Destructive Immigration

The most pressing problem that our country faces today: destruction by the invasion of England which is now taking place, an invasion which is often referred to by soft euphemisms, but which is an invasion nonetheless. Polls show that the vast majority of English people want legal immigration reduced and illegal immigration stopped. Why have our government has taken no action to stem the flow of third-world minorities, a flow that is now so great that it literally transforming our nation in a way that ordinary English people find frightening and disturbing.

In fact, why does the U.K Parliament actually promote immigration, legal and illegal, against all reason? Our nation, already mired in debt, cannot productively employ our existing population. With rare exception, the immigrant, legal or illegal, from a third world area is fleeing, not political persecution, but economic deprivation as a direct result of over-population, in quasi-feudalistic societies steeped in ignorance and authoritarian religious dogma. Decades of experience has shown that many of these immigrants and their numerous offspring end up as drains on one or more of the myriad Liberal-sponsored county, and national give-away programs. Not satisfied with our bounty, they now turn to violence and jam our law enforcement, judicial, and prison systems. All of this is paid for by confiscator taxing of a diminishing number of legitimate English citizens productively employed. We have no laws as in the US that require a legal immigrant to be conversant with our history and our institutions, guarantee that he will not require support from the government for a minimum of five years, be in good health, and have a working knowledge of English? Why is there this special status for all immigrants as long as they are a member of a so-called minority? (This word "minority" is wildly inappropriate, when you consider that persons of European descent constitute only about 8% of the world's population!)

And why, when a foreign woman gives birth in the England is she not sent back wherever she may belong - with her infant? Born in the England. The infant is by a quirk of the law an U.K. citizen. His mother is not. Today immigrants clamour that their native language and cultural morals should be officially designated as national "alternatives," while they complain that they are not accepted by the dominant English culture.

You might call this an extreme example - but it is not at all uncommon in modern England as Parliament and the civil servants dance to the tune of multiculturalism and the New World Order that is being imposed on an uninformed and unconcerned English people.

By what right does a judge, solely on his own, decide that a group of illegal immigrants,  - or whomever - rescued from a container truck by the brave men of the HM customs, should be considered for U.K. citizenship, rather than repatriated, or left to the mercies illegal gangs, at the very least they should be sent straight back to the European country the just came form.  Is not the act of rescue itself sufficient demonstration of our humane good will? Must we allow a single man who calls himself a judge to second-guess the majority of our citizens? What loopholes allow him and the racially motivated Liberal groups and their money-hungry lawyers to circumvent reason, logic, and our laws and determine that these obviously economically motivated émigrés are really political refugees? Why does Parliament allow a judge to transgress the interests of those taxpayers who support him and allow him to flaunt the laws of this nation, which he is supposed to uphold? When our nation was vibrant and forthright in support of the interests of its own, such behaviour by a public servant would not have been tolerated. But a few years ago our imperial Parliament flew in the face of the well being of its constituents and passed an immigration amnesty act that forgave most illegal immigrants their crime and guaranteed that even greater numbers would cross our borders illegally.

Now that Parliament and the Labour Party has demonstrated its abject lack of integrity by having granted amnesty to countless illegal who have verified their fitness to become UK citizens by having avoided our law enforcement institutions for a few years, millions more are now emboldened to break our laws. They now know that there exists a foolishly generous nation where a criminal must spend only a short time as a fugitive to have his crime forgiven with no greater penalty for being caught before he qualifies for amnesty, than the necessity to begin over again. When he achieves this goal not only is his crime forgiven - even if suspected - but also he is rewarded beyond his greatest dreams. He is instantly eligible for the multitude of government, and local give-away programs that are denied to those here legally. His cup is overflowing, particularly when he learns that, he need not even exist as a fugitive. As he needs no official papers to live and work in England, with little likelihood that he will be discovered. For all this, there is a small risk. He risks neither life nor incarceration: If he fails this time, he but needs to try again - and again - and again.

The billions that constitute the surplus population of Eastern Europe, Africa, China and Asia have been given the signal that England is a rich land ripe for conquest and colonisation, that its citizens are prevented from stopping the invasion by their own government. And they are coming; by sea and by air, they are coming in increasing numbers.

These invaders are breaking our laws. They are committing a crime against England- against all of us. Under our truly ineffective Liberal laws, they are committing only a misdemeanour. In many other countries of the world, they would be shot the instant they trespassed. Those who aid them, whether by giving them work or sanctuary, are also criminals. They have committed a crime. But the long-term harm such criminals do to the future of our nation far outweighs the penalties our laws could exact, were they enforced. Why do we let them get away with it?

One reason is psychological intimidation and Liberal brainwashing. We are always hearing the cry "we are all immigrants - " such claims misapply the past to a very different present. The immigrants of the last 2000 years were nearly all Europeans and were assimilated to our culture and institutions quickly and they proved their mettle by hard work by which they built our Western Civilisation. . The character of the immigrants has changed - and so has England. No longer able to absorb millions, we are unable even to provide jobs and homes for those that are already here.

Another argument made by both Liberals and Conservatives to excuse these crimes is that without illegal immigrants, crops would rot on the ground and garments would go unsewn, computers would not get programmed. A more ridiculous argument cannot be imagined. With unemployment statistics in the multiple millions - and with many more English people not listed in the figures because they have given up looking for work - and with factories closing down every day as more and more companies, encouraged by our internationalist rulers, move their production to the third world, it is absurd to suggest that we do not have enough English hands to do the work that must be done. What is not laughable, however, is the fact that so many disloyal businessmen would rather pay an Asians or Chinese people slave wages to do the work than pay a living wage to an Englander, It is also said that these illegal immigrants bring their cultures and add "richness" and "diversity" to our society. We might, however, question whether or not we really need what they bring of their "culture." Have we not enough of whatever "richness" they might provide now? Have the Liberals who push this "diversity" line of argument ever told us just how much "diversity" is needed or when we will finally have enough diversity, and when third world immigration can therefore stop? Have we not enough of ignorance, crime, filth, disease, hatred, and irresponsible breeding right now? It is a fact of chilling import that these people are not only flowing by the hundreds of thousands across our borders, but are now reproducing at a rate well in excess of six times the rate of ordinary English family. And they are bringing a true "diversity" of diseases - diseases that had been virtually eliminated from England. Is not our civilisation, which we of English descent have built in England at the cost of so much labour, and so much blood. It has given the world the most freedom and the greatest discoveries the world has ever known. Already our standard of living has declined. This is a warning sign. Our fall to the status of a Third World nation is upon us, assured unless we take immediate steps to clean up the corruption in our government and close our borders.

What might be the reasons that our elected representatives have for being so signally unrepresentative of the English. Could it be that they have a fear of either alienating or no longer enlarging certain "minority”-voting voting blocs? Is it possible that our politicians rely upon an electorate of legal and illegal "minorities" to tip the voting balance in their favour? Is it possible that politicians would betray the principles upon which this nation was based just so they can spend a few more years at the bountiful feeding trough? Are we been punished for our Empire and getting the payback? Is it Adolf Hitler's posthumous revenge on England, Or are they merely well rewarded puppets of the scheming internationalists who want to erode our national identity so they can erect their One-European then One -World government on England’s rotting corpse? Or all of the above? Perish the thought.