ðHgeocities.com/cannabinoidscience/General.htmlgeocities.com/cannabinoidscience/General.htmlelayedx„ŽÕJÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÈ°k’X_OKtext/htmlaÌþX_ÿÿÿÿb‰.HWed, 21 Jul 2004 00:06:21 GMTŸMozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, *ƒŽÕJX_ General

General Background on Cannabinoids

The term 'cannabinoid' originally referred to the 60 or so C21 terpenes found in the plant Cannabis sativa, but today the word is used more broadly to refer to  "all ligands of the cannabinoid receptor and related compounds, including endogenous ligands of the receptors and a large number of synthetic cannabinoid analogues" (Grotenhermen, 2003, p. 329). The cannabinoids present in plants can now be referred to as the phytocannabinoids. There are two known cannabinoid receptors in humans, CB1 and CB2. Both belong to the group of receptors known as G-protein coupled receptors, and through G-proteins are linked to cellular ion channels.  CB1 receptors are located almost exclusively on neurons of the central and peripheral nervous system, but are also present in small amounts on cells of the endocrine glands, leucocytes, spleen, heart and parts of the reproductive, urinary and gastrointestinal tracts (Pertwee, 1997). Most of the well-known psychotropic effects of cannabis are produced by activation of CB1 receptors in the brain. CB2 receptors, on the other hand, are present mainly on immune system cells, appear to be absent on CNS cells (Pertwee, 2002), and mediate many of the immunomodulatory effects of cannabinoids. There is also some evidence for at least one other, as-yet-unidentified cannabinoid receptor. There is a 48% amino acid sequence similarity between CB1 and CB2 receptors (Howlett et al, 2002). Cannabinoid receptors appear to be present in all vertebrates, and many invertebrates as well, indicating that the endocannabinoid system is evolutionarily conserved (Salzet et al, 2000). Cannabinoid receptors appear to be absent in insects, however (Salzet and Stefano, 2002).

There are several known endocannabinoids, endogenous substances in the body that activate the same receptors as THC, the most well-studied being anandamide and 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (Goodman, 2003). Unsurprisingly in light of the known effects of exogenous cannabinoids, the endocannabinoid system seems to be involved in the regulation of many physiological processes, including appetite and lipogenesis, vasoconstriction and dilation, learning and memory, immunity, and regulation of pain and inflammation (Goodman, 2003).

The most widely used natural source of cannabinoids is of course the dioecious plant, Cannabis sativa. There are at least two recognized subspecies of cannabis, sativa and indica (indica), and numerous hybrid varieties. All varieties are capable of interbreeding, and thus do not form truly separate (reproductively isolated) species, yet the species as a whole is characterized by very high genetic variability (de Meijer et al, 2002). Most of the psychoactive cannabinoids in Cannabis are present in glandular trichomes covering the flowers of female plants. Trichomes are present on most terrestrial plants, and appear to serve as a natural defense against herbivorous predators (for instance, a trichome may burst when touched by an insect, exuding a sticky substance that immobilizes the insect). The function of psychoactive cannabioids in trichomes of natural cannabis may also function as a defense, since they are present in virtually all animals, including most of the invertebrates tested. Surprisingly, however, cannabinoid receptors appear to be absent in insects, e.g. Drosophila (Salzet and Stefano, 2002). Natural varieties and cultivars can vary dramatically in terms of their psychoactive potency (% of THC by weight), cannabinoid profile (THC/CBD ratio), and flower yield, with the highest yields and potencies typically being found in indica cultivars.

History of Cannabinoid Use


The plant cannabis and products derived from the cannabis plant have been used continuously by humans for medicinal and recreational purposes for thousands of years (Abel, 1980; Earleywine, 2002). Cannabis was probably first used as a fiber source for textiles and rope, with medical applications being fortuitously discovered much later. Hemp strands adorning clay pots dating to 8000BCE have been uncovered  in Taiwan (Earlywine, p. 4). The earliest prescription of cannabis as medicine is attributed to the Chinese emperor Shen Neng, who lived approximately 2700BCE. In the Indian text Atharvaveda, which is thought to have been written between 2000 and 1400BCE, cannabis is described as an anxiolytic. References to cannabis as a medicine and intoxicant are found in the writings of many authors of the ancient world, including Pliny the Elder, Herodotus, Dioscorides, and Plutarch. The earliest probable references to cannabis as medicine in European literature appear in Rabelais' Gargantua and Pantagruel (1532). The Portugese botanist Garcia da Orta in his work Colloquies on the Simples and Drugs of India (1563) described to a western audience the use of cannabis in India, its sleep-inducing, anxiolytic, and appetite-stimulating effects, as well as its tendency to induce laughter. Cannabis was a part of the western pharmacopoeia until its removal from the U.S. Pharmacopeia in 1941 and its rescheduling as a Schedule 1 controlled substance in1970. However, despite dramatic efforts to eradicate its use, the recreational use of cannabis in the west has increased dramatically over the past several decades, and today it is used recreationally by a significant portion of the global population. Current data from the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse 2001 indicate that approximately 37% (83 million) of all Americans 12 years and older have ever tried cannabis, while approximately 5% (12 million) report use during the past month (SAMHSA, 2002). Globally, the number of people who have used cannabis in the last year is estimated to be approximately 163 million, or about 4% of the world population aged 15 or older (UNODCP, 2003).

Acute Effects of Cannabinoids in Humans

The most well-known of the cannabinoids, the ingredient of cannabis that produces most of its known effects, is delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Prominent physiological effects of THC include (from Grotenhermen, 2003, p. 344) tachycardia, increased cardiac output, vasodilation, orthostatic hypotension, hypertension, reddened conjunctivae in the eyes, reduced tear flow, decrease of intraocular pressure, analgesia, appetite stimulation, bronchodilation, hyposalivation and dry mouth. THC also produces psychotropic effects, which are discussed elsewhere. As noted by Breivogel and Childers (1998) the effects of cannabinoids on the endocrine system, movement, nociception, memory and other systems correlate well with the distribution of receptors in the body. Further, there is a very strong structure/activity relationship, such that the greater the affinity of a cannabinoid for its receptor, the more potent it is in producing the characteristic effects in vivo, such as hypomobility, antinociception, hypothermia, catalepsy, and psychotropic activity, both in humans and in other animals (Compton et al, 1993; Melvin et al, 1993).  Grotenhermen (2003, p. 345) notes:

 

Cannabinoids interact with a multitude of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, among them acetylcholine, dopamine, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), histamine, serotonin, glutamate, norepinephrine, prostaglandins and opioid peptides. A number of pharmacological effects can be explained (at least in part) on the basis of such interactions. For example, tachycardia and hyposalivation with dry mouth are mediated by effects of THC on release and turnover of acetylcholine. In a rat model, cannabinoid agonists inhibited activation of serotonin 5-HT3 receptors, explaining the antiemetic properties of cannabinoids by interactions with serotonin. Therapeutic effects on movement and spastic disorders could be ascribed in part to interactions with GABAergic, glutaminergic and dopaminergic transmitter systems

 

Cannabinoids and Modern Medicine

Currently there is much interest in the medical use of both natural and synthetic cannabinoids. The main psychoactive ingredient in cannabis, THC, has numerous and surprisingly diverse medically-interesting properties, including analgesic properties, antitumoral properties, neuroprotective properties, and immunoregulatory properties, combined with very low toxicity. In mice, the THC LD50 is 800-1900 mg/kg, while in dogs and monkies no deaths were noted even at 3000 and 9000 mg/kg, respectively (Thompson et al, 1973).  All of the known psychoactive and therapeutic effects of THC are manifested at doses under 20 mg (ED50 is less than 20 mg). The ratio of effective dose to lethal dose in humans is thus greater than 10,000. The low toxicity of cannabinoids compares quite favorably with many existing pharmaceuticals used to treat chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, movement disorders, emesis, and anorexia. There is also interest in development of pharmaceuticals that target the endogenous cannabinoid system. For instance, Kathuria et al (2003) recently showed that inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase, the enzyme that normally degrades the endocannabinoid anandamide, increases brain levels of anandamide and produces benzodiazapine-like effects in an animal model. As Baker et al (2003) note in their recent review of cannabinoid therapeutics- "that we are only just beginning to appreciate the huge therapeutic potential of this family of compounds is clear" (p. 291).

References

Abel, 1980.
Marijuana- the First twelve thousand years. Plenum Press, New York.



Baker et al, 2003. The therapeutic potential of cannabis. Lancet Neurology 2, 291-298.

Breivogel and Childers, 1998. The functional neuroanatomy of Brain cannabinoid receptors. Neurobiology of Disease 5, 417–431.

Compton et al, 1993. Cannabinoid structure-activity relationships: correlation of receptor binding and in vivo activities. Journal of Pharmacology and Expimental Therapeutics 265, 218-226.

de Meijer et al, 2002. The Inheritance of Chemical Phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. Genetics 163, 335-346.

Earleywine, 2002. Understanding marijuana: A new look at the scientific evidence. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Goodman, 2003. An Overview of the Endogenous Cannabinoid System : Components and Possible Roles of this Recently Discovered Regulatory System. Erowid.org, May 2003: plants/cannabis/cannabis_pharmacology2.shtml.

Grotenhermen, 2003. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cannabinoids. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 42, 327-360.

Howlett et al, 2002. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of Cannabinoid Receptors. Pharmacological Reviews 54, 161-202.

IOM, 1999. National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine report Marijuana as Medicine: Assessing the Science Base.

Kathuria et al, 2003. Modulation of anxiety through blockade of anandamide hydrolysis. Nature Medicine 9,76 - 81.

Melvin et al, 1993. Structure-activity relationships for cannabinoid receptor-binding and analgesic activity: studies of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs. Molecular Pharmacology 44, 1008-1015.

Munro et al, 1993. Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids. Nature 365, 61-65.

Ohlsson et al, 1980. Plasma delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations and clinical effects after oral and intravenous administration and smoking. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 28:409-416.

Pertwee, 1997. Pharmacology of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 74 (2): 129-80.

Pertwee, 2002. Sites and mechanisms of action. In: Grotenhermen and Russo, eds., Cannabis and cannabinoids: pharmacology, toxicology, and therapeutic potential. Haworth Press, New York. 2002, pp. 73-88.

Salzet et al, 2000. Comparative biology of the endocannabinoid system. European Journal of Biochemistry 267, 1-12.

Salzet and Stefano, 2002. The endocannabinoids system in invertebrates. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential FattyAcids 66, 353-361.

SAMHSA, 2002. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Volume 1. Summary of National Findings. Available online at: http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/nhsda/2k1nhsda/vol1/toc.htm

UNODCP, 2003. Global Illicit Drug Trends 2003. Available online at: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/global_illicit_drug_trends.html

Zimmer and Morgan, 1997. Marijuana Myths Marijuana Facts: A Review Of The Scientific Evidence. The Lindesmith Center.