(YF2d4) persecuting heterosexuals

As of this date, 07-02-24, this folder contains 2 items. ******* item 1 HOMOSEXUAL KILLS GOOD SAMARITAN ******* item 2 HOMOSEXUAL LEADERS INTIMIDATE LIFESITENEWS.COM AND PRO-FAMILY GROUPS ******* item 3 GAY ACTIVISTS TRY TO BAR RED CROSS ******************************************************************************************************** ******* item 1 HOMOSEXUAL KILLS GOOD SAMARITAN ******* Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 ******* Subject: Woman Murdered After Reportedly Witnessing to Homosexual ******* from Linda Harvey and ******* By Bob Kellogg, correspondent http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0023383.html ******* A killing in Chicago last week could turn "hate crimes" laws on their head. ******* A brutal murder in Chicago last week highlights the double standard surrounding hate crimes. A homosexual killed a woman that was trying to witness to him. Will authorities call the killing a hate crime and will the media report it in the same way they did the Matthew Shepard murder? ******* Nineteen-year-old Nicholas Gutierrez is charged with first degree murder in the slaying of 51-year-old Mary Stachowicz. He allegedly beat, stabbed and hid her body in his apartment after she told him God would not approve of his lifestyle. The two were co-workers. Gutierrez allegedly has said he was enraged because it reminded him of heated debates with his mother. ******* Relatives say Stachowicz was probably trying to help. Peter LaBarbera, of Concerned Women for America, was pointed in his response to this crime. "This woman, Mary Stachowicz, was killed evidently because she was sharing the truth about homosexuality to a gay activist", LaBarbera said. "We will be waiting to see, now, if the media treats this case like it treated the Matthew Shepard case." So far it has not. Laura Montgomery, of Soulforce — a gay-activist organization — seemed to avoid the hate crime aspect of the incident. "Our understanding of the Bible in no way condemns sexual orientation or the love that two people of the same sex feel towards one another," Montgomery said. But, when pressed, Montgomery grudgingly said she might consider this murder a hate crime. "If it was directed at this person and intended to intimidate Christians, that would be a hate crime in my mind", Montgomery said. ******* For LaBarbera, this murder was blatantly a hate crime."It's going to be hard for people to say this is not an anti-Christian hate crime committed by a homosexual activist. But I fully expect the media to not pay a lot of attention to this case."Prosecutors say they are considering the death penalty for Gutierrez. The Cook County State's Attorney's office says since Gutierrez is being charged with murder, a hate crime charge would be irrelevant. ******************************************************************************************************** ******* item 2 HOMOSEXUAL LEADERS INTIMIDATE LIFESITENEWS.COM AND PRO-FAMILY GROUPS ******* Psychological warfare ‘jamming’ technique seeks to instill doubt in minds of pro-family persons ******* Toronto, May 3, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Since the passage into Canadian law last week of the homosexual hate crime Bill C-250, LifeSiteNews.com and other pro-family groups in Canada have been subject to some intimidating communications from homosexual activists. The emails, and ones received over the last few years from other activists bear a similar slant, all suggesting LifeSiteNews.com, by reporting news on the homosexual issue that balances the mainstream media’s bias, is ‘hateful’ and out of touch with the rest of the world. The tactic is a well known psychological warfare technique known as ‘jamming’. ?******* One email received the day C-250 was passed into law, was sent to homosexual activist leaders in Canada and purposely forwarded to LifeSiteNews.com, Focus on the Family Canada, and REAL Women Canada. In it Mark Hanlon, Director, External Issues at the Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgendered group at the Memorial University of Newfoundland, wrote: ?******* "These right winged, conservatives are teaching these same messages to their children for the good of society and for the good of morals and ethics. Let's get this one thing straight to all you Conservative groups - your children's attitudes, if they inherit these beliefs from you, will be in a minority down the road. You are setting them on a dangerous path of intolerance and hate. Stop this path - before the world of tomorrow judges them and, thanks to this bill, prisons or fines them. Crimes of hate against the LBGT community will be treated equally with anti-semitism, and anti-african canadian hate crimes."?******* Described years ago by Dr. Charles Socarides in “Thought Reform And The Psychology of Homosexual Advocacy”, jamming used by homosexual advocates seeks to instill doubt in the minds of pro-family leaders as to the correctness in their belief in the abnormality of homosexuality. This is done by oft-repeated but unfounded accusations of hateful speech and un-Christian-like conduct, and the equally unfounded assertion that pro-family positions are held by only an insignificant minority of society. (see Dr. Socarides work here:?******* http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/narth/1995papers/socarides.html )?******* In his article “Selling Homosexuality”, prolific family issues writer Matt Kaufman reveals that “Harvard-trained social scientists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, … in the late ‘80s issued a call for gay activists to adopt "carefully calculated public relations propaganda." Kaufman explains that included in that campaign was “jamming”, which he writes “means, simply, smearing anyone who disagrees with their agenda.” ?******* Prominent US columnist Cal Thomas is quoted by the US website, People for the Way, Truth and Life, having said, “Gay-rights groups are experienced intimidators. They feverishly oppose discussion about people who have come out of same-sex relationships and slander those who manage to get through their jamming system, saying people who abandon homosexuality weren't "really" homosexual in the first place.”?******* http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/TPFT8634/mycustompage0101.htm?******* In a recent email to LifeSiteNews.com someone identifying him/herself only as ‘The Watcher’ says, “I …. was shocked to discover that there are actually organizations like yours in Canada, hiding hate behind a mask of religion.” The word ‘hate’ has been unilaterally redefined by gay activists to refer to opposing views or even facts related to homosexuality that must be censored. The email continued, “Actually, I'm glad I found you. I would appreciate it if you could supply me with a list of organizations that you know of that represent discrimination to its fullest. That way, I'll be able to keep an eye on everyone to ensure that Canada's hate laws are not infringed upon.”?******* In an email referencing the supposed protection for religious groups against hate crime prosecution, someone identifying himself as H. (Bart) Vincelette from Vancouver B.C. said, “You are not a religion recognized by the federal gov't, and therefore are subject to the scrutiny of those who believe in obeying the law of the land . . . I thought you might appreciate a friendly reminder that no one is exempt from the laws governing civility in Canada.” ?******* Finally emails from Lynn Harrington, an active member of the list-serve of the homosexual activist group EGALE (Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere) has for over a year emailed notes to LifeSiteNews.com similar to this one received last month: “Lifesite, Here is something for you to think about in your homo-hating little world.” ?******* Another example of “jamming” - no tolerance, no reasoned dialogue, strong use of emotion and intimidation, false accusations. Historically, it sounds very familiar.?******* See Kaufman’s “Selling Homosexuality” http://www.boundless.org/2001/regulars/kaufman/a0000605.html ********************************************************************************************************* ******* item 3 GAY ACTIVISTS TRY TO BAR RED CROSS by Keith Peters, Washington, D.C., correspondent ******* Source:http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0031711.cfm ******* Sent by Stephen Gray graysinfo@telus.net] ******* April 20, 2004 ******* Are homosexuals interested in the public good — or just their agenda? That question is being raised after a controversy on an Oregon college campus. ******* One of the claims of homosexuals is their lifestyle and demands for special treatment under the law don't hurt anyone. But a recent controversy at Western Oregon University puts that assertion in question. ******* Gay activists tried to evict the Red Cross from the campus, claiming the charity — known for helping people struck by disaster — discriminates against homosexuals by forbidding donations of blood by men if they have had sex with another male since 1977, to prevent HIV/AIDS entering the blood supply. ******* Daniel McConchie, of the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity, said the issue is not discrimination, it's public safety. ******* "Public health should never be subjugated to the whims of the politically correct ideas of the moment," he said, "especially when they are of the dangerous sort where people could get a disease that could potentially take their lives." ******* Student leaders at Western Oregon University told the Associated Press that matters of public health override discrimination and for that reason they wouldn't kick the Red Cross off campus. ******* But Peter LaBarbera, executive director of the Illinois Family Institute, said homosexual activists seem to put their interests above the public's interest. ******* "Whether it's public health, homosexual adoption of young children, destroying marriage, it seems like it's always about gays and not about what's best for society," he said. "The homosexual movement is really based on a sin, and therefore it's not a traditional civil rights movement but we should not be intimidated into thinking these questions are about discrimination or civil rights." ******* FOR MORE INFORMATION ******* In "Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth," psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover examines recent research reported in medical journals and the popular press. He finds many of these studies flawed and cites evidence that homosexuality is indeed changeable. He explains how psychology, biology, choice and habit all interweave to produce deeply imbedded patterns of sexual behavior. ********************************************************************************************************