![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Heist By Stephen Gray Who would have believed that the perfect heist would have blown up in the face of the family. It had been an inside job and the loot had been looted “legitimately.” The job had been committed without violence and without threats. It looked like a clean getaway and another family success. Friends of the family got a piece of the action and even the cops got some of the money. It was the heist of the century. A numbers racket beyond compare and perfectly “legal.” Then a smart accountant started to study the books of the firm. The accountant said money was unaccounted for, false invoices had been written and cheques cashed without work being done. The scam was exposed for all to see. Still nobody went to jail and it was said there was not much of a paper trail. The old boss still as confident as ever was quoted in a newspaper as saying: “Perhaps there were a few million dollars that might have been stolen in the process.” He was right on the money with that statement. In fact a lot of people thought the candor of the old boss was refreshing. Still, at least the money went to a good cause. The family was still in power and friends of the family got some of the money. Everybody was one big happy family, until now. Now there was trouble within the family and many members were running scared. Questions were now being asked of family members. Even the cops were now investigating the heist. Great! So much for gratitude, the cops got some of the money then they investigate themselves and the family!!! Whatever happened to loyalty? The family was starting to come apart. Soon they would be squealing on each other. Stool pigeons were perched to squawk. Some of the family were accusing each other of vendettas and tampering with other family members. A quote in a newspaper said a family member knew, “where the bodies were buried.” Another family member said, he had been “branded like a criminal” and that the only blame he would take, was that there was a “system failure.” Another guy was quoted as saying: “ I’m not going to incriminate myself.” The code of silence was being broken. People were now ratting on each other. Members of the family were threatening to sue the family. Ethics and morality had gone missing along with the money. One of the heads of the family even said the money would be returned if the family had some. This made other family members mad. Was this guy admitting money had been stolen? After all, he had been looking after the families finances for years so he should know where all the money went. But he said he didn’t know. Still, he was not the only one who didn’t know. All the family were in a state of denial. Nobody was going to take the blame and nobody was going to take responsibility. The family would tough it out. This was their territory; they still held the power. They still had hatchet men and guys who could lean on those who wouldn’t cooperate. Just ask an ethical banker who questioned a loan. The family sent in the cops and other heavies to try and ruin his reputation. Nobody messes with the family without repercussions. The family was the law and the law was the family. Even the judges were appointed by the family. Many of the people whose money had been stolen still idolized the family. They were still supportive of the family’s power structure. These people could always be depended upon, when the time came, to endorse the family. This was more than loyalty; this was blind stupidity. But this was why the family had the power. They knew you could do anything to these silly people and they would come back for more. For these were the family’s zombies, unquestioning and unable to think. They liked being robbed and the family liked taking their money. The heist money would never be returned. The family would come out of this stronger than ever. Their power was assured because they had the numbers and numbers count when the chips are down. The inquiries into the missing money would take years to conclude. Many people would get work from the inquiries. It was a win, win situation. After all, out of evil comes good. The good in this case was jobs for the boys and girls of the investigating team. A great make work project. The family would continue business as usual. The missing money would stay missing and the heist of the century would soon be long forgotten. In fact it was said that other families in other places were now looking at this way of doing business. Why resort to crudities, violence and strongarming to commit robbery when this kind of thing can be pulled off as a “legal” heist? Stephen Gray graysinfo@telus.net website http://www.oocities.org/graysinfo |