Welcome to Oligarchy 

This Week's Scary Thought:  September 27. About Bill Mahr's recent comment on "Politically Incorrect," Bush spinner Ari Fleishman said: "There are reminders to all Americans that they need to watch what they do, and this is not a time for remarks like that; there never is."   Let's think about freedom of speech, ladies and gentlemen.  Are we hearing a threat here?

See how the government can be affecting the way you think!

Some Dare Call It Treason!

Giving Up Our Civil Liberties?

THE AMERICAN TALIBAN
AMERICAN "TALIBAN" USES CRISIS TO ATTACK GAYS, FEMINISTS, CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS

American "Taliban" Leaders Speak. (MP3)
jerry@falwell.com

RUSH LIMBAUGH:

"Robertson and Falwell Were Wrong"
The American Taliban--Several Views
"What is objectionable, what is dangerous, about extremists is not that they are extreme, but that they are intolerant. The evil is not what they say about their cause, but what they say about their opponents."

- Robert Kennedy
George W. Bush's Dubious Friends (2000) AND 
"Bin Laden's family link to Bush"
Links to Ben Laden in the past.  Read this and think about it just a bit.  Interesting timing of things, isn't it?
What Was Behind The Warming Of Relations Between Bush And The Taliban?  

For more information on these articles, click on the link.

KARL ROVE,  Bush's long-time political guru and White House advisor:
"As people do better, they start voting like Republicans...
...unless they have too much education and vote Democratic,
 which proves there can be too much of a good thing." 

August 23, 2001 Posted: 9:07 PM EDT (0107 GMT)

From Major Garrett
CNN White House Correspondent

CRAWFORD, Texas (CNN) -- The Bush White House is counting on corporate America to save its surplus.

But the corporations might not show up for duty. And if they don't, the president's budget could be in very hot political water.

The White House is expecting American corporations to voluntarily pay $5 billion in taxes two weeks ahead of time, something corporate tax analysts doubt will occur. That extra $5 billion in revenue the White House expects corporations to pay ahead of time is very important indeed.

Without it, the Bush budget surplus would be $5 billion smaller, and that would mean Bush has tapped into the Social Security surplus, something he has repeatedly vowed not to do. The White House released revised surplus numbers Wednesday, showing a federal surplus of $158 billion, a mere $1 billion more than the Social Security surplus.

But that $158 billion surplus only exists if American corporations pay $5 billion in taxes two weeks early.

"There is zero chance any member of the Fortune 100 would ever pay corporate taxes ahead of time," said Clint Stretch, director of tax policy for the accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche. "Corporations do not have the slightest interest in paying corporate taxes early. They're not going to volunteer money to the government."

"When George W. Bush announced from Sweden on June 14 that he planned to pull the US Navy out of the Puerto Rican island of Vieques by 2003, it struck some as odd when he referred to the people of Vieques, all US citizens, as "our friends and neighbors" who "don't want us there." It was as though he was saying Puerto Rico is a foreign country." --Falcon

CIA believes it should run the country

By Carla Binion

(Read the shocking story)

And, of course, Vincent Bugliosi, prosecutor of Charles Manson and author of several bestselling true-crime books, in The Betrayal of America: ". . . the Court committed the unpardonable sin of being a knowing surrogate for the Republican Party instead of being an impartial arbiter of the law.... [The Court searched] mightily for a way, any way at all, to aid their choice for president, Bush, in the suppression of the truth, finally settling, in their judicial coup d'État, on the untenable argument that there was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause..."

GAO May File Suit Over Energy Papers
Politics: The White House's refusal to turn over Cheney task force documents may cause a constitutional conflict.

WASHINGTON--Congressional investigators, refusing to back down in a three-month standoff with Vice President Dick Cheney, threatened Friday to sue the White House if it continues to withhold documents detailing how a Cheney-led task force developed its national energy policy.

But the White House indicated no new willingness to turn over the disputed documents to Congress, setting up the possibility of a constitutional clash between the executive and legislative branches.

September 7, 2001

NEWS ANALYSIS

Trying to Get Past Numbers on Stem Cells

By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

WASHINGTON, Sept. 6 — In science, the term "embryonic stem cell line" has a specific meaning: a self- perpetuating colony of cells, grown over a period of months, that exhibit biological characteristics showing they can become any tissue or organ. In announcing his plan for federal financing of stem cell research, President Bush used a looser definition.

Now that language may come back to haunt him.

Opponents of Mr. Bush's policy today seized on the administration's acknowledgment on Wednesday that only about two dozen of the 64 cell lines that Mr. Bush says are available for federal research are fully developed. The rest are still growing and may not prove useful to scientists who hope to use stem cells to develop replacement body parts.

"The president's credibility on the whole issue of allowing stem cell research is open to question," said Representative Henry A. Waxman, Democrat of California. "He predicated his decision on information that turns out not to be accurate. I think that is a real problem for him."

The California [power] crunch really is the result of not enough power-generating plants and then not enough power to power the power of generating plants.
--
George W. Bush, Interview, The New York Times, January 14, 2001, quoted from Jacob Weinberg, "

Scarce Funds Imperil Bush Health Goals
Programs: Secretary Thompson pulls back from aid for uninsured children, blaming sour economy. Medicare plan is also endangered.

By ROBERT A. ROSENBLATT, TIMES STAFF WRITER

WASHINGTON -- Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson signaled Thursday that the Bush administration is backing away from its commitment to extend health insurance coverage to some of the nation's 39 million uninsured.

The slowing economy is making it likely that the money won't be available for that effort and for a major expansion of Medicare, Thompson said.

Earlier this year, the administration agreed with a congressional budget resolution to set aside $28 billion to help the uninsured by expanding a program for children in low-income families. The program is a personal favorite of Thompson, and he used a similar one as governor of Wisconsin to manage dramatic increases in coverage. But in an interview with The Times, he warned that budget pressures may make any expansion impossible this year for the Children's Health Insurance Program, known as CHIP.

"The reality is the economy is starting to contract, and when it does you don't have as much money," Thompson said. The "$28 billion would be a nice fix toward helping the uninsured, but . . . I don't know if it's going to be there."

He also warned that it may be virtually impossible for Congress to make good on another part of the budget resolution, a plan to spend $300 billion over 10 years to reform Medicare and add a new prescription drug benefit.

The chances of achieving this seem dubious, according to Thompson, who used the word "if" repeatedly. Approval would be possible only "if Congress can find that amount of money, which I think is going to be very difficult."

. . . And Hardball Politics

By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Friday, September 7, 2001; Page A29

Testy, testy, testy.

President Bush was not happy this week when White House reporters pressed him on whether he'd veto bills that would use the Social Security surplus to pay for other parts of the federal budget. He was testy because he didn't want to say whether he'd keep his promise on the matter.

"I can definitely say that every Social Security recipient is going to get their check and that's what the American people need to understand," Bush said, answering a question that wasn't asked. "There's always that scare tactic, trying to tell the American people that the budget process is going to lead them to not get their Social Security check. That's just ridiculous."

Ridiculous? Well, who once suggested that guaranteeing older Americans their checks meant there would be no dipping into the Social Security trust fund? "We made it secure for older workers," Bush told CNN's John King last April, "because we've set aside all the Social Security surplus for only one thing, and that's Social Security." If that was true then, why isn't it true now?

How Bush Handles Finance Reform
Will Set Tone for His Presidency


By Charles Lewis

(An interesting point of view.  And of course, we now have had six months to see where this is going.)

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier...just as long as I'm the dictator..." --Washington, DC, Dec 18, 2000, George W. Bush during his first trip to Washington as President-Elect

- Six years of negotiations to add enforcement provisions to the 1972 treaty outlawing biological weapons have halted. The reason: The Bush administration vetoed going ahead with a protocol to the Biological Weapons Convention that would have given states the right to obtain information about and inspect sites where biological weapons were suspected of being developed, produced, or used.

To escape blame, Secretary of State Colin Powell argued that the decision was not new: The Clinton administration "probably would have come to the same conclusion." But this and other statements seriously misrepresent the Clinton administration position and the value of the agreement itself.

The Bush team argues that because the equipment and materials used to make bioweapons are also used for legitimate civilian purposes, the convention's ban can't be verified. Therefore, no additional measures could detect violations with high confidence.

The Clinton administration agreed that verification in this narrow sense was not possible. We also believed, however, that we had an obligation to try to strengthen the prohibition against developing and producing biological weapons, given that most of the dozen or so countries pursuing bioweapons capabilities - including states like North Korea, Iran, and Iraq - are parties to the convention. Rather than verification, our goal was deterrence: to make it more costly and risky for cheaters to keep cheating.

Chicanery?

Read about another company using money instead of ethics.

Misplaced Priorities

Friday, August 24, 2001; Page A26

ATTORNEY GENERAL John Ashcroft responded to the Justice Department's latest figures on drug prosecutions by claiming that they prove that "federal law enforcement is targeted effectively at convicting major drug traffickers and punishing them with longer lockups in prison." The data the department released show almost the opposite: that the nation's tough drug sentencing regime is, to a great extent, being used to lock up comparatively low-level offenders who could easily be prosecuted in state courts. The data, far from affirming that the federal drug effort is a success, raise real questions about the federal government's prosecutorial priorities in the war on drugs.

The growth in federal drug prosecutions over the past two decades has been prodigious. Between 1984 and 1999, the number of suspects referred to federal prosecutors in drug matters tripled, to more than 38,000 -- of whom 84 percent were prosecuted. Drug cases during that time went from 18 percent of the total federal criminal caseload to 32 percent. According to other department data, drug convicts now account for 57 percent of the federal inmate population, in contrast to only 21 percent of the much larger state population.

This growth is not, as the attorney general suggests, largely the result of locking up major traffickers. In 1999 only about one-half of 1 percent of criminal referrals were for the most serious drug cases -- those involving what are known as continuing criminal enterprises -- and these led to only 116 actual prison sentences. Two-thirds of drug defendants could not afford to hire their own lawyers, a good indication that they were hardly high-level traffickers. In fact, 38 percent of all convictions involved quantities of drugs small enough that no mandatory minimum sentence could be applied, while only 3 percent resulted in mandatory minimum sentences of longer than 10 years in prison. In 1997 the department reports, 14 percent of federal drug inmates were in prison for drug use, and 42 percent were serving time for dealing -- either at the street level or above. It is simply wrong to argue that the focus of the federal drug effort has been kingpins. Rather, in many jurisdictions, federal drug investigations and prosecutions seem to run parallel with efforts of state prosecutors and local police forces.

Another striking feature of the department's data is the disproportionate role that marijuana seems to be playing in federal drug prosecution. Marijuana is hardly the most dangerous of drugs. Yet 31 percent of federal drug referrals involved marijuana offenses in 1999, more than for any other type of drug. And though these referrals ultimately produced shorter sentences, they were actually more likely to result in prosecutions than cases involving powder cocaine, crack cocaine or heroine. Marijuana cases all by themselves now account for a measurable percentage of the entire federal criminal caseload.

Who's Afraid of a Germ Warfare Treaty?
September 6, 2001

By BARBARA H. ROSENBERG and MILTON LEITENBERG, Barbara H. Rosenberg, chair of the Federation of American Scientists Working Group on Biological Weapons, is a research professor of natural science at the State University of New York at Purchase. Mi.

Declaring that "mankind already carries in its hands too many of the seeds of its own destruction," President Nixon unilaterally renounced biological weapons in 1969.

This led to international agreement on the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972, which codifies the ban on development and possession of germ weapons. The United States then terminated its biological weapons program and focused on defenses.

New information has just come to light, however, that raises questions about recent U.S. compliance with the ban. In July, Donald Mahley, the chief U.S. negotiator for a new treaty to monitor the ban, admitted to Congress that more than one U.S. government agency conducts biological activities that appear ambiguous. Consequently, to protect their interests, the agencies have objected to certain monitoring measures, Mahley said. Two weeks later, Mahley stunned the negotiators from 55 countries assembled in Geneva to finalize the treaty by refusing to continue negotiating.

Bush Gave Afghanistan $132 Million To Date This Year

TASHKENT, Aug 08, 2001 (Itar-Tass via COMTEX) -- The George W. Bush administration is to provide additional financial assistance to the people of Afghanistan. The sum will amount to 6.5 million dollars, as offcially reported by the information department of the Uzbek Embassy in the United States. The total volume of U.S. financial help to Afghanistan will amount to over 132 million dollars this year. Thus, the USA will become the world's biggest financial source for Afghanistan."

August 24, 2001
THE NATION
EPA Study Undercuts Arsenic Step
Environment: Clinton administration cost analysis is found credible, though Bush faulted it in delaying tap-water safety order.
By ELIZABETH SHOGREN, TIMES STAFF WRITER

WASHINGTON -- A new study by an EPA advisory panel appears to undermine one of the Bush administration's primary reasons for revoking a tough new standard for arsenic levels in drinking water.

The panel, in a report released Thursday, concluded that the Clinton administration did a "credible job" of computing the costs to water systems when it ordered that arsenic in drinking water be reduced 80%.

EPA Administrator Christie Whitman prevented the standard from taking effect, citing concerns that the previous administration did not adequately consider the costs and benefits of the new standard or the latest scientific evidence on the effect of small amounts of arsenic, a carcinogen, on human health. "When the federal government imposes costs on communities, especially small communities, we should be sure the facts support imposing the federal standard," Whitman said in March when she rescinded the standard and launched a review.

That decision has cost the administration dearly, raising doubts about the president's commitment to public health.

The panel's findings could increase political discomfort for the Bush administration as it continues to justify revoking the Clinton administration standard and prepares to announce its own proposal this fall on what the standard should be.

Bush Backs Tax Cut, Blames Congress
President Deflects Attacks From Democrats Over Shrinking Budget Surplus

By Amy Goldstein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 22, 2001; Page A02

INDEPENDENCE, Mo., Aug. 21 -- President Bush sought to counteract criticism of his fiscal policies today, insisting that "excessive spending" by Congress -- not the deep tax cut he persuaded lawmakers to approve -- poses the main threat to the shrinking budget surplus.

Days after Democrats launched a campaign to discredit his tax cut as irresponsible in a slowing economy, Bush shifted the blame, portraying himself as "the person who's got the opportunity to bring fiscal sanity to Washington." He put Congress on notice that he would be "watching carefully" to guard against "a last-minute budget raid" and that he might veto spending bills this fall if he considers them inflated.

Bush spoke here a day before the Office of Management and Budget issues new estimates showing that the federal surplus is dwindling faster than administration analysts had expected. They will show that the projected surplus for the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30 is $158 billion, down from an earlier estimate by the administration of $281 billion, largely because of the tax cut and a drop in government revenue.

Mideast, slavery still on racism meeting agenda
U.S. threatens to boycott UN event over demands linked to those issues
CAPE TOWN (AP) — The Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the issue of slavery will definitely feature on the agenda of an upcoming United Nations conference on racism, South Africa's foreign minister said Sunday.

The United States has threatened to boycott the World Conference Against Racism, which begins Aug. 31 in the South African city of Durban, because of references to the Middle East conflict and African demands for slavery reparations in a proposed convention document.

South African Foreign Affairs Minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma said it was unrealistic to expect delegates not to discuss these issues.


208 and Counting

Friday, September 7, 2001; Page A28

SINCE CONGRESS'S return this week, two more House members have signed the petition to force a vote on campaign finance reform, and a third has promised to do so. That means the petitioners now have 208 of the 218 supporters they need -- only 10 to go, and several times that many prospects, if past votes are any indication.

The additional signers were Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland, 16th Republican to buck the party leadership on the issue, and Maxine Waters of California, a Congressional Black Caucus member who had been holding back. The promise was from Richard Neal of Massachusetts, who as a matter of principle has never in seven terms signed a so-called discharge petition to take control of the House floor away from the leadership, but says that because of the importance of the issue, "I'll be number 218" this time. Good for him.


If China Builds More Warheads

By Rose Gottemoeller
Thursday, September 6, 2001; Page A23

President Bush made it clear from the outset of his administration that he was not much interested in negotiations on arms control matters, preferring instead unilateral measures designed to induce cooperation in U.S. partners. In this way, the administration would make fast progress on arms control while avoiding, as Undersecretary of State John Bolton put it in recent Senate testimony, "small armies of negotiators inhabiting the best hotels in Geneva for months and years at a time."

The problem with this approach, of course, is that without the probes and feints of the negotiating process, one is in danger of giving too much to induce cooperation in the other parties. There could be no clearer example of this than the Bush team's signal to China over Labor Day that it might be willing to see a return to nuclear testing so that China could field new warheads -- and specifically multiple, independently targetable warheads (MIRVs).

On the one hand, MIRVs would enable China to be confident that the limited missile defense system of the United States would not negate its strategic offensive deterrent. On the other, MIRVs are universally regarded as a stepping stone for aspirants to strategic superiority. Encouraging a boost in Chinese warheads in this way is highly destabilizing and will do nothing for U.S. national security. And although the Bush administration seems to think it so, the Chinese were not inevitably headed in the MIRV direction.

"We spent a lot of time talking about Africa, as we should. Africa is a nation that suffers from incredible disease."--After meeting with the leaders of the European Union, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 14, 2001

Stem Cell Research Faces FDA Hurdle
With Mouse Cell Base, Tough Rules Apply

By Justin Gillis and Ceci Connolly
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, August 24, 2001; Page A01

Most or all of the human embryonic stem cell colonies approved for research funding under a new Bush administration policy have been mixed in the laboratory with mouse cells, which may create substantial hurdles for scientists trying to turn the colonies into treatments for Parkinson's disease, spinal-cord injuries and other ailments.

The cell colonies, or "lines," were created for early-stage research with no thought that they would become the only embryonic cells eligible for federal money. But that is the status President Bush conferred on them in his first prime-time address to the nation on Aug. 9.

The standard technique for creating human embryonic stem cell lines has been to extract cells from inside a microscopic embryo, then grow them atop embryonic mouse cells, known as "feeder" cells. The latter excrete some unknown nutritional or growth factor that helps the human cells stay healthy. Because they have been in close contact with mouse cells, the human cells pose a small but real risk of transferring potentially deadly animal viruses to people.

Because of that, under guidelines the Food and Drug Administration has been developing for several years, it would be difficult, though not impossible, to use the cells in human clinical tests.

Kurt Vonnegut Fan? Read This

US should not ease its stand against tobacco

By Cesar Chelala, 8/20/2001

THE RESIGNATION of the top American official working on an international treaty to reduce cigarette smoking worldwide raises concern about the future of the US position on this critical health issue.

Thomas E. Novotny, a public health specialist and strong advocate for tobacco control, led the US delegation to the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control during the Clinton and Bush administrations. His resignation comes at a time when the United States is engaged in contentious negotiations with more than 150 countries on how to counter rising tobacco use worldwide.

Novotny had reportedly been frustrated over the Bush administration's softened stand on key issues, such as restrictions on secondhand smoke and the advertising and marketing of cigarettes. The convention was created to stimulate international dialogue around tobacco control issues and health and foster action by member states to implement strong initiatives to reduce tobacco use.

There is now overwhelming evidence that tobacco use is directly responsible for more than 25 causes of death, and it is estimated that 4 million people died of tobacco-related illness in the year 2000. That figure will probably increase to 10 million deaths per year in the 2020s, 70 percent of which will occur in developing countries, which are the ones that can least afford the economic losses.

Looking Beyond Jobs in Welfare Reform
Conservatives Advise States to Promote Marriage, Abstinence, Stronger Families

By Amy Goldstein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 6, 2001; Page A21

The Bush administration officials who oversee welfare reform yesterday urged states to broaden their focus beyond programs that help recipients get a job, saying they should try ways to foster marriage, abstinence and responsible fathers.

In their efforts to wean poor Americans from the welfare rolls, senior Health and Human Services administrators said, states and local communities also have been slow to enlist the assistance of churches and community groups that already work in low-income neighborhoods.

This conservative face of welfare reform -- part of the 1996 law that restructured the nation's welfare system, but a relatively subordinate theme during the Clinton administration -- dominated a two-day conference convened by HHS to critique the nation's progress under a new system of support for its poorest families.

MEDIA COVERAGE OF ASHCROFT HEARING RESTRICTED BY REPUBLICANS IN VIOLATION OF HOUSE RULES... After Ashcroft finished speaking [at a House hearing in which Democrats indicated that some of what Ashcroft was requesting was unconstitutional and excessive (“Past experience has taught us that today’s weapon against terrorism may be tomorrow’s law against law-abiding Americans,” Dem Conyers said.)], committee Democrats called civil liberties and free-speech advocates to testify, including representatives of the American Civil Liberties Union and People for the American Way, which have echoed some of Conyers’ concerns. But while Ashcroft’s testimony was open to television cameras, the committee’s Republican staff ordered camera crews to leave, including those of C-SPAN, the public interest network available on cable television systems nationwide, NBC News’ Mike Viqueira reported. Print reporters and members of the general public were allowed to remain, meaning the speakers’ comments could be reported, but none of them would be available for Americans to see or hear for themselves. House rules state, “Whenever a hearing or meeting conducted by a committee or subcommittee is open to the public, those proceedings shall be open to coverage by audio and visual means,” Viqueira reported. --NBC, 9/24/01

***
It's clearly a budget. It's got a lot of numbers in it."-- George W. Bush--Reuters, May 5, 2000

IMPORTANT!  
The Memo the Bush Administration Hoped You'd Never Read.

Thought for Californians:  Why are the windmills in the Altamont pass not moving when we have an energy crisis.  Could it be an electric company move to keep prices up and supplies down?
For a link to California Energy Use estimates and actual usage, click here.
"I know what I believe. I will continue to articulate what I believe and what I believe -- I believe what I believe is right," he said, to the confusion of some of the listening journalists during an informal meeting near the steps of Rome in Italy where orators used to speak. --Reuters, 7/23/01