I cannot vouch for the authenticity of this letter but it is all true regrdless of wether LTC Zimmerman wrote it or not.
May 1999 MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDING GENERAL, FT. CARSON, CO 80913 SUBJECT: Retirement after 20 Years of Service
1. My decision to retire from the service in the United States Army as of 31 January 2000 is based on a multitude of reasons, mainly considerations for the future stability of my family. I believe it important to provide my little daughter, now six years old, a well-established and secure environment without the turmoil of constant moves and deployments.
2. From a personal perspective, I truly consider the last 20 years in the service of my country as a time of wonderful challenges and much personal growth. Whenever associated with soldiers in a troop environment, I enjoyed the close camaraderie normally associated with close-knit combat units. Besides the many positive experiences of the last twenty years, which included participation in combat during Desert Storm and two below the zone promotions, I must confess that during the last five years, the idea of serving beyond the 20 year mark became more and more questionable for me. The main reason for my personal doubt is the constantly changing culture in the Army which is becoming more concerned with producing a superficial image of accomplishment, guided by false caring vs. tackling our readiness issues with up-front leadership and firm solutions. The Army has become a "social experiment", geared towards promoting diversity and celebrating individual successes vs. instilling the sense of unity behind the values our constitution, the Flag and our distinguished unit colors. The end result we see today is clearly diminished combat readiness and a lower willingness by our young people to serve a higher cause.
3. As I have
come to grips with the decision to begin a new life in the civilian sector,
I cannot but still feel committed to continue my association with the Army
and its people. After all, as General Creighton Abrams once said, 'the
Army is people'. It is my plan, to continue to serve and assist the people
that make the Army and the armed forces, possibly in a political role.
This "outside" option ensures that my voice will not drowned-out by senior
officers and commanders who have lost their connection to the troops and
have lost comprehension of the real causes for the decline in readiness
or morale in the armed forces of today. In addition, I would not rule out
writing a book summarizing my personal observations or perspectives gained
in the last 20 years which differ drastically from the current "party-line"
leadership position prevalent in the Army. The issues/topics which are
crying out for solutions and discussion by our senior commanders include:
a. Senior Leaders are not
listening. Listening, in our Army, is a lost art. The attitude of "father
knows best" will definitely not lead to major changes in our current situation
of eroding combat readiness and rapidly disappearing benefits. One should
always remember that the most significant changes in military affairs were
not the result of General Officer initiatives but were initiated by junior
and mid-grade officers who, in many cases, put their future and careers
at risk.
b. Many senior leaders don't
understand soldiers. Soldiers want to serve in Elite organizations. Why
not give elite organizations such as Armor units, berets, a tank expert/assault
badge and special work coveralls (just one example). If you want to create
an elite army with high combat spirit, you cannot treat first line combat
troops just like the rest. You must make them feel that they are special.
Maybe even special field-pay or a "wear and tear " affected clothing allowance
could be beneficial. As soon as the elite unit message spreads, everyone
will want to join.
c. Re-evaluate Army doctrine
based on training center results. Think "out of the box". Remember G.S.
Patton: 'there is no approved solution to any tactical situation'. Our
military decision making process (MDMP) is totally out of date and geared
towards a leadership system which puts inexperienced, sometimes tactically/operationally
incompetent officers in to key leadership positions and commands. The result:
high risk for catastrophe in combat but good survival opportunity for the
incapable leader if he follows the PROCESS. NTC has become the premier
example of the process-oriented evaluation. Follow the process but lose
the fight - you'll still be successful in our Army.
d. Training schedules and
deployments are unpredictable. Senior leaders in many cases don't know
what is important and therefore invent much unnecessary "nice-to-do" training.
For certain contingencies and deployments, the "pick me or I volunteer"
attitude seems to be prevalent. We must return to the quality over quantity
attitude. The "fast food", or "all-you-can eat approach" has failed us
in the past. But in order to return to quality, one must clearly understand
what is important. Today's "jack of all trades" leader, who attempts to
"punch every ticket" in 20 years cannot make a clear determination as to
what really counts.'
e. Superficial control/leadership.
Many commanders/leaders love to inspect superficial items such as chin-straps,
ear plugs, boot heels, PT cards etc. because it's too tough to understand
the depth of true combat readiness. Such real checks would include proper
load plans (by the way, the US Army still doesn't have a decent load-plan
for armored vehicles today --tow cables are still outside of the turret
and would have to be dismounted in most awkward fashion, possibly under
fire), weapons proficiency, reactions to contact, barracks discipline,
vehicle preparations for movement etc.
f. Too much emphasis on the
wrong issues. Many senior leaders with the zero-defects mentality rapidly
jump to quick fix solutions to repair the system with other "systems" or
"checklists". Again, the result is a shallow solution that doesn't repair
anything. To the contrary, it most often addicts soldiers to a newly established
"military welfare" system. Soldiers today see themselves as victims of
the system. Leaders don't push for self-discipline and developing maturity
but accept self-flagellation as the accepted course of action. Programs
that ought to be reviewed for overemphasis: n Sex training n Consideration
for Others Training n Overemphasis on superficial inspection items, i.e.
chin strap drills, 3x5 PT cards, etc. n Too much emphasis on simulation
to save money in the wrong areas. n Overemphasis on ACS, AFTB, Volunteerism
etc. Most of the social services create an environment that does not emphasize
soldier self-discipline, self-help, and maturity. n Overemphasis on force
protection (unfortunately, even life in the civilian world bears some risks).
n Too much emphasis on diversity (Asian week, African American week, Hispanic
week etc.). Again, we fail to stress unity vs. diversity. We are all AMERICANS
who should be committed to a common purpose - the defense of our Nation.
g. The assignments system
is broken. Units, crews, squads are not kept together long enough to fully
exploit their combat capabilities. We are not able to build the tight interpersonal
trust relationships between leaders and soldiers. People are move rapidly
to increase their promotion opportunities to "punch tickets" vs. true readiness
concerns. Fact: we are still using the old Vietnam individual based replacement
procedures and our leaders seem to be satisfied with it.
h. The current quality of
our soldier recruits and junior leaders is not as good as it should be.
No one will admit to it because it would mean admitting to failure - unacceptable
in a zero-defects world. Because of a severe shortage of junior leaders,
we are told to create/promote our own. End result -- officers do NCO jobs,
just like during the Vietnam days. Promotion boards today do no certify
junior NCO's can lead in their specific specialties. In the days of diversity
and interchangeability of specialties (everyone is wonderful!), promotion
boards don't emphasize questions regarding weapons, ability to lead, tactics,
but concentrate on non-specific issues like ACS programs, financial advisor
issues, EO programs and other ancillary topics. All in the guise of "taking
care of soldiers".
4. Lastly, obviously it would be remiss not to mention to the rapidly eroding benefits for retired soldiers. Our medical care is deteriorating at unacceptable pace. The once promised free medical care is not free anymore. At a time that people grow older and need care, only limited help at high cost will be available. And by the way, the quality will be the same, should you retire at the 20 or 30-year mark. Our retirement pay, based on the base pay level does not currently compensate for the number of deployments, moves and hardships suffered by the average Army family.
5. Although it is a tough decision to leave the Army and begin a new life, I am ready to make peace and leave the service, knowing that I have made a contribution to the Army in peace and war. It is my desire to take 60 days of terminal leave and begin my official separation in September of 1999.
6. I am aware
that because of my decision to separate, I will most likely receive a standard
2-block rating on my next evaluation report to "save" the top ratings for
officers with a future on active duty. I request however that my service
as commander of 1-68 Armor and my service during actual combat receive
the appropriate recognition and that my evaluation fairly reflect the facts
of my contributions to the Army.
7. I am leaving
the Army on a positive note with the desire to continue to make a difference
for the soldiers still in uniform and those who have already joined the
civilian ranks. I hope this memorandum explains some of the reasons for
my retirement request. Above all, I am proud to have served and to be able
to offer my family a new option. As a parent, and with regard to the recent
shooting incident at a Colorado high school, I believe it to be an important
ingredient of patriotism to educate a future generation of Americans in
values and laws that govern us as a civilized Nation. The regard for values
must begin at home and in our schools to take deep root in our society.
To wear plastic value tags on our dog tag chains offers only another shallow
quick fix.
R.W. Zimmermann
LTC, AR (USA)