|
Conquest. The conquest of England by the Normans in 1066
One can see that each Conquest and colonisation of England has brought its benefits and Improved our nation. Each civilisation was more advanced in many way’s to the nation they had just conquered other wise the conquest would not have taken place. he Celts, Picts, Romans, Jutes, Angles, Saxons, Vikings, Danish, Norwegian, Swedish warriors and then the Normans all came to this country as 'conquerors' or Invaders. As it has been proven, and as the dictionary defines, the difference between 'conqueror' and 'immigrant' are NOT the same thing. In time and in turn the conquerors lost all their original identities through inter-mingling and became 'Britons'. The benefits that this brought us lasted into the mid 20th Century but are still evident today, you only have to look at our History, Literature, Inventions, They forged a nation and Built an Empire of their own. Contrast this to the very recent policy of MASS immigration. (The current immigration and population growth of the existing Third world immigrant is on a scale never previously know). No one has been able to tell us what benefits, this Immigration, from the Third World has given us. Arguments are put forward but are easily brushed aside. Once the English are in a minority and lost control of the country the Third world conquest will be complete, the only difference to the dictionary definition is: we would have surrendered, freely given up our sovereignty with out the use of force of arms. End result is the same
The dictionary agrees with or definitions and so do the historians. The Celts and Picts – Colonists They were followed by the Romans in the first century AD, - Conquers 5th century AD, making way for a succession of invasions by the Jutes, the Angles and the Saxons – Invaders 400 years later came the next wave; this time it was the Vikings. The Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish warriors – Invaders In the thousand years since the Norman Conquest of 1066 – Invaders and Conquers Post-war 20th century Britain opened its doors to Poles, Indians, West Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Ugandan Asians and Chinese – IMMIGRATION STARTED IN 1948.
This is hardly the stuff of a nation descended from immigrants is it? Immigrants or Conquers Part 2Why are we been told with such assuredly that we are all descended from Immigrants? It is repeated every time there is an immigration debate at least once if not hundred times. It is a way of removing our Moral right to object to immigration. If we are all immigrants what is happening is no more than a natural continuation in the process of immigrants coming to England / Scotland / Wales and Northern Island. Since we are quite clearly from Conquers and Invaders it shows the lie. Immigration is not natural to this country, Yes we have a history of been invaded and resisting either ending up in been Conquered or repelling the invasion. But immigration is a very new concept to England et al. The Truth is Immigration as been presented to us know by the politicians and media only started when 20th century Britain opened its doors to Poles, Indians, West Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Ugandan Asians and Chinese. To show we are not descended from immigrants removes thier most powerful and disarming weapon against us it give us back or Moral right to defend ourselves and our country from Invasion because that is what it is. If diversity should be welcomed and celebrated at whatever the cost to England and the English should we not have welcomed. The Spanish Armada, The German army of 1914 and Adolph hitter and his Storm Troopers of 1939 as a chance to add their ethnic culture, food and politics to our own. Did we not miss out on an exciting opportunity? Why would we want to turn any one away from our shores?
|