Bush And Hitler -
The Strategy Of Fear

By Dave Lindorff
CounterPunch
2-4-3
It's time to stop trying to   explain why a war on Iraq is a bad idea.
The logic, of course, is   clear. The administration has no evidence that Hussein has weapons of   destruction. If it did, it would have shown it to the American public and the   U.N. long ago. It has no evidence that Iraq is in league with Al Qaeda for   the same reason. And it's obvious that even if--a big if according to   Genernal Norman Schwarzkopf--a U.S. invasion does succeed in easily toppling   Hussein, the result of that unprovoked assault, especially if it is carried   out by the U.S. without a U.N. endorsement, will be a wave of terror against   Americans and American interests that will dwarf anything seen in the past.
This is all self-evident,  and even the Bush Administration has tacitly admitted that increased   terrorism will be the result of an attack on Iraq: it has had the State  Department issue a warning to Americans overseas and to Americans planning to   travel that they should be prepared to be terrorist targets.
The point, however, is that   this is precisely what the Bush Administration wants to happen.
A permanent state of   American panic, fortified by regular doses of terror attacks, hijackings and   building demolitions by crazed Muslim fanatics is exactly what Bush needs to   stay in power, win re-election in 2004, stack the federal courts, gut the   Bill of Rights, and enrich its corporate sponsors.
Don't hold your breath   waiting for some politician on the Democratic side of the aisle to stand up   and confront the administration about this treasonous plan.
That means it is urgent for   the left to address the issue--to insert it into the public debate.
If Bush truly wanted to  reduce the threat of terror against Americans, he would not be harassing   Arab-Americans and Muslims at random and deporting people for minor alleged   visa violations after secret hearings and detentions (a teriffic way to create  blood enemies!). He would not be using cowboy rhetoric and threatening to   invate Iraq all on his own, knowing that one result will be the political  undermining of a whole series of repressive secular Arab regimes, and their  replacement by fundamentalist Islamic governments. He would not be holding   back funds for legitimate homeland y defense efforts, such as bolstering fire  departments and police departments. y And if he was really trying to steel  America for a battle against the forces of evil in Iraq and the   rest of the world, he'd be using Churchillian language, talking about mutual  sacrifice and of fortitude under fire. Instead he calls up dire warnings of   fanciful nuclear or germ attacks against urban centers, and the spectre of   unimaginable horrors--things that can only induce a cowering response.
The sad thing is that   Americans, fattened up and soft of muscle from their diet of McDonald's   Whoppers and dim-witted from an overdose of reality TV shows and   entertainment programs posing as news, suck up this kind of fear-mongering   (all of which is eagerly played up by ratings-hungry media executives). If   one plane gets highjacked, plane travel plummets. If a few letters are found   to be contaminated with anthrax spores, people across the land stop opening   their mail, or start zapping it first in their microwaves. If a child is   reported missing in Arizona, parents across the land clutch their children to  their bosoms and begin lecturing them about the evils of talking to strangers, forgetting that this is exactly what a child ought to   do if she gets lost.
In Europe, Asia, Africa or   South America, where wars and terrorism, not to mention natural disasters,   have been a way of life, the loss of a few hundred, or even a few thousand   people, to a bomb, an earthquake, a flood or a civil war, does not induce a   national catatonia. People clean up the mess as best they can, count their   losses, and go on with their lives.
The other sad thing about   us Americans is that we have no notion of the horrors of war, and so are   quick to wish it on others (Indian Americans and the MOVE and Branch Davidian   organizations aside, the last war on American soil was fought 137 years ago).   It's no wonder those people of Old Europe, as chickenhawk   Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld disparagingly referred to Germany and   France, are more reluctant about going to war in Iraq. They know that   dropping bombs from B-52s all across the country and fighting door-to-door in   Baghdad will produce horrific casualties and create destruction that will   take years to repair (There are still several mountains on the outskirts of   Darmstadt, Germany, where I spent a year as a highschool student--the stacked   rubble, including many human remains, of a city of 200,000 destroyed in one   night by a British fire-bombing. Similar man-made mountains can also be   spotted around Berlin.) Europeans also know that if terrorism on a wider   scale is the result, in the U.S. and in Europe, it will be a grisly affair.
Americans have only the WTC   to look at when they try to contemplate the effects of war, and all in all,   that was a pretty antiseptic affair. One second you the towers, another   second, they were gone, and within a year or so, the site was all cleaned up   and ready for a nifty new building. Indeed, the only institutional memory   left of that attrocity is the unseemly battle by survivors of the once   high-flying investment banker victims of the attack to get better   reimbursements from the government for their unfortunate loss of those   six-figure incomes.
The naivity of Americans   about the reality of war was brought home to me years ago, when as a young   journalism student, I found myself working on a story aout a truck accident   and ended up in a local firehouse in Middletown, CT. It was 1970, at the  height of the Cold War, and the fireman on duty asked me if I'd like to see   the bomb-proof back-up government offices that had been built under the   station thanks to some federal disaster funding. We walked down a stairwell   through three feet of case-hardened concrete, and through a blast door, into   a spare-looking room filled with desks. On each desk was an etched nameplate,   identifying the government bureau that would be represented by the official   seated there. I saw a sign for Mayor, another of  Police, and a third for Fire, but there were also   desks for Welfare, Assessor and Tax  Collector, as though, after a nuclear holocaust there would be need for   these worthy bureaucrats!
That, of course, is not how   wars look--especially modern wars where military planners don't bother   distinguishing between civilian and military targets. Vietnam is still   recovering from its having been the target of all those bombs, napalm and   Agent Orange attacks, not to mention the loss of a generation of its young   men and women. Afghanistan may never recover from the relatively minor recent   war there.
If we Americans value our   society, our polity, our rights and liberties, and our security, we must   begin exposing George W. Bush and his War Party for what they are: craven   usurpers aiming at nothing less than the undermining of all those things that   most of us hold dear.
It's going a bit far to  compare the Bush of 2003 to the Hitler of 1933. Bush simply is not the orator   that Hitler was. But comparisons of the Bush Administration's fear mongering  tactics to those practiced so successfully and with such terrible results by   HItler and Goebbels on the German people and their Weimar Republic are not at   all out of line.
Dave Lindorff is the author   of Killing Time: an Investigation into the Death Row Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal.   A collection of Lindorff's stories can be found here: http://www.nwuphilly.org/dave.html
http://www.counterpunch.com/lindorff02012003.html
Site Mao
Site Mao