SMS MKT ou Mobile Marketing

 


 

SMS: Response-able Marketing
 

BY DARRYL NELSON (profile) | June 10, 2003
 

Attitudes in mobile phone use in Australia confirm marketers should view mobiles as a channel for customer response, rather than a delivery channel for marketing activities. "SMS is a wonderful response mechanism but with 160 characters, it's really a terrible advertising medium," says Niki Scevak, senior analyst, Jupiter Research, Australia.

A new survey by Jupiter Research (which shares the same parent as this publication) also suggests that people are more interested in enhanced utility through their handsets rather than entertainment, particularly in terms of communication.

"The trend is all about communicating. In terms of commercial value, communication has always been proven to be more valuable than content," explains Scevak. "There's much more demand for applications that enable people to communicate with each other, and for more enhanced, richer communication."

The report finds that, despite Australia having one of the highest relative costs for sending SMS, it also has one of the highest average user rates. Seven million people (approximately half of Australia's mobile phone users) each send on average 44 messages every month.

There is also growing evidence of participation in marketing events. TV promotions lead the way, with 21 percent saying they had entered a competition or voted via SMS (over the last 12 months) in response to a TV campaign, while 15 percent responded to food or drink packaging, 5 percent to radio promotions and 4 percent to print promotions.

The demand for communication over content is highlighted by interest in next-generation mobile services. The most popular services users said they'd be interested in using were: photo messaging (35 percent), accessing local information such as maps, restaurants and transport timetables (32 percent) and sending e-cards (23 percent).

In contrast, content such as various file downloads, video news and financial information were all considered desirable by far less people.

The revenue-share barrier

By far and away the greatest amount of SMS activity in Australia is person-to-person. Of a projected 4 billion messages that will be sent this year, 3.7 billion will be P-to-P. The remainder are person-to-application (A-to-P), such as entry to competitions, and clearly this is an area where considerable growth is possible.

The vast majority of mobile users still don't use their phones for this activity. The report shows 69 percent of users have not entered a competition or voted via SMS within the last year at all, and Jupiter predicts A-to-P SMS usage will grow from 7 percent this year to only 12 percent in 2008.

Scevak believes this is because the market lacks promotions compelling enough for users to respond to, which in turn relates to the lack of incentive the current revenue-share structure provides to businesses: "If the telcos don't give incentive to media and business clients to drive these services, they'll miss out."

"It's easy to see that a smaller share of a larger pie is better than what we have now," he argues.

Carriers here typically share only 30-40 percent of A-to-P revenues, which at current SMS rates means only a few cents per message. However, the report also says the introduction of premium-rate SMS services will help shift the telcos' stance on these deals. Greater pricing flexibility, and hence the opportunity for larger margins, will make driving A-to-P services more attractive to all parties.

Scevak believes Australia will follow arrangements in other markets, where telcos in Europe share an estimated 50-70 percent of premium-rate revenues and as high as 70-80 percent in China: "It really is inevitable that, over time, these revenue-share deals will change in favour of the promoters."

And while he admits it still remains to be seen whether Australians are ready to start paying premium-rate SMS charges, he again cites experiences in more mature markets as a clear indication they will: "In Norway, premium-rate SMS accounts for only 3 percent of the total messages sent, but 20 percent of the value, so it's proven that people are comfortable using it." [link original]

 


 

SMS marketing could be patented

 

A relative newcomer to the telecommunications industry has a patent pending for its interactive promotional text messaging product that will have far-reaching implications. Cool 123 is an up and coming New Zealand-based research and development company that had filed for patent in New Zealand and internationally for its real-time interactive promotional SMS product that includes voting and polling.

“The exciting thing about this patent is that it broke new ground by introducing SMS marketing,” says Bryan Smith , Marketing Director for Pipers Patent Attorneys who are representing Cool 123.

First introduced by Cool 123 in 2000, the interactive text messaging product provides a platform with which anyone who owns a mobile phone can interact with advertising and media campaigns. This could include sending a keyword or code from a billboard, media advertisement or product packaging to enter a competition, and then being able to receive a reply via a ‘sms-coupon’, ‘sms-voucher’, or ‘sms-tickets’ to their mobile phone.

Although the product has been utilised for the past two years, it has yet to be granted a patent but once it is, it will have widespread global implications for the telecommunications industry in the future.

As SMS based voting and polling has been in use in several countries for the past few years, it is difficult to see how this patent could pass due diligence. However, the workings of patent offices is a strange world, and if granted this could have a serious impact on the growth of SMS and interactive television.

[link original]

 


 

SMS Marketing: More Value 4 Ur $
 

BY DARRYL NELSON (profile) | June 04, 2003
Mobile marketing in Australia is still primarily about SMS campaigns, yet some results are starting to underline its strategic value. According to David Burden, CEO, Legion Interactive, Coca-Cola's first "Summerdays" campaign in 2001 saw 2.4 million valid entries, while a follow-up promotion produced a further 3.4 million entries.

Despite multiple entry channels, a staggering 97 percent of those entries were received via SMS, says Burden. "We're seeing a lot of activity around promotional campaigns, with SMS as an entry channel for competitions," he adds.

With such growing importance to marketing strategies, the Australian Direct Marketing Association (ADMA) has made moves to include SMS in its Code of Practice, and will be launching the initiative at the Pan Pacific conference this month.

All members of the ADMA have agreed to an opt-in policy for SMS marketing lists, and the organization will be adding a 'Do Not SMS' register to its website. It already provides Do Not Mail and Do Not Call registers, allowing consumers to expressly opt out of receiving such marketing activities.

"We want the mobile market to be buoyant and for consumers not to worry about mobile marketing spam. The mobile phone is a very personal device, so it should be like that," explains Burden, who is also a director of the ADMA.

The mobile element

Because it's still primarily SMS-based, Burden argues mobile marketing is very much a component of a mixed marketing strategy, and not yet mature enough to run as a standalone campaign. "SMS is still only 160 characters, so it's not really very compelling. It needs to be supported through other channels," he says.

He does see that this will change to some degree with the emerging technologies of MMS and 3G networks, which will make content compelling enough to run standalone mobile marketing. However, he adds this is unlikely to be until 2006 at the earliest: "Until we get penetration of these types of devices, there wont be a massive uptake of standalone mobile campaigns."

Consequently, the use of mobile marketing remains restricted to a few key areas and players. As well as part of major brand promotions, such as with Coca-Cola, SMS is also being used in conjunction with outdoor media.

Burden cites the case of St George Bank, which has been successfully running promotions at AFL and NRL matches. Billboards within the stadia invite participation via SMS from the watching fans: "It's really the only mechanism that enables them to respond without leaving their seat," adds Burden.

Advertising or revenue?

Perhaps the greatest success is being seen among media businesses, which are using it for increased interaction with audiences. SMS is having a particularly significant effect with TV networks. A survey in Europe by Strand Consult reportedly found that premium-rate mobile TV-voting services generated more than EU85m (A$152m) in revenue in 2002.

The report highlighted Norway, where the population of 4.3m people managed to send more than 2.3 million SMS votes throughout their version of Pop Idol, which will soon begin stirring a new round of Pop Stars mania here.

However, Burden points out that Australia traditionally lags Europe by about 12-18 months, and many SMS campaigns here have run at a loss: "We've just launched premium-rate SMS services here, with Big Brother 3, so they're very new to Australia. The ability to generate revenues from these kinds of service is still viable, but most currently are not."

"For the TV networks, giving the viewer another reason to watch the channel is what they're most interested in," he says. Nevertheless, he adds that many TV executives are starting to look at the SMS response rates and wonder whether interactive TV services are not already here.

Niki Scevak, senior analyst, Jupiter Research (that shares the same parent as this publication), concurs, explaining that the phenomenon appears to be making huge investments in interactive TV infrastructure somewhat redundant: "There's already massive mobile penetration, and with premium rate SMS, there's now a revenue stream. It's really such a simple and elegant response mechanism." [link original]


Envie novos links!!!

 


WirelessBR é um site brasileiro de divulgação de tecnologia, independente, sem fins lucrativos, desvinculado de qualquer empresa, operadora de telefonia ou fabricante de equipamento. Seus integrantes e colaboradores são pessoas físicas atuando voluntariamente, sem remuneração. Tecnologia, neste caso, é sinônimo de organizações, empresas, produtos e serviços.  Há sempre  preocupação em citar as fontes. No entanto, se alguma pessoa , física ou jurídica,  sentir-se prejudicada em seus direitos, basta um comunicado e a matéria  será reformulada .

A ComUnidade WirelessBrasil é o ecossistema virtual - e informal - formado pelos  Grupos de Debates Wirelessbr, Celld-group e pelos sites Teleco e WirelessBR, este criado e mantido pelos participantes dos Grupos. 
Nosso objetivo primordial é compartilhar gratuitamente informações e conhecimento na  área das telecomunicações - tecnologias, serviços e produtos. Tudo que é publicado nos sites é comentado nos Grupos. Tudo que é debatido nos Grupos gera atualização dos sites. 
Neste ambiente interagimos com muita cordialidade, cortesia, tolerância e paz - sempre fazendo novos amigos!  Estamos solidários e ajudando na colocação/recolocação de nossos profissionais e para isso mantemos uma página onde os currículos dos participantes são publicados gratuitamente.  Prezado leitor e internauta: Venha participar!  Venha ajudar!  [Veja mais detalhes]