Bush And Friends Try To Qaush
Criticism Of 'War On Terror'
On The Front Lines Of A War On Dissent ... Students Prepare To Protest Anti-Terrorism Agenda


By William Walker Washington Bureau
Toronto Star
WASHINGTON - Nineteen-year-old Naureen Shah has been called a  Taliban, a Nazi and un-American.
Three of her classmates at   Chicago's Northwestern University have been questioned by the FBI since the   enactment of the Patriot Act, the U.S. government's anti-terrorism   legislation.
I've been called all   kinds of names says Shah, a second-year journalism student. But   I think it's the Patriot Act that's un-American. I think broadening the war   to a place like North Korea is un-American.
Her experience reflects an   anti-dissent environment being fostered by law-enforcement agencies, the   Republican administration and its right-wing friends in their robust campaign   to quash criticism of the war on terrorism.
Shah will jump on a bus   this week and travel with fellow students to Washington for the first major   American protest against the war on terrorism and the U.S. role in the   Mideast crisis.
Organizers expect tens of thousands from across the country to march on the White   House Saturday to demonstrate against a wider war on terrorism and what they call the Bush-Sharon war against the Palestinian people.
Just as a university   student-based opposition to the war begins to gel ,До more than 150 campuses   in 40 states have held rallies urging U.S. military restraint ,До it's   becoming clear that there's also a war in America against dissent.
And it's being waged not   just against students and professors, although universities are where the   major skirmishes are taking place. Journalists, business people, even   retirees have been targeted for speaking out. Some have been fired from their   jobs, received hate mail or been made social outcasts for exercising their   First Amendment right to freedom of speech.
Consider:
Barry Reingold, a   60-year-old retired telephone company worker in San Francisco, recently had   two FBI agents visit his home to question him about criticism of the war on   terrorism he voiced while working out at his local health club. The agents   filed a report on him.
Journalists Jackie Anderson   of the Sun Advocate in Price, Utah; Dan Guthrie of the Grants Pass Daily   Courier in Oregon; and Tom Gutting of the Texas City Sun have all been fired   for writing columns questioning the war. In Washington, some senior White   House and Capitol Hill reporters have been frozen out by   lawmakers for expressing similar sentiments.
The Houston Art Car Museum had a recent visit from FBI and Secret Service agents who cited several   reports of anti-American activity going on here. The museum was showing Secret Wars, an anti-war exhibit set up before Sept. 11.
A.J. Brown, a freshman at   Durham Tech in North Carolina, says two Secret Service agents knocked on her   door to question her about a report that you have un-American material   in your apartment. They asked about a poster on her wall opposing the   state of Texas' death penalty.
The campaign against   dissent is being led by President George W. Bush, who has said repeatedly   that you're either with us, or you're against us. His press   secretary, Ari Fleischer, has warned: Americans need to watch what they   say, watch what they do.
Attorney-General John   Ashcroft, the FBI's boss, told Congress: To those ... who scare   peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists ,До for they erode our national unity and   diminish our resolve. They give ammunition to America's enemies and pause to   America's friends. They encourage people of goodwill to remain silent in the   face of evil.
More than 90 per cent of   Americans support military strikes in Afghanistan in response to the Sept. 11   terrorist attacks. But a CNN-USA Today Gallup poll found that only a slim   majority of Americans ,До 52 per cent of those surveyed ,До favour broadening   the war to Iraq, North Korea or Iran, the nations that make up Bush's axis of evil. Forty per cent of respondents prefer their   government to target specific terrorist groups, rather than entire countries.
Given that Bush has stated   his intention to broaden the war (inaction is not an option he   said in regard to Iraq) and continue it through the remaining 2 1/2 years of   his term, his government and its supporters are working hard to avoid a   massive build-up of student opposition similar to the anti-Vietnam War   movement of the late 1960s and early '70s.
Warned Bill Bennett, head   of the right-wing Empower America organization, at a recent Washington news   conference: Professional and amateur critics of America are finding   their voices. They're finding their voice on campuses, in salons, in learned   societies and in the print media and on television.
Anti-war protests are   nothing new in the U.S., which has always had its dissenters. But it wasn't   until the Vietnam War that student radicalism in America hit its peak,   culminating in the May 4, 1970, riot at Kent State University in which Ohio   National Guardsmen shot and killed four student demonstrators.
These days, however, it's   unfashionable to be an anti-war crusader on U.S. college campuses. There has   been virtual unanimity on the need to eradicate Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda   terrorist group from Afghanistan, but students are beginning to mobilize   against Bush's pledge to fight the war over several more years, in several countries,   in the name of stamping out terrorism.
Bennett, a staunch   Republican who served as education secretary in the Ronald Reagan   administration and drug czar under George Bush Sr., has joined   former CIA director James Woolsey and Reagan assistant secretary of defence   Frank Gaffney in founding Americans For Victory Over Terrorism, a group that   intends to visit campuses and conduct pro-war teach-ins.
Meanwhile, Lynne Cheney,   wife of Vice-President Dick Cheney, has helped organize a group called the   American Council on Trustees and Alumni (ACTA), which cites a blame   America first bias among hundreds of professors and is monitoring their   anti-war statements.
In what many professors   view as a threat to their academic freedoms, ACTA is sending mass mailings to   alumni of schools where offensive comments have been made, urging   donations be cut off and pressuring university trustees to take action. One   Florida professor, who didn't have the protection of being tenured, has   already been fired.
It's your   constitutional right to criticize,Bennett told educators. But   when you criticize, you take the consequences for your words. Your words may   be responded to and your words can be interpreted in such ways that they hurt   the national resolve.
Bennett's warning about  consequences; is already painfully clear to University of Texas   journalism professor and activist writer Robert Jensen.
Jensen wrote a piece in   which he urged Americans to confront some of the ugly truths about their country's history of targeting civilians in war as a way to   understand why some fundamentalists hate America. After a Texas newspaper   published the column, more than 4,000 e-mails flooded in, many demanding he   be fired and announcing intentions to stop donations to the school.
University president Larry   Faulkner publicly branded Jensen ,До who has tenure and thus cannot be fired   ,До as someone who should be ignored because he's misguided and   his work contains a fountain of undiluted foolishness.
In an interview with The   Star, Jensen responded, saying: Do we live in a society where free   thought is being marginalized? Yes. Is it being suppressed in a social sense?   Yes.
The president of my   university said I was a fool who shouldn't be taken seriously. It sends a   signal to the university community that, if you want to get along and get all   the perks that come with the job, you'd better keep your comments within   acceptable limits.
The American Civil Liberties   Union and other national organizations have decried the Bush administration's   Patriot Act for giving the FBI vast powers to intercept Americans'   conversations, cellphone calls and e-mails, even to eavesdrop on talks   between lawyers and their clients.
Of course, the FBI has a   long history of pushing the privacy envelope.
In the mid-1950s, the late   FBI director J. Edgar Hoover launched COINTELPRO, an enormous domestic   surveillance program to monitor the Communist party in the United States.   Within a decade, it was expanded to include the Socialist Workers party, the   Black Panthers and Nation of Islam groups and eventually most of the   community and religious organizations that became known as the New Left.
Whatever kind of   intellectual climate we have is, I think, being slowly starved, says   Jensen. "It's like we're saying to people, `You shouldn't think. You   should listen to the people in power and, if they say we should go to war, we   should go to war.' That's what disturbs me.
Bush, he adds, has announced an unlimited war against a potentially endless enemy. Do they   understand the consequences of a war the secretary of defence has said has no   `exit strategies' and will be a `sustained engagement that carries no   deadlines?'
Jensen says Bennett's   organization and Lynne Cheney's ACTA seem to believe universities are still   run by leftover hippies, some pot-smoking intellectual commies. But   there's nothing further from the truth.
The sense one had   that, in the '60s and '70s, universities were centres of intellectual   engagement has largely been lost. I'd call that a threat to democracy.
All over the world,  in Canada and in Europe, people are dealing with these complexities. But   here, we're just not.
Back at Northwestern, Shah   has high hopes for Saturday's march on the White House.
This is the first   protest that is going to unite several different causes, she says.
Our opposition to the   war is no joke. It's based on facts. We want to draw together concerns about   globalization issues, the Middle East and NAFTA, to make the connections to   the war on terrorism. We don't feel that's been properly done until now.
I don't see the   possibility of a larger student movement unless we begin to understand how   the war affects us all directly. But the basis is there. It might happen   yet.
4,18,02
Home
Home