Estudio de
Museología Rosario...http://emuseoros.wm.com.ar
...un sitio especializado en museología....visítenos...
Northeast Document
Conservation
Center
100
Brickstone Square
Andover, MA
01810-1494
Tel: (978)
470-1010
Fax: (978)
475-6021 TECHNICAL
LEAFLET
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
Section 3,
Leaflet 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Beth
Lindblom Patkus
Preservation
Consultant
Walpole, MA
and
Karen
Motylewski
formerly
Director of Field Service
Northeast
Document Conservation Center
Natural
disasters, such as hurricane Andrew's August 1992 assault on southern Florida
and Louisiana, make all of us acutely aware of our vulnerabilities to disaster.
Fortunately, catastrophes of this magnitude are rare, but disaster can strike
in many ways. For example, a broken water main inundated the Chicago Historical
Society in 1986; fire severely damaged the Cabildo in New Orleans in 1988; the
Loma Prieta earthquake damaged several San Francisco area museums and libraries
in 1989; smoke from an electrical fire covered collections throughout the
Huntington Gallery in 1985; mold damage threatened Mount Vernon's archival
collections. Large or small, natural or man-made, emergencies put an
institution's staff and collections in danger.
It is
unfortunate that institutional staff often learn about the advantages of
emergency preparedness through hard experience, but an emergency does not have
to become a full-fledged disaster. In fact, hazards can often be mitigated or
avoided altogether by a comprehensive, systematic, emergency-preparedness
program. Such programs provide a means for recognizing and preventing risks,
and for responding effectively to emergencies.
An
increasing number of professionals know that small-scale emergencies can be
contained if staff members are prepared to react quickly. Damage can be limited
even in the face of a large-scale disaster. For example, cultural institutions
in Charleston, South Carolina, formed a consortium that focused on disaster
preparedness several years before they were hit by hurricane Hugo in 1989. Many
of those institutions sustained only minor damage because they were able to put
their early warning procedures into operation.
Disaster
planning is complex; the written plan is the result of a wide range of
preliminary activities. The entire process is most efficient if it is formally
assigned to one person who acts as the disaster planner for the institution and
is perhaps assisted by a planning team or committee. The institution's director
may play this primary role or may delegate the responsibility, but it is
important to remember that the process must be supported at the highest level
of the organization if it is to be effective. The planner should establish a
timetable for the project and should define the scope and goals of the plan,
which will depend largely on the risks faced by the institution.
A prudent
first step is to list geographic and climatic hazards and other risks that
could jeopardize the building and collections. These might include the
institution's susceptibility to hurricanes, tornadoes, flash flooding,
earthquakes, or forest fires, and even the possibility of unusual hazards such
as volcanic eruptions. Consider man-made disasters such as power outages,
sprinkler discharges, fuel or water supply failures, chemical spills, arson,
bomb threats, or other such problems. Take note of the environmental risks that
surround your institution. Chemical industries, shipping routes for hazardous
materials, and adjacent construction projects all expose your institution to
damage. While all institutions are not vulnerable to all disasters, any event
that is a real possibility should be covered under your emergency plan.
Look
carefully at your building and site. Check the surrounding terrain. Is the
building located on a slope? Is the basement above flood level? Are there large
trees near the building? Are such things as utility poles and flagpoles secure?
Is the roof flat? Does water accumulate? Do gutters and drains work properly?
Are they cleaned regularly? Are windows and skylights well sealed? Is there a
history of leaks or other building and structural problems?
Within the
building, fire protection systems, electrical systems, plumbing, and
environmental systems are of primary concern. Are there enough fire
extinguishers, and are they regularly inspected? Does the building have fire
alarms and a fire-suppression system? Are they well maintained? Are they
monitored twenty-four hours a day? Are fire exits blocked? How old is the
wiring? Is it overloaded? Are electrical appliances unplugged at night? Is
auxiliary power available if needed? Are water pipes in good shape? Are there
water detectors, and do they work? Are there any problems with the
climate-control system? You may have already thought of many other questions,
and you should create a risk-assessment checklist of your own.
It is also
important to determine the vulnerability of the objects within the collections.
What types of materials are included? Are they easily damaged? Are they
particularly susceptible to certain types of damage such as moisture, fire,
breakage, and the like? How and where are collections stored? Are they
protected by boxes or other enclosures? Is shelving anchored to structural
elements of the building? Is it stable? Are any artifacts stored directly on
the floor where they could be damaged by leaks or flooding? All items should be
raised at least four inches from the floor on waterproof shelves or pallets.
Are materials stored under or near water sources? Analyze your security and
housekeeping procedures. Do they expose collections to the dangers of theft,
vandalism, or insect infestation?
Consider
administrative vulnerabilities. Are your institution's collections insured? Is
there a complete and accurate inventory? Is a duplicate of the inventory
located at another site? Have collection priorities been set? In other words,
do you know which collections should be salvaged first in the event of fire,
water, or other emergency? Do you have a back-up priority list if you cannot
reach the highest-priority objects due to building damage or the nature of the
disaster?
While these
questions may seem overwhelming, by the time you complete your survey, you will
have a good idea of the significant risks your institution faces. Although
there may be a wide range of disaster scenarios, the most common are water,
fire, physical or chemical damage, or some combination of these. The specific
procedures of a disaster plan focus on the prevention and mitigation of these
types of damage.
Once your
institution's hazards are specified, the disaster planner should devise a
program with concrete goals, identifiable resources, and a schedule of
activities for eliminating as many risks as possible. Geography and climate
cannot be changed, but other vulnerabilities can be reduced. If building and
collection conditions are regularly monitored, repaired and improved, many
emergency situations will be eliminated.
A regular
program of building inspection and maintenance should be a very high priority
if one is not already in place. It can prevent or reduce common emergencies
resulting from burst pipes, defective climate-control equipment, worn
electrical wiring, clogged drains, or other problems. If all improvements
cannot be undertaken at once, make a schedule and follow it. If some items on
your schedule prove impossible or are delayed, move on to the next goal and
return to the earlier problem when it becomes more practical.
Once
building systems are in proper working order, devise a maintenance schedule.
Patchwork repairs and deferred maintenance only result in accelerated
deterioration, leading to an increased risk of emergencies. Keep a log of
building events like clogged drains, furnace cleaning, and equipment failures.
The more you know about your building and its operation, the faster (and more
economically) repairs can be made.
While water
damage is the most common form of disaster for museums, every institution with
collections of enduring value needs a good fire-protection system. Since most
emergencies seem to happen outside normal working hours, reliable fire
detection systems on professional, twenty-four-hour monitors are a wise
investment. Wherever possible, collections should also be protected by a
fire-suppression system. The use of halon is no longer recommended.
Preservation professionals now recommend wet-pipe sprinklers for most libraries
and archives. In addition, water misting suppression systems have become
available within the last several years; these can provide fire suppression
using much less water than conventional sprinkler systems. Before choosing a
fire-protection system, be sure to contact a preservation professional or a
fire-protection consultant for information about the latest developments in
fire protection and for advice appropriate to your collections and situation.
All
fire-protection systems should be designed and installed by professionals with
experience in servicing museums, archives, and libraries, because the needs of
these institutions differ from the needs for home protection. Talk to
colleagues at other local institutions or a preservation professional in your
region for recommendations, and always check references.
Other
actions that reduce building and collection vulnerability include maintaining a
collection inventory, improving collection storage, and following good security
and housekeeping procedures. An inventory will provide a basic list of holdings
to assist in assigning priorities for salvage, and will be essential for
insurance purposes. Improved collection storage, such as boxing and raising
materials above the floor level, will reduce or eliminate damage when
emergencies occur. Comprehensive security and housekeeping procedures will ward
off emergencies such as theft, vandalism, and insect infestation. They will
also ensure that fire exits are kept clear and fire hazards eliminated.
Disaster
planning should not take place in a vacuum. To work effectively, it must be
integrated into the routine operating procedures of the institution. In fact,
you will probably find that in planning for disasters you will also be working
toward the accomplishment of other goals. For example, a properly functioning
climate-control system will prevent fluctuations in temperature and relative humidity,
resulting in a better preservation environment and a longer life for all
collections. At the same time, this prevents disasters such as water leaks from
air-handling units. Similarly, if an institution surveys its collections and
creates an inventory for disaster planning, a corollary benefit is better
access to the collections for researchers and staff.
Remember
three important characteristics of an effective disaster plan:
comprehensiveness, simplicity, and flexibility. The plan needs to address all
types of emergencies and disasters that your institution is likely to face. It
should include plans for both immediate response and long-term salvage and
recovery efforts. The plan should also acknowledge that normal services may be
disrupted. How will you proceed if there is no electrical power, no water, and
no telephone?
The plan
must be easy to follow. People faced with a disaster often have trouble
thinking clearly, so concise instructions and training are critical to the
success of the plan. The key is to write in a clear, simple style without
sacrificing comprehensiveness. Above all, remember that you cannot anticipate
every detail, so be sure that while your plan provides basic instructions, it
also allows for some on-the-spot creativity.
Decide who
will be responsible for various activities when responding to an emergency. Who
will be the senior decision-maker? Who will interact with fire officials,
police, or civil defence authorities? Who will talk to the press? Who will
serve as back-up if any of your team members are unable to get to the site?
Identify a location for a central command post (if necessary), and space for
drying collections. Set up a system for relaying information to members of the
salvage team. Because written information is less susceptible to
misunderstanding, your communications strategy might include notes to be
delivered by "runners." Good communication is essential to avoid
confusion and duplication of effort in an emergency.
Finally, if
the planning process seems overwhelming, approach it in stages. Decide what
type of disaster is most likely to occur in your institution, and begin to plan
for it. The plan can always be expanded to include other scenarios.
Some
important steps should be taken before you write your plan. First, identify
sources of assistance in a disaster. Determine the supplies you will need for
disaster response and salvage efforts for your specific collections. Basic
supplies like polyethylene dropcloths, sponges, flashlights, and rubber gloves
should be purchased and kept on hand. They should be kept in a clearly marked
location, inventoried periodically, and, if necessary, replaced. If you choose
to lock the cabinet containing the supplies, make sure the keys will be available
in an emergency. A sample list of basic supplies is included with this article.
Keep a list of additional supplies that might be needed. This list should
include suppliers' names, addresses, and phone numbers, and should provide
backup sources for supplies. Arrangements should also be made for emergency
cash or credit, because it is sometimes difficult to get money quickly in a
disaster situation.
In recent
years, many disaster-planning guides have published lists of supplies and
companies that provide disaster services as well as sources of technical
assistance. Research these services thoroughly--it is an essential part of the
planning process. If possible, invite local service providers to visit your
institution to become familiar with your site plan and collections in advance
of an emergency. It is also a good idea to plan for back-up companies to
provide critical supplies and services in case there is a community-wide or
regional disaster. Consider coordinating with other local institutions.
The
disaster planner should identify all appropriate disaster-response and recovery
services. These can range from police, fire, and ambulance services to
maintenance workers, insurance adjustors, and utility companies. Several
national companies provide disaster-recovery services such as dehumidification
and vacuum freeze drying. Liaisons should be maintained with local emergency
services so that they can respond appropriately in case of disaster. For
example, you may want to provide the fire department with a list of
high-priority areas to be protected from water if fire-fighting efforts permit.
You may be able to arrange with the fire department to allow specific staff
members from your institution to enter the building for evaluation or salvage
if safety allows. It may be possible to rope off areas for arson investigation
while allowing accessibility to other areas. All such arrangements must be
prepared for in advance for efficient response.
Other
valuable sources of assistance are local, state, or federal government
agencies. While it is widely known that the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) provides disaster assistance programs, institutions may not be aware
that this can include support for recovery of art objects and cultural
resources. An October 1991 policy change allows federal assistance to pay for
conservation of objects that are damaged in a disaster. Conservation is defined
by FEMA as "the minimum steps which are both necessary and feasible to
place the items back on display without restoring them to their pre-disaster
condition." FEMA does not cover the replacement of destroyed items.
The first
priority in any disaster is human safety. Saving collections is never worth
endangering the lives of staff or patrons. In a major event, the fire
department, civil defense authorities, or other professionals may restrict
access to the building until it can be fully evaluated. Once safety concerns
are met, the next consideration will be records and equipment crucial to the operation
of the institution, such as registrar's records, inventories, and
administrative files. Collections salvage and building rehabilitation will be
the next priority.
Objects or
collections of great importance to the institution must be identified ahead of
time. If this is not done, valuable time may be wasted salvaging materials of
little value or spent arguing about what should be saved first. Ideally, this
step includes a floor plan that clearly states the priority of collections for
salvage. This should be attached to the disaster plan, but the security of this
type of information should be considered. It may be wise to allow only
upper-level staff access to this part of the plan prior to an actual emergency.
Salvage
priorities should be based not only on the value of objects, but on their
vulnerability to the particular damage caused by the emergency. If you are not
knowledgeable about the hazards for various materials, contact a conservator to
help you incorporate these considerations into your salvage plan. Paper and
textiles, for instance, are susceptible to mold when they are warm and damp.
Many metals will corrode rapidly under the same conditions. Salt water may
accelerate this damage. Ivory, small wooden objects, and lacquer may swell and crack
with rapid changes in moisture and temperature. Veneers and furniture may be
constructed with water-soluble adhesives. Objects may become brittle after
exposure to the temperatures of a fire. All categories of collections have
special handling and salvage procedures developed by experienced professionals.
Because the instructions for salvage of the wide variety of objects found in
collections is beyond the scope of this article, a brief reading list has been
included for further information.
Once the
necessary preliminary steps have been taken, writing the plan should be
relatively straightforward. Although each plan will be different, a sample
outline is given below:
Introduction--stating
the lines of authority and the possible events covered by the plan.
Actions to
be taken if advance warning is available.
First
response procedures, including who should be contacted first in each type of
emergency, what immediate steps should be taken, and how staff or teams will be
notified.
Emergency
procedures with sections devoted to each emergency event covered by the plan.
This will include what is to be done during the event, and the appropriate
salvage procedures to be followed once the first excitement is over. Include
floor plans.
Rehabilitation
plans for getting the institution back to normal.
Appendices,
which may include evacuation/floor plans; listing of emergency services;
listing of emergency response team members and responsibilities; telephone
tree; location of keys; fire/intrusion alarm procedures; listing of collection
priorities; arrangements for relocation of the collections; listing of in-house
supplies; listing of outside suppliers and services; insurance information;
listing of volunteers; prevention checklist; record-keeping forms for objects
moved in salvage efforts; detailed salvage procedures.
No matter
how much effort you have put into creating the perfect disaster plan, it will
be largely ineffective if your staff is not aware of it, if it is outdated, or
if you cannot find it during a disaster. A concentrated effort must be made to
educate and train staff in emergency procedures. Each staff member should be
made aware of his or her responsibilities, and regular drills should be conducted
if possible. Keep several copies of the plan in various locations, including
off-site (ideally in waterproof containers). Each copy of the plan should
indicate where other copies may be found.
Most
important, the disaster plan must be updated periodically. Names, addresses,
phone numbers, and personnel change constantly. New collections are acquired,
building changes are made, and new equipment is installed. If a plan is not
kept completely up to date, it may not be able to assist you effectively in dealing
with disasters.
Disaster
planning is essential for any institution to provide the best possible
protection for its collections. Disaster can strike at any time--on a small or
a large scale--but if an institution is prepared, the damage may be decreased
or avoided. A disaster plan must be considered a living document. Its
risk-assessment checklist must be periodically reviewed, its lists must be
updated, and its collection priorities revised as needed. An effective disaster
plan will do its best to insure that historical collections in our cultural
institutions are safeguarded for the future.
The
following sources provide further basic reading on disaster planning for
libraries and archives. Please consult NEDCC's leaflet "Emergency
Management Bibliography" for additional references.
Artim,
Nick. "An Introduction to Automatic Fire Sprinklers." WAAC Newsletter
15.3 (September 1994): 20-27, and 17.2 (May1995): 23-28. Available at
http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/waac/.
Describes
the various types of sprinkler systems and their advantages and disadvantages
in a clear, readable style.
Artim,
Nick. "An Update on Micromist Fire Extinguishment Systems." WAAC
Newsletter 17.3 (September 1995): 14. Available at http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/waac/.
Provides
information on development and testing of water misting fire-suppression
systems.
Artim,
Nick. "Cultural Heritage Fire Suppression Systems: Alternatives to Halon
1301." WAAC Newsletter 15.2 (May 1993): 34-36. Available at http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/waac/.
Useful for
institutions deciding whether to retain or replace a Halon fire-suppression
system.
Canadian
Conservation Institute. "Emergency Preparedness for Cultural
Institutions." CCI Note 14/1, and "Emergency Preparedness for
Cultural Institutions: Identifying and Reducing Hazards." CCI Note 14/2.
(Ottawa: CCI, 1995).
A good
starting point; has an excellent checklist for reducing hazards.
Fortson,
Judith. Disaster Planning and Recovery: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarians and
Archivists. (New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, 1992).
Excellent,
comprehensive guidance for emergency preparedness: risk prevention, response,
and recovery. Includes resource lists, bibliography, decision tree. If you can
buy only one emergency planning guide, this should be it.
Fox, Lisa
L. "Management Strategies for Disaster Preparedness." The ALA
Yearbook of Library and Information Services 14 (1989): 1-6.
An
excellent summary of management and implementation strategies for putting
theory into practice.
Lyall, Jan.
"Disaster Planning For Libraries and Archives: Understanding the Essential
Issue." Provenance: The Electronic Magazine 1.2 (March 1996). Available at
http://www.nla.gov.au/nla/staffpaper/lyall1.html.
O'Connell,
Mildred. "Disaster Planning: Writing and Implementing Plans for
Collections-Holding Institutions." Technology and Conservation (Summer
1983): 18-24.
A succinct
and practical approach to disaster planning. Every planning committee should
read it before undertaking the task.
Walsh,
Betty. "Salvage Operations for Water Damaged Archival Collections: A
Second Glance" and "Salvage at a Glance." WAAC Newsletter 19.2
(May 1997). Available at http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/waac/.
Excellent
recovery guidelines for minor, moderate, and major disasters.
BASIC
EMERGENCY SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT:
Dehumidifier
Metal cart
Plastic
(milk) crates
Flashlights
50-ft.
extension cord (grounded)
Portable
electric fan
Wet vacuum
Blank
newsprint
Freezer or
wax paper
Plastic
trash bags
Plastic
buckets and trash can
Paper
towels
Sponges
Mop
Monofilament
nylon (fishing) line
Broom
Gloves
(rubber/leather)
Rubber
boots and aprons
Safety
glasses
Plastic
sheeting (stored with scissors and tape)
First aid
kit
Clipboards,
paper, pens, markers
Emergency
funds (cash and purchase orders)
Acknowlegements
Reprinted
with permission from Disaster Planning for Cultural Institutions, by Beth
Lindblom and Karen Motylewski, published originally as Technical Leaflet #183
by the American Association for State and Local History, Nashville, TN, 1993.
All rights reserved.
Copyright
1999, Northeast Document Conservation Center. All rights reserved.
2/99
Estudio de Museología Rosario...http://emuseoros.wm.com.ar ...un sitio especializado en museología....visítenos...