"Australia's consumer price index fell 0.4 percent in the September quarter, to put the annual inflation rate at negative 0.3 percent - it's lowest level for 35 years."
The following graph appeared in the Business Herald recently,
as a part of Brian Fallow's article:
The data is from the Reserve Bank, which calculates its own version
of the Consumers Price Index (CPI) as a measure of what it calls
"underlying inflation".
The significant line in the graph is that for "nontradeable
inflation". In essence, nontradeable inflation is determined
by rises in real costs within New Zealand, whereas "tradeable
inflation" is determined mainly by the exchange rate of the
NZ dollar.
New Zealand's commodity export prices are directly determined
by the exchange rate. The prices of import substitutes
- goods that are both made in New Zealand and imported - are regulated
by the prices of imports which are directly determined by the
exchange rate. When the exchange rate goes up, producers in the
tradeable sectors - who face the same cost pressures as those
in the nontradeable sectors - go out of business when they
cannot match the prices of foreign goods. In other words, they
are obliged to absorb cost increases.
The inflation rate that matters in terms of its impact on New
Zealand's living standards is that of New Zealand's domestic costs.
The best CPIbased measure of domestic costs is the Reserve
Bank's measure for nontradeables. It shows that domestic
costs increased significantly in New Zealand in 199091,
and 199497; at well above the upper limit for inflation
set by the Government in accordance with the requirements of the
1989 Reserve Bank Act (RBA).
The real exchange rate is a measure of the nominal exchange rate
(the value of the NZ dollar against a "tradeweighted
index" [TWI] average of the values of foreign currencies),
adjusted by a tradeweighted measure of NZ's domestic inflation
rate relative to foreign inflation. If New Zealand has a rising
nominal exchange rate, and a higher domestic inflation rate than
the countries it trades with, then it's economy is in big trouble;
trouble that can be temporarily alleviated by inflows of foreign
capital. That happened in 1985, 1987 and 1990. Such inflows aggravate
the problem, though, by creating a current account deficit (see
The Balance of Payments Deficit).
If we look at the real real exchange rate, which
means using the "nontradeable rate" of inflation
rather than the "underlying" rate, then the same problem
is clearly apparent in 199497. The real real exchange
rate has risen significantly in 199496, to the detriment
of employment in the tradeable sectors, and to the detriment of
efficiency in nontradeable sectors such as Health and Education.
This inflation means that, for example, the public health sector
is collapsing despite increased funding. Increased funding only
goes part of the way to meeting increased transaction costs.
Transaction costs include the costs of managing such things as
high interest rates and bidding for contracts.
The Australian inflation experience puts NZ's situation in a proper
perspective. With no Reserve Bank Act like ours, with low interest
rates and a falling exchange rate, the Australian inflation rate
is much lower than New Zealand's. Not only does that mean that
we cannot attribute New Zealand's supposedly low inflation rate
to the RBA, but it means that the RBA is itself an active contributor
to inflation in New Zealand.
It works like this. Interest rates - which determine minimum profit
rates - represent a major business cost (see Profit, the Profit
Motive and Social Profit). Thus any policyinduced
increase in interest rates (indeed any increase in interest rates
not matched by an increase in the productivity of capital) represents
a significant increase in factor costs in any capitalintensive
economy; ie in any national economy and in the international economy.
At the national level, a proportion of such cost increases can
be exported via an exchange rate appreciation.
In the New Zealand case, the above graph shows with incredible
clarity just exactly what did happen after the Reserve Bank acted
to push interest rates up in mid1994. Domestic inflation
increased dramatically, while tradeable inflation was suppressed
by being exported.
What is particularly hard to believe is the lack of recognition
of this problem in the business press, despite such data - presented
in a clear graphical form - staring our journalists in the face.
The theme of the Herald article is that, because inflation
is so high, then the Reserve Bank will have little scope to deviate
from the highinterest rate stance it has pursued unrelentingly
since 1994. Yet it is so obvious that this particular inflation
problem is in fact being caused by the very policy that we are
being told we cannot afford to drop. It is obvious from the graph,
and it is obvious from the Australian data.
The Reserve Bank Act does massive damage to the New Zealand economy.
It leads to gross resource misallocation; to a low growth of outputs
and an increasing waste of inputs. For what? Rather than giving
us a better inflation rate for our trouble, it delivers us a significantly
worse rate of domestic inflation than we would have had in the
absence of the Act. (Thanks to the 'First Past the Post' electoral
system, the 1989 RBA wasn't even controversial; it was passed
as a fait accompli supported by both parties in a twoparty
system.)
There is only one way in which the actions of the Reserve Bank
under the RBA reduces the CPI. It exports some of our inflation
by way of engineered increases in the exchange rate. This is what
happened from 1994 to 1996. What is particularly scary is that,
as other countries copy our RBA, as Great Britain has already
done, then, with more other countries doing the same thing, then
a higher interest rate increase will be needed to get the exchange
rate up. The global escalation in interest rates that would
follow from other states copying our technique of treating inflation
would cause a worldwide increase in unemployment, a massively
increased misallocation of resources, and a global increase in
inflation.
![]() |
![]() |
( viewings since 28 Dec.'97: )