Stiff Right Jab – Who Is The Real Fox?
Steve Montgomery & Steve Farrell
Monday, Sept. 10, 2001
NAFTA . . . FTAA . . . joint border development planning commissions . . . new rules with new institutions . . . no single government can handle it alone . . . a borderless society . . . a border government . . . taking compassionate conservatism to the next level! . . . Trust! Trust! Trust! (1)
These are the words, the Third Way/new world order rhetoric, if you will, of US President George W. Bush, and Mexican President Vincente Fox - two men equally committed, or so it seems, to redefining the laws, the Constitution, the way of life of the United States of America according to the collectivist design of that despicable body of Naked Capitalists - the Council of Foreign Relations, even as they promise prosperity economics, democracy, democracy, and more democracy.
Patrick Henry, at St. John's Church on March 23, 1775 said:
For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it. (2)The truth as Henry saw it, was that the chains were clanging. Their clanging was ominous. The janglers were the British. Their stated design was to bind their enemies in all things. The soon to be enslaved were our forefathers. Henry's biggest concern? With the facts staring many patriots square in their face, far too many of them felt secure, complacent, trusting. Unfathomable, it was, that the heads of their own government would conspire against their rights. Wasn't the King their Father? Wasn't England their mother? Surely, Father and Mother would not make war on their children!
The truth was, however, and the evidence supported it, Father and Mother were conspiring, were making war, and were fixed on enslaving and exploiting their wayward, troublesome, bastard child.
The lesson learned? When it comes to political power, never trust - ever be vigilant.
Mr. Bush and the Republican Party encourage conservatives, regarding their "free" trade negotiations, regarding the dismantling of our immigration laws, that we should "trust" them - that our sovereignty, our political institutions, and our way of life are secure in their hands - that their only design is to help the American economy, and to export, democracy. In essence, they will honor their oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." But such promises are hallow, in lieu of the facts and common sense.
Let's take a step back. The date is April 22, 2001 - the location, Quebec - the players involved, the Heads of State of the Western Hemisphere including President Fox and President Bush - the occasion, the Summit of the America's - the purpose, to create a Free Trade Area of the America's.
Ask yourself to what document George W. Bush made a loyalty oath when he and his fellow Western Hemisphere buddies put their hands, their voices, and their hearts to the following joint declaration:
We, the democratically elected Heads of State and Government of the Americas, have met in Quebec City at our Third Summit, to renew our commitment to hemispheric integration . . . We reiterate our firm commitment and adherence to the principles and purposes of the United Nations and of the Organization of American States . . . We welcome the significant progress achieved to date toward the establishment of a Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) . . . The Agreement should be balanced, comprehensive and consistent with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and disciplines . . . (3)
This is not an oath to sustain the US Constitution, this is not an oath to protect US sovereignty, this is not an oath to defend the laws and borders of this country - but to take them down, to merge the United States with a bunch of corrupt, leftist banana republics under the laws and premises of the pro-Communist, anti-morality, anti-American United Nations.
Is this, truly the goal of Free Trade and regional arrangements under the UN Charter? Consider what pro NAFTA, pro WTO Newt Gingrich (CFR), urged his fellow Republicans, in respect to the same.
[W]e need to be honest about the fact that we are transferring from the United States, at a practical level, significant authority to a new organization. This is a transformational moment. I would feel better if the people who favor this would just be honest about the scale of change . . . [This is] a very big transferof power. (4)
Gingrich, and the Republicans, never did take that message to their constituents. Why? Were they afraid that if the average American ever figured out what was really going on, that they would have sniffed out treason?
Writing in the Fall 1991 edition of Foreign Affairs (the mouthpiece of the Council of Foreign Relations - and what Time Magazine dubs "the most influential periodical in print") M. Delal Baer, was equally frank.
After all, international organizations like GATT and NAFTA by definition minimize assertions of sovereignty in favor of a joint rule-making authority. (5)
Baer went on to then enthusiastically note the connection between the EU and NAFTA. In Europe, he knew, a few, seemingly innocent economic alliances, such as - the 1951 creation of the European Coal and Steel Community, and the 1957 six nation European Economic Community (EEC or Common Market), were never really, just about money, but more about the creation of a new international government - the EU.
NAFTA, should be used for the same, he stated:
"It may be useful to revisit the spirit of the Monnet Commission, which provided a blueprint for Europe at a moment of extraordinary opportunity. The three nations of North America, in more modest fashion, have also arrived at a defining moment. They may want to create a wiseman's North American commission to operate in the post ratification period . . . The commission might also adopt a forward-looking agenda on themes such as North American competitiveness, links between scientific institutions, borderland integration, the continental ecological system and educational and cultural exchanges."
Leon Trotsky would have been proud of the EU and NAFTA. The EU certainly fulfills his dream:
The Federated Republic of Europe, the United States of Europe -- that is what must be. National autonomy no longer suffices. Economic evolution demands the abolition of national frontiers.(6)All those things (and much more) move forward, first through the three nation NAFTA, and next through the hemispheric FTAA, including Bush and Fox's plan for "borderland integration." This is not about Free Trade, this is about putting an end to the United States of America - as we know it - and the agent, is President George W. Bush, Republican. The lackeys? Every Republican and Democrat who blindly rallies behind the President.
History You May Have Missed
During President Washington's presidency, Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, the man who penned, "all men are created equal," submitted his "Report On Commercial Intercourse," to Congress. Regarding trade equality, he resolved "to enforce a perfect commercial equality by retaliating impositions." Adam Smith and Pat Buchanan, couldn't have said it better. After all, true free trade ought to include the right of each sovereign nation and its people (through Congress) to negotiate on fair and just terms, or not at all. NAFTA, FTAA, and WTO are top down arrangements which take such vital decisions away from us, and thus strip us of our equality before the law.
Constitutional Corner
The Republicans wish to export democracy. Perhaps they have already forgotten that their President won the election, despite a lower overall vote total, because this nation is a Republic.
On May 31, 1787, at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Edmund Randolf, the delegate from Virginia, reminded his fellow delegates as to why the convention had been called:
[T]he general object was to provide a cure for the evils under which the United States labored; that in tracing these evils to their origin, every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy; that some check therefore was to be sought for, against this.
The turbulence and follies of democracy. Is there a more accurate description of the governments of South and Central America, to which our dear President, his Party, and his CFR advisors would merge us?
Wary Eye
Merry and Serge Bromberg record in their biography, Jean Monnet and the United States of Europe, the conspiratorial and totalitarian mind-set of their hero (Monnet) in his decades long quest to create a united Europe.
"Gradually, it was thought, the supranational authorities, supervised by the European Council of Ministers at Brussels and the Assembly in Strasbourg, would administer all the activities of the Continent. A day would come when governments would be forced to admit that an integrated Europe was an accomplished fact, without their having a say in the establishment of its underlying principles. All they would to is merge all these autonomous institutions into a single federal administration and then proclaim a United States of Europe . . .
"Actually, the founders of the Coal and Steel Community would have to obtain from the various national governments - justifiably reputed to be incapable of making sacrifices for the sake of a federation - a whole series of concessions in regard to their sovereign rights until, having finally been stripped, they committed hara-kiri by accepting the merger." (7)
As to the "spontaneity" of the movement for a united Europe, Monnet and co. were financed, supported, and controlled by Marshall Plan funds, the US State Department, and most especially the Council of Foreign Relations. The real instruments of this "spontaneous" uprising of a united socialist Europe.
Like Father, Like Son?
Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a "world order" in which "the principles of justice and fair play ... protect the weak against the strong ..." A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfil the historic vision of its founders [Such as that of the Chief Architect of the United Nations--the convicted Spy Alger Hiss?].(8)
Pending Legislation
Congress will consider in September a variety of Republican Party measures to give the President Fast Track authority, so that he might without congressional interference (that is without consulting and debating with the peoples representatives), swiftly move forward to subvert our sovereignty at every turn. Write your congressman and Senators tell them NO!
Look for Stiff Right Jab Monday, Wednesday, and Friday in NewsMax.com Contact Steve & Steve at StiffRightJab@aol.com
If you haven´t already, read Part VI of Steve Farrell´s Democrats In Drag, and Part 9 of Missing the Mark With Religion or access his NewsMax archives.
Footnotes
1. Edwin Chen and James F. Smith, Bush-Fox summit seen as opportunity to cooperate, Los Angeles Times, September 4, 2001
2. Henry, Patrick, Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death
3. http://www.sice.oas.org/ftaa/quebec/declara_e.asp
4. Jasper, William F. The United Nations Exposed, p. 196
5. Ibid. p. 194
6. Leon Trotsky,Oct. 30, 1917, at Smolny, Petrograd
7. Bromberger, Merry and Serge, Jean Monnet and the United States of Europe, New York, Coward McCann Publishers, 1969, p. 123 - As quoted in William F. Jasper's fine documentary, The United Nations Exposed
8. President George Bush Sr., Speech to Congress, March 6, 1991
Stiff Right Jab Index Page
Home