There Is A Firestorm Coming And
It Is Being Provoked By Mr. Bush

By Robert Fisk Commentary
The Independent - London
5-29-2
More and more, President Bush's rhetoric sounds like   the crazed videotapes
   of Osama bin Laden...
So now Osama bin Laden is Hitler. And Saddam Hussein is Hitler. And George Bush is fighting the Nazis. Not since Menachem Begin fantasised to President Reagan that he felt he was attacking Hitler in Berlin - his Israeli army was actually besieging Beirut, killing   thousands of civilians, Hitler being the pathetic Arafat - have  we had to listen to claptrap like this. But the fact that we Europeans had to   do so in the Bundestag on Thursday - and, for the most part, in respectful   silence - was extraordinary.
I'm reminded of the Israeli   columnist who, tired of the wearying invocation of the Second World War to  justify yet more Israeli brutality, began an article with the words: Mr   Prime Minister, Hitler is dead.Must we, forever, live under the shadow   of a war that was fought and won before most of us were born? Do we have to   live forever with living, diminutive politicians playing Churchill (Thatcher   and, of course, Blair) or Roosevelt? He's a dictator who gassed his own   people, Mr Bush reminded us for the two thousandth time, omitting as  always to mention that the Kurds whom Saddam viciously gassed were fighting  for Iran and that the United States, at the time, was on Saddam's side.
But there is a much more   serious side to this. Mr Bush is hoping to corner the Russian President,  Vladimir Putin, into a new policy of threatening Iran. He wants the Russians   to lean on the northern bit of the axis of evil, the infantile   phrase which he still trots out to the masses. More and more, indeed, Mr   Bush's rhetoric sounds like the crazed videotapes of Mr bin Laden. And still   he tries to lie about the motives for the crimes against humanity of 11   September. Yet again, in the Bundestag, he insisted that the West's enemies   hated justice and democracy even though most of America's Muslim  enemies wouldn't know what democracy was.
In the United States, the   Bush administration is busy terrorising Americans. There will be nuclear   attacks, bombs in high-rise apartment blocks, on the Brooklyn bridge, men   with exploding belts - note how carefully the ruthless Palestinian war  against Israeli colonisation of the West Bank is being strapped to America's   ever weirder war on terror - and yet more aircraft suiciders. If   you read the words of President Bush, Vice-President Dick Cheney and the   ridiculous national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, over the past three   days, you'll find they've issued more threats against Americans than Mr bin   Laden.
But let's get back to the   point. The growing evidence that Israel's policies are America's policies in   the Middle East - or, more accurately, vice versa - is now being played out   for real in statements from Congress and on American television. First, we have the chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee announcing   that Hizbollah - the Lebanese guerrilla force that drove Israel's demoralised   army out of Lebanon in the year 2000 - is planning attacks in the US. After   that, we had an American television network revealing that   Hizbollah, Hamas and al- Qa'ida - Mr bin Laden's organisation - have held a   secret meeting in Lebanon to plot attacks on the US.
American journalists insist   on quoting sources but there was, of course, no sourcing for this   balderdash, which is now repeated ad nauseam in the American media. Then take   the Syrian Accountability Act that was introduced into the US   Senate by Israel's friends on18 April. This includes the falsity uttered  earlier by Israel's Foreign Minister, Shimon Peres, that Iranian   Revolutionary Guards operate freely on the southern Lebanese   border. Now there haven't been Iranian Revolutionary Guards in Lebanon - let   alone the south of the country - for 18 years. So why is this lie repeated   yet again?
Iran is under threat.   Lebanon is under threat. Syria is under threat - its terrorism  status has been heightened by the State Department - and so is Iraq. But   Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister held personally responsible by   Israel's own enquiry for the Sabra and Shatila massacre of 1,700 Palestinians   in Beirut in 1982, is - according to Mr Bush - a man of peace".   How much further can this go? A long way, I fear.
The anti-American feeling   throughout the Middle East is palpable. Arab newspaper editorials don't come   near to expressing public opinion. In Damascus, Majida Tabbaa has become   famous as the lady who threw the US Consul Roberto Powers out of her   husband's downtown restaurant on 7 April . I went over to him,  she said, and told him, 'Mr Roberto, tell your George Bush that all of   you are not welcome - please get out'; Across the Arab world, boycotts   of American goods have begun in earnest.
How much longer can this go   on? America praises Pakistani President Musharraf for his support in the  war on terror, but remains silent when he arranges a dictatorial   referendum to keep him in power. America's enemies, remember,   hate the US for its democracy. So is General Musharraf going to  feel the heat? Forget it. My guess is that Pakistan's importance in the famous  War on terror - or ;war for civilisation as, we should  remember, it was originally called - is far more important. If Pakistan and   India go to war, I'll wager a lot that Washington will come down for   undemocratic Pakistan against democratic India.
Across the former Soviet  southern Muslim republics, America is building air bases, helping to pursue   the;war on terror against any violent Muslim Islamist groups that  dare to challenge the local dictators. Please do not believe that this is   about oil. Do not for a moment think that these oil and gas-rich lands have  any economic importance for the oil-fuelled Bush administration. Nor the   pipelines that could run from northern Afghanistan to the Pakistani coast if   only that pesky Afghan loya jirga could elect a government that would give   concessions to Unocal, the oddly named concession whose former boss just   happens to be a chief Bush adviser to Afghanistan.
Now here's pause for   thought. Abdelrahman al-Rashed writes in the international Arabic daily   Asharq al-Awsat that if anyone had said prior to 11 September that Arabs were   plotting a vast scheme to murder thousands of Americans in the US, no one  would have believed them. We would have charged that this was an   attempt to incite the American people against Arabs and Muslims," he   wrote. And rightly so.
But Arabs did commit the   crimes against humanity of 11 September. And many Arabs greatly fear that we  have yet to see the encore from the same organisation. In the meantime, Mr  Bush goes on to do exactly what his enemies want; to provoke Muslims and  Arabs, to praise their enemies and demonise their countries, to bomb and   starve Iraq and give uncritical support to Israel and maintain his support   for the dictators of the Middle East.
Each morning now, I awake   beside the Mediterranean in Beirut with a feeling of great foreboding. There   is a firestorm coming. And we are blissfully ignoring its arrival; indeed, we   are provoking it.
http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=298681
Site Map
Site Map