|
What Makes a
Nation: The Case of Japan
1
The
Japanese and Immigration
10
“England's particular
multicultural inheritance is due to our historical, trading and
imperial relationship with different parts of the globe. We went
over there, during the C20th they came over here. In essence these
communities became part of a inter-connected community of peoples.
Now the imperial relationship has ended but the reality of
interconnectedness remains”
You say our trading and Imperial
past makes us liable for present immigration Well here we go another
exposure of your left wing multi cultural nonsense, another argument
blown away. Keep them coming and well keep knocking them down. RE:
Japan a bigger trading power than us and a Homogenous nation. See
how much better they are.
Japan puts us to shame. Whether
it is crime rates, literacy, GNP growth, investment rates, life
expectancy, or even the yearly number of patents per capita, Japan
is well ahead of us and of nearly everyone else.
Unlike England, which is worried
about the future, always slipping behind and cutting back, Japan is
optimistic. Only 45 years after B-29s nearly destroyed it, Japan is
bursting with energy--investing, building, expanding, ready for the
future. Before long, a few rocky islands in the Pacific could be the
dominant economic and cultural force in the world. How have the
Japanese done it?
People who visit Japan are
tempted to think that the Japanese are just like us. They dress like
Westerners, they build skyscrapers, they believe in efficiency, and
listen to Beethoven. Many of them even speak English. Virtually
every analysis of Japanese success therefore concentrates on such
things as fiscal policy and management techniques. This is no more
useful than explaining England’s ghetto poverty
The Japanese are not like us. In
some ways, they are as we used to be, and in others they are unlike
anything we have ever been. But the essential thing is that Japan
is, and will always be, Japanese. It has an almost 19th
century sense of nationhood, and a fierce resolve to maintain its
national traditions, come what may. Unlike the English or
common-market Europeans, Japanese have a near-instinctual sense of
who they are. This gives Japan the community and purpose that will
carry it well into the next century.
Japanese have an almost touching,
"Wogs-begin-at-Calais" conviction of their own uniqueness.
No people in the world spend as much time meditating on, glorying
in, or apologizing for its singularity. There is an entire
publishing genre one might call "theory-of-the-Japanese,"
in which authors agonize happily over how inscrutable Japanese are
to everyone else.
Naturally, a highly developed
sense of uniqueness requires a sharp distinction between Japanese
and others. Even in the 17th century, Japanese were so determined to
keep their land untainted by foreigners that they closed themselves
off to the world for two centuries. Their forced re-entry into
international affairs in 1853 did not essentially change their sense
of separateness. The rule is simple: The only way to become Japanese
is to be born that way.
The best illustration of this is
the way Japan treats resident Koreans. Many Koreans migrated to
Japan between 1910 and 1945, when Korea was part of the empire.
There are now thousands of third-generation Koreans, who look, act,
and sound just like Japanese. They have permanent legal residency
but they are not citizens. They cannot vote or hold government jobs,
and most Japanese would rather not marry or employ them. Lately,
there has been some liberal clucking in the press about this, but
the general feeling is that if Koreans don't like it, they can
always go back to Korea, which is where they belong.
The word "nation" comes
from the Latin natio, meaning "race" or
"breed," and from nasci, meaning, "to be
born." Japanese feel this vividly. No matter how
"Japanese" a third-generation Korean may seem, his
cultural pedigree is alien. I have asked Japanese how many
generations it would take before Koreans would really be Japanese.
They look at me as if I were stupid, and say, "They'd always be
Korean."
Japanese are just as suspicious
of their countrymen who have emigrated. Someone who has left Japan
to live in Brazil or the United States has forever renounced his
status as a Japanese. Should he or his descendants ever want to come
back to Japan, they would be just as unwelcome as Koreans. Japanese
who emigrate know this, and they throw themselves wholeheartedly
into the culture of their new homeland.
Since Japanese feel so distant
from people who are racially and culturally indistinguishable from
themselves, it is not hard to imagine how they feel about people who
are obviously different. In 1986, the then-Prime Minister of Japan,
Yasuhiro Nakasone, casually mentioned to a group of journalists that
large numbers of blacks and Hispanics were a drag on the “American
economy” (the same is applicable to England) and made the country
less competitive. Although the remark provoked outrage in America
and England, in Japan, it was accepted as obviously true.
In 1990, when a cabinet minister
congratulated the police on clearing the sex trade out of a
residential neighbourhood, he likened the arrival of prostitutes to
the appearance of immigrants in an all-white neighbourhood. They
lower the tone, he said, and the solid citizens clear out. British
commentators choked with anger. Of course, whites have fled a
thousand English communities that were turning Asian / black, but
Japanese cabinet ministers are presumably not supposed to have
noticed.
Distaste for immigrants is
nothing new. One of the consequences of the post-war occupation of
Japan was a crop of mixed-race children, left behind when the
Americans went home. The half-white children were grudgingly
tolerated. The ones who were half-black were bundled off to Brazil,
along with their mothers.
Linguistically, culturally, and
racially, Japan is one of the most homogeneous countries in the
world. This means that it never even thinks about dozens of problems
that are worrying England nearly to death. Since Japan has only one
race, no one ever uses the word "racism." There was no
"civil rights movement," There is no bilingual education,
There is no tyranny of
"political correctness." No one is clamouring for a
"multi-cultural curriculum," and no one wants to rewrite
history. When a company needs to hire someone, it doesn't give a
thought to "ethnic balance;" it just hires the best person
for the job. No one has ever been sent to a re-education seminar
because of "insensitivity."
Japan has no Civil Rights
Commission and no Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. It has no
Equal Housing Act or Equal Voting Rights Act. No one worries about
drawing up voting districts to make sure that minorities get
elected. Japan has no noisy ethnic groups trying to influence
foreign policy. Japanese haven't the slightest idea what a
"hate crime" could be. There is no end to the things
Japanese don't have to worry about.
And put that way, one wonders
what half the people in England (Including Beth) would do for a
living or what journalists would think to write about, if it weren't
for the looming presence of race. The time, money, effort, and agony
that the English lavish on race don’t tighten a single bolt or
bake a single bun, and Japanese can put the effort to productive
use.
"Progressive" English
believe that a great deal of racial scurrying around is somehow good
for us, and they work themselves into self-righteous frenzies over
the Japanese compulsion to draw boundaries between themselves and
others. Of course, an insistence on boundaries is one of Japan's
greatest and most obvious strengths. Though the English have been
trained to pretend otherwise, it is a natural part of any healthy
society. Nothing in Japan would be the same if Japanese did not draw
such a firm line at the water's edge.
One of the greatest differences
between Japan and England is that at some basic level, Japanese are
like the three musketeers: all for one, and one for all. Whatever it
is that Japanese are up to, they are in it together.
This sense of shared purpose
appears in a thousand pleasant ways. One is the virtual absence of
crime. Anyone can walk anywhere in Japan at any time. If a
shopkeeper has excess inventory, he puts it out on the sidewalk. No
store in the whole country bothers with elaborate security systems
that sound an alarm if someone makes off with the goods.
The cost of crime, jails, and law
enforcement is a heavy burden not only on the English economy but
also on the English soul. In a country where people feel a duty to
their tribe, the costs are far lighter.
Another result of homogeneity and
national solidarity is the relative absence of social conflict.
Since all Japanese come from the same stock, receive much the same
education, and absorb the same traditions, they have the same
expectations of each other. There are far fewer doubts than in
England about what is proper and what is not.
One consequence is that most
Japanese go to their graves without ever meeting a lawyer. Japanese
do not spend their time suing each other. When businessmen need a
contract, they sit down and write it. They don't need lawyers to
help them. If there is a disagreement later on they work it out.
People who never have to "celebrate diversity" actually
have a good chance of understanding each other.
Another sign of how much Japanese
have in common is the willingness of most adults to act in loco
parentis when they see a misbehaving child. Only in a community
of common values, where there is no doubt about right or wrong, do
people bother to rebuke a stranger's child. Japanese would want
their own children scolded by strangers if they needed it;
everyone benefits from well-mannered youngsters.
Many things would be impossible
in Japan without a sense of common purpose. Lately, the country has
been spending huge sums on enormous infrastructure projects. The
four main islands of Japan have been linked with bridges and tunnels
longer than anything else in the world. Networks of super express
train tracks are constantly being laid, and skyscrapers are going up
everywhere.
Japanese understand perfectly
that national solidarity grows out of what Japanese have in common
with each other. They prize their homogeneity, and don't want it
diluted. Japan therefore takes no immigrants. Virtually the only way
to become a Japanese citizen is to marry a Japanese, and even then
citizenship is not automatic. The authorities look very carefully
into the alien's background and character, and give him every
opportunity to change his mind. The process takes years, and is not
complete until the alien is, in effect, adopted by a Japanese family
and takes a Japanese name. Usually it is the in-laws who do this,
but there is little recourse if they won't.
Occasionally, Japan is pressured
into taking in foreigners. Back in the 1970s, the United States
practically forced it to accept a handful of Vietnamese boat people.
It didn't take the Vietnamese long to realize that they weren't
wanted, and most of them eventually moved on to America. The
Japanese were quietly delighted.
In public, and in any
international forum, Japanese mouth the expected clichés about one-worldism
and borderless bliss, but they don't believe them. They know that
their smooth-running society requires a degree of national
solidarity that can come only from racial and cultural homogeneity.
Japanese solidarity might have
led to a Scandinavia-style nanny state, with government cosseting at
every turn. It did not. The Japanese family, which has always
demanded loyalty and promised protection in return, has looked after
the losers. This means that Japanese cities have nothing like the
hordes of welfare-bred derelicts that are rapidly filling up every
public space in England
Japan has miles of underground
arcades and covered shopping streets. In London or Birmingham, they
would be rank with scruffy urban campers, and customers wouldn't
dare come around after sundown. In Osaka or Tokyo, one can go for
days without seeing a single "homeless" person, and even
Japanese bums are a cut above the rest. After all, it is a nation of
100 percent literacy, and I have seen vagrants curled up in a
corner, reading a scavenged copy of the Japanese equivalent of the
financial times.
At a time when fashions slop from
one country to the next as if there were no borders, it is a wonder
that Japan has managed to stay so resolutely Japanese. It is a great
help to be surrounded by water; anything that gets into Japan has to
cross the ocean. Even with this advantage, Japan has been remarkably
successful at quietly violating many of the rules that The English
have set up as moral imperatives for the planet. (Of course, there
are countries no one cares about. Mauritania can even practice
slavery since no one can find it on the map, but we have all heard
of Japan.)
Along with its un self-conscious
racialism, it is Japan's insistence on separate sex roles that most
provokes excitable Westerners. Men and women operate in different
spheres and almost no one makes a fuss about it
At the same time, being a
Japanese housewife is no idle lark. Most husbands hand over the
entire pay packet to their wives, and live on an allowance. Women
decide where the children will go to school, where to go on
vacation, and whether to buy a house. Most important, they see to it
that Japanese children keep doing enough homework to score at the
top of every international competition. Japanese mothers are so
single-minded about schooling that they are known as "education
moms."
All this housewifery is a deep
insult to The English feminists. They regularly march over to Japan,
guns blazing, and explain to their Japanese sisters how oppressed
they are. The Japanese listen politely and go on being oppressed.
They don't seem to mind living in a society with no latch-key
children, very little juvenile delinquency, no illegitimacy, and a
divorce rate less than half that of the United Kingdom.
Japanese also take a traditional
view of homosexuality: they don't like it. There is no trace of a
"gay rights" movement, and plenty of Japanese sincerely
believe there are no homosexuals in Japan. One thing of which there
is very little is AIDS. At last count there were about 400 cases of
AIDS in the whole country; In Japan, infected foreigners are
promptly kicked out of the country, and Japanese are kept under
close watch to see they don't give the disease to anyone else.
Yet another Japanese trait that
is unfashionable but obviously good for the country is a firm belief
in hierarchy. Although Japan is extremely homogeneous, there is
little loose chatter about equality. Japanese accept that some
people will end up at the top and others at the bottom, and they are
generally cheerful about it. The old get the respect of the young,
teachers get the respect of students, the boss gets the respect of
his employees, and customers get the respect of everyone.
A visitor to Japan gets a whiff
of this when be becomes a customer in a hotel or restaurant. Japan
has a tradition of service that has none of the surly air of
"I'm just as good as you, Buster," that is so common in
the England. A waiter or bellhop's job is to serve you, and he puts
everything he has into his job. No one thinks it the least bit
demeaning to treat customers as if they were princes. It is Japan's
way of doing a good job.
This yeoman love of a job well
done is everywhere. In factories, on farms, and even in government
offices, Japanese do their work with touching earnestness. Even the
garbage man puts his heart into his job just as the company
president does. And since Japan is a meritocracy, with none of the
complications of a racial spoils system, the garbage man can dream
that his son will grow up to become the company president.
Of course, it would be a mistake
to think that homogeneity cures all woes or that Japan has no
problems. Many countries, including our own, have problems that
homogeneity cannot cure, and Japan has its own special troubles. My
point is not that Japan has built a society that the English or
anyone else would necessarily find congenial. It is that they have
built a society that Japanese find congenial.
Only now are Japanese getting
over their post-war sense of inferiority towards Caucasians. There
is still a ritualised and increasingly empty admiration for the
"American way of life," coming from the second world war
of course and older Japanese still believe that America and is a
mighty nation that can do anything it sets its mind to. Younger
Japanese suspect it no longer has much of a mind. Still, one
undiminished object of admiration is the Caucasian aesthetic. White
models help sell everything from diamond rings to instant noodles.
Plastic surgeons take the slant out of eyes and enlarge noses, and
never the other way round. Some of those half-white children that
America left behind have traded on their looks and become models and
actors.
One of Japan's most serious
problems is one that a healthy society should not have: It has one
of the lowest birth rates in the world. Each Japanese woman has an
average of only 1.53 children, well below the replacement level of
2.1. At a rate of 1.5, each generation is 25 percent smaller than
the one before, and morbid statisticians have been trying to figure
out how many generations it will take before there are no Japanese
left.
It is important to note that
neither this low birth rate nor an acute labour shortage have gotten
anyone but socialists talking about immigration. There is some
discussion of the possibility of bringing in carefully supervised
work gangs from South East Asia, but most Japanese are against the
idea. Instead, there is talk of rising the retirement age from 65 to
75.
From a conventional British
perspective, this is foolishness. Without immigration, Japanese
labour costs will be higher, and some things will be more expensive.
That, however, is the point. Nationhood has a price. What sets the
Japanese apart from The English is their willingness to pay it.
No doubt there are many talented
Japanese women who are frustrated to stay home with children rather
than run companies--but each new generation of Japanese is more
carefully reared than perhaps any other in the world. No doubt
Koreans are unhappy to be disfranchised--but Japan does not have a
foreign policy that is paralysed by different internal ethnic
groups. No doubt it is a misfortune to lose one's house to a bridge
pylon--but the whole nation may benefit from the bridge. No doubt
there are Malays digging ditches in Sumatra for 25 cents a day, who
could afford indoor plumbing and a motor scooter if they dug ditches
in Japan--but long-term national cohesion requires that Japanese dig
Japan’s ditches.
To be sure, there is frustration
in Japan. Cohesion has its costs, and some Japanese will always be
out of step. Nevertheless, this is a small price to pay for the
blessings that today's Japanese can expect to pass on to their grand
children: unity, cultural integrity, family ties, love of country,
and a uniquely Japanese national character. Japan is certainly
"racist," "sexist," "homophobic" and
"nativist"--and perhaps the most successful society on
earth.
The Japanese have the right attitude when it comes to immigration.
The reason Japan has remained a relatively homogeneous society is
because of strict restrictions placed on immigration. Having those
restrictions in place have allowed the Japanese to maintain their
own culture without having to deal with the "tribalism"
that seems to occur in Western industrial countries. The following
is worth a read:
By the BBC's Jonathan Head in Tokyo
A new immigration law comes into effect in Japan on Friday.
Under the new regulation, those who are caught after entering Japan
illegally face possible criminal charges, causing alarm among the
country's growing population of undocumented immigrants.
Over the past few weeks the main immigration office in Tokyo has
been inundated by thousands of desperate people who have been trying
to avoid new penalties. Most are immigrants from other Asian
countries like China and the Philippines who have been working here
for years without official permission.
Under the new law, illegal immigrants can no longer avoid the
possibility of being fined or imprisoned after being here for three
years.
And once deported, they are now going to be banned from coming back
for five years.
Most immigrants are unaffected
Lawyers say that in practice the impact on most illegal aliens will
not be very different.
Only a few are likely to be prosecuted and most probably won't ever
be caught.
But the new law has been so poorly explained that there is fear and
confusion among the more than a quarter of a million undocumented
immigrants.
So they are turning themselves in to the authorities in the hope of
more lenient treatment.
Japan has in the past strictly controlled immigration and immigrant
communities are still relatively small and inconspicuous compared to
other industrialised countries.
But their numbers are growing as Japanese companies seek cheaper
labour from abroad for the jobs the Japanese no longer want to do.
The
governor of Tokyo has set off a swell of criticism in diplomatic
circles and foreign communities here by saying that immigrants in
Japan, mainly people of Korean and Chinese descent, were quite
likely to riot after a major earthquake. The governor, Shintaro
Ishihara, called on the military to be prepared to maintain order in
such an uprising.
"Atrocious crimes have been committed again and again by
sangokujin and other foreigners," Mr. Ishihara said over the
weekend at a ceremony of the Ground Self-Defense Force, the Japanese
equivalent of an army. "We can expect them to riot in the event
of a disastrous earthquake."
"Sangokujin" literally means people from third countries,
and it was used, not as an insult, by the Allied Forces that
occupied Japan to refer to people who were not Japanese or from the
occupying forces. But the Japanese gave the word a xenophobic twist,
and it is rarely used today, except as a sharp insult.
The comments were particularly painful to many Koreans who live here
because they revived memories of the racial violence that flared
after an earthquake struck Tokyo and Yokohama in 1923, killing
97,000 people. Korean residents were blamed for setting fires and
looting, and several thousand ethnic Koreans in those cities were
massacred by Japanese.
"These remarks bring the nightmare home to us of the
groundless, hostile rumor of the 1923 earthquake by which many
innocent comrades were victimized just because they were
foreigners," the Korean Resident Union in Japan, which
represents 600,000 South Koreans, said in a statement. "The
comment is also something that has the potential to ruin friendships
between many Japanese and many foreign residents in Japan who had
hoped to create a society in which they can coexist."
The political minister for the South Korean Embassy in Tokyo, Chu
Kyu Ho, said although Mr. Ishihara's remarks were not too likely to
sour the current good relations between the countries, he had
damaged Japan's reputation internationally. "I hope that the
Japanese people will disavow his remarks, because they are so
inappropriate and so ridiculous," Mr. Chu said. "But what
really worries me is that many Japanese don't know their own history
and may not even understand what's behind this sort of remark."
Many Korean residents are descendants of Koreans who were forcibly
taken here to work in Japan's colonization of the Korean Peninsula
in the early part of the 1900's.
Choe Kwan Ik, deputy director of international affairs for the
General Association of Korean Residents in Japan, which represents
displaced North Koreans in Japan, said until Japan apologized for
its atrocities and made reparations, its officials would continue to
make comments like Mr. Ishihara's.
South Korean and Chinese have long expressed concern that Mr.
Ishihara, who was elected last April, would use his position as
leader of Japan's most populous region as a stage to promote his
nationalist views.
The outspoken governor and author of "The Japan That Can Say
No," has in the past called for Japan to develop nuclear
weapons and dismissed the Rape of Nanking in 1937, when Japanese
troops killed tens of thousands of Chinese, as a lie.
[ Article by Calvin Sibs for the New York Times, 4/11/00 ]
|