IS JESUS
CHRIST THE ONLY WAY TO GOD?
“Doesn’t the sincere
Muslim or Buddhist or Hindu worship the same God as the Christian, but under a
different name?” This question is often asked and is related to the questions
about the heathen and getting to heaven by living a moral life.
1.
There are many similarities between Christianity and other
religions in the moral and ethical realms. The equivalent of the Golden Rule and
the Ten Commandments can be found in most of the religions of the world. But as
we will see in the question, “Won’t a good moral life get me to heaven?”, systems of ethics are like “sets of swimming instructions”
and will never allow us to reach “
2.
Uniqueness of Christianity. Although similarities
exist, for example, between Christianity and Islam, the two faiths are
diametrically opposed on the most crucial question: Who is Jesus Christ? Islam
denies the deity of Christ, that Jesus Christ is the eternal Son of God. It
denies that He died on the cross and rose from the dead. But the Christian
faith affirms these facts on every hand. Both faiths cannot simultaneously be
true at this particular point. One is correct; one is incorrect.
The same is true of Hinduism. The greatest Hindu
disciple of modern times, Mohandus K. (Mahatma) Gandhi, refused to
believe that Christ was the only Savior and deliverer from sin. He wrote in his
autobiography:
“It was more than I could believe that Jesus was
the only incarnate Son of God, and that only he who believes in Him would have
everlasting life. If God could have sons, all of us were His sons. If Jesus was
like God, or God Himself, then all men were like God and could be God Himself.
My reason was not ready to believe literally that Jesus by His death and by His
blood redeemed the sins of the world. Metaphorically there might be some
truth in it .... I would accept Jesus as a martyr, an
embodiment of sacrifice, and a divine teacher, but not as the most perfect man
ever born. His death on the cross was a great example to the
world, but that there was anything like a mysterious or miraculous virtue in it
my heart could not accept” (Mahatma Gandhi, Autobiography, pp. 170,
171.) (italics mine).
No one questions the sincerity and intensity of
faith of Mahatma Gandhi. But sincerity or intensity of faith do not create
truth. Faith is no more valid than the object in which it is placed. Believing
something doesn’t make it true, and disbelieving in something doesn’t make it
false. We can believe whatever we wish but we have no right to change the basic
claims of Christianity to make it what we would like it to say. The question
is, “What is true?” And truth must be accepted on its own terms.
3. The claims of Christ are to be
reckoned with.
a.
Jesus
is a man of history. We know this from (1) the 27 different documents of the
New Testament (which were initially circulated separately and later
collected), (2) the writings of the church fathers (Polycarp, Eusebius,
Irenaeus, Ignatius, Justin, Origen, etc.), some of whom had personal
contact with the disciples themselves, and finally (3) the secular historians,
Josephus, Tacitus, Seutonius, Pliny, and Lucian.
b.
The
sources reveal the following things about Him and His life.
(1)
He claimed to be God (John 1:1, 14;
(2)
He claimed to be sinless (John
(3)
He demonstrated divine power over nature, disease, and death (Mark
(4)
He claimed that He alone could deal with man’s basic problem
– Sin (John
“For
it is an unbroken torture to me that I am still so far from Him, who, as I
fully know, governs every breath of my life, and whose offspring I am. I know
that it is the evil
passions
within that keep me so far from Him, and yet I cannot get away from them”
(italics mine).
All of the sacrifices of the Old Testament were
types and shadows, looking forward to that final substitutionary sacrifice
which would take away the sin of the world. “And not through the blood of goats
and calves, but through His own blood, He entered the holy place once for all,
having obtained eternal redemption... But now once at the consummation of the
ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself” (Heb.
4. On the basis of Christ’s claims, we
have four alternatives: He was either a liar, a
lunatic, a legend, or the Truth. If we say He is not the Truth, we are
automatically affirming one of the other three alternatives. When someone holds
one of the other three positions, we should invite them to show us the evidence
they have that would lead us to adopt their view.
a.
Liar. This view sets forth the premise that when Jesus claimed to
be God, He knew that He was not, but deliberately deceived His hearers to give
more authority to His teaching. Few would hold this position seriously. Even
those who deny His deity agree that Jesus was a great moral teacher. It would
seem highly unlikely that at the base of all this moral teaching was a
deliberate lie about His own identity.
b.
Lunatic. Some assert that Jesus was sincere, but deluded and
self-deceived. It is true that there are people today in institutions who
imagine they are Napoleon, George Washington, or even Jesus Christ. But we see
no evidence in Jesus of the abnormality and imbalance we find in a deranged
person. His poise and composure are not characteristic of people who suffer
from megalomania or some other paranoid disturbance.
c.
Legend. Many assert that much of what is recorded was never said by
Jesus at all, but rather attributed to Him by His enthusiastic followers in the
third and fourth centuries. They merely put words in His mouth, and if He were
here today, He would repudiate these ideas.
The problem with this position is that it tends
to disregard the findings of modern archeology. Recent discoveries are
confirming that the New Testament documents were written during the lifetime of
Jesus Christ’s contemporaries. The development of an elaborate legend would
need a more significant time lag. This lag does not exist with respect to
Christianity.
For example: People in that skeptical age would
have been no more likely to circulate and accept a legend such as this than our
neighbors today would be likely to spread a report that the late President John
F. Kennedy claimed to be God, said He had the power to forgive sins, and rose
from the dead. Too many people who knew President Kennedy are still around.
With so many testimonies to the contrary the rumor could never get off the
ground.
d.
Truth. The only other alternative is that Jesus spoke the truth.
Anyone can make the claims that Jesus made, but no one has ever backed them up
as He did. Jesus is the way to God. “I am the way, and the truth, and the life;
no man comes unto the Father but through me” (John 14:6). He is the
bridge to God. The
5.
Non-Christian Sources
for Christianity.
a.
Josephus, a Jewish historian, says: “As therefore Ananus was of such
a disposition, he thought he had now a good opportunity, as Festus was now
dead, and Albinus was still on the road; so he assembled a council of judges,
and brought before it the brother of Jesus the so-called Christ, whose name was
James, together with some others, and having accused them as law-breakers, he
delivered them over to be stoned.” Antiquities, XX 9:1, Early 2nd century.
b.
Tacitus (born A.D. 52 to 54), a Roman historian of the 2nd
century, in writing of the reign of Nero, alluded to the death of Christ and to
the existence of Christians at Rome: “But not all the relief that could come
from man, not all the bounties that the prince could bestow, nor all the
atonements which could be presented to the gods, availed to relieve Nero from
the infamy of being believed to have ordered the conflagration, the fire of
Rome. Hence to suppress the rumor, he falsely charged with the guilt, and
punished with the most exquisite tortures, the persons commonly called
Christians, who were hated for their enormities. Christus, the founder of the
name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of
c.
Seutonius (A.D. 120), another Roman historian of
the 2nd century, refers to a “Chrestus” who had led a new
superstition. He also says:
“Punishment by Nero was inflicted on the
Christians, a class of men given to a new and mischievous superstition.” Lives of the Caesars, Vitae Neronius XVI. 2.
d.
Pliny (A.D. 112 – Letter to Trajan), a regional leader of
the Roman government in writing to the emperor Trajan was seeking counsel as to
how to treat the Christians. He explained that he had been killing both men and women, boys and girls. There were so many being
put to death that he wondered if he should continue killing anyone who was
discovered to be a Christian, or if he should kill only certain ones. He
explained that he had made the Christians bow down to the statues of Trajan. He
goes on to say that he also “made them curse Christ, which a genuine Christian
cannot be induced to do.” In the same letter he says of the people who were
being tried that:
“They affirmed, however, that the whole of their
guilt, or their error, was, that they were in the habit of meeting on a certain
fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to
Christ as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked
deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft, or adultery, never to falsify
their word, not to deny a trust when they should be called on to deliver it up.”
Letter of Pliny to Trajan. Epistles
X. 96.
e.
Lucian, the satirist of the 2nd century, spoke
scornfully of Christ and the Christians.
He connected them with the synagogues of
“…the man who was crucified in