"The net worth of the 225* richest people in the world now equals the combined income of the poorest 2.6 billion, who comprise 47 percent of the world's population." (UNDP's 1998 Human Development Report)       (* billionaires)

                                            one of David MacClement's pages

Marijuana, education and jobs


           in New Zealand.
. My own opinions .
Respectable people's opinions
Discussion-List letters
New Zealand Polit.& Environmt
World Events& Predictions
GREEN Parties World-Wide
Universal Basic Income
Voluntary Simplicity Articles
links- Frugal, Simple Living
links- General (ie. All Other)
Support-worthy commercial

The Marijuana Debate: GreenViews(NZ) list, & North & South

At 12:31 2/6/2000 +1200, Alison Coleman wrote:
> ... the problems associated with dope smoking are suffered by 
>a few significant groups - the young, the mentally ill and so on. 
> We have to find a way in which to decriminalise use by the vast
>majority (who are using it now anyway) but who don't become addicted ...
David MacClement writes:

** I have two short points:

(1) there have always been recreational drugs, since before homo sapiens; I don't see that the law should have much to do with it.

(2) In the last 10-25 years, youth have had much less to look forward to than almost all previous generations; I think "the drugs problem (mainly alcohol and tobacco)" is only a symptom of a far deeper malaise. With our young people having 'nowhere to go and not a lot to do', I'm very sympathetic to them. We ourselves have three right in the muck and fog of the problem. With the focus for so many recent generations being on getting a paying job, but with such a big fraction of the relatively few jobs available now being of so little long-term interest, they're right to turn them down, IMO. Getting money is /not/ the focus of anyone's life. We're people, not economic ciphers.

David.


Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000
Subject: [GV]Marijuana Debate
Hi greens,

Murray Ogilvie [MO] wrote:

> I speculate that there is a genetic element to addiction propensity.
> If genetic screening could identify those at risk, you could be educated 
> about the threats that face you specifically.
I would add the theory that drugs are a convenient excuse for all sorts of shortcomings in our society. When we argue that drugs e.g. alcohol, nicotine, dope etc. "blow" young peoples brains out* we assume they had some in the first place.
People are not educated when they are born - they learn - more when young and less when adult.
Unless we properly educate our young, there is indeed nothing there to be "blown out".

As long as working for a couple of bucks in a supermarket or Junk Mail delivery is more important than education we indeed need all these evils we can blame for our shortcomings....
Another example is the assumption that surfing the internet and showing off with a couple of computers in schools have much to do with education when at the same time unqualified staff is employed for teaching.
Education includes not only knowledge but just as important is the ability to observe, reason, be critical and draw conclusions. That's what only good teachers can teach (if they have these abilities themselves).
As long as we are a people of "slogan repeaters" we will not take part in the "knowledge industry" that's for sure. If our young spend their time with stupid work, play computer games and don't learn the basics in school there is no reason to be worried about any harm any drug could do to their "brains".

> >(MO) > In my view we should (as a society) be able to embrace those who
> >suffer the "illness" of drug addiction.
I do not doubt that people can be addicted to drugs but I suspect that in most cases this is just a convenient excuse. Why not admit that we like drugs???
I don't need the excuse to be addicted to enjoy a couple of beers or coffee etc.

The whole marijuana discussion might come down to the point of whether we non- users have a right to force the people who like it to give it up.
In my opinion that's unfair and as long as there is no harm to others people should have the freedom of choice.

There are plenty of other activities which are tolerated but have a negative impact on other people:
Spray-drift, burning all sorts of rubbish and polluting other people's air & property, noisy lawn-mowers, polluting cars, hidden dangerous chemicals in food, business people ripping off the weak, wasting public money, exploiting workers, exploiting children etc. but we seem unwilling to do anything about it.

All the above activities (the order is not meant to rate the level of negativity) are tolerated or seen as "smart" in kiwiland but we would not refrain from punishing a group of people having the habit of taking drugs.

have fun
sigi
Sigi & Silvia,  Nelson, New Zealand
Organic Products Sites:
http://www.TheShop.co.nz
Buy Organic and enjoy!


  *

North & South, June 2000, editorial by Jenny Chamberlain:
==========================

Green Scream

Along with 106,500 others I cast my party vote for the Greens last November. My reasoning was simple: I wanted to send a message to the incoming government that environment and sustainability issues must move to the top of our national "to do" list.
In my opinion, they're increasingly urgent for several reasons, ... that one day we'll match words with deeds: that major food producers including the dairy and beef industries will wake up to the enormous potential of the organic export market and go green - the way the kiwifruit industry has with the Zespri brand.
...
My vote got me much more than I bargained for. Since the Greens entered Parliament the ambitions outlined in their pre-election wish list, Thinking Beyond Tomorrow, are being subsumed by an issue not mentioned anywhere in that high-minded document. The debate on decriminalising cannabis is accruing more media coverage than ecologically sustainable business, or Sue Kedgley's safe food campaigning. An extraordinary situation is developing. List MP Nador Tanczos's campaign to liberalise cannabis laws has leapt to centre stage and everything I voted for has been marginalised.
...
Today's joint is up to 50 times more potent than those available in the 70s. Frequent use leads to more tissue destruction and long term neurological impairment than any other drug of abuse. Cannabis is robbing the brains of our young in a way the odd fag behind the bike shed never could. It's ripping their - and our - futures away. It's often more easily available than tobacco. Four major Nelson secondary schools recently made a combined statement about increasing cannabis use in schools - they claim students enter at third form level already experienced smokers. Ask teachers in rural areas who know how pointless it is trying to teach after their pupils' lunchtime joints.
...

[return to top]


  Return  to  David's main  page
 Go to David's RainForest  page

  Please send any questions or comments to the site Editor


This is: http://www.oocities.org/Athens/Delphi/3142/Marijuana-education-jobs.html#top