|
Catechism of a
Revolutionary
Among the
‘nihilists’…an ascetic mentality made its appearance…Without that
ascetic spirit a heroic revolutionary struggle would have been impossible.
Intolerance and isolation of self from the rest of the world grew much
stronger. This led to Nechaev’s Revolutionary Catechism.
— Nicholas Berdyaev
Sergei Nechaev (1847-1882) was an
extraordinary young Russian revolutionary whose scheme for a highly
disciplined, professionally-organised revolutionary movement is outlined
in his Catechism of a Revolutionary (1868). Nechaev argued that
just as the European monarchies used the ideas of Machiavelli and the
Catholic Jesuits practiced absolute immorality to achieve their ends,
there was no action that could not be used to for the sake of the
people’s revolution. He founded a small revolutionary group known as The
People’s Retribution (Narodnaya rasprava), which was outlawed in
Russia after the murder of one of its own members in 1869. Nechaev was
eventually gaoled in 1872. He died in prison ten years later.
Peter Marshall, in his book A History of Anarchism, describes Nechaev’s Catechism
of a Revolutionary as “one of the most repulsive documents in the
history of terrorism.”
The Catechism reflected a significant
portion of Russian revolutionary thinking. Bolshevic leader V.I. Lenin
admired the Catechism, while the Russian writer Dostoevsky partly
modelled the character Verkhovensy in The Possessed on Nechaev. After
the Bolshevic Revolution several books and poems were published in Russia in
which Nechaev is presented as an epic Russian hero. In the 1960s the Catechism
was revived by the Afro-American revolutionary group the Black Panthers,
and Eldridge Cleaver wrote favourably of it in his controversial Soul on
Ice.
The Russian anarchist Mikhail Bakunin found
himself seduced by young Sergei Nechaev’s pure fanaticism, confiding to a
friend, “They are charming these young fanatics, believers without a god,
and heroes without flowering rhetoric.” To Bakunin, Nechaev with his
extreme energy and dedication, appeared to be a reincarnation of the
legendary Russian bandits Stenka Razin and Pugachev.
The Russian philosopher and former Marxist,
Nicholas Berdyaev (1874-1948) offers one of the most illuminating insights
into Sergei Nechaev and his Catechism of a Revolutionary. Berdyaev
says that Nechaev “was a real ascetic and a hero of the revolutionary idea,
and in his Revolutionary Catechism writes, so to speak, an
instruction for the spiritual life of the revolutionary and requires from
him a denial of the world.”
The importance of Sergei Nechaev’s thought
is its radical transvaluation of values and open defiance of the prevailing
morality. On the surface Nechaev’s words may indeed appear repulsive and
dangerously threatening, but there remains a deeper meaning capable of
inspiring revolutionary struggle. Nechaev exuded a mystical courage and a
religious passion to change reality. In this he was not too far from the
mystics of the middle ages who stood in opposition to all organised
religious and social laws. His apparent immorality derived from the cold
realisation that both Church and State are ruthlessly immoral in their
pursuit of total control. The struggle against such powers must therefore be
carried out by any means necessary.
Nechaev’s Catechism, on the inner
level, can be read as an indictment of a Control System that can only be
changed through unconditional, all-consuming struggle. And although written
in the 19th century the essence of Sergei Nechaev’s Catechism is
relevant today. The immoral Control System is still in place, only its forms
have changed. Therefore a secret, largely invisible Centre of New Resistance
is needed, linked not by rigid organisational framework, but by subtle bonds
and hidden contacts. New means of struggle and non-conformity are necessary
in the 21st century. Today the computer hackers who penetrate and disrupt
the System’s computer databases engage in the same struggle as the
barbarian tribes who overran the decaying Roman Empire. The System relies on
conspiracies, intrigues, disinformation, and manipulation to keep people in
bondage. We need to turn the System’s weapons against it. Maybe we can
learn something from young Sergei Nechaev.
Catechism of a
Revolutionary
The Attitude of the
Revolutionary Towards Himself
1. A revolutionary is a
dedicated man. He has no personal interests, no dealings, feelings,
attachments or property, not even a name. Everything in him is solely
directed towards one exclusive concern, one thought, one sole passion
— revolution.
2.
Within the very depths of his being, not just in word but in deeds, he
has broken all connection with the social order and the intellectual
world with all of its laws, moralities, customs and accepted conventions.
He is an implacable enemy of this world, and if he continues to live in
it, that is only to destroy it more effectively.
3. The revolutionary
despises all doctinairism and has rejected the mundane sciences, leaving them for future
generations. He knows only
a single science: the science of destruction. For this purpose and this
purpose only, he studies mechanics, physics, chemistry and perhaps
medicine. Towards this end, night and day he will study the living
science of men, their characters, positions and all the circumstances of
the present social order on all its levels. The purpose is only one: the
quickest and most sure destruction of this filthy system.
4.
He despises public opinion. He despises and hates the present public
morality in all its forms. For him only that is moral which contributes
to the triumph of the revolution. All that obstructs this is immoral and
criminal.
5.
A revolutionary is a doomed man. Merciless towards the state and the
entire educated society, he in turn should expect no mercy from them
towards himself. Between them and him there exists a concealed,
continual and irreconcilable war for life or death. He must be ready for
death on any day. He should train himself to withstand torture.
6.
Severe with himself, he must also be severe towards others. All the
tender and soft feelings of kinship, friendship, love, gratitude and
even honour must be extinguished in him by the sole cold passion for
revolotionary success. For him there must exist only one consolation,
reward and pleasure — the triumph of the revolution. Day and night he
should have but one thought, one purpose — merciless destruction.
Striving cold bloodedly and indefatigably toward this goal, he must
always be ready to perish, and to destroy with his own hands everything
that obstructs his achievement.
7.
The nature of the real revolutionary excludes his having any romanticism,
feelings, exaltations, or infatuations. It even excludes his having any
personal hatred or desire for revenge. The revolutionary passion, though
it becomes habitual, must be combined with cold calculation. At all
times and places, the revolutionary must not be impelled by his personal
impulses but must be directed by the common interests of the revolution.
The Relationship of a
Revolutionist Towards His Revolutionary Comrades
8.
A friend or amiable person to a revolutionary may only be one who has
proved by his deeds that he too is a revolutionary. The measure of
friendship, dedication and other obligations to that friend must be
determined by his usefulness in the cause of the all-destructive,
practical revolution.
9.
Solidarity among revolutionaries needs no discussion. The total strength
of the revolutionary work is based upon it. Revolutionary comrades who
are on the same plane of revolutionary understanding and passion should,
in so far as is possible, discuss all major events together and reach
unanimous conclusions. In accomplishing whatever plan is decided upon,
however, everyone should, in so far as is possible, rely upon himself.
In carrying out various destructive actions, everyone must act alone and
should seek advice or aid from his friends only if that is necessary for
success.
10.
Every comrade should have at hand several revolutionists of second or
third rank, not as fully dedicated as himself. He must look upon them as
part of the common revolutionary capital put at his disposal from which
he should strive to extract the greatest possible use. He should look
upon himself as capital doomed to be expended for the success of the
revolutionary cause, but he has no right to personally dispose of that
capital without the consent of the fully initiated comrades.
11.
When a comrade gets in trouble, and the question is whether or not to
save him, the revolutionary should not be guided by his personal
feelings but entirely by the interests of revolutionary success.
Therefore, he must carefully weigh the comrade’s usefulness against
the revolutionary expenditure of force needed to rescue him, and he must
decide which over-balances the other.
The Revolutionary’s
Relationship Toward Society
12.
The acceptance of a new member into the organisation, one who has proved
his loyalty not through words but through deeds, can only be decided
upon through unanimous consent.
13.
A revolutionary enters the world of the state and its so-called
intellectual world, and he lives in that world with the sole purpose of
its complete and speedy destruction. He is not a revolutionary if he
feels sympathy for anything in that world or if he halts before the
destruction of any situation, relationship, or person belonging to that
world in which all must be equally hated. It is all the worse for him if
he has family, friendship, or love relationships; he is not a
revolutionary if they can stay his hand.
14.
With the purpose of merciless destruction the revolutionary may and
often must live in society, pretending to be something he is not. The
revolutionary must penetrate everywhere: into the highest and the middle
classes; into the merchant’s store; into the church; into the mansion
of the aristocrat; into the worlds of bureaucracy, the military, and
literature; into the Third Division [the secret police]; and even into
the Winter Palace [of the Czar].
15.
All this filthy society should be split into several categories. The
first category consists of those condemned to death without delay. The
organisation of comrades should make up a list of the condemned,
considering their harm to the success of the revolution, with those
ranking highest being eliminated first.
16.
Putting together such lists, and thus ordering the condemned,
consideration should be given to neither the personal villainy of the
man nor the hatred provoked by him among the comrades and the people.
This villainy and this hatred can even be partially and temporarily
useful in contributing to the arousal of the masses to revolt. It is
necessary to be guided by the degree of usefulness that his death might
create for the revolutionary cause. First of all, you must destroy those
people who are most harmful to the revolutionary organisation, and such
people whose sudden and violent deaths would bring the most terror to
the government, shaking its might and depriving it of its most clever
and energetic members.
17.
The second group is composed of such persons to whom life is temporarily
conceded so that their terrible deeds will bring the people to
inevitable revolt.
18. The third category
includes a multitude of highly placed persons, animals, having neither
great intelligence nor energy, but having through their social positions
wealth, connections, influence, and power. You must exploit them by
every possible means and in every manner, implicate them, confuse them,
and obtain, in so far as possible, their dirty secrets to make slaves of
them. Their power, influence, connections, wealth, and might will in
this way become an inexhaustible treasury and help for many
revolutionary enterprises.
19.
The fourth category is composed of ambitious office-seekers and liberals
of different shades. You can conspire with them, pretending to blindly
follow them; but at the same time you must take them under your control,
obtaining all their secrets, compromising them to the utmost, so that
their return to favour would be impossible, and making it so that they
will pollute the state with their own hands.
20.
The fifth category is composed of doctrinaires, conspirators, and
revolutionaries who merely talk idly before gatherings and on paper. You
must constantly push and pull them forward towards practical,
headbreaking statements, the results of which will leave no trace but
the complete destruction of the majority of them but which will still
produce a few true revolutionaries.
21.
The sixth and a very important category consists of women, and these
should be divided into three categories. First, those empty-headed,
senseless, and soulless women who can be used in the same ways as the
third and fourth categories of men. Next, women who are warm, devoted,
and talented but not our own since they have not yet worked themselves
up to a real, austere, revolutionary understanding, must be used as
would be men of the fifth category. Finally, there are those women
completely ours, i.e., those who are completely dedicated and have
accepted our program. They are our comrades, and we must look upon them
as our most precious treasure without whose help we could not succeed.
The Attitude of the Organisation
Towards the People
22.
The Organisation has no other goal than the full liberation and
happiness of people, i.e., the common workingman. But convinced that
liberation and the obtaining of happiness is only possible by means of a
fully destructive, popular revolution, the Organisation will, with all
its might and resources, encourage the development and intensification
of those calamities and evils which will exhaust the people’s patience
and drive them into a total uprising.
23.
By “revolution,” our Organisation does not mean a regulated pattern
in the classical, western sense, a movement that always stops and bows
with respect before private property rights and before traditions of
public order and so-called civilisation and morality – one which until
now has limited itself to overthrowing one political form to replace it
with another that tried to create a so-called revolutionary-state. The
only revolution that could be beneficial for the people would be that
revolution which destroyed at its roots any elements of the state and
which would exterminate all the state traditions, social order, and
classes in Russia.
24.
The Organisation thus does not intend to impose on the people any new
organisation from above. The future organisation will without doubt grow
out of the popular movement and from life, but this is the task of
future generations. Our task is terrible, complete, universal and
merciless destruction.
25. Therefore, to get closer to the people, we must unite with those
elements of popular life that, from the time of the beginnings of
Moscow’s state power, have never stopped protesting, not only with
words but with deeds, against everything that directly or indirectly is
bound with the state: against the nobility, against the bureaucrats,
against the clergy, against the guilds, and against the exploiting
kulaks [rich peasant farmers]. Let us join together with the fearless
bandits, the only true revolutionaries in Russia.
26.
To unite this world into one unconquerable, unbending force, that is the
goal of our organisation, our conspiracy, our task.
Sergei Nechaev:
Revolutionary Ascetic
Nechaev was a zealot
and a fanatic, but by nature a hero. As a means of realising social
revolution he preached deceit and pillage and pitiless terror. He
was so strong a man that at the time when he was in Alexeevsky
Ravelin he subjected the prison staff to such propaganda that
through it he issued his directions to the revolutionary movement.
He was in the grip of a single idea and in the name of that idea he
demanded the sacrifice of everything. His Revolutionary Catechism
is a book which is unique in its asceticism. It is a sort of
instruction in the spiritual life of a revolutionary, and the
demands which it makes are harsher than the requirements of Syrian
asceticism. The revolutionary must have no interests, no business,
no personal feelings and connections; he must have nothing of his
own, not even a name. Everything is to be swallowed up by the single
exclusive interest, by the one idea, the one passion – revolution.
Everything which serves the cause of revolution is moral. Revolution
is the one criterion of good and evil. The many must be sacrificed
for the one. But this is also the principle of asceticism. In such a
case the living human person is crushed; it is deprived of all the
richness of the content of life for the sake of the Revolution –
God. Nechaev demanded an iron discipline and extreme centralisation
of groups, and in this respect he was a predecessor of bolshevism.
The revolutionary tactics of Nechaev which permitted the most
non-moral methods repelled the greater part of the Russian
revolutionaries of narodnik persuasion; he even alarmed
Bakunin….
— Nicholas Berdyaev, The Russian Idea
|
|
|
|