HOME CLASSIFIEDS NJ DIRECTORY HOMES JOBS CARS CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE SEARCH
  
NEWS LOCAL NEWS HEALTH EDUCATION SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT LIFESTYLES COLUMNISTS

LIFESTYLES
RELIGION
News
Religion Headlines
Rummo's Home Page
An Evangelical View

SECTIONS
NEWS
LOCAL NEWS
EDUCATION
HEALTH
SPORTS
ENTERTAINMENT
COLUMNISTS

INFORMATION
CONTACT US
NJ COMMUNITY
SUBSCRIBE
CLASSIFIEDS
NJ DIRECTORIES


Click this link to buy
Rummo's book,
The View from the 
Grass Roots

   
Teaching the Facts About Life's Beginning


THROUGHOUT OHIO AND in one Georgia school district this year, children will be learning the creation theory of "intelligent design" in addition to evolution. 

The Cobb County, Ga., science texts now include the following disclaimer: "This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered."

Intelligent design, which has been touted as a crucial link between science and theology, is a theory of creation first espoused in the 1980s. Contrary to Darwinism, its premise is that nature displays abundant evidence of design by an "intelligent agent" rather than by undirected natural causes. 

This approach also will be included in this year's science curriculum throughout Ohio, whose educational standards committee has voted to include more than just Darwin's theory of evolution in the state's classrooms. 

Intelligent design is just as scientific as what Darwinists claim for their own treatment of evolution. That's still not good enough for those who fear that intelligent design implies a designer and hence -- God. But that leaves us with the impression that science requires either atheism or agnosticism as its underpinning. 

And that is absurd. 

Many of the greatest scientists the world has ever known held to a strong biblical worldview. These scientists, including Copernicus, integrated a belief in God with the natural world. It was what urged them on to deeper scientific inquiry. Their discoveries served to confirm the belief that order, purpose, and design were inherent in the world. 

Because evolution cannot be demonstrated in the laboratory, it is not subject to the scientific method. Any explanation of how simple molecules could have spontaneously rearranged themselves into the elaborate biochemical systems present in all forms of life is speculative. Such study belongs to the realm of philosophy or metaphysics or maybe even -- heaven forbid --religion, but it's not science in the truest sense of the word.

Yet Darwinism has become an orthodoxy, complete with devout adherents who believe in its tenets with religious fervor. You can hardly blame them. They must rely on faith just like those whom they ridicule for embracing creationism.

And faith is not just a prerequisite for Darwinian evolution, but cosmology as a whole. Take, for example, the Big Bang -- that event cosmologists tell us happened 14 billion years in the universe's distant past, when everything that exists supposedly got its start. Nobody really knows what happened.

Well, almost nobody.

God admonished Job in the Old Testament book that bears his name, "Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Tell me, if you have understanding" (Job 38:4).

In an April 26 Wall Street Journal article, science editor Sharon Begley reported that some cosmologists have given up on the Big Bang. Instead, they propose a "bouncing universe" that started from "a random blip [that] got things rolling, creating an infinitesimal bit of space-time from nothingness."

When creationists quote Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth," and explain God created the universe ex nihilo (from nothing), they are branded as religious fanatics. But when cosmologists postulate the universe began "from nothingness," it's somehow deemed "science."

Ahem.

Brian Fahling, senior policy adviser for the American Family Association, explains: "The theory of evolution has far too long been shielded from critical examination. The tired old tactic of shrieking 'fundamentalist' or 'creationist' every time a question about evolution arises is wearing thin. Dissenting voices in the scientific and academic communities are increasing in number despite tremendous institutional pressure to conform to the orthodoxy of philosophic naturalism."

The 16th-century scientist Francis Bacon wrote, "A little science estranges a man from God. A lot of science brings him back." 

Science students in the public schools deserve the same opportunity for free and critical thinking in their studies of the origin of the cosmos. They should be taught "a lot of science."

Gregory Rummo belongs to Madison Avenue Baptist Church in Paterson. He is the author of "The View From the Grass Roots," published by American Book Publishing. You may e-mail him at TheRecordReligion@northjersey.com

4894536

   
Copyright © 2002 North Jersey Media Group Inc.
Copyright infringement notice