Hgeocities.com/cannabinoidscience/Brain.htmlgeocities.com/cannabinoidscience/Brain.htmlelayedxJ[ OKtext/html b.HWed, 14 Jul 2004 13:54:32 GMTMozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, *}J Brain Cannabis and the Brain

Despite some persistent claims to the contrary, there is no compelling evidence that cannabis use, even long-term heavy cannabis use, causes brain damage in humans. Block et al (2000) examined 18 heavy users and 13 controls with MRI and found no evidence of any regional tissue changes, contrary to older reports that  certain areas were atrophied in heavy users. In experiments approximating chronic use in mice-- up to 250mg/kg/day for 2 years-- no histopathological changes were observed (Chan et al, 1996). For comparison, an average adult who smokes one average-potency joint per day is recieving approximately 10-30mg. Claims for cannabis-induced brain damage in the 70's and 80's (e.g. Heath et al., 1980), were based on a small number of rhesus monkies and used flawed experimental designs, and subsequent rhesus studies with larger samples and higher doses found no histopathological changes (Scallet, 1991), even with high doses of smoked cannabis delivered via gas masks over 2 years. Iverson (p. 1264) notes that "[w]hile it may be possible to demonstrate neurotoxic actions after exposure of neurons to high concentrations of cannabinoids in vitro, there is little evidence for any significant neural damage in vivo after the administration of pharmacologically relevant doses of these drugs." To the contrary, one of the most interesting findings in cannabinoid research during the past decade is that THC and other cannabinoids have potent neuroprotective properties.

References

Block et al, 2000. Effects of frequent marijuana use on brain tissue volume and composition. Neuroreport 11(3), 491-6.
To investigate CNS effects of frequent marijuana use, brain tissue volume and composition were measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 18 current, frequent, young adult marijuana users and 13 comparable, non-using controls. Automated image analysis techniques were used to measure global and regional brain volumes, including, for most regions, separate measures of gray and white matter. The marijuana users showed no evidence of cerebral atrophy or global or regional changes in tissue volumes. Volumes of ventricular CSF were not higher in marijuana users than controls, but were, in fact, lower. There were no clinically significant abnormalities in any subject's MRI. Sex differences were detected in several global volume measures.
Heath et al, 1980. Cannabis sativa: effects on brain function and ultrastructure in rhesus monkeys. Biological Psychiatry 15, 657-690.

Iverson, 2003. Cannabis and the brain. Brain 126, 1252-70.
The active compound in herbal cannabis, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, exerts all of its known central effects through the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor. Research on cannabinoid mechanisms has been facilitated by the availability of selective antagonists acting at CB(1) receptors and the generation of CB(1) receptor knockout mice. Particularly important classes of neurons that express high levels of CB(1) receptors are GABAergic interneurons in hippocampus, amygdala and cerebral cortex, which also contain the neuropeptides cholecystokinin. Activation of CB(1) receptors leads to inhibition of the release of amino acid and monoamine neurotransmitters. The lipid derivatives anandamide and 2-arachidonylglycerol act as endogenous ligands for CB(1) receptors (endocannabinoids). They may act as retrograde synaptic mediators of the phenomena of depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition or excitation in hippocampus and cerebellum. Central effects of cannabinoids include disruption of psychomotor behaviour, short-term memory impairment, intoxication, stimulation of appetite, antinociceptive actions (particularly against pain of neuropathic origin) and anti-emetic effects. Although there are signs of mild cognitive impairment in chronic cannabis users there is little evidence that such impairments are irreversible, or that they are accompanied by drug-induced neuropathology. A proportion of regular users of cannabis develop tolerance and dependence on the drug. Some studies have linked chronic use of cannabis with an increased risk of psychiatric illness, but there is little evidence for any causal link. The potential medical applications of cannabis in the treatment of painful muscle spasms and other symptoms of multiple sclerosis are currently being tested in clinical trials. Medicines based on drugs that enhance the function of endocannabinoids may offer novel therapeutic approaches in the future.
Scallet, 1991. Neurotoxicology of cannabis and THC: a review of chronic exposure studies in animals. Phamacology Biochemistry and Behavior 4, 671-676.
Several laboratories have reported that chronic exposure to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or marijuana extracts persistently altered the structure and function of the rat hippocampus, a paleocortical brain region involved with learning and memory processes in both rats and humans. Certain choices must be made in designing experiments to evaluate cannabis neurotoxicity, such as dose, route of administration, duration of exposure, age at onset of exposure, species of subjects, whether or how long to allow withdrawal, and which endpoints or biomarkers of neurotoxicity to measure. A review of the literature suggests that both age during exposure and duration of exposure may be critical determinants of neurotoxicity. Cannabinoid administration for at least three months (8-10% of a rat's lifespan) was required to produce neurotoxic effects in peripubertal rodents, which would be comparable to about three years exposure in rhesus monkeys and seven to ten years in humans. Studies of monkeys after up to 12 months of daily exposure have not consistently reported neurotoxicity, and the results of longer exposures have not yet been studied.