Theory is that some things allow for different energy levels.
These are not the steps I took to reach my conclusions. Just hoping they are logical steps to lead the reader to the same conclusion.
Take a short piece of plastic tubing (1/2 or ¾ in dia.)(about a foot long) and cap one end.
Gently blow across the open end to produce a tone. Most of us have done similar.
Now blow increasingly harder until a higher pitched tone is produced.
I did this to check my theory.
Two tones are produced depending on the energy level of the air delivered across the open end.
The air inside allowed for two energy levels.
In our quest to discover subatomic particles, we find more particles than we think we should and some seem to be duplicates just at higher mass.
Be it particles or quarks, we find the same duplication. Some label them first generation, second generation and third generation.
Is it possible that, like our air whistle, particles can have higher energy levels?
By using ever more powerful accelerators, we have the energy available to assemble particles in the next energy levels and we have labeled them by generation level. According to my theory.
Because they are higher energy particles in a low energy environment, they dissipate quickly.
Similar with quarks. This duplication is possibly defining different energy levels.
If that is the case, high energy particles could be defining high energy atoms.
High energy particles and hence atoms, would be just as stable in a high energy level as are particles and atoms in this energy level.
All the particles and matter in the next energy level would be invisible to us.
Evidence shows there are at least three energy levels labeled as generations and reason states there has to be a fourth.
There could be planets and other heavenly bodies in the higher energy levels.
If there were a star in the next energy level, and it is invisible, what would it look like to us?
It might look like a body in space with massive gravity influence that gives off no visible light.
The gravity of such one would be intense and its presence would be felt by all its neighbors.
Is there evidence of such a phenomenon?
I believe there is evidence of such high energy stars and they have mistakenly been named blackholes.
In further proof of this, there is a patent given for a Faster than the speed of light antenna for RF signals. What he defines as poking a hole in a dimension, could also be raising the energy level of the RF signal so it radiates and is received from the next higher energy level.
If we could prove that blackholes are high energy stars, This could account for the invisible or missing dark matter of the universe.
Would also help to better understand the organizing of particles and quarks.
Furthermore, it opens a completely new avenue for research concerning the accessibility and uses of this next higher energy level. My preliminary research defines how this might be done.
For example: a mission to MARS could be measured in hours and not months. Reducing the cost and danger level.
