![]() by Cindy Little AL 8660 Materials
Design, Development, & Publication
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading | Two Important Concepts or Facts | Quotation with Explanation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Session 1 8/27-9/10 |
Byrd, P. (1995). Writing
and publishing textbooks. In Patricia Byrd (Ed.), Material writer's
guide (pp. 3-9). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
|
|
"Thus the work of materials writers is an interdisciplinary mix deeply influenced by cultural standards in the production and use of textbooks in educational settings (p.6)" The two key ideas here are "interdisciplinary mix", which addresses content, and "cultural standards", which addresses the audience.People look at textbooks at materials in different ways, depending on experience and cultural background. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dubin, Fraida. (1995). The craft of materials writing. In P. Byrd (Ed.), Material writer's guide (pp. 13-22). Boston: Heinle & Heinle. |
|
"Developing craft knowledge concerning materials
development should contribute to creating practitioners who are capable
of handling a variety of writing assignments; it should produce people
who are more flexible and varied across skill areas."
A materials writer must really be a jack of all trades! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jolly, D, and Bolitho, R. A framework for materials writing. In Brian Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 90-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
|
"However, we take an entirely different view, believing
that materials writing as as a process is pointless without constant reference
to the classroom. In short, a need arises, materials are written,
materials are used in the classroom to attempt to meet the need and subsequently
they are evaluated."
A good materials writer needs the classroom as a reference point. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
McDonough, J., and Shaw, C. (1993). Current approaches to materials design. In Jo McDonough and Christopher Shaw, Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher's guide (pp. 43-62). Oxford: Blackwell. |
|
"Most importantly, it contains the far-reaching
implication that syllabuses cannot be fully worked out in advance but must
evolve as learners' problems and developing competence gradually emerge."
Every class is different and requires special attention, which often means plans must change to meet the needs of the students. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Session 2 9/10-9/24 |
Byrd, P. (1995). Issues in the writing and publication
of grammar textbooks. In Patricia Byrd (Ed.), Material writer's guide,
pp. 45-63. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
|
|
"While we go through the process of thinking,
collection of information and revision of drafts, we eventually come to
the time when something must be turned in. Thus the process results
in a product-and is motivated by the need for that product." (p.56)
It is important to remember that there is a final goal - the product! There is a tangible,finite and achievable result that we are striving for. "Presenting only examples without explanations is not a realistic
strategy because of the fundamental nature of an example: any piece of
language could be an example of many different concepts or patterns.
The explanation is necessary as a way of focusing attention on the purpose
of the example."(p.51)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conrad, S. (2000). Will corpus linguistics revolutionize
grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 548-560.
|
-register specific description of English grammar -integrate teaching of vocab w/grammar -emphasize conditions for use
|
"The implication of corpus research for pedagogy is
that grammatical study needs to take place within the context of a register
or by comparing registers." (p.552)
The linking adverbial examples show how it is difficult to make generalizations about use when the contexts vary so greatly. "Thus, decisions about pedagogy should apply corpus linguistics by taking into account functional descriptions and frequency information as well as analyses of students' needs." (p.557) We shouldn't neglect uncommon grammatical features, but should teach them in a realistic context. Also, grammar points that are more frequent should receive more consideration. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jones, S., Byrd, P., Allomong, S., and Tanaka, Y. Heinle & Heinle grammar activity inventory. Retrieved from http://www.gsu.edu/~wwwesl/inventgr1/ |
|
"One important reason for the separation of grammar
and writing is the difference in the approach to both selection and implementation
of activities for the two types of textbooks. In grammar texts, items to
be taught are chosen (i.e., adverbs of frequency) and then activities to
enhance or test their acquisition are chosen (e.g., matching) from those
available. In writing texts, on the other hand, there is a different tradition
concerning activity types, and organization of units. Writing is almost
always contextualized and based on a unit topic."
Perhaps it would be nice to have a book that integrated both! It is for subsequent researchers to study the different categories
and develop some correlation between particular activity types and improved
learning.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Teaching grammar. In Marianne
Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language
(3rd
ed., pp. 251-266).
|
|
"..meaningless mechanical drills, such as repetition
drills, commonly associated with behaviorist approaches to learning, do
not engage the learner in the target behavior of conveying meaning through
language."(p.258)
The types of activities we choose should seek to engage the learner in a meaningful context. However, sometimes the rote activities have a place in equipping the learner with the form skills necessary for using the language in a meaningful, authentic context. "...grammar teaching can better be thought of as developing 'grammaring',
i.e., helping students be able to use grammar skillfully, a goal that requires
significant practice."(p.258)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Session 3 9/24-10/8 |
Coxhead, A. (2000). A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34, (2), 213-238. |
|
"This study has identified vocabulary to include
in teaching and learning materials, but there remains a need to design
tests to diagnose whether learners know this vocabulary and whether attempts
to teach it and learn it have been successful."
This is a great list - now we just need to figure out what to do with it! "By highlighting the words that university students meet in a wide range of academic texts, the AWL shows learners with academic goals which words are most worth studying." The list can help teachers decide what words to teach, as well as help teachers evaluate students' vocabulary knowledge. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decarrico, J.S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In Marianne Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 285-299). |
|
"A common view in vocabulary studies is that we
have not been explicitly taught the majority of words that we know, and
that beyond a certain level of proficiency in a second language, vocabulary
learning is more likely to be mainly implicit (incidental)."
I think the key is exposure - for both explicit and implicit acquisition. "It is, of course, neither possible nor desirable for learners to try to use all strategies all the time, but they may find it useful to vary strategies that seem more appropriate to a given situation..." Learners need to know how to decide the most appropriate strategy in a situation. We need to equip learners for this decision making process. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Groot, P. (2000). Computer Assisted Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Language Learning & Technology 4, (1), pp. 60-81. Retrieved at http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/groot/default.html. |
too many other unknown words. |
"..Intensive processing of new words leads to
a more solid embedding and better long term retention which is needed for
active use of the words, than does superficial processing
of the words out of context with the translation given, as in bilingual
lists. "
The study's results indicate that there is a correlation between retention and depth of processing. "Authentic language material is generally not produced with the intention of illustrating to learners the meaning or usage of certain words but rather to convey information to other native speakers who are already familiar with these words. " -nice to have a definition of authentic materials! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nation, P. (2000). Learning vocabulary in lexical sets: Dangers and Guidelines. TESOL Journal 9 (2), 6-10. |
|
"Seeing items in contrast to each other can clarify
their differences in meaning and use, but this contrast should not occur
until one or both of them are firmly established."
Teachers need to be make sure a word is established before introducing a related word. "The principle behind interference is something like this: if two
or more items share some strongly related common features and they are
learned together at the same time, the similar features make them become
strongly associated with each other, and the differences interfere with
each other."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stoller, F.L., and Grabe, W. (1995). Implications for L2 vocabulary acquisition and instruction from L1 vocabulary research. In Thomas Huckin, Margot Haynes, and James Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning, pp. 24-45. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. |
aptitude hypothesis; knowledge hypothesis; instrumental hypothesis |
"Generally speaking, the range of skills introduced
in an L1 or L2 classroom and corresponding instructional approaches cannot
be determined until the following issues are considered: student needs
and motivation, instructional objectives, the words which might need to
be learned, the extent to which these words need to be learned, and their
importance for overrall curricular goals."
And more than one approach is needed - too many variables to consider. "..the potential overuse of semantic mapping and semantic feature analyses, used to either introduce too many vocabulary items at once or to introduce less useful vocabulary, must be avoided in L2 contexts where students may be easily overloaded." Even the best ideas must be used in moderation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
IEP #1 0650: Structure and Composition
course materials such as syllabus and IEP documents and communication with the teacher |
|
"In this course, students will learn about academic writing
and about the grammar of academic writing. Through the writing, revising,
and editing of academic papers, students will practice the features that
make for successful writing in university courses."
Activities for the course must aid students in developing the skills necessary to complete the above mentioned tasks. "To improve the accuracy of your writing, we will practice editing texts for both grammar errors and logical organization." Some web activities could involve the editing process. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
IEP #2 0650: Structure and Composition
textbook and instructor's manual |
|
"It [the final section] takes students through th esteps of producing
the final writing assignment from the stage of gathering information for
a specific audience and purpose to organizing the piece of writing to self-editing,
peer response, and revision."
At the end of each chapter students must synthesize what they have learned through several writing tasks. The organization is important to consider as we design activities. "It [this book] contains strategies to help you approach a variety of writing tasks-understanding your audience and purpose, discovering what elements are required in each writing task, seeing the grammar and vocabulary that you can use in a given writing task, and applying editing strategies to accurately convey your meaning. This statement provides a framework for our activities - they should contribute to one or more of these goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Session 4 10/8-10/22 |
Prowse, Philip. (1998). How writers write: testimony from authors. In Brian Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 130-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
|
" 'Some people just sit down at the table and work.
It has never been this way with me. My ideas and intentions boild
inside me for a long time, even details take quite a while to mature, then
at some point I feel I can start writing. Usually after this moment
everything pours out in a gulp.'"
I can relate -- I can't force the writing process, and when I do, the product is terrible. It's only when I least expect it or find myself under immense pressure that I am able to write. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reid, J. Developing ESL writing materials for publication OR writing as a learning experience. In Patricia Byrd (Ed.), Material writer's guide (pp. 64-78). Boston: Heinle & Heinle. |
|
"Writing, like teaching, is hard work: only those whose
commitment to service and the satisfaction of serving need apply."
Writing requires skill and motivation! I need a sudden injection of both! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Session 5 10/22-11/5 |
Byrd, P. (2001). Textbooks: Evaluation for selection and analysis for implemention. In Marianne Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 415-427). |
|
"Once a textbook has been selected, teachers need to
analyze the resources in the textbook to create a plan for daily lessons
and for the whole course that helps them both implement and supplement
what is already given in the most efficient and effective way."
It's important to see the big picture - to have an overview of the course before you ever even enter the classroom. "..teachers have to be aware not just of their lives inside their classrooms, but they must also be knowledgeable about the larger system in which they work and about possible ways that the system might allow for teacher participation in its administrative processes." It seems as though teachers definitely have more say in the US, and in particular within private institutions in the States. However, it is important for teachers to me informed no matter where they happen to be. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kessler, G., and Plakans, L. (2001). Incorporating ESOL learners' feedback
and usability testing in instructor-developed CALL materials. TESOL Journal 10 (1), 15-20 |
|
"The overall process is to get users to perform tasks on the materials
being developed and to observe what occurs as they do so. During
observation, the developer collects data on the actions, particularly the
problematic actions, of the user. There are many possibilities for
proceeding with usability testing. Each developer should consider
the materials, the users, and the environment.."
Even though this is an effective means of collecting data, the researcher must consider a variety of variables. "As more instructors attempt to develop computer-based materials, it becomes increasingly important to assure the appropriateness and usability of the materials." Obviously, although instructors may know their students best, they may not create the best materials. We need to test the appropriateness and usability of what we create. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology 2 (1), pp. 22-34 Retrieved at http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article1/index.html |
|
"When learners have focused their attentions on their
errors, they need to have the opportunity to correct themselves."
Feedback is important and useful only when learners can try to put the new information into practice. This is where encouragement and direction from the teacher is vital, as learners strive to produce correct language forms as a result of the new information received after making mistakes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Egbert, J. (1999). Classroom practice: Creating interactive CALL activities. In Joy Egbert and Elizabeth Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 27-51). Alexandria, VA: TESOL. |
|
"School is often an isolating environment in which one
classroom rarely communicates with others."
This is so true! I sometmes go days without interacting with my colleagues, a sad fact considering the goal of a community of learners. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Healey, D. (1999). Theory and research: Autonomy in language learning. In Joy Egbert and Elizabeth Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 391-402). Alexandria, VA: TESOL. |
|
"A commonly noted problem with autonomous learning
is that students sometimes have trouble seeing the progress they have made
and become discouraged when they think about how much farther they need
to go."
This is where the teacher's encouragement and feedback is crucial, especially with sensitive learners. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kol, S., and Schcolnik, M. (2000). Enhancing screen reading strategies. CALICO Journal 18 (1), 67-80. |
|
"However, the results of the current study seem to indicate
that students can probably read as well on screen as they do on paper,
provided students who read on screen are taught the necessary strategies."
As teachers we must remember that if if we are going to require our students to read on screen then we must equip them with strategies to make the medium more effective. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shin, J., and Wastell, D. (2001). A user-centered methodological framework for the design of hypermedia-based call systems. CALICO Journal 18 (3), 517-537. |
|
"Although learners wanted more control during the learning
process, they were more satisfied at the after-learning stage with the
low control system. This result implies that the learners felt greater
achievement after learning with restricted navigation. "
It's interesting to note the learner input as we design our activities and address issues of learner autonomy in the classroom. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOP | ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||