|
Saucer Exhibitionism and Close
Encounters INEXPLICATA Contributing Editor Manuel Carballal investigates one of the most "character flaws" of the UFO phenomenon--its persistent need for making a spectacle of itself! This article originally appeared in the June 1999 issue of El Ojo Crítico. It
had happened again. Upon reaching the small village of Lestedo, scant
kilometers from Compostela, I ran once more into what I've come to term as
"UFO exhibitionism". The recent landing case of a supposedly unidentified
craft posed a scenario I had already seen in many similar cases, only that
on this occasion it was positively shameless. Now we were dealing with a
"flying saucer", described by the female witness as a "large disk with
borders filled with yellow lights, having a slightly larger and reddish
light in its middle..." Dunia
Sinde, a delightful eight-year old girl, was home alone on that October
night. Her parents were busy running the cafeteria they own in Santiago.
At around two in the morning, Dunia was startled by a strange sound like
that of "a felt tip pen while drawing on a piece of paper." A strange
yellow glow poured into her room from the exterior. She got out of bed and
headed to the window. That's when she saw it. Right in front of her. Some
80 meters away. Almost touching the ground but without contacting it: it
was a "flying saucer." When
I reached the landing site a few days later, both Dunia and her father,
Alejandro Sinde, patiently answered my questions, allowed me to tale soil
samples, take photographs and make video recordings. What they could not
explain was why that object--whatever it was--should have chosen that site
to "show itself off." The
Sinde family's home is discreetly isolated. Right in back of the house,
where Dunia's bedroom "happens" to be located, there is a 150 meter long
lawn surrounded by eucalyptus trees. This expanse is cut down the middle
by a bushy row of trees. Why did this object choose to land precisely next
to the house? Why didn't it land at the other side of the trees, which
would have made it completely invisible to prying eyes? From an aerial
perspective, this situation is clearly visible. If a pilot--alien or
human-- wanted to land without being seen, it would do so on the left hand
side of the expanse, beyond the trees. However, the object chose to land a
few meters to the right, on the other side of the trees--just enough to be
seen by the witness. It landed, allowed Dunia to look at it for a few
seconds, and then "started making the felt tip pen sound again before
leaving and vanishing from site..." UFO
Exhibitionism Regardless
of how much information they may amass, the reports they may file, or how
much data they feed into their computers, those ufologists who do not
engage in field work will never be able to understand certain facets of
the UFO phenomenon: aspects, sensations, intuitions or even events that
only become apparent while burning shoe leather and beating the same
roads, trails and highways where the slippery saucers have allowed
themselves to be seen. The contempt expressed by certain self-appointed
"scientific ufologists" like Ricardo Campo against what they term "picnic
ufology" leads them to miss out on certain aspects of the phenomenon,
which are indispensable for its comprehension. Hoofing
it to the geographic sites where close encounters have occurred gives us
precisely this perspective. That's why when I reached the remote village
of Mansilla in the province of Burgos, I felt that sensation yet again. I
was accompanied by Carmen, a young graduate in Geography and History who
had gone through an uncanny experience precisely at the same place where
we stood. Carmen
was returning to her home in Burgos in the fading hours of the afternoon.
While driving along the road between the villages of Mansilla and Arroyal,
she was surprised by a luminous object that swooped down on her
car... I
managed to find burned shrubs and strange prints at the exact location of
the "encounter". While taking samples which would later be analyzed by
Reia Lab Scan, S.A., it suddenly dawned on me that the object had "landed"
only 30 meters from a discreet hollow where it could have remained
invisible to any indiscreet glances from Carmen or anyone else driving
along that road. Carmen
agreed to undergo all manner of tests, including two hypnotic regression
sessions--one of which I witnessed-- performed by Dr. José Andrés Lozano
from Burgos. We were unable to extract a reasonable answer to this evident
UFO exhibitionism from her stories, whether awake or under hypnosis. It is
as if the object had been expecting one witness in particular, at that
place and time, and chose to "act" upon him or
her... The
cases catalogued by the late J.Allen Hynek as "close encounters" are often
accompanied by this disconcerting attitude, leading certain researchers,
myself included, to believe that the old ufological theory--so popular in
the '60s and '70s--of alien scientists being caught unawares by indiscreet
witnesses is false. Landings and humanoid encounter cases, or at least a
fair share of them, appear suspiciously "forced". The witness appears to
find him/herself at exactly the right time and place for a UFO or its
shameless occupants choose to allow themselves to be seen. One of the most
graphic examples of this UFO exhibitionism has taken place on a number of
Spanish beaches. Strangers
on the Beach I
found fresh evidence of UFO exhibitionism when I travelled to Punta
Hidalgo on the island of Tenerife [one of the Canary Islands--Ed.]
to research some notable UFO sightings which had occurred there over the
preceding months. However, none of them had been seen closely as the case
experienced by Olga and José, a married couple, scant weeks before my
visit. Olga and José were inside their vehicle, admiring the spectacular
night sky as seen from Punta Hidalgo as well as from many other spots on
Tenerife. Although they did confess that their visit to the area was
prompted by constant stories of UFOs in the area. The
couple suddenly noticed a strange, luminous, semi-spherical object
approaching the coast. Motionless, the couple witnessed the uncanny event
from their car seats: some strange, tall entities, with long hair and
completely human-looking, had "landed" on the sands of Punta Hidalgo
before their very eyes...What ufologist could even dream that some "alien
scientists" wishing to remain anonymous would exit their craft on a beach,
right in front of the only car parked in the entire
area? The
fact is that Spanish beaches have been the stage--and I underline the
"stage" part-- of an infinity of UFO incidents. Can there be a less
suitable place, and more devoid of shelter, for protection against curious
glances than a beach? Having
reached this point, it is inevitable to mention the Conil case, without a
doubt one of the most famous and controversial UFO cases of the past
years. When the TASS news agency stunned the world in 1989 with news of a
UFO landing in the Russian city of Voronezh, it eclipsed all subsequent
UFO stories. For this reason, the media paid no heed whatsoever when a new
UFO incident took place 2 days following the events at Voronezh, this time
in the town of Conil near Cádiz in southern Spain. Dozens
of researchers made the pilgrimage to Conil in search of new information
on the elusive saucer phenomenon. The witnesses endured, with saintly
patience, the questions of a thousand and one ufologists, and retold their
experiences on the beach at Conil an equal number of times--a case
involving two strange humanoids that allegedly emerged from a UFO. I took
the trouble to climb the hill located on the right-hand end of the beach
to take some general photos of the "encounter". A glance at these photos
will suffice to show that beach features much more discreet locations than
the point, which is right in front of the town center and several hotels
and small businesses, where the supposed aliens were "accidentally"
seen. This
behavior has remained a constant in similar cases. Months after the Conil
case, a new "humanoid landing" took place on another Spanish beach. A case
hitherto unknown, as so many others. But on this occasion we must travel
to the other end of the country, more than 1000 kilometers
away. Much
like the Conil case, this new incident, which was shared by multiple
witnesses, took place in the town of Sada (La Coruña). And I use the word
"shared" because as at Conil, a group of witnesses observed strange lights
in the sky--"UFOs"--shortly before other witnesses noticed the strange
humanoids on the beach. On
that night, right at midnight, D. José Francisco García, director of the
Radio Oleiros station, was driving in his car accompanied by his wife and
in-laws, bordering the beach at Sada. The four witnesses managed to see
the strange luminous, cigar-shaped object "completely surrounded by light
bulbs" as it crossed the sky. Their observation lasted some 5 to 6
minutes, as they would later tall me. Upon visiting the area, I learned
that another couple had an even more surprising experience on the same
beach. As Juan (a witnesses who demands the utmost anonymity) would tell
me, he and his wife were on the beach that night a few hours after José
García and his family witnessed the strange aerial object. They suddenly
ran into two strange humanoids who appeared to emerge from the sea. Both
of them, as in the Conil case, were dressed in long tunics and carried a
kind of bag "into which something was being poured." My investigations in
the area show that it is probable that other people witnessed the
manifestation of the entities from a greater distance, but why in that
precise area of the beach and not by the cliffs, which is much less
conspicuous? One could honestly believe that the two entities were there,
and at that moment, for the benefit of Juan and his
wife. The
Transcendent Experience This
"UFO exhibitionism" -- as if the phenomenon were choosing precisely the
right time and witness to appear -- leads us to a further question: the
fact that encounters that UFOs and their alleged "occupants" go far beyond
representing a casual incident in a witness's life. Without arguing if
these experiences are real or a sort of mystical experience, I can still
state that these experiences are more than an "accidental" and isolated
event, at least in most cases. Certain authors, largely from the U.S.A.,
believe that encounters with alleged aliens forms part of a follow-up in
the witnesses' lives, thus implying that new UFO incidents will occur over
time. D.
Manuel Castro is an airport operator. He has spent a considerable part of
his life linked to the world of aeronautics, performing maintenance on
airplanes. It is for this reason that he has never been able to identify
the strange artifact that he saw land in a Galician town in the summer of
1958. Out of this object--completely atypical in UFO lore--there emerged
three humanoids dressed in tight-fitting outfits who then proceeded to
collect soil samples. This amazing and "casual" encounter with the
humanoids appeared to be an isolated experience in his life until he had a
repeat UFO experience in the Nineties. One of them, which took place in
the heart of the city, was so impressive that it led him to immortalize
his experience on canvas. D. Manuel's painting, which depicts the UFO that
surprised him in the middle of the night, is impregnated with the full
emotional burden that a UFO witness can convey. It
is precisely this emotional factor, the trembling in the voice, the beads
of sweat on the witness's forehead, that cannot be captured by any
questionnaire submitted by mail from a ufologist. It is all too often that
so-called "analysts" or "armchair researchers" miss out on this dimension
of the phenomenon. A dimension that is of the greatest importance, to my
understanding. The
emotional burden in many cases constitutes an invitation to reflection. As
well as the disquieting coincidence of details in witness accounts,
separated by hundreds of kilometers or dozens of years. These
coincidences, not only in the shape of the objects but in the description
of the devices, are perceived by the field researcher even in the use of
language, in the comparisons made by the witness, or in the emotion
arising from the retelling of the experience. Could these similes be
attributable to chance? Perhaps, if the experience being described was
archetypical, in other words, a story involving a "flying saucer" brimming
over with macrocephalic little green men, which have been made commonplace
by the media or films. But, what if the witnesses are describing the same
phenomenon, completely different from the psychosocial influence of the
cinema? When Manuel Castro, for example, drew in my field notebook strange
phone-booth shaped UFO one from which three "astronauts" in tight-fitting
coveralls emerged, I found it absurd. I had to traverse the nearly 950
kilometers separating Galicia from Seville to find a "twin" case, only
better documented. Miguel
Fernández Carrasco's experience should occupy a privileged position in
European ufological history: on the night of January 28, 1978, Miguel, who
was then 24 years old, had dropped off his girlfriend, Carmen Alvarado
Sáenz, age 20, at her house around midnight, and returned home from
Sanlúcar la Mayor to Benacazón, some four kilometers
away. According
to his report, he noticed a "shooting star" around twelve-thirty a.m. A
few minutes later, the "star" turned in to an unidentified craft which
landed some five meters away from the witness. The object had a
parallelepipedal configuration, much like a telephone booth "but much
larger" (some two meters wide by three and a half meters tall)--similar to
the one described by Manuel Castro in Galicia, having a sort of dome on
its upper section which issued read and white flashes. Near the upper edge
of the vehicle's "trunk" were two appendages shaped like fins. A kind of
door in the shape of a half-archway opened, spinning on hypothetical
hinges. At that moment, a blinding light issued from the inside of the
ship, and a ramp projected toward the floor. According
to the young man's story, he was frozen in terror as two humanoid beings
standing some two meters tall emerged from the craft. They wore
tight-fitting coveralls "like a frogman's wet suit", according to Miguel,
and a thick belt whose buckle emitted soft, rhythmic red flashes. Despite
his terror, Miguel managed to control his panic and broke into a run. The
humanoids promptly returned to the object and it "took off". Looking
behind him as he ran, the witness claims that the UFO rose in a great puff
of smoke, heading toward him--which only served to increase his panic. The
craft soon overtook him, and Miguel felt that he was hit with "a burning
exhaust or emanation" from the UFO. The young man remembers nothing more
until he appeared at the entrance to his house. He
was taken to the emergency room of Seville's Hospital San Lázaro where he
underwent extensive tests. According to the report I found at said
institution, he was found to have strange burns and ocular irritation
"similar to having been exposed to a very powerful light". The most
surprising fact about the case is that a Seville judge called Miguel to
testify, giving place to the only court action ever taken in a case of UFO
aggression in Europe. A legal action which, I might add, was lost in the
shuffle of paperwork and took me many days to obtain, involving an
adventure which touches the limits of the unimaginable. This legal action
constitutes, without a doubt, one of the most extraordinary documents in
European UFO history, and the strange premature aging of the witness over
the past years should also be cause for reflection on the
matter. Does
this extraordinary pursuit by an unknown craft represent a unique case in
Spanish ufology? Not at all. I would now have to travel to Barcelona to
research a case disconcertingly similar to Miguel's. This
case involved Juan Soler Cintas, a resident of Manresa, who lived through
a chase quite similar to Miguel's. The protagonists of the event were a
cigar-shaped object and humanoids dressed like "astronauts". Could three
men from Galicia, Cataluña and Andalucía have invented such similar
characters while having no contact between them? These
coincidences, these significant "chance events" in UFO stories can only
become visible in the field researchers logbook, when he or she has had
the opportunity to interview the witnesses in very similar cases, event
though these may be separated in space and/or time. It is said that an
image is worth more than a thousand words, and when three witnesses
separated by time and space draw an apparently identical phenomenon in my
logbook, it is hard to attribute this coincidence to
"chance". In
1996, I visited the community of Proaza in Asturias to investigate a
series of close encounter events. One of them was experienced by Monserrat
and Camilo Rivera. It was 21:35 hours when the young couple observed an
enormous white light descending over the trees near their house. The
luminous sphere stopped 50 meters from the house at treetop level. Once
again, the phenomenon chose to appear within full view of the witnesses
and not in the concealment offered by the nearby woods. It had a kind of
"door" in its middle and suddenly projected a sort of "multicolored ramp
of lights". According to the witnesses, the enormous sphere terrified
them. In fact, Monserrat was the first one to run into the house to
protect her children from "a thing that wasn't of this world". When Camilo
Rivera drew what he had seen in my logbook, I was left dumbfounded. The
humble Asturian farmer had drawn an object suspiciously similar to the one
described by the witnesses of the UFO landing at Galdar (Las Palmas,
Canary Islands) many years earlier. But let's not get ahead of
ourselves. A
new landing would take place long afterwards, this time in remote spot
called Ferreiras, in the municipality of Friol, and that's where I was
headed. José Manuel Castro, an illiterate worker, was the main protagonist
of this incident. According to his story, an enormous, spherical object
resembling the full moon descended over the treetops scant meters from his
home. Gripped by panic, Jose Manuel ran into his home; peeping through the
window and shielded by a pane of glass, he noticed how the gargantuan
sphere had stopped over the trees and projected a halo of light "like a
rainbow". The
description made by José Manuel Castro in Friol was astoundingly similar
to the one made by Camilo Rivera regarding the sphere that had hovered
over the trees at his home in Proaza, 250 kilometers from Ferrerías. But
there's more. When Jose Manuel Castro looked out the window and saw the
"ramp of light looking like a rainbow", he could also see a group of three
or four small humanoids descending along it, while an equal number of 2 or
3 meter tall beings remained on board. Even more surprising is that after
analyzing the terrain on which the object had supposedly landed, we found
the prints of--landing gear?--forming a triangle measuring 8 x 8 x 10
meters and some completely unidentifiable "footprints". We managed to make
plaster casts of the prints, which could not be attributed to any known
animal after analysis at Universidad de Santiago and by zoologists in the
city of Lugo. What
is boggles the mind is that this utterly illiterate farmer had drawn
several "giants" within the sphere, suspiciously similar to a classic UFO
incident which took place thousands of miles away and twenty years
earlier. When we visited Galdar on the island of Grand Canary, we managed
to secure the exact same description of an object much too similar in
appearance and behavior to the one in Ferrerias or Proaza to be
"coincidental". The
Thousand and One Faces of a Myth Antonio
Meilán López is a normal man leading a normal life. He owns a small store,
is a devoted family man, and a football fan...like so many other normal
men. As a teenager, he witnessed a completely amazing phenomenon: while
returning home one afternoon in a small Galician town, he ran into a group
of small beings wearing tunics. Steeped in Galician popular culture,
Antonio Meilán identified those strange creatures with the Santa Compaña his elders had told
him so much about. Like Antonio, many Galicians who have encountered
strange entities in the night have identified them with the Compaña. When similar tunicked
creatures have been seen in any city in Castille or Cataluña, or on a
beach in Conil, they have been identified as "aliens". Only after having a
"classic" UFO experience a few months ago (our reason for interviewing
him) did he take an interest in ufology, and after reading a few books and
articles on the phenomenon, he rethought his opinion about the creatures,
believing them to be more closely related to outer space than to
folklore. Antonio
Meilán's experience should lead us to ponder. Anthropology and Sociology
texts are laden with alleged "folklore" cases which undoubtedly conceal
genuine "close encounters with humanoids" which could engross the files of
any ufologist. Serafín
Pena Tejeiro, for example, is a young resident of Cospeito (Lugo) who was
catapulted to national prominence in the national media after recounting
his encounter with two strange flying beings. As he told us upon visiting
his home--a humble farm--Serafín had left home before dawn to reach the
spot where a friend would pick him up every day to go to work. No sooner
had he left his doorstep than he witnessed an amazing sight: over the
treetops he could see a sort of "luminous stand" upon which two humanoid
figures were walking. They reminded young Serafín of the Blessed Virgin
that can be seen in the town chapel, and who else could it be? The
unspecialized media dubbed the story "The Virgin Appears at Cospeito".
However, any student of Marian phenomena would notice that Serafín's
encounter lacked any of the elements which characterize Marian events.
There were neither messages nor mystical phenomena; the witness was not a
clairvoyant; there were no healings, and the apparition never repeated
itself. Serafín employed a simile that matched his cultural context to
describe what he had seen--just like thousands of other witnesses. To
identify the nature of the phenomenon by means of what the witness
transmits to the researcher is very daring and often
incorrect. In
very few cases can we illustrate this concept more clearly than in the
series of "apparitions" which occurred in the gypsy neighborhood of
Penamoa (La Coruña) in the mid-'80s: over days, if not weeks, the
residents of Penamoa and some researchers who joined them, patrolled the
surroundings of the town, armed with rifles and handguns in an attempt to
hunt down the strange humanoid that had been seen in the vicinity. The
discovery of some animals slain under mysterious circumstances, plus the
strange lights in the sky that accompanied the manifestations of the
humanoid, were overlooked by non-specialized chroniclers. To the gypsy
community--strongly influenced by evangelical churches--the apparition had
to be demonic, and the services of a group of pentecostal exorcists were
recruited in an effort to banish the entity through
prayer. As
had occurred in similar cases, such as the apparitions of humanoids in
Vega de Coria or Santander following repeated sightings, the humanoid
disappeared along with the enigmatic lights in the sky. Was it a diabolic
apparition, as the Protestant pastors claimed, or a new UFO humanoid
incident? Beyond
all the anthropological, religious, folkloric or even ufological
explanations that can be put forth, we have the eyewitnesses' own
testimonies. Accounts which may coincide despite the effect of time or
distance and which often point to an incomprehensible exhibitionism on the
phenomenon's part; accounts of phenomena which will be identified by the
witness according to his or her cultural context. However, aside from all
our conjectures and speculations, "they" remain out there--lurking in the
shadows for the right place and time so that one of us, perhaps even you,
becomes an involuntary witness to the absurd phenomenon known as
UFO. Fear
of the Unknown: The Ultimate Evidence In
1997, the overwhelming UFO wave in Galicia caused us to wander some 2000
kms. from one town to another in the Spanish northeast. Each investigated
sighting bore rumors of a new case in another town, and the car's front
end immediately pointed in that direction. Finally, after collecting
testimonies from several witnesses on the border between Galicia and
Asturias, a powerful snowstorm trapped my car, lacking chains for the
tires, on a mountain pass where the interviewees had warned me of the
presence of wild bears. Such are the hazards of field
research. Shivering
from the cold -- the Lada Niva lacked a heater -- and mindful of any noise
in the surrounding forest, I remained there for a few endless hours
awaiting the arrival of the tow truck I'd requested through my cellular
phone. Hopefully it would reach me before the bears did. The mechanic
found me huddled in the seat, defending myself with a ridiculously small
knife. I must have been a sight when he knocked on the windshield and made
me jump out of my body. "I can see you weren't exaggerating over the
phone, boss," the fellow in the blue coveralls remarked, "you were pretty
scared, huh?" He was right. I wasn't lying when I phoned the nearest shop
and said I was in an emergency; the fact is that real, sincere and
spontaneous fear is one of humanity's most eloquent elements, including
the UFO phenomenon. An
even more eloquent and revealing case came from Sierra de Outes (La
Coruña). We met with the witness, Manolo Javela, in the town's only bar.
When told that we had travelled the distance because of the UFO
experience, he knotted his brow and violently denied all of the rumors
that had reached us: "I made that stuff up, and besides, I didn't see
anything!" Having travelled hundreds of kilometers to interview the man,
we dejectedly finished our coffee and sandwich before leaving. Only when
we made it clear that we weren't journalists and no photos of him would be
published did his attitude change. For Manolo Javela had been through two
traumatic experiences: a close encounter with humanoids and the pitiless
mockery of the press. It had led him to conclude that it was better to be
taken for a joker than a madman (and I invite all "pseudo-skeptics" to
reflect upon this). On
the day of the incident, Manolo had been found by some neighbors huddled
inside his car and shouting for help. When they managed to get him out of
the car, he wouldn't stop screaming that a flying saucer and some little
green men had attacked him. "I never saw a man gripped by such visible
fear," said one of the locals who found him. To the people of Outes --
putting aside all journalists, armchair ufologists and pseudo-skeptics --
Manolo's fear was sufficient proof of the honesty of his encounter with
the "little men", because everyone in the town remembered how when a gang
of toughs arrived in town to start a fight, Manolo Javela had faced them
all alone and run them off. Javela is a brave character who isn't afraid
to take on delinquents by himself...but the creatures who descended from
above that night managed to shatter his resolve, turning him into the
umpteenth victim of terror of the unknown. A questionnaire send by mail,
fax or e-mail by the armchair ufologists shall never manage to understand
this aspect of the UFO phenomenon. The
Questions Raised by the Phenomenon Are
UFOs alien craft wanting to show off? Not in my opinion. The problem with
applying the ETH (extraterrestrial hypothesis) to the UFO phenomenon is
that it is much too simplistic. In
fact, no serious astronomer discards the possibility of ET's in the
universe. What is untenable is that said ET life should visit us, since it
would involve a technology capable of surpassing the speed of light, which
is unimaginable according to our physics. Let us suppose that there is a
technology capable of neutralizing the increase in ship's mass,
proportional to its acceleration. Or let's imagine that an astronaut is
able to break down to the molecular level, travel at lightspeed, and
reassemble himself at the arrival point. We can imagine a technology
capable of flying through black holes, etc.--these are all science fiction
conjectures. But let's suppose such technology really exists. Would a
civilization having such spacecraft use internal combustion engines? Would
it be ignorant about anaesthesia? Would it not have cloaking devices? It
is hard to imagine a technology able to surpass the speed of light leaving
burned grass at a landing site, since any carbonization would we due to an
internal combustion engine...not to mention a ship that toys with black
holes needing hydraulic landing gear with "legs". It is paradoxical that
these prodigious machines should appear on radar screens, when we
earthlings have had "invisible aircraft" since the 1940's. It is galling
that during a UFO abduction or act of aggression a witness should undergo
traumatic "tortures", when our own hospitals have techniques to avoid
pain, or to even erase any memory of said
operations. The
conclusion is evident: if UFOs were alien, they should be much more than
vehicles, and if they are vehicles, then they are not alien. Unless, of
course, all the "evidence" of the phenomenon (landing marks, burned grass,
radar detection, scars on witnesses) are a "means of expression" for the
phenomenon, just as the witness might imagine a "spaceship" to look and
behave. In this order of affairs, either everything is due to a strange
physical manifestation of the witnesses' beliefs and prejudices--according
to his cultural background--or what is more disquieting, a real phenomenon
alien to the protagonist him/herself which uses the archetypes of Western
technological civilization to make itself visible "in the likeness" of
what the witness would believe if faced with an alien
craft. Ultimately,
to continue arguing about the extraterrestrial or non-extraterrestrial
provenance of UFOs strikes me as absurd. As our physics indicates, it is
absolutely ridiculous to believe in physical and solid craft like the ones
that appear on radar screens or leave the imprints of their "legs" on the
grass they burn upon landing. We must go beyond the outward appearance of
the phenomenon and venture into its true nature, which will more than
likely have nothing to do with metallic "flying saucers" filled with
small, bigheaded
EBEs... |