Liver and biliary tract
Jetra i bilijarni
trakt
ARCH GASTROENTEROHEPATOL 2002; 21 ( No 3 – 4 ):
Ventilatorno – perfuzioni poremećaji u cirozi jetre
( accepted September 21st, 2002 )
Djordje Ćulafić, Mirjana
Perišić, Predrag Rebić
Institute for Digestive
Diseases, Clinic of Gastroenterology and
Hepatology, Clinical Center of
Serbia, Belgrade.
Address correspondence to: Dr Djordje Culafic
49
Mirijevski venac St.
YU-11160 Belgrade, Serbia
Yugoslavia
Tel. + 381 11 342 8020
E-mail:dculafic@EUnet.yu
................................................
.....................................................
Ventilatory-perusion disoder in cirrhosis Gastroenterološka
sekcija SLD-
01734,2002.
Ventilatory-perfusion
disorders in chronic liver diseases are multifactorial in origin, and may be
caused by impaired pulmonary vasoconstrictive response, increased airway
closing volume, ascites, pleural effusion, and hepatosplenomegaly.
We
examined ventilatory-perfusion indices in 50 consecutive patients with liver
cirrhosis, at the Institute for Digestive System Diseases and the Institute of
Pulmonary Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia. Pulmonary function tests were
used to determine transfer factor and
transfer coefficient, as indicators of alveolo-capillary diffusion rate.
Restrictive ventilatory impairment was determined on the basis of spirometric
parameters: vital capacity, Tiffeneau index and total lung capacity.
Obstructive ventilatory disorder was determined on the basis of Tiffeneau
index.
In the
group of 18 non-smokers with liver cirrhosis we diagnosed 10 subjects with
lower transfer factor, reduced vital capacity, decreased forced expiratory
volume during the first second, and forced expiratory flow at 25% forced vital
capacity. Restrictive ventilatory disorders were diagnosed in 12 (38.7%) patients
with ascites. In comparison with group without ascites (c2 test), significantly higher
incidence of restrictive ventilatory disorders was found in patients with
ascites (p=0.03). However, ascites had no significant effect on the level of
partial oxygen pressure (in comparison with the group with ascites and
hypoxemia, and the group without ascites but with hypoxemia) (p=0.79, c2 test). Hypoxemia was found in 18
(36%) patients. Mean value of partial oxygen pressure was 9.68 kPa (SD=1.10).
This result indicates that ventilatory-perfusion ratio causes moderate
oxygenation impairment.
Key
Words: ventilatory-perfusion disorder, liver
cirrhosis.
SAŽETAK
Ventilaciono-perfuzioni poremećaji u
oboljenjima jetre su multifaktorskog nastanka i prouzrokovani su: oslabljenim
plućnim vazokonstriktornim odgovorom, porastom volumena zatvaranja disajnih
puteva, ascitesom, pleuralnim efuzijama i hepatosplenomegaliom. U
Institutu za bolesti digestivnog sistema i Institutu za plućne bolest,
Kliničkog centra Srbije u Beogradu, ispitalivali smo ventilaciono-perfuzione
poremećaje kod 50 pacijenata sa cirozom jetre. Funkcionim plućnim testovima odredjivali smo transfer faktor i
koeficijent transfera kao pokazatelje stanja alveolno-
kapilarne difuzije. Restriktivne
ventilacione smetnje definisali smo na osnovu spirometrijskih parametara:vitalnog kapaciteta, Tiffeneau indeksa i totalnog
plućnog kapaciteta. Opstruktivne ventilacione
smetnje određivali smo na osnovu Tiffeneau indeksa. U našem ispitivanju otkrili smo da 10
osoba u grupi od 18 nepušača sa cirozom jetre, koji su imali smanjene vrednosti
transfer-faktora imaju i značajno manje vrednosti vitalnog kapaciteta,
forsiranog ekspiratornog volumena u prvoj sekundi i posebno forsiranog ekspirijumskog protoka pri 25% forsiranog
vitalnog kapaciteta, u odnosu na preostalih 8 ispitanika s normalnom difuzijom u plućima.
Ovakav nalaz bi mogao da se objasni ranim, supstancijalnim
promenama ili
edemom u plućnom parenhimu. Restriktivne ventilacione smetnje smo
dijagnostikovali kod 12 (38,7%) pacijenata sa ascitesom. U poređenju sa grupom bez ascitesa (c2 test), nađena je statistički značajno
veća incidenca restriktivnih ventilacionih smetnji kod pacijenata sa ascitesom
(p = 0,03). Međutim, ascites nije značajno uticao na vrednost parcijalnog
pritiska kiseonika (poređenje grupe sa ascitesom i hipoksemijom u odnosu na
grupu bez ascitesa sa hipoksemijom) (p = 0,79, c2
test). Hipoksemiju je imalo 18 (36%) pacijenata. Srednja vrednost parcijalnog
pritiska kiseonika je iznosila 9,68 kPa (SD = 1,10). Rezultat ukazuje
da poremećaj
ventilaciono perfuzionog odnosa obično uzrokuje blaže oksigenacione poremećaje.
Ključne reči:ventilaciono-perfuzioni
poremećaj, ciroza jetre.
In patients with
chronic liver diseases pulmonary functions are frequently impaired.
Approximatelly 30% of
cases with decompensated liver cirrhosis are hypoxemic (1).
The genesis of
arterial hypoxemia is multifactorial in origin and may be caused by
lower affinity of
hemoglobin for oxygen, pleural effusion (hepatic hydrothorax),
pulmonary
hypertension, parenchymal pulmonary disease, bronchitis or emphysema
induced by smoking,
portopulmonary shunts, decreased alveolo-capillary
difusion rate,
ventilatory-perfusion
mismatch and/or intrapulmonary arterio-venous shunts (2,3).
The most
common functional respiratory disorder in patients with liver cirrhosis is
ventilation-perfusion mismatch as well as the reduction of pulmonary diffusion
phase. On the contrary, measurable disorders of air volume and air flow through
respiratory pathways are rare (4).
In chronic
liver diseases pulmonary ventilatory-perfusion () disorder is of
multifactorial origin, and may be caused by impaired pulmonary vasoconstrictive response,
increased closing volume, ascites, pleural effusion, and hepatosplenomegaly
(4). Clinically, disorders of lung function caused by
mismatch commonly manifests with moderate hypoxemia.
disorder is very frequent extrahepatic manifestation
of chronic liver disease (5).
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
This study enrolled 50 consecutive patients with liver
cirrhosis diagnosed at the Institute for Digestive System Diseases and the
Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia. Analyses included
past medical history, physical examination, liver function tests, virological
survey, laboratory tests for specific metabolic liver diseases (ceroloplasmin,
alfa-1 antitripsin, transferin saturation index etc) and percutaneous liver
biopsy.
Two groups of pulmonary function tests were routinely made:
blood gasses analysis and ventilation tests (spirometry, flow-volume curve and
body plethysmography). Blood gas essay was carried out using Blood Gas Manager
1312. Expected values for partial oxygen pressure were calculated according
to Sorbini equation (Pa,O2=103.5
– 0.42 x years) (6).
To determine statistical, dynamic pulmonary volumes and
capacities: vital capacity (VC), forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced
expiratory volume during the first second (FEV1) spirometric studies
were performed by open spirometric system with pneumotachograph (Pneumoscreen
II spirometer). To measure total lung capacity (TLC), thoracic gas volume
(TGV), residual volume (RV), and air volume resistance in the airways (RaW)
body plethysmography with constant volume was used. This measurements were
performed by Bodyscreen II.
Results of pulmonary function tests were used to determine
transfer factor (TL,CO) and transfer coefficient (KCO= TL,CO
divided by the effective alveolar volume), as indicators of alveolo-capillary
diffusion state. Diffusion indices were assessed by CO measurement using the
one-inspiration method, with Transferscreen II apparatus. Lower normal limit of
transfer factor was determined by mathematics. The expected values of TL,CO
were subtracted by SD of 1.64 (SD of 1.42 for males, SD of 1.17 for females).
The expected values of TL,CO were calculated on the basis of valid
standards (in males, expected TL,CO = 11.11 x height in meters –
0.066 x years – 6.03; in females, expected TL,CO = 8.18 x height in
meters – 0.049 x years – 2.74) (7).
Restrictive ventilatory disoder was determined on the basis
of spirometric parameters: VC, index 100 x FEV1/VC (Tiffeneau) and TLC. Lower normal
limit was determined as the expected value – 1.64 SD (in males, SD for FVC =
0.61, SD for TLC = 0.70, and for Tiffeneau SD = 7.17; in females, SD for FVC =
0.43, SD for TLC = 0.60, and for Tiffeneau SD = 6.51) (8).
Obstructive ventilatory disorder was determined on the basis
of the following ratio: 100 x FEV1/VC. Values below 75% were
considered to be abnormal index of pulmonary ventilation. The function of minor
airways was determined by MEF25 (forced expiratory flow at 25% FVC)
and MEF50 (forced expiratory flow at 50% FVC).
RESULTS
In order to determine the effect of mismatch
on partial oxygen pressure, patients without intrapulmonary shunt were
analyzed. Seventeen (34%) out of 50 cases
were smokers. Hypoxemia was found in 18 (36%). Mean partial oxygen
pressure was 9.68 kPa (range: 7.70 to 11.57) (SD=1.10).
The obstructive ventilatory disorder with Tiffeneau index
<75% was diagnosed in 13 (26%)
patients. We found lower transfer factor in 27 (54%), and lower transfer
coefficient in 33 (66%) cases.
Ten out of 18 non-smokers with liver cirrhosis, who exibited
lower transfer factor (mean value 70.9; SD=16.8), also had significantly lower
VC (mean value 75.7; SD=16.1), FEV1 (mean value 78.3; SD=18.8) and
especially MEF25 (mean value 65.5; SD=23.5). The remaining 8
subjects had normal pulmonary gass exchange.
In order to study the effect of ascites on partial oxygen
pressure, patients without intrapulmonary shunt were analyzed. The diagnosis of
ascites was made in 31 (62%) patients. In recumbent position, hypoxemia was
found in 13 (65%) ascitic patients, with PaO2 mean value
of 9.63 kPa (SD=1.01, min 8.23, max 11.06). In sitting position, hypoxemia was
recorded in 10 (50%) patients with ascites, with PaO2
mean value 10.47 kPa (SD=1.18, min 9.30, max 12.60). Ascites had no significant
effect on partial oxygen pressure (comparison of group with ascites and
hypoxemia, and the group without ascites and with hypoxemia) (p=0.79, c2 test).
Restrictive ventilatory disorder was diagnosed in 12 (38.7%)
patients with ascites. Mean value of restriction parameters was: VC 73.0
(SD=14.4), TLC 83.7 (SD=13.5), and Tiffeneau index 78.3 (SD=3.37). In
comparison with non-ascitic group (c2 test), significantly higher incidence of restrictive
ventilatory disorders demonstrated
patients with ascites (p=0.03).
Lower transfer factor with mean value 62.1 (SD=16.8) and
diffusion disorder was recorded in 18 (58%) patients with ascites. In relation
to non-ascitic group (TL,CO mean value 71.8; SD=13.7), no
significant difference of incidence of diffusion disorders was found (p=0.59,
t-test).
Hepatic hydrothorax was diagnosed in 5 (10%) cirrhotic
patients. All manifested restrictive ventilation disorders and hypoxemia with
mean PaO2 mean 9.36 kPa (SD=1.09, min7.50, max10.12).
DISCUSSION
In healthy persons, the strongest stimulus of pulmonary
vasoconstriction is alveolar hypoxia (9). In liver cirrhosis vasoconstrictive
response to hypoxia is impaired. Abnormal vasomotor activity and decreased
vasomotor arteriolar tone cause dilatation of minor lung blood vessels. On the
contrary to macroscopic arterio-venous shunts which are rarely seen in cirrhotics, pulmonary
microcirculatory dilatation is common post-mortem finding (10).
In 1987, Rodriguez-Roisin et al. reported that reduction of
pulmonary vascular reactivity is an important cause of hypoxemia and disorder.
In their series of 15 patients with liver cirrhosis, pulmonary vascular
reactivity was checked by measuring
resistance of pulmonary blood vessels when exposed to hypoxic and hyperoxic air
mixture. In hypoxic condition no significant changes of
distribution
was noted; expected increase of
pulmonary vascular resistance was completely absent in 5 patients. Hyperoxia
caused worsening of
ratio
and moderate drop of pulmonary vascular resistance (11). In 1990, Agusti et al.
reported that beside airway diseases, vasoparalysis of pulmonary vasculature is
responsible for alteration of ventilatory-perfusion ratio and accounts for
paradoxical phenomenon: low pulmonary vascular resistance associated arterial
hypoxemia (12).
In 1971, Ruff et al. noted for the first time an increase of
closing volume in 8 out of 10 patients with liver cirrhosis using the
xenon-133. During normal respiration, early airway closing (closing volume -
CV) is caused by mechanical compression or interstitial lung oedema because of
salt retention, hypoalbuminemia, increased capillary permeability,
hormone-related water retention or reduced pulmonary lymphatic drainage.
Developed microatelectases led to perfusion of non-ventilated lung regions
(13).
In patients with liver
cirrhosis closing volume is frequently upregulated reflecting functional status
of minor blood vessels. Closing capacity (RV+CV) has tendency to be higher than
FRC in patients with liver cirrhosis and hypoxemia, suggesting premature airway
closing and air trapping even during unforced breathing (14,15).
In 1980, Hara et al demonstrated lower MEF25 in 53
patients with liver cirrhosis without apparent clinical and radiological chest
disease. In their study values of MEF50, VC, TLC, FRC, RV and FEV1
were within normal limits. Beside decreased MEF25, the authors found increased closing volume (CV)
indicating disordered function of minor airways. Cigarette smoking had no
effect on their results (16). This observation was further verified by Furukawa
and associates. Lower MEF25 was detected in the majority of his 105
patients in spite of the fact they had normal VC, FRC, RV, TLC, RV/TLC and FEV1
values (14). In 1989, Scemama-Clergeu et al. found normal values of FEV1/FVC
with reduced FEF25-75 in the majority of 10 patients with liver
cirrhosis (17). Marichal et al. recorded decreased flow via minor
airways as only spirometric disorder in the group of 8 patients with liver
cirrhosis (18).
In our study 10 out of 18 non-smokers cirrhotics with lower
transfer factor demonstrated reduced VC, FEV1 and especially MEF25.
This finding is explained by early, substantial changes or pulmonary
parenchymal edema.
Profuse ascites and/or pleural effusion reduce lung expansion
and cause restriction of pulmonary volume and capacity. All static pulmonary
volumes are decreased: VC, TLC, FRC and RV. Further on, in chronic liver
diseases reduction of total pulmonary capacity may be caused by inspiratory
muscles weakness, due to malnutrition. Forced air flow is decreased in
concordance with reduced volume. Maximal inspiratory pressure is commonly
maintained. Ascites increases the diaphragmatic curvature and therefore
enhances the ratio of length and contractility of this muscle (2).
We diagnosed restrictive ventilatory disorders in 12 (38.7%)
patients with ascites. In comparison with non-ascitic group (c2 test), significantly higher
incidence of restrictive ventilatory disorders was found in patients with
ascites (p=0.03). The evacuation of ascites resulted in the improved total
pulmonary capacity, functional residual capacity and airway flow. The best
improvement was noted in the expiratory reserve volume (19).
In recumbent position, enlarged abdominal viscera pushes the
lungs upwards, causing considerable restriction of ventilation and gas
exchange. Flow reduction may be more pronounced in minor airways, leading to
increase of closing volume. Reduction of FRC is particularly important. In low
FRC and higher closing volume, the airway closing occurs even with calm
breathing. Early airway closing makes large areas of the lower lung lobes excluded
from the ventilation while continuing to be circulatory perfused what worsen
ventilation-perfusion ratio. Perfusion of non-ventilated regions causes that
large quantity of blood runs though lungs without being oxygenated (20).
In the upright position patients with massive peritoneal
effusion usually have normal arterial blood gasses, while partial insufficiency
of respiration is induced by recumbent
position change. Extremely large restrictions due to massive ascites may led to
global respiratory insufficiency, which is mostly marked in supine position
(21).
In order to evaluate the effect of ascites on partial oxygen
pressure, patients without intrapulmonary shunts were analyzed. In recumbent
position, hypoxemia was recorded in 13 (65%) patients, with mean PaO2
value 9.63 kPa (SD=1.01, min 8.23, max 11.06). In sedentary position, hypoxemia
was documented in 10 (50%) ascitic patients
with mean PaO2 value 10.47 (SD=1.18, min 9.30, max
12.60). Ascites had no significant effect on partial oxygen pressure (in
comparison of group with ascites and hypoxemia, and the group without ascites
but with hypoxemia) (p=0.79, c2 test).
Significant effect of ascites on gass exchange has been
challenged by other authors. Several group reported that there is no significant
improvement of gas exchange after ample paracentesis ( assessed by PaO2
level, transfer factor and alveolo-arterial oxygen gradient) in spite of
considerable improvement of ventilatory function and increased FEV1,
FVC, TLC and FRC (22,23).
In 1997 Chang et al. published the results of their study in
which they explored the effect of ascites on pulmonary function in two groups
of patients. They compared therapeutic effects of paracentesis and diuretics.
On the contrary to the patients managed by paracentesis, those treated with
diuretics manifested significant improvement of gas exchange, along with PaO2
increase and large reduction of alveolo-arterial gradient. This suggests that beside
mechanical effect of ascites, the interstitial pulmonary edema and fluid
retention contribute additionally to gas exchange imapirement
(24).Alveolo-capilary gas diffusion is impaired only in concordance with reduced pulmonary volume (25).
We demonstrated lower transfer factor (TL,CO) and
impaired diffusion in 18 (58%) patients with ascites. In relation to group
without ascites, there was no significant difference of incidence of diffusion
impairment (p=0.59, t-test).
Pulmonary transfer factor for CO is being improved parallely
with the improvement of pulmonary volume (26).
Lower values of transfer coefficient were recorded after
paracentesis in relation to values before paracentesis. This is to suggest
that, after ascites evacuation, pulmonary volume is improving more than gas
diffusion from alveoli to blood and, therefore, the quotient of transfer factor
and effective alveolar volume is being reduced (27).
In the absence of primary lung or heart disease, patients
with liver cirrhosis and pleural effusion are classified as having hepatic
hydrothorax (28). The development of pleural exudatate is operated by multiple
pathogenic mechanisms: hypoalbuminemia and subsequent fall of colloid osmotic
pressure, anastomoses between portal and azygous systems with fluid
transudation due to increased hydrostatic pressure in azygous vein, lymph
transudation from ductus thoracicus, entry of fluid into pleural space via
transdiaphragmatic lymphatic channels, and direct flow of peritoneal fluid
through diaphragmatic openings (29).
There is some evidence that congenital diaphragmatic porus(i)
and the increased intraabdominal pressure are the most important precipitating
factors for the development of hepatic hydrothorax. Most commonly, these
porus(i) are small diaphragmatic openings 0.03-0.12mm in diameter (30).
It is well known that pleural exudation may develop in the
absence of ascites. One-way, peritoneo-pleural fluid flow occured due to
valvular mechanism based on pressure difference. The fluid runs from the
abdomen, where pressure is positive, to the chest, where pressure is negative accordingly
to the respiratory cycle. Transdiaphragmal flow of peritoneal fluid into the
pleural space is an alternative way of ascites elimination (31).
Pleural effusion in the absence of ascites represents major
diagnostic problem. In 1985, Rubenstein and associates reported that
intraperitoneal injection of 99m Tc-sulphur colloid may verify
transdiaphragmatic passage of peritoneal fluids into pleural cavity. Instilled
intraperitoneal 99mTc-sulphur colloid is not detected in pleural space in
patients with effusions due to pulmonary or cardiac diseases (29).
Pleural exudation causes ventilatory restrictive disorder due
to lung compression. This is more
pronounced in the upright position. Large exudates displace heart to the
contralateral side thus jeopardizing heart performance and interfering with
diaphragmatic function as well. The reduction of diffusion accompanies lung
volume decrease what further on lowers transfer factor (31).
In our study, hepatic hydrothorax was diagnosed in 5 (10%)
patients with liver cirrhosis. All patients had restrictive ventilatory
disorders and hypoxemia with PaO2 mean value of 9.36 kPa.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that mismatch
is result of complex of multifactorial pathogenetic mechanisms. The disorded
ventilatory-perfusion ratio causes moderate oxygenation impairment.
1. Sherlock S. Diseases of the liver and biliary
system. 8th ed. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications 1989; 82-5.
2. Hourani JM, Bellamy PE, Tashkin DP, Batra P,
Simmons MS. Pulmonary dysfunction in advanced liver disease: frequent
occurrence of an abnormal diffusing capacity. Am J Med 1991; 90: 693-700.
3. King P, Rumbaut R, Sanchez C. Pulmonary
manifestations of chronic liver disease. Dig Dis 1996; 14: 73-82.
4.
Krowka
MJ. Clinical management of hepatopulmonary syndrome. Seminars in liver disease
1993; 4:414-22.
5.
Melot C,
Naeije R, Dechamps P, Hallemans R, Lejune P. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary
contributors to hypoxaemia in liver cirrhosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139:
632-40.
6.
Sorbini CA, Grassi V, Solinas E, Muiesan G. Arterial
oxygen tension in relation to age in
healthy subjects. Respiration 1968; 25: 3-13.
7.
Cotes JE.
Standardization of the measurement of transfer factor (diffusing capacity). The
European Respiratory Journal 1993;6: 5- 40.
8.
Quanjer PH. Lung volumes and
forced ventilatory flows. The European Respiratory Journal 1993; 6: 5- 40.
9.
Harris P,
Heath D. The human pulmonary circulation. Churchill-Livingstone. Edinburg 1986;
545-3.
10.Daoud FS, Reeves JT, Schaefer JW. Failure of
hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Clin
Invest 1972; 51: 1076-80.
11.Rodriguez-Roisin R, Roca J, Agusti AG, Mastai
R, Wagner P, Bosch J. Gas exchange and pulmonary vascular reactivity in
patients with liver cirrhosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 135: 1085-92.
12.Agusti AGN, Roca J, Bosch J, Rodriguez-Roisin
R. The lung in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1990; 10: 251-257.
13.Ruff F, Hughes JMB, Stanley N, McCarthy D, Green R,
Aronoff A. Regional lung function in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. J Clin
Invest 1971; 50: 2403-13.
14.Furukawa T, Hara N, Yasumoto K, Inokuchi K.
Arterial hypoxemia in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Am J Med Sci 1984;
287:10-13.
15.Behera D, Singh M, Chawla Y, Dilawari JB. Pulmonary
function abnormality in patients with portal hypertension with or without
chronic liver disease. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 1998; 40:33-39.
16.Hara N, Yoshida T, Furukawa T, Inokuchi K.
Abnormalities in maximum flow volume curve and closing volume in patients with
hepatic cirrhosis. Jpn J Surg 1980; 10: 265-269.
17.Scemama-Clergue
J, Piquet J, Clerici C, Harf A, Dhumeaux D. Effects of propranolol on
pulmonary gas exchange in patients with
cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1989; 9:234-239.
18.Marichal I, Dublet P, Medrano G, Hinestrosa H, Talmo C,
Korchoff W, Alvarado R, Quiros E. Liver cirrhosis: pulmonary function. G E N
1991; 45:263-269.
19.Angueira CE,Kadakia SC.Effects of large - volumen
paracentesis on pulmonary function in patients
with tense cirrhotic ascites. Hepatology 1994;20 : 825-828.
20.Zhu Z, Yuan Y, Li N, Ye X, He T. Pulmonary function
abnormality in patients with portal hypertension with or without liver disease.
Hua Hsi I Ko Ta Hsueh Hsueh Pao 1992; 23:343-346.
21.Gupta D, Lalrothuama S, Agrawal PN, Agrawal
AN, Dhiman RK, Behra D, Chawla Y. Pulmonary function changes after large volumen paracentesis.Trop
Gastroentrol 2000;21:68-70.
22.Berkowitz KA, Butensky MS, Smith RL. Pulmonary
function changes after large volume paracentesis. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88:
905-7.
23.Chao Y, Wang SS, Lee SD, Shiao GM, Chang HI, Chang SC.
Effects of large volume paracentesis on pulmonary function in patients whit
cirrhosis and tense ascites. J Hepatol 1994; 20: 101-5.
24.Chang SC, Chang HI, Juh F, Shiao GM, Wang SS,
Lee SD. Therapeutic effects of diuretic and paracentesis on lung function in
patients with non-alcoholic cirrhosis and tense ascites. J Hepatol 1997; 26:
833-8.
25.Stanley
NN,Woodgate DJ.Mottled chest radiograph and gas transfer defect in chronic liver
disease.Thorax 1972;27:315-323.
26.Chao Y, Wang SS, Lee SD, Shiao GM, Chang HI, Chang SC.
Effects of large volume paracentesis on pulmonary function in patients whit
cirrhosis and tense ascites. J Hepatol 1994; 20: 101-5.
27.Chang SC,Chang HI,Chen FJ,Shiao GM,Wang SS.Effects of ascites and body position on
gas exchange in patients with cirrhosis. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B 1995;19:143-150.
28.Morrow CS, Kantor M, Armen RN. Hepatic hydrotorax. Ann
Intern Med 1958; 49: 193-203.
29.Rubinstein D, Melnnes IE, Dudley FJ. Hepatic
hydrotorax in the absence of clinical ascites: diagnosis and management.
Gastroenterology 1985; 88: 188-91.
30.Alberts WM, Salem AJ, Solomon DA, Boyce G. Hepatic
hydrothorax. Arch Int Med 1991; 151: 2383-8.
31.Chen A, Yat SH, Yen CT, Hung ST, Tung C. Diaphragmatic
defect as a cause of massive hydrotorax in cirrhosis of the liver. J Clin
Gastroenterol 1988; 10: 663-6.