GETTING THE FAT OUT
The
following was written by Bill Hull, minister of a church in Illinois.
The
20th century church is fat, laboring slowly uphill with potbelly
hanging out, gasping for air. We are out of shape indeed. Church growth
statistics don’t tell the real story. They serve more as a bathroom scale which
tells us how heavy the church is but doesn’t measure true muscular growth.
Churches have been labeled super, dynamic, mega, and so on – but not yet have I
heard of one being pronounced obese.
Allow
me to define “fat”. It involves scores of passive parishioners
sitting week after week and soaking up what is, in some cases, gourmet
preaching, but who are still infected with a disease called
“spectatorism”. This mass of untapped
potential is generally educated far beyond their level of obedience, and is not
translating Christian theory into practice.
Therefore,
what former football coach Bud Wilkerson says about
the physical fitness of our nation applies to the church as well. “On any given Sunday in the National
Football League we find 22 men on the field desperately in need of rest, while
in the stands sit 80,000 who are desperately in need of exercise.” There are many churches composed of one
minister leading scores of spectators. Yet, the biblical motif for the church
is one pastor leading an army of ministers (Ephesians 4:11-16).
Spectatorism
generally creates flabby, weak, spoon-fed believers who have grown old, but not
grown up, in the Lord. They know more about church policy than evangelism, and are
better acquainted with parliamentary procedure than with discipleship.
If we
were to diagnose the disease we could say that, on the surface, there seems to
be a lack of stamina and determination for ministry. However, if we were to trace it further, we
might find that the lack of ministry stamina and determination is because the
people don’t have enough motivation or vision to exercise their gifts and
abilities. This happens when the average
church member doesn’t know “how I fit” into the apparent puzzle of God’s
purpose. When we trace this situation
all the way to its starting point, quite often we find pastors who lack the
courage of their convictions.
Many
pastors believe in making ministers in the style of Ephesians 4:11-16 – once
maturity is reached, most members of the body are doing their part as ministers
and pulling their own weight. Then the
body “grows and builds itself up in love” (v. 16). But this involves sacrifice for the pastor on
several fronts.
First,
he must cease to be the Big Fisherman – the one doing the lion’s share of the
evangelism from the pulpit as well as on a personal basis. It will mean letting go of certain ministries
traditionally given to the clergy so that the laymen can function
properly. Since the New Testament’s
description of ministry lists more than 30 different functions, it is obvious
that one man cannot possibly do all the ministry.
A
major impediment to making ministers is pressure to produce numbers and to grow
at a rapid rate. So often this pressure
feeds on the pastor’s ego needs and sense of insecurity, and he sells out to
the quick fix. He takes the shortcut
style of fattening up the church in numbers, facilities, and budget.
But
making ministers means taking part in the risky business of getting close to a
few men and training them in various ministry skills. This is difficult, especially if the pastor
is not accustomed to it, because it takes time to build men.
Also
included would be phasing out various programs which are not making ministers,
along with forging into new territory to find effective vehicles of
discipleship. This would involve sufficient
change for the pastor to be misunderstood and criticized (since the cause of
every problem is change). Be assured
that making ministers will make enemies, beginning with Satan and anyone he can
recruit in the church.
In
spite of this, the benefits resulting from a serious discipleship thrust are so
attractive I believe, as to be well worth the necessary adjustments. The idea of hundreds of ministers involved in
the harvest is exciting. The
parishioners are already resident in the harvest field, and after they are
trained they become laborers in that same field.
If
you would like to get the fat out by making a serious attempt at making
ministers, may I suggest a general course of action.
The
first step is information. Get it. Know what you are talking about before you
begin to speak. Investigate the biblical
description for the purpose of the church.
Then determine the best possible method that will facilitate the realization
of that purpose. Remember, the
biblically stated purpose of the church is inspired, but the methods employed
in working toward the goal are up for grabs.
Read
available books on the subjects of discipleship and evangelism. Along with this, consider the resource
material offered by parachurch consulting groups. If need be, hire a consultant to evaluate
your local situation and allow him to suggest a tailor-made program for your
specific needs.
Once
again know what you are talking about.
Be able to articulate your position based on a biblical apologetic and
the benefits of pursuing a course of action.
The
second step is communication – selling the vision to the congregation without
alienating those who do not understand (which, by the way, will include a
good share of the leaders in the average congregation). Do not draw lines in the sand and ask those
who are truly spiritual and mean business with God to step over to the
discipleship side. Jesus didn’t use this
method until His followers were mature, so we should not expect anything more
of the average churchman. The key to
effectively selling the concept of evangelism and discipleship as the heart of
the church program lies in painting an attractive portrait of the possibilities
of how everyone can make a contribution, and how everyone counts.
The
parishioners must see how they fit into the big picture. Once they see this and understand how
everyone works together you will have them on your side.
The
third step is execution. Put it to work. The proof, as someone has said, is in the
putting. Execution is the Achilles heel
for a great many programs in general and discipleship in particular. We may possess the knowledge to make
ministers – along with the best sales technique – and the lion’s share of the
church may be “chomping at the bit” to get the fat out. But unless the vehicles we have designed to
make ministers are successful, the resurrection of parishioners and program
alike is next to impossible. I’d suggest
these ways to avoid common pitfalls.
First, build the foundation
well. Think big, but start small. Even though the program may not begin with a
splash, it will grow into something meaningful.
Second, never expand the program
beyond trained leadership. Nothing will
kill your efforts more quickly than nonproductive leaders. There must be quality control in our
disciple-making efforts.
Finally, be patient. Jesus selected the 12 after a year of
ministry. Don’t give in to pressure,
from well-meaning parishioners and fellow pastors alike, to get impressive
results quickly.
It is
interesting that the most important results the church is told to produce are
the most difficult to demonstrate – that is, the fruit of the Spirit. Many times, the results don’t show up right
away in large numbers and the temptation to question the value of what you have
committed yourself to can set in all too easily. But this temptation must be resisted at every
turn.
I
believe the purpose of the church is to glorify God and the most satisfying way
to achieve this is to bear fruit for God.
Bearing fruit is accomplished only by disciples (John 15:8). Therefore, the Great Commission, by
commanding the church to make disciples (Matt. 28:19), ultimately results in
God being glorified as disciples in the church bear fruit.
Making
ministers is the essence of the church’s task; and as we carry out that task,
we shape up the saints and get out the fat.