What
An excerpt from the last chapter entitled Paul, Jesus and Christian Origins. The citation starts from the heading From Jesus to Paul—and Beyond (p. 178) and ends with the closing of the book (p. 183). It addressed the question put forth in the previous paragraph: ‘What is the relation between Paul, Jesus and the origins of Christianity?’
It all depends, of course, not just on what you make of Paul but on what you make of Jesus. I have written at length on this topic elsewhere, most recently in Jesus and the Victory of God.5 In the light of that, it should be clear where the discussion has to start.
If we are to locate both Jesus and
Paul within the world of first-century Judaism, within the turbulent
theological and political movements and expectations of the time (and if we are
not then we should admit that we know very little about either of them) then we
must face the fact that neither of them was teaching a timeless system of
religion or ethics, or even a timeless message about how human beings are
saved. Both of them believed themselves to be actors within the drama staged by
It will not do, therefore, to line up ‘Jesus’ key concepts’ and ‘Paul’s key concepts’ and play them off against one another. It will not do to point out that Jesus talked about repentance and the coming kingdom, while Paul talked about justification by faith. It misses the point to even show (though this can be done quite easily) that these two, when set into context and translated into terms of one another, belong extremely close together. The point is that Jesus believed himself to be called to a particular role in the eschatological drama; and so did Paul. The real question is, what were those roles, and how might they relate?
I have argued elsewhere that Jesus
believed himself called to be the one through whom God’s
strange purposes for
But Jesus did not remain as a
spectator, commenting on this passage of events from the outside. He came to
the centre of the stage, not just metaphorically, but literally, in his entry
to
As he trod this road, Jesus was
conscious of a deeper vocation even than that of Messiah.
Like any Jewish martyr of the
period, Jesus believed firmly that if he died in obedience to the will of God
he would be vindicated by being raised from the dead. Unlike other martyrs, he
seems to have believed that, since what he was doing was special, climactic,
the one-off moment of
It should be clear from all this that if Paul had simply trotted out, parrot-fashion, every line of Jesus’ teaching – if he had repeated the parables, if he had tried to do again what Jesus did in announcing and inaugurating the kingdom – he would not have been endorsing Jesus, as an appropriate and loyal follower should. He would have been denying him. Someone who copies exactly what a would-be Messiah does is himself trying to be a Messiah; which means denying the earlier claim. When we see the entire sequence within the context of Jewish eschatology, we are forced to realize that for Paul to be a loyal ‘servant of Jesus Christ’, as he describes himself, could never mean that Paul would repeat Jesus’ unique, one-off announcement of the kingdom to his fellow Jews. What we are looking for is not a parallelism between two abstract messages. It is the appropriate continuity between two people living, and conscious of living, at different points in the eschatological timetable.
Jesus believed it was his vocation
to bring
This reminds us that neither for Jesus nor for Paul was the message, the announcement, a matter merely of ‘religion’. The post-enlightenment box into which ‘religion’ has been slotted, whether by those determined to make religion irrelevant to real life or by those determined to protect religion from the ravages of real life, has nothing to do with the worldview of a first-century Jew believing that Israel’s God, the creator, was taking his power and reigning. Jesus was not announcing ‘a new religion’; nor was Paul. Nor was the Judaism whose expectation both were affirming a matter of ‘religion’ only. Of course (lest ears be so dull that they translate what I am saying into its opposite) – of course the proclamation of Jesus, and the gospel announcement of Paul, addressed human beings with a challenge and a summons, a warning and an offer, which went down to the very depths of human experience, into the far recesses of the heart, awakening parts which other messages could not reach. But they did this, not because they were about ‘religion’ as divorced from the rest of life, but because the claim of Israel always was, the message of Jesus always was, and the announcement of Paul always was, that the human race was to be shown, invited to, summoned into, and enabled to discover the true way of being human, the way to reflect the very image of God himself in every aspect of life, and with every fibre of one’s being. If that is what you mean by ‘religion’, so be it. Jesus and Paul thought of it as Life, as being human, as being the children of God.
When all this is said and done, it
should be comparatively easy to work through the actions and message of Jesus,
and the agenda and letters of Paul, and to show that there is between them, not
(of course) a one-for-one correspondence, but a coherence, an appropriate
correlation, an integration that allows fully for the radically different
perspective of each. Jesus was bringing
No doubt there are dozens of different details to be examined carefully if the question off Jesus and Paul is to be sewn up in all its particulars. To go further into the question at this point is unnecessary; it has been done so well. So recently, by David Wenham in his book Paul: Follower of Jesus or Founder of Christianity6 that it would be tedious to traverse the same ground again. Despite the popular impression, there are in fact a good many echoes of the actual saying of Jesus in the letters of Paul, though here again, Paul has not been a slavish repeater of tradition so much as faithful rethinker of the rich material he has heard, using it in fresh ways for his own very different context. What matters, far above any attempts to place Jesus and Paul one on each side of a theological see-saw and make them balance out, is to grasp the truth that grasped them both: that in their day, and through their agency—the one as focus, the other as pointer—the one living and true God had acted climactically and decisively to liberate Israel and the world, and to establish his kingdom of love, the kingdom through which the world would be brought out of the long winter of sin and death and would taste at last the fruits of the Age to come.
Paul, of course, believed that he
was living in the very early days of spring. Almost all the ice and snow still
remained to be melted. Looking at the world nearly two thousand years later,
one may suggest that we have got no further (in Northern Hemisphere terms!)
than March at the latest. Some places have felt real sunshine, have seen
flowers and blossoms which show that winter is really over. Other places remain
icebound. Some places experienced early blooms, but the snow has covered them
again. Part of the point of the new age, it seems, is that it doesn’t conform
to a timetable like the natural seasons. The creation, after all, is to be set
free from its timetables of life and death, its bondage to decay. But, as Paul
insists in the same passage where he asserts that great hope, this will happen
though the witness, the holiness, the suffering, the prayer, and finally the
resurrection of those in whose hearts God has already brought about ‘the
first-fruits of the Spirit’ (Romans 8:18-27). So, as he says in another great
passage of hope, ‘be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the
Lord; since you know that, in the Lord, your labour
is not in vain’ (1 Corinthians 15:58). That, as Paul well knew, is the
appropriate attitude and activity for those who, whether suffering or
celebrating, live in the period between the triumph of
5. N.T. Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God, 1996.
6. David Wenham, Paul: Follower of Jesus or Founder of Christianity, 1995.
You can purchase this book at amazon.com by simply typing in
its title.
![]() |
![]() |
What Saint Paul Really Said, NT Wright, Eerdmans 1997 |