Oct 27, 2005

1.   I posted this message at which is archived here at

    Title  of  the message thread:   Jihad Watch: Israel: at least five killed in suicide bombing in Hadera

    Link  to the message  thread:

    Link to the my message:

 You many comment on what I wrote at at my blog

Oct 26, 2005

1.    Halal and Haram Speech at

Halal means that which is allowed by Islamic law.
Haram means that which is prohibited by Islamic law

I  wrote the following (see belowe) at today but it got deleted.

Do you think what I wrote needs to be deleted? Can you think of any reason why they might have done this? Do you agree with their action? Email me at or post a message at my blog

The message thread Title:    Fitzgerald: Countering Da'wa in prisons

The message thread URL:

Here is what I wrote that was so "Haram" to the Censors at

Yes, Hugh

Islam and muslims are racist.

Tabari II:11 “Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African’s color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks.”

Simply telling those in and out of prison these facts might not be enough. As you acknowledged ( "(and sometimes with justification)" )there is real racism in America and this problem should be dealt with as well.

Your strategy seems to be only to tell these real or imagined victims of racism that the Islamic alternative is just as bad or worst.

How about giving them better alternatives? Where are the positives on the side of good?
Instead of what seems like you saying "put up with the existing milder racism because it is not as bad as Islamic racism."

I am sure this is not what you meant but it does sound like it.


Briefly on Iraq.

I think you are wrong for calling for too early a withdrawl.

You seem to want to leave Iraqi to themselves and let them tear each other apart so that they will be too occupied to bother the rest of us.

There is a major flaw in this line of reasoning. Some historical facts indicate that things might not go as you wished.

I give you two examples. Afghanistan after the Soviet withdrawl and the Iran-Iraq Gulf war.

During the Iran-Iraq war, they were fighting quite savagely but terror attacks were going on even then. Both Iran and Iraq were able to work on acquiring WMDs (Weapons of mass distruction) while slaughtering each other. Both countries also supported global terror while at it (Hizbullah by Iran and PLO by Saddam).

The same is true of Afghanistan. When the Soviets left there was a bloody civil war but that didn't make the world safer. Instad Osama and co took advantage of the chaos and build basees there that training thousands of terrrorists who are now all over the world.

My point is that lettting them tear each other apart is not going to make us any safer as you can see from this.

I think it would make it even worst for US.

Look back to Afghanistan. When the world left it to itself it became the al Qaida head quarters from where they launched the 9-11 and other attacks.

To stop them the US end up having to go into Afghanistan. So much for leaving them to themselves.

The same will also happen in Iraq if the US leave too soon. It will became a launch pad for terror attacks and the US will have to go back into Iraq again to stop them. So why leave? We are just going to have to go back in anyway if we leave.

I don't think any cent or drop of sweat or blood should be shed for those who are forever ungrateful. Those with eternal hatred for us deserve no help. But to preserve ourselves somethimes we might have to stabilize or try to make it as best as we can instead of letting it get out of control and then have to deal with a worst problem later.

The old "Domino Theory" is really true. We can't just wait like sitting ducks while the rest falls down one by one. "Paleo-con" ideas of "isolationism" didn't work as Pearl Harbour and WWII followed. Fortress America mentality might lead to WWIII.

I have said something like this before but I don't think I have had any replies from you yet.



Entries for Oct 26, 2005 are archived at

Aug 19, 2005

1.  I have deleted the spams (those useless long rubbish messages posted) at my blog at 
    The troll responsible must be a muslim.

2.  I will put up more stuff up at my blog and here at my web site. Please check.

3.  Some of the messages I posted at got deletd. What do you think about them deleting stuff you write there?

Aug 15, 2005

1. I have set up a blog at . Please come and share your thoughts by commenting there.

2. Some trolls are currently pestering my blog by posting very long and rude posts to clog up the threads. I have laid a complaint with Hopefully they will band those trolls (most likely a muslims) from

3. I am still working on this site and my blog but won't be able to do much at the moment becuase I am too busy. Come back and check often.


http://www.Answering-islam.Org/ (A Christian site. The biggest and best site on the internet. Must See.)

http://ProphetOfDoom.Net/ (Islam's Terrorist Dogma In Muhammad's Own Words. It gives you the verses.)  (A Christian site.),24,0,0,1,0  "What Muslims Really Believe" A compendium of Islamic scriptures arranged by topic

http://www.JihadWatch.Org  (News site. Updated Daily. The comments section is not Christian friendly. Many Christian haters are there and if you respond to the lies and false accusations they make against Christianity there you comments could end up being deleted. Beware.) (An atheist site. Beware.)


Since November 18, 2004

Last Updated: Oct 26, 2005