FIRST CONSTITUTIONAL COURT SINCE 1910 IN OREGON - JUDGE ROSENBLUM TAKES LAWFUL OATH - UPHOLDS KETTLEBERG RACKETEERING CASE AGAINST JUDGES, ATTORNEYS...

JUDGE ROSENBLUM TAKES CONSTITUTIONAL OATH IN KETTLEBERG CASE IN PORTLAND

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF WITH VULTURES EXPOSE' OF FALSE OATH OF JUDGES ENTERED INTO RECORD OF JUDGE COON IN CHRISTINES CASE IN JOSEPHINE COUNTY

Judge Coon enters Amicus Curiae Brief into Record with exhibits of judicial fraud; UNDISPUTED..... Judge Rosenblum allows Racketeering case brought by Roger Weidner to proceed, affirmation of criminal charges against judges, attorneys for theft and conversion of hundred million dollar estate of Janette Kent.

Judges in Oregon are under false oaths since l998; and a changed oath since l910. (go to www.avoiceforchildren.com and download the expose' (long download!) with exhibits written by researcher and court advocate Milt Mitcheck, or write to the addresses at the end for the articles on this that went out on September 5, 2001)

Multnomah County - October 2, 2001 - State attorneys met in the Multnomah County Courthouse of Judge Ellen F Rosenblum on October 2, 2001, on a motion to dismiss a Racketeering Complaint brought against numerous judges and attorneys for criminal acts in the theft and conversion of the Estate of Don Kettleberg, that was willed to Janette Kent thirteen years ago. Weidner, a former prosecuting attorney, has for more than ten years filed into the courts to force the state to turn over the estate to Kent, as the courts ordered the state to do ten years ago.

The state attorneys brought a motion to dismiss on a "Rule 21", the arbitrary, biased and routinely used method to dismiss the Complaints from abused Citizens when they charge public officials or bar members criminally. As the hearing began, Weidner told Rosenblum that there were some problems with the oath she was acting under. Weidner showed Rosenblum a certified copy of her oath, and the exhibits that show that the current oath leaves out words from the constitutionally mandated oath, in particular the words "said" state, and faithfully and "impartially". (The differences are like night and day in a court - the word "said" refers to the REAL land, water, air, Sui Juris Inherent Rights, that only belong to SOVEREIGNS - NOT corporations or states or groups of any kind - and NOT adherent or bound or bonded or contracted in any way to administrative rules. This is about HUMAN RIGHTS AND FAMILY RIGHTS; and to leave out the word "impartially" is obvious that the judges only swear to "faithfully" uphold THEIR Amended VII Statutory system, the OVERLAY of codes, ordinances, statutes and "offences", NOT the Organic Constitution.)

Agreeing that her oath was faulty, exactly as Weidner had charged, Judge Rosenblum said "sometimes things are inadvertently left out, but I will take that oath right now !" Rosenblum stood at the Bench, raised her right hand, and said "normally this would be in front of a judge, but I am under oath and this is on the Record", and Rosenblum took the ORIGINAL oath in front of the audience of attorneys and court watchers. By taking an oath to the "said" state of Oregon, this is the first time since around 1910 that a court has exercised Original Jurisdiction in the state of Oregon, and the first judge since that time to swear to IMPARTIALLY uphold the SAID state, the REAL land, your REAL person and Human Rights. "Said", literally, "aforementioned", in this case, the Constitutionally Lawful Republic of Sovereigns in the State of Oregon. Article 1, Section 1, "All authority inherent in People", Oregon Constitution. (only HUMANS can exercise inherent rights, not a "corpse" - "corps" - corporations that are NOT human, cannot sign anything, have no signature or voice, cannot bear any CLAIM against any Sovereign, cannot bear children or have parental righs, cannot own property - except in the counterfeit overlay the bar and legislature has created and in which the bar spins the people around for their own profit).

Rosenblum told the state attorneys that she was not going to allow their motion to dismiss. Rosenblum said "No - there are allegations of criminal conduct and racketeering and conspiracy in Mr. Weidners Complaint." Rosenblum went on to say that elements of the Racketeering and Conspiracy were both criminal and civil, and told Weidner to amend his Complaint to separate the criminal charges from the civil charges to make it more clear and certain and bring it back in the next hearing. Rosenblum has now acknowledged on the record the evidence of a criminal enterprise of Racketeering involving numerous attorneys, judges and corporate interests in the Kettleberg Estate case, affirming the criminal evidence and facts as Janette Kent and Roger Weidner have testified on the Record for many years.

Rosenblum, by taking an oath to the Original Jurisdiction, lawfully threw out the state administrative, color of law, statutory, unconstitutional paperwork that the attorney generals office generates, always to dismiss without factual dispute or Law. Rosenblum knew in a court of lawful Judicial Due Process that it would be misprision of felony for her to deny the evidence before her and that the criminal charges could not be ignored.

Under the LAWFUL OATH, only credible evidence comes in and a criminal indictment cannot be dismissed in an administrative quasi-judicial process, that is in place at this time under color of Law and their false oaths.

On September 20, 2001, in Josephine County in the court of Judge Coon, researcher and court advocate Chris Youngblood filed an Amicus Curiae brief into the case of Brian and Ruth Christine, with the "vultures" book and the evidence of the judges false oaths. Right now the court is moving to terminate parental rights on the Christines five daughters, rolling over the parents Inherent Rights like road kill, yet have never allowed a trial or conviction against the parents. The state also has NEVER supported or produced any evidence whatsoever in a court to substantiate their kidnapping of the Christine children, unsupported yet printed repeatedly in the newspapers, who work for the state and money interests too, who have slandered and biased the case with unsupported, unproven and uninvestigated lies.

The state, acting as though it can "sever" UN A LIEN ABLE parental rights, is moving without Law in an unconstitutional process without evidence or judicial due process in that case, as well as EVERY case against families in Oregon. The Christine's "repossessed" their children from the state, had them for a few days, and now the state has again taken them, as well as the newborn in Montana. Ruth Christine was forced to bear her baby in shackles imprisoned, having committed no crime nor convicted of any crime, and Baby Abby Rose, whom the state has already destroyed the maternal human bond of mother and child, having NEVER convicted either parent of ANY crime! The Christine's are now in jail in Montana for their brave and selfless acts to exercise Inherent Rights to protect their family body. They have put their lives on the line for their children and for every family in America.

Youngbloods Amicus brief was filed ten minutes before the hearing, and Judge Coon acknowledged the brief immediately. Coon told the court to make copies for all adverse parties in the case, and that the Amicus was now part of the case file in the Christine case. The state attorneys present, as well as attorneys for the State Offices for Services to Children and Families, had no rebuttal to the Amicus brief, outlining the lack of  jurisdiction of the administrative non constitutional court, and that the actions against the Christines have been committed by false judges with no worn oath/contract/bond to the organic Constitutional State of Oregon. The Amicus and exhibits prove that the orders and actions previously brought against the Christines are null and void of Law, and cannot be lawful enforcement. The brief made clear that the state cannot proceed in the manner it has been any longer, having no Lawful Constitutional jurisdiction.

By entering this evidence of false oaths into the Record, and the facts undisputed by the state became legal fact. The facts in the Record have to be disputed in every hearing, on both sides, or what is claimed becomes undisputed fact in the Record. On September 20, the evidence of the false oaths became fact in the Record. And on October 2, when Ellen Rosenblum took a Lawful oath, she became the first judge to do so in nearly a hundred  years, restoring a court of Constitutional Judicial Due Process under the Organic Constitution.

By swearing to uphold "said" state, the statutory overlay is now burnt away, vaporized, and any judge swearing their lawful oath cannot support the unconstitutional statutory overlay anymore now in Oregon. It is all in the process. It is difficult for many to understand the manipulations of this information, without experience in a court. These are deeply embedded manipulations, intentionally deceptive, and how the bar has operated in the dark to deceive and control the common people as they are being exploited and destroyed in administrative process for profit 'INTEREST' for the corporate state.

Today, Oregon has at least one judge with a Lawful oath to exercise an Original Jurisdiction, which reestablishes our Sovereign, Republic in Oregon, and sets the tone for the rest of the country. Now that the evidence has been exposed, entered in to Record and affirmed by a judge, the bridge has reached across between the People, Our Republic and our Rights, and the door is opened for everyone to Claim their birthrights and inheritance, Inherent Rights given to you by God and protected by the Bill of Rights and the Constitutions. We have to CLAIM our rights to exercise them.

We have to realize now that every order, judgment, trial, fines or assessments, that have been generated by these actors under false oaths is NULL AND VOID, including previous judgments of Rosenblum herself. Also, there is NO JUDGE at this time setting on the Supreme Court, including Chief Justice Wallace Carson, who have a lawful oath, as Rosenblum took yesterday. The People have to insist now that their cases be dismissed as they were not allowed Judicial Due Process in the courts. This has now been established as FACT now that Rosenblum has confirmed that the previous oath was false and VOID.

We have to demand that EVERY judge in Oregon takes their Lawful oath now, and no longer tolerate statutory fraud or the counterfeit amended VII statutory judicial system in Oregon. Measure #1 is gathering signatures now across the state, to repeal the Amendment to the Constitution in 1910 that "supplanted" the organic Constitution of the SAID state of Oregon, the Law, the Bond, the Oath and the Contract with the Sovereigns.

TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW TO FIND THIS PETITION, AND MAKE SURE THEY SIGN IT.....
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
The Way Court is Suppose To Be!