An ABC News.com's May, 2001 story exposed released documents that showed the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff actually planned domestic terrorism to whip Americans into a pro-war frenzy. This was in the 60's but it shows that the highest echelons of our govt. have actually considered terrorizing their own people for political gain. Click here for the story. Is there a relationship between the planned domestic acts of terrorism against U.S. citizens and The Proper Crisis?

Below you will find links on terrorism and experimentation done to U.S. citizens by the U.S. government:

Questions

The media has told US time and time again that the planes crashing on September 11, 2001 were the result of terrorism, but there are still many unanswered questions, right? Or have the media and the government found concrete evidence that points to terrorism and Osama Bin Laden? In order to answer the above questions, U.S. foreign policy, our covert and overt operations (wars, coups & assassinations, invasions, business relationships, etc.), and aid (intelligence, financial, dual use technology, WMD given to foreign governments and regimes need to be researched, and the connection between our government and Afghanistan. We also need to ask and answer questions concerning the past and present U.S. foreign policy towards the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and Central/Latin America.

What is the past relationship between the Taleban and the U.S. government? When did the U.S. first fight a war on Afghanistan's soil? Was the U.S. there fighting during the late 1970's and early 1980's? Or is it that you DON'T KNOW what "your" government does?

• Why was Afghanistan attacked and not any other country (i.e., Saudi Arabia, France, etc.)?

I am sure that I am not the only person who has general and specific questions concerning the 09/11 continuum and the "blame-game" that the FBI and CIA have played (and still are playing), and since this is the case, we cannot blindly and foolishly believe the media and our government (both of which have been caught in scandals and lies in the past), we have to use our freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution to question our elected (and unelected - Bush) officials to make informed decisions. In doing so, it is imperative that you read the information within the 09/11 Investigation.

• Were the planes UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) or were they controlled by a remote control?

In questioning September 11, we cannot be foolish enough to believe that money was not made and that no entity or person made money from the attacks. We should think logically and rationally about what we are told and hear about the attacks, as many are still profitting today from the attacks. If you don't believe that money was made, check out stock holders that benefited from the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) and the others that have benefitted from the "09/11 Continuum."

• Did an airplane really crash into the Pentagon? If so, why did the structural damage not look like an airplane had crashed into it??

Have you seen The Siege, if so, doesn't isn't it eerie that there are many similarities between the movie and what is now called "September 11th?" Did you notice the similarities between the speech that was made in the movie by the President and the speech that Bush gave? Or is it just a coincidence?

We have to look into the questions surrounding the actions of our government's agencies, especially the "intelligence" agencies to find out the TRUTH.

Have there been plans in the past to attack and go to war in Afghanistan? If so, does this mean that there was compliance between the U.S. military (and other agencies) and the conspirators of the events that took place on September 11th? If this is the case, then can we continue to allow our government to go about in its present state without making changes??

Why is a war being fought again on foreign soil? What do we, the people of the United States, hope to gain? Is there anyway that we can justify morally or conscientously this new war? Are we proud of people who had nothing to do with 09/11 being MURDERED because of flimsy (circumstancial) evidence that could not stand up in an U.S. or international court of law? Will this war bring about justice? If not, then why is it being fought?

Are the actions of our government and therefore US hypocritical? How can we (through the Department of Defense War) attack, bomb, and invade countries every week of the year and not expect any retaliation? If there is retaliation, then does our government have the right act like "victims?" Who are the "real" victims? What is the true tragedy: the thousand(s) that lost their lives in the U.S. or the 300+ million that have been lied to since September 11th (well, really since the beginning of this country's existence)?

Were the attacks "friendly fire"? Did the U.S. government use the same tactics when they wanted to go to war with Cuba (.pdf file)? Or was this a joint military operation between the U.S. and Israel's Mossad?

Or has the "corporament" "turned over a new leaf" and now wants to show its humanitarian side by helping the people of Afghanistan? However, if this is the case, then why has the heroin production in Afghanistan gone up and what about the "girls being sold for kg of wheat?" Why did they/we wait until the Taliban (Taleban) gained control of so much of the country before finally deciding to "free" and "liberate" the people of Afghanistan? Why were over 20, 000 civilians murdered during the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan if the purpose was to help? why were cluster bombs and food packets used?

"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government."

- Thomas PPaine

If you think that the "War on Terrorism" will end in Afghanistan, then you are wrong as it seems that our government has plans to bomb and invade other countries. Yet who will die during the bombings and invasions...civilians ("collateral damage"). Can you sit back and let this happen? If so, then are you being hypocritical? Are we not a country full of "compassionate" people?

For those who believe that the plane crashes at the World Trade Center--I am not convinced that the Pentagon was hit bit an airplane--were attacks on the "freedom(s)" that we think we have or are told we have, think again. If this was the case, then why wasn't the Statute of Liberty, Liberty Hall, our courts, Lincoln's Memorial, etc. attacked? Are these not symbolisms of our "freedom?" What symbolism does the WTC and Pentagon represent outside of the U.S. and within the U.S.? Are they symbols of capitalism (greed, arrogance, materialism & money, exploitation, destruction of the environment--air, land, and water, annihilation of other cultures, and globalization) and militarism (terrorism, fear, threats, force, aggression, murder, and violence)?

Why would the leaders of a country be "jealous" of our "freedoms" and attack the U.S. because of their jealousy? If you are the leader of a country, would you not have unlimited (or close to it) freedom? If so, then that can not be a reason for the "attacks" on the United States? So what does this mean, have we been lied to again by the media and our government? Why have they lied again, what do they have to gain?

Do we KNOW what OUR government and corporations are doing abroad in our names? Do we agree with what they are doing on a moral, ethical, spiritual, and "human" level? Doesn't our government (military, CIA, FBI, SOA graduates, NSA, NRA, NASA, etc.) and our corporations have a responsibility to let US know what they are doing and why? If not, then we need to change this.

Whose blood from the past and present is on our hands because of our "corporament"? Do they not represent "America?" Following the illegal and unjustified attack on Afghanistan citizens, what will happen next? How will the children feel once they grow older, if they have were not killed by cluster bombs, land mines, or U.S. bombs that began dropping on September 11, 2001? Will they feel happy about the United States invading their country and uprooting and/or destroying their culture? How will the adults feel? Are the bombings acts of humanity or Crimes Against Humanity?

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

- Benjammmmin Franklin, 1759

Sources

1. The World Book Encyclopedia. Volume 7: F. World Book, Inc., Chicago, 1984. pg. 428, critically reviewed by William C. Havard.