real authors.34
In addition to these evidences we can also add the findings of modern archaeology. Time after time archaeology has vindicated biblical accounts which had previously been ridiculed as being grossly inaccurate.35 Concerning this, Nelson Glueck, a world-famous Jewish archaeologist, went so far as to say that "it may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference."36
In any responsible examination of the biblical documents the evidence for their reliability comes out positive. Even well-known secular historians accept the biblical accounts as being historically reliable. A.N. Sherwin-White, a non-Christian, accepts without question the essential reliability of the Gospels and the Book of Acts:
For Acts the confirmation of historicity is overwhelming...any attempt to reject its historicity in matters of detail must now appear absurd. Roman historians have long taken it for granted.37
It is very interesting to note that Yusuf Ali, in his widely used English translation of the Qur’an, twice cites Sir Frederick Kenyon as a renowned authority.38 Kenyon, formerly the principal curator of the British Museum, was one the world’s greatest authorities on textual criticism of ancient works. Concerning the textual reliability of the Bible, he concluded that "the Christian can take the whole Bible in his hand and say without fear or hesitation that he holds in it the true Word of God."39
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When we consider the New Testament, however, we find a completely different scenario. We have today in our possession 5,300 known Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, another 10,000 Latin Vulgates, and 9,300 other early versions (MSS), giving us more than 24,000 manuscript copies of portions of the New Testament in existence today! (taken from McDowell's Evidence That demands a Verdict, vol.1, 1972 pgs.40-48; and Time, January 23, 1995, pg.57).
Author |
Date Written |
Earliest Copy |
Time Span |
Copies (extent) |
Secular Manuscripts: |
||||
Herodotus (History) |
480 - 425 BC |
900 AD |
1,300 years |
8 |
Thucydides (History) |
460 - 400 BC |
900 AD |
1,300 years |
? |
Aristotle (Philosopher) |
384 - 322 BC |
1,100 AD |
1,400 years |
5 |
Caesar (History) |
100 - 44 BC |
900 AD |
1,000 years |
10 |
Pliny (History) |
61 - 113 AD |
850 AD |
750 years |
7 |
Suetonius (Roman History) |
70 - 140 AD |
950 AD |
800 years |
? |
Tacitus (Greek History) |
100 AD |
1,100 AD |
1,000 years |
20 |
Biblical Manuscripts: (note: these are individual manuscripts) |
||||
Magdalene Ms (Matthew 26) |
1st century |
50-60 AD |
co-existant (?) |
|
John Rylands (John) |
90 AD |
130 AD |
40 years |
|
Bodmer Papyrus II (John) |
90 AD |
150-200 AD |
60-110 years |
|
Chester Beatty Papyri (N.T.) |
1st century |
200 AD |
150 years |
|
Diatessaron by Tatian (Gospels) |
1st century |
200 AD |
150 years |
|
Codex Vaticanus (Bible) |
1st century |
325-350 AD |
275-300 years |
|
Codex Sinaiticus (Bible) |
1st century |
350 AD |
300 years |
|
Codex Alexandrinus (Bible) |
1st century |
400 AD |
350 years |
(Total New Testament manuscripts = 5,300 Greek MSS, 10,000 Latin Vulgates, 9,300 others = 24,000 copies)
(Total MSS compiled prior to 600 AD = 230)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Are the Biblical Documents Reliable?, Jimmy Williams, Probe Ministries]
© 1995-1999
Leadership U.
Author and Work |
Author's Lifespan |
Date of Events |
Date of Writing* |
Earliest Extant MS** |
Lapse: Event to Writing |
Lapse: Event to MS |
Matthew, |
ca. 0-70? |
4 BC - AD 30 |
50 - 65/75 |
ca. 200 |
<50 years |
<200 years |
Mark, |
ca. 15-90? |
27 - 30 |
65/70 |
ca. 225 |
<50 years |
<200 years |
Luke, |
ca. 10-80? |
5 BC - AD 30 |
60/75 |
ca. 200 |
<50 years |
<200 years |
John, |
ca. 10-100 |
27-30 |
90-110 |
ca. 130 |
<80 years |
<100 years |
Paul, |
ca. 0-65 |
30 |
50-65 |
ca. 200 |
20-30 years |
<200 years |
Josephus, |
ca. 37-100 |
200 BC - AD 70 |
ca. 80 |
ca. 950 |
10-300 years |
900-1200 years |
Josephus, |
ca. 37-100 |
200 BC - AD 65 |
ca. 95 |
ca. 1050 |
30-300 years |
1000-1300 years |
Tacitus, |
ca. 56-120 |
AD 14-68 |
100-120 |
ca. 850 |
30-100 years |
800-850 years |
Seutonius, |
ca. 69-130 |
50 BC - AD 95 |
ca. 120 |
ca. 850 |
25-170 years |
750-900 years |
Pliny, |
ca. 60-115 |
97-112 |
110-112 |
ca. 850 |
0-3 years |
725-750 years |
Plutarch, |
ca. 50-120 |
500 BC - AD 70 |
ca. 100 |
ca. 950 |
30-600 years |
850-1500 years |
Herodotus, |
ca. 485-425 BC |
546-478 BC |
430-425 BC |
ca. 900 |
50-125 years |
1400-1450 years |
Thucydides, |
ca. 460-400 BC |
431-411 BC |
410-400 BC |
ca. 900 |
0-30 years |
1300-1350 years |
Xenophon, |
ca. 430-355 BC |
401-399 BC |
385-375 BC |
ca. 1350 |
15-25 years |
1750 years |
Polybius, |
ca. 200-120 BC |
220-168 BC |
ca. 150 BC |
ca. 950 |
20-70 years |
1100-1150 years |
*Where a slash occurs, the first date is conservative, and the second is liberal.
**New Testament manuscripts are fragmentary. Earliest complete manuscript is from ca. 350; lapse of event to complete manuscript is about 325 years.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------