H-1B Class Action
H-1B Grievances
H1-B program flaws - Skirting the letter and/or intent of the program
How it happens/Why it happens
- A foreign national with any input in hiring gives preference to
their compatriots regardless skillset.
- A hiring manager is pressured by H1-Bs to hire their friends.
- Companies see them as bargains financially.
- H1-Bs are more willing to accept abuse and intimidation.
- H1-Bs are unaware of their legal rights and/or unfamiliar with
how to enforce them and/or unwilling to enforce them.
- Foreign nationals network and assist each other seeking employment
opportunities whether they know each other or not.
- There is no validation of the H1-B applicant's credentials by the
consulates or INS.
- There is no enforcement of the requirement employers are to notify
the INS that the H1-B is no longer employed by them.
- There is no enforcement by the INS to make out of status H1-Bs
leave after their 10 days are up or at any time.
- There is no requirement that given two employees with equal skills,
one resident and one H1-B, that the original criteria of not being
able to find a resident with the skills be used to choose in a
layoff.
- There is no requirement that should a resident be laid off, that
that resident be recalled before hiring an H1-B to replace them.
- There is no requirement that a resident employee or company cannot
train an H1-B. If training is needed then a resident can just as
well be trained.
- There is no requirement for an employer to send the resume of a
hired H1-B to the resident applicants who weren't hired. Without
this a resident has no proof they were equally or better qualified
for the job.
- There is no sensible definition of "H1-B dependent". The current
definition is 15% H1-B of the entire set of employees of a company
and not the profession being flooded, as in the current state,
engineering.
- There is no motivation for a company to hire a resident if they can
sponsor an H1-B for a green card and retain a longterm stronghold
over an employee.
Please add any I've missed.
- There is no accounting of how many actual visas are
written. INS and DOL counts are of "petitions" which
document up to 999 aliens on one I-129.
SIDE EFFECTS
- College bound have no reason to choose an industry not hiring
residents.
- H1-Bs sending money home does nothing for the US ecomony though
it is good for their nation's economy.
- High unemployment means not only less money going into our
economy but also being drained from the economy for unemployment
benefits.
- Growing and long term unemployment radiates fear into the rest of
the population and affects their spending.
- Issues of sex, age, race and marital status discrimination are
reseeded into the hiring and compensation practices of the industry.
- Abandoning the limitations on per nation visa and green card
allotments abandoned the goal of assimilation.
- The cultural business practices and work ethic of the predominant
nationality of the department staff becomes the practices and work
ethic of the department.
- Intentional or unintentional exclusion of resident staff in
technical discussions by foreign national staff undermines
productivity.
- The flaws in the H1-B program are not discussed publicly as often
as they should be because of repeated accusations of xenophobia.
- H1-Bs with bogus credentials are bad for businesses, unemployed
residents and genuinely talented H1-Bs. The totally inept may be
caught in an interview but a quick study can be employed before
it's discovered.
- This issue has become a source of campaign fund income for
residents' representatives.
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
- Are predominantly H1-B engineering staffed businesses
continuing to succeed?
- Are businesses aware of of the change in their business
practices and work ethic introduced into departments or the
costs associated with it?
- Is the influx of "temporary" foreign national labor into IT
an irrelevant factor in the length and depth of the industry bust?
- Can a mainly or totally H1-B engineering staff produce
a viable product in the American market with no experience in
or knowledge of inherent requirements?
- Is the IT industry's demand for a perfect skill match forcing a
migrant IT population and what is the effects/costs?
- Has the IT industry's demand for perfect skill matches and H1-Bs
done anything for the growth and expansion of useful technology
or national engineering knowledge base?
- How has the IT industry determined that it can only succeed
hiring perfect skill matchs instead of taking up the task of
training as with other businesses?
- How has the IT industry convinced the government they have no
responsibility in training workers in it's skill requirements
unlike other businesses?
- Are our representatives influenced in their voting for or against
this program because of IT illiteracy?
- Considering the spewing of new development and application
technology into the marketplace, is the requirement of a perfect
skill set match an insatiable requirement that will burn itself
out by it's own nature, having hitting the wall nationally and
then possibly internationally?
- Could a university ever produce a four year study program to meet
the needs of a skill volatile industry like IT?
- If an IT company cannot predict what it will need for skill sets
in the near future then how can it claim the need for an LCA?
- How much has a "temporary" H1-B visa influenced layoff decisions?
- How much has a "temporary" H1-B visa, extentions and LCAs misled
visa holders as to their real status of being temporary or
permanent?
- Should an unemployed resident IT worker invest any more time/
effort/expense in employment in this industry?
- Why are people who train H1-Bs to replace them not taking up the
legal issue that the requirement the visa was granted on was the
condition that a resident could not be found with the same skills?
- Why should a company laying off resident IT workers with equivalent
skills to their H1-Bs ever be granted an H1-B visa (actually, yes,
they are granted to the company), an extention to visas or an LCA?
- Is the very definition of the H1-B program a lack of commitment
of the IT industry to it's employees and technology?
Please add any questions you may have.