Reduced Total Energy Requirements
for a Modified Alcubierre Warp Drive Spacetime
-The ESAA Spacetime-
Contributors:
F. Loup, D. Waite, E. Halerewicz, Jr.
July 26, 2001
abstract
This HTML document was designed in order to supplement a work posted at
the "general relativity and quantum cosmology arXiv"
for parties interested in further mathematical detail of our proposed spacetime.
Also for the readers interest a brief history of how the work
came to be is included, the text in this page can also be a useful introduction
into our theory for parties unfamiliar with our work. This should
allow the reader to grasp the basic concepts of our work, as implied by
the arXiv listing a basic knowledge of General Relativity (GR) is assumed.
Contents

Collaboration History
Introduction
The Spacetime
The Discussions
More on the Work
The Work
Possible solutions to the Einstein Tensor
Numerical evaluations
Numerical Simulation of A(ct,r)
Contrivariant solutions to the Einstein tensor
Related links
Affiliated Links
Closing
Closing Remarks
1 Introduction
A free discussion forum was established in late December 2000 by Fernando
Loup in honor of Miguel Alcubierre's
work on the warp drive spacetime. Loup had a dream of showing
both the scientific community and the world at large the reality of the
warp drive spacetime. The discussion forum was open to anybody and everybody
willing to entertain the idea of a working warp drive spacetime.
The discussion forum the Alcubierre Warp Drive hosted by yahoo
(currently available at the following URL: http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/alcubierrewarpdrive),
is what brought the authors of this work together to envision a "modified"
warp drive.
1.1 The Spacetime
The main concept behind our proposed warp drive came directly from independent
work developed by David Waite (the early work, and subsequent others are
available thorough Modern Relativity).
Previous research work into the energy requirements of the warp drive focused
on [global] remote frames, so Waite began to investigate the local
energy requirements of the warp drive spacetime within the [local] ship's
frame, this is where the story of our warp drive begins. By adding
a time dilatation coefficient of order A(ct,r)
to the ship's frame one can reduce the stress energy energy terms
Tab and Tab, simply by making A arbitrarily large
in the warped region!
1.2 The Discussions
The online discussion forum the Alcubierre Warp Drive, began as
a novel experiment, where members would answer questions that interested
parties had for the new science. The early discussions within the
Alcubierre
Warp Drive began with philosophical debates, random brain storming,
and slowly evolved to include mathematical discussions. It was during
this new phase where Waite joined the club discussion, and we carefully
began discussing the ramifications of his proposed warp drive. Unfortunately
as soon as the mathematics became the bulk of the discussion, most of the
philosophical debates were lost, but at this point Fernando Loup and Edward
Halerewicz began to describe the possible consequences of Waite's spacetime.
During the discussion of Waite's idea the club was very grateful to receive
advice and guidance from the very busy but gracious Dr. Alcubierre.
And it was at this point that simply entertaining the idea of a new warp
drive became a much more formal process, and a new theory of its own right
began to form.
2 The Work
Abstract:
It can be shown that negative energy requirements
within the Alcubierre spacetime can be greatly reduced when one considers
the Einstein tensor in the ship's frame. Thereby reducing the negative
energy requirements of the warp drive spacetime arbitrarily as a function
of A(ct,r). With this function new quantum
inequality restrictions are investigated in a general form. Finally
a potential method for generating a warp velocity greater than that of
light is presented.
So what are the results of our applied efforts you ask? Waite
started with a new approach on how the energy requirements within the warp
drive can be greatly lowered, by simply looking at the energy requirements
of the ship's frame. Although this approach hadn't been used
in the previous literature, this alone could not lower the extreme magnitudes
negative energy required by the existing literature. However by introducing
an arbitrary time dilatation coefficient A(ct,r),
as similarly done by Hiscock, the negative energy densities from equation
19 of Alcubierre's work can be reduced greatly. The coefficient A(ct,r)
has the following properties a=A=1 in the ship's
frame and far from it, and A has large values within the bubble walls R
which act to lower the negative energy densities.

-
Figure 1: The ESAA spacetime represented one dimensionally in
Cartesian coordinates, with a=1 this spacetime
appears hyper-dimensional in comparison to the Alubierre spacetime f(rs)=0.
This figure represents the varying Warp Drive parameter N the minimum value
N=B(rs)=1 gives the Alcubierre top hat f(rs)=1 (black). The median
(gray) and maximum (white) represents an energy reduction due to a decreased
volume as a factor of the warped region with an arbitrary boundary a=1+(R+(D/2))^N,
when R=100 m the "maximum warp" factor is N=9.3.
2.1 Possible solutions to the Einstein Tensor
From GR, the meaningful solutions (i.e. solutions which corresponds to
classical physics) for the stress energy calculations result from the contrivaratint
solutions Tab. We had entertained the idea of a covariant
solution (simply because this was not done in the previous literature),
but quickly withdrew it because it greatly complicated the warp drive we
chose (see the links within Section 2.3 for
reference). But in studying the relationships between covariant and
contrivariant solutions, we have found an explicit case where a covariant
solution can act to subtracted energy from the proper time coordinates.
We achieved this result by causing the warp drive to behave similarly to
the Alcubierre top-hat function. This result is however erroneous
in reference to our work because we modified our result to coincide with
Pfenning's piecewise function, thus we arrive at a completed total energy
calculation of order (by implementing the boundaries associated with figure
1):
EPI=-(b2 c4/12G)*(1/D2)*(1/(R+{D/2})4N)*((R+{D/2})3-(R-{D/2})3/3)
thus arriving at an energy of approximately equal to one galactic mass.
When this is however extended to a five-dimensional Anti de-Sitter space,
the integral need not be confined to the the boundary R+(D/2),
thus resulting in an energy approximately equal to100,000 solar masses.
These results however are purely arbitrary by defining N=1, R=100, and
D=16
for A(ct,r), for the above equation the maximum
warp factor is given by N=19.8 (see figure 1 above), thus resulting in
a minimum energy requirement of -0.024 grams, for one possible boundary
of the warp drive spacetime.
2.2 Numerical evaluation of A(ct,r)
To obtain a better understanding of the chosen time dilation coefficient
click here.
2.3 Exact numerical evaluation of the ESAA spacetime
The exact contrivariant soultions of the Einstein Tensor, in regards to
the Waite spacetime, provided by GRTensorII package through Maple VI, are
provided here.
3 Related Links
Although there are great number of useful Web Links pertaining to the warp
drive, we have chosen to only to identify links affiliated to the authors
of this work.
Alcubierre
Warp Drive (Open warp drive discussion forum available through
yahoo)
Modern Relativity (affiliated
page of David Waite)
Loup Warp (homepage
of Fernando Loup)
Warp Drive Today
(popular description of the warp drive by Edward Halerewicz)
4 Closing Remarks
In conclusion it can be shown that the warp drive spacetime can not be
ruled out because of `unphysical energy conditions', by simply choosing
an arbitrary function the energy reductions become rather dramatic.
It is also however noted that an arbitrary function is indeed a mathematical
trick, within a four-dimensional spacetime there is no mechanism to make
N>1 as far as we know. However, it is somewhat easy to consider N=2
for a "hyper drive" spacetime, in our discussion this would describe a
five-dimensional Anti de-Sitter spacetime, and without experimental results
this may also be considered a mathematical trick (in which the "warp bubble"
can be interpreted to have velocity that is 100 times that of light).
It is therefore noted that the warp drive may have several limitations
within semi-classical general relativity, such as the violation of the
Null Energy Condition (NEC), thus post relativistic corrections would make
it appear that the warp drive spacetime still has life in it!
Copyrighted © 2001: Edward Halerewicz,
Jr.
Back to Homepage