HIGHWAY TO THE STARS, Introduction continued

      Speaking to me, says astrologer Jeanne Avery in
The Rising Sign,

           A person with Aquarius on the rise can be a forerunner in showing
           the rest of humanity the way. . . when this sign is on the ascendant,
           the individual has a unique approach to life that makes him
           somehow different from other people. He may have a most unusual
           personality, or be so far ahead of his time that he is accused of being
           eccentric. . . he can express a strong sense of freedom for himself
           and others. He becomes the water-bearer by walking to the beat of a
           different drummer. He may be the person to bring back information
           that has been lost to civilization for centuries.

           In the days when conformity, stability, and proper conduct were the
           code of behavior, when conservatism was the vogue, the Aquarius
           personality had a difficult time fitting into society. He was too much
           of a maverick to conform to the dictates of others. Since we are
           coming into the Aquarian age, sociological conditions have changed
           rapidly, with individuality the highest goal to strive for.

      Thomas Jefferson, author of America’s Declaration of Independence, in connection with Aquarius, was a Deist. He believed in God by reason and nature.  Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, an abstract thought, has no boundary.  The  boundary throughout history has been man's control, employing a god of man's making to control the individual. The same as Islam, America's makers and keepers of the law have placed themselves in control of our lives. Self-serving authorities eliminate the power that made America great. We depend evermore on government, and ever-less on our marvelous minds.
      I decided to write my memoirs. By daily thinking and writing my thoughts, I’ve  discovered a world I didn’t know existed. Exercising the mind as I have, the same as physical exercise, strengthens the mind.  A personality test revealed that I was average, except in judging and perceiving I scored significantly higher than both males and females.  I attribute that to my daily activity.
     Astrologer James Redfield, author of
The Celestine Prophecy, advised me in an audio tape, "We cling to the idea that things are going fine. We have goals we want to achieve. We need to manipulate others to keep everything just right. We don't want information that rocks the boat.” We is individuals who go into the making of the establishment. “This allusion, based on security control, has to shift to our inner connection, our God-self force," said Redfield.
     What brought philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche to ask, "Is man one of God's blunders or is God one of man's blunders?” Are man's age-old fantisies saving us from our sinful selves, or are we born God-selves capable of knowing good and evil?  Given the state of things, this is a question that deserves much concern.
     The root of our problem is spelled out in the Bible, in Genesis 1:26: “And God said, Let us make man in our image.” Since there is only one god, God was speaking to man in general. God gave man dominion over Earth and all other life on the planet.  So far, it adds up.
     Then in John 8:44, Jesus, the son of God, said, “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.” In Genesis 3:6, 7,  Eve at the forbidden tree,  “and when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit and did eat, and gave also to her husband with her; and he did eat." So far so good. But then we read, "And the eyes of them were both opened, and they knew they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves aprons.” Why was the naked body seen as something to be ashamed of?  Did Adam and Eve think that or did some authority of the past give us that idea?  If God made man in his image, he made man capable of separating the truth from fiction.  The son of God would not have said  our father is the devil. I'm one of nature's creatures, with a sex drive, but with reason, distinguished from other creatures.  The story of the tree of knowledge of good and evil is fiction.  How can one know good if he doesn't know evil?  Why would God have created man in his image and then not allowed him to know good and evil? Lower animals don't know good and evil.  God gave man dominion over lower animals. 
     Also, in Revelations, adding to the inconsistency,  we are informed of the "mark of the beast," "the end times," and the "Battle of Armageddon." In Revelations 6:15.16, “Behold I come as a thief, Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame." There it is again, the idea that nakedness is shameful. Is the naked truth shameful?  "And he gathered them together into a place called Armegeddon." In chapter 17, comes the seven dooms. Back to Genesis 3:3: “But the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. In Genesis 3:4,5, “And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall surely not die: For God doth know that in the day you eat thereof, then your eyes will be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.”
     Lower animals don’t know good and evil. Knowing good and evil is that which makes us human, in the image of God. It's double talk. Does not obedience allow for reason?  In Nazi Germany, you obeyed one of history's most unreasonable, Hitler.  The Nuremberg trials found those obedient to Hitler committed crimes against humanity.           
     During my adolescence, Christianity taught me that if I even thought about sex I was a sinner.  I’m a creature with a sex drive,  and blessed with reason. Christianity adheres to a 5,000 year-old yarn that made me think I was going to hell. Which is worse, growing into adults who think our sex drive is evil or being adulterous.  Could the guilt from this teaching be the number one reason for sexual perversion?  The Bible is a book of 5,000 year-old stories carried from generation to generation, espousing  ancient ideas that do not apply today, but still play a major role in our lives.
      The prophet Job was originally a man of means, of family, of good health, but obedient to his God's unreasonable demands. For God’s sake, Job gave up everything in this world he held dear. As I write this Christmas day, Christmas representing peace and good will toward man, Muslims drilled in Islam's teaching think Christians and Jews represent the "Great Satin."
     Larry Dossey, M.D., in his
Healing Words,

         
In the fourteenth century, an anonymous English monk, believed to
           be the author of The Cloud of Unknowing, an exalted religious tract
           that deeply influenced the religious life of the time, added his lament
           to the futility of addressing and even thinking about the Universal.
           “But now you will ask me,” said he, “How am I to think of God
           himself, and what is he? And I cannot answer you accept to say I
           don't know! For with this question you have brought me into the
           cloud of unknowing. Of God himself can no man think.

     With this clouded English monk’s  idea in mind, of God himself can no man can think, nineteen individuals of the Muslim faith used American airliners to kill thousands of innocent people and do billions of dollars in damage in America, in a “holy war” aimed at placing Islamics in control of the world. The American captain of the biggest aircraft carrier in the world says his ship is for one reason alone: “to make people think our way.” 
     On the national news, I watched Senator Barbara Boxer place her palms on her chest, and then make a fist as she made an impassioned plea against sending more troops to Iraq.  Her appeal was to mothers. In her opinion, Secretary of State Rice couldn’t know because she was not a mother. Based on experience, Boxer feels one way. Someone else with a different experience feels another way.  Boxer emphatically made the point that right national decisions are not made based on the way we feel.
     Transformation means to change in nature: “the process by which deep structures are converted to surface structures.” The mother cares for and teaches the offspring until mature enough to be on their own.  In lower animals, it is in their nature that upon reaching maturity they are left to their own devices to survive.  We don’t need Mother Boxer advising mature humans.
     I was once a sailor on the vast ocean, captain of my ship, a 37 foot sloop named
Bold Venture.  I conquered every challenge nature threw at me and came back believing in myself. Life came from the sea. The sea transformed me.  No one knows like a sailor knows the power that lies within us.
     To make a long story short, there are those in government asking for your vote, Barbara Boxer one of them, with the promise of doing more for you, in this particular case if you are a mother, than the opposition. How does one come to believe in himself? Necessity is the mother of invention. Immature people with little motivation to do better, given a government handout, are never going to do better.  Those with little motivation are going to vote for the politician they feel will give them the most, in this case, Mother Boxer.  That’s why it is not the legitimate duty of government, unless the individual is utterly incapable of taking care of his own needs, to  help the individual with taxpayer money. 
     The United States is helping out millionaires by giving them government entitlements. Remember that politicians reason by votes, not with their minds.  Secretary Rice, one of Boxer’s opposition, is not a mother. Was the passion display heartfelt, or was Boxer grandstanding for votes?  Will we never learn?  Do you need a mother to care for you, or are you capable of thinking for yourself?
     On a much broader scale, we should not have had the decision to make in the first place to send more troops to Iraq. The decision has to do with thousands of years of false concepts, concepts that come from customs and conventions, concepts that come from various faiths in the supernatural.  Supernatural is an invention to explain that which we are told is impossible for mere mortals to know; God conveniently reveals to the authorities what he wants us to know. God reveals to Islam’s authorities a different message than God reveals to Western authorities—all based on feeling. 
     In Exodus 3:13, 14, "And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the  children of Israel, and shall say the God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they
say to me, What is his name? What shal I say unto them? And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM; and he said, thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you." Aware of the oneness of all—I AM—made in the image of God, when I went to sea on a small sloop it was just me and the ocean.  I saved, not only my own life, but the lives of three others with me. My crew called it a miracle. Until we are called upon, we have no idea of the power that lies within us.  God’s hand was on my wheel. 
     We’ve got external Mother Boxer and an external Father in Paradise or Heaven, take your pick, to care for us. We will never know the right answer until we own up to the truth. The killing in Iraq is about gaining power and control by igniting the feelings of people who for thousands of years have placed their faiths in manmade fantasies and little faith in themselves.
     What would it be if every individual thought for himself?  Would the result be anarchy?  In my Webster’s College Dictionary, under the word anarchy, “a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principle mode of organized society,” since the theory has never in the history of man been in fact, we don’t know how it would be.
     If we, the people, understood that absent coercive government as a political ideal, and cooperative and voluntary association of individuals prevailed in organizing society, we would live in peace. America is more and more isolated in her thinking. The world is blinded by surface reflections. By clinging to out-dated dogmas and conventions, the gap between haves and have-nots of the world will continue to grow proportionately greater, and with this comes inevitable conflict. To put it all into perspective, the world is now wrapped up in a holy war with have-nots who base their war on the teaching of the prophet Mohammad.  Their prophet lived 600 years ago, before the invention of the printing press. Trying to communicate complex ideas to relics of the past is impossible, but we can start in America by giving the individual back his God-self.
     President Bush is the head of an establishment which since the Great Depression has aimed for control of the individual, its main thrust, the welfare state, government helping out the individual. What better way could there be to gain control of the individual?  Bush haters should understand that it doesn’t make any difference who is the head honcho.  With the Constitution turned on its ear, America is heading for the rocks.  That’s why radical Islam is making headway. It is fair to say the American establishment is the culprit. 

   
The current welfare state in America is the evidence that conventions start with a desirable end, forcing all the pieces to fit.  The great idea of giving the establishment the go-ahead to spend our money, or whatever, always turns into a pyramid game. Then, comes the rub. Having painted itself into a corner, every single time, the perpetrators of the fraud make excuses. America’s politicians are spending all of their time addressing the symptoms of their mistakes.  Allowing government to establish its means to the end, as Amereica stands witness, justice is either strictly in the interests of the strong, or at best conventions entered upon purely out of expediency, which, ultimately, boils down to the same thing. You can’t claim slavery, and more lately caretaker government, and claim to be legitimate. 
     In Reverend C. I. Scofield’s introduction to
The Scofield Reference Bible, “The Dispensations are distinguished, exhibiting the majestic, progressive order of the divine dealings of God with humanity, 'the increasing purpose' which runs through and links together the ages”  says when you link the ages you see that we are here with a more advanced purpose than the prophets of yore.
     Synergy is a term that comes from a 1657 theological doctrine, that human will cooperates with divine grace in regeneration. Divine grace comes from submission to authority. Authority  doesn't regenerate us; authority is the source of human degeneration.  Only by the U. S. Congress’ grace, do we Americans exist.
     Synergy occurs when our interaction with the elements allows us to become effective in organizing our lives in harmony with a perfectly natural universe. The American people, having forked over their inalienable rights to government, have never been as divided.
     It figures that I would be informed on the Internet that Scofield was a fraud.  Everyone with whom I agree is a fraud. The Roman emperor Constantine adapted Christianity. Anyone who didn’t adapt to his brand of Christianity was a fraud and subject to prosecution. A Holy Roman Empire composed of seven secular states in cahoots with the Holy Roman Catholic Church was a political plus for Europe's rulers. Anyone who didn’t submit was subject to prosecution. America's present legal and judicial activists, bent on placing themselves in control, take us back to the tree of knowledge of good and evil.  The serpent is authority claiming it has a lock on good and evil. If authority can divide our interests, it remains in control.  
      Nobel Prize winner physicist Murray Gell-Mann has described quantum mechanics as “that mysterious, confusing discipline which none of us really understands but which we know how to use.” It figures that physicist Richard Feynman would assert, “I think I can safely say that no one understands quantum mechanics. . . Do not keep asking yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, ‘but how can it be like that?’ Nobody knows how it can be like that.”
     Why is that? Physics, the science that deals with matter, energy, motion, and force, now gives us quantum physics. By examination of the microcosmic, the idea has been proposed, “if this is so, that is so.”  It means we use our minds, not our power. Quantum reality says the observer makes his own reality. When one submits to authority, he doesn't observe.  His reality is whatever authority says it is, and authority's power is mindless. As history records, there is no end of it. If nature had intended humans to be hive creatures, she would not have given us human minds.
     Walter Bagenat, a British economist said the only  thing worse than government is anarchy.  "It is often said that men rule by their imaginations; but it would be truer to say they are governed by their weakness of imagination." Those who stick with their rhetoric, their precedence, their determinism, their epistemology, their statistics, their saints, said establishment freaks of nature will never be open-minded enough to know what they have. What makes the individual human able to reason is not something the ironclad establishment is into. It clings to concrete reality, the world as it is conceived.

    
We learn from quantum mechanics, however, that Newton's and Einstein's ends were not the  end.  In my physics class in 1942, I was taught that an atom had a nucleus of protons and neutrons, with electrons orbiting the nucleus.  The new age, quite apart from the establishment, with imagination, American physicists Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig developed a theory of particle physics that proposed quarks as the building blocks of protons and neutrons, borrowing the word from James Joyce’s novel, Finnegans Wake, which contains the phrase, “three quarks for Muster Mark.”
  To give you an idea of what the future holds, nobody knows what we’re looking at, but most of the progress being made in science is being made in quantum physics. There were only two types of quarks to describe the proton and neutron: the “up quark” and the “down quark.” However, at the same time of the arrival of the quark, physicists discovered new elementary particles, including   kaons, which they called “strange.” The explanation of these particles required a third type of quark, so physicists named it the “strange quark” to make three quarks for Muster Mark—the up quark, the down quark and the strange quark.
    They used the three-quark model through the 1970s to learn about the internal structure of the proton. These experiments supported the existence of quarks and gluons inside protons, but they had not yet actually been discovered. In 1970, they predicted the existence of a fourth quark, called the “charm quark.” Thus, a particle containing the charm quark, the second-generation partner of the strange quark, alas, came the discovery in 1975 of a third-generation “lepton,” another building block of matter, which led scientists to predict the existence of a third generation of quarks. The “bottom quark” came along in 1977.
      Pioneer Enrico Fermi’s name lives on in the Enrico Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory at Batavia, Illinois, which houses machinery that stands 3 stories tall and weighs about 5,000 tons. Four-hundred-fifty physicists coordinate their efforts around the Fermilab, which houses an accelerator big enough to build the energy required to see a “top quark.” In February 1995, the discovery of the theorized “top quark” was a big day for quantum physicists. The top quark, an essential in the construction of matter, was a giant step forward.
      This quark which no longer exists in nature, played an essential roll in the primordial past. In the world of particle physics, this elusive giant (about the size of a gold atom) is extremely short-lived, but held to be of great importance to matter’s early construction. The top quark, the “top kick” of the atom’s organization, came along after physicists had struggled for considerable time to fill a hole in the standard model they envisioned for atoms. Knowing what controls atoms, a standard model predicting that three generations of quarks should exist, each one containing two different quarks.
     Quantum physics connects with ancient ideas. The ancients mapped the heavens for the purpose of engineering a structure that included we peons. Without personal knowledge, we deduce facts indirectly that reasonably follow other facts, according to common experience. In other words, conventions conceive; we individually perceive when we are not brainwashed into blind submission. Conventions conceive of desirable ends and then try to force the pieces to fit. Therein lies the crux of our problem—putting the cart before the horse, putting self-serving power ahead of the individual.
     Throughout the course of human history, the universe has been steadily growing in size, and in understanding. What the mind is capable of is seen today in thousands of ways. Two hundred years ago what we know today would have been impossible. In the next 50 years, we will likely gain far more than we’ve gained in the past 200 years.
The inventors of numbers used them to account for. Using numbers in their reasoning process, ancient astrologers learned from drawing geometric pictures that told them “if this is so, that is so.” Progress takes place when we have everything to gain and nothing to lose. Classical physics, by admitting what the numbers say, would have to go back to the drawing board and start from scratch.
     From time immemorial, humankind has been using numbers in trading, in building and measuring, in writing, in timekeeping, in symbolism, in abstract thinking. The last number to come, zero—nothing—plays its role as placeholder. The year zero follows an event so significant that it literally starts a new time reckoning. The last such event was the death of Christ.
     The astrological age is a time period corresponding with the time it takes for the vernal equinox to move through one of twelve constellations of the zodiac. If it is true that it takes 25,000 years to move through all twelve constellations in the time-space consortium, then it is true that we are now moving from the Age of Pisces, the symbol of which is two fish swimming in opposite directions, which began a little more than 2,000 years ago, around the time of Christ, into the Age of Aquarius, the symbol of which is the water-bearer to humanity.
     The Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, "washed  his hands" of Christ's crucifixion, but shortly after the crucifixion the Romans destroyed the Hebrews' temple and took them into slavery.  It's one of those politically improper facts of history. Can we deduce that a quantum leap in man's evolvement is approaching? Is it those who cling to the outdated past who will perish?  At this crucial time in history, we are leaving an age of authoritarianism, an age when the individual was held for naught, and currently witness to a writhing, dying monster, the shame of man, the "Mark of the Beast," the "End Times," yet the bewitched with faith in their fathers the doomsayers don't make the connection.  We approach the end of their time.
    To make the case for numerology and astrology, I’ve arranged the events of my life in accordance with numerology’s 9 steps in reality creation. In step 1, the pioneer, seeking an identity, finds a mate represented by 2. The 1 and 2 combine and form 3: diversification. The first three steps take place in the three dimensional space-time consortium, and occur chronologically, in my case, to fit with my experience. In reasoning “if this is so, that is so,” in that the numbers fit the experience, we have reality in numbers.
     Taking this thought a step further, in step 4, the symbol for system and order, we step into the fourth dimension. 4 deals with quality. Numerology gave me a form to go by in writing my memoirs.  In my case, observation tells us numerology’s explanation is a good fit.
     Pythagoras, said to be the father of modern mathematics, studied under Egyptian priests. He is remembered for his theorem, the square of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides. On quantum physics’ idea, “if this is so, that is so,” Pythagoras saw in geometric ratios the explanations of all natural phenomena. Quantum physicist Evan Harris Walker, from his understanding of the microcosmic, bringing meaning to the Pythagorean theorem, wrote in
The Physics of Consciousness:

           Look again at the three-squares in Figure 8.1. What we have constructed
           is the standard figure from the Pythagorean theorem. . . Thus we have a
           simple graphical way of showing how many photons (in any time interval)
           will pass through a pair of Polaroid filters at any angle—and also how
           many will be stopped.

     An understanding of the microcosmic world would bring about a great social shift for the better. As history records, authority, with a penchant for putting the cart before the horse, classical science uses mathematics promiscuously in EPR's math, the old-school Newton-Einstein ultimate reality, to attempt to disprove quantum mechanics’ math. Common sense says EPR’s math is nonsense.
     In quantum mechanics, the internal and intimate is explored. In Walker’s explanation, he offers mathematical proof that photons remember, and, it doesn’t make any difference in their communications whether they are inches or light years apart, their communication is instantaneous. Particles, the smallest objects in the scheme of things, communicating is a new idea to me. It may not appear the same in the microcosmic world as in our world, however, indirectly—if this is so, that is so—in quantum mechanics, we observe and this is what makes reality.
      I wanted to know who Walker was, so I went to the Internet. “Who was Evan Harris Walker? My Uncle, Dr. Evan Harris Walker, died on the evening of August 17, 2006 at Hartford Memorial Hospital in Havre de Grace, Maryland,” wrote his nephew, Michael P. Walker.
     Michael: "I recently asked him how we would know if someone ever actually changed history retroactively as that new history would be all we remember. He said there would be some subtle indicator or something that looked like a coincidence." The events of my life are loaded with coincidences.
     Michael: "Dr. Walker is the author of
The Physics of Consciousness. He is regarded by many to be the founder of the modern science of consciousness research. He was the first to propose a theory of the nature of consciousness tied to well-known physical principles of quantum mechanics and based on quantitative physical and neurophysiological data. He has made significant contributions to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics and originated the ‘Quantum Observer Theory’ relating to state vector collapse that is of significance to parapsychology. Both of these theories have been supported by extensive and predicted experimental results. He has also contributed to the fields of neurophysiology, specifically to the mechanism of synaptic functioning, and in psychology to understanding optical illusion phenomena."
     A feature of the microcosmic world is that mathematics can determine where an object is; mathematics can determine the speed of the object; but mathematics cannot determine both at the same time. It is called Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. There is something in nature that remains a mystery. But if this is so, that is so, we humans, with indirect means of understanding, are endowed with vast power.
     Walker is accused by many of his colleagues of trying to smuggle God into physics, but the numbers rule, not the number jugglers. Quantum mechanics gives us a state of consciousness and a non-local force. Since this layman is on Walker's wave length, perhaps I can take up where he left off. Tachyons are hypothetical subatomic particles that travel faster than the speed of light. Coincidentally, it is believed by some people that at the time a soul begins to experience life as an independent entity, a field of energy known as the Akashic Record, is created to record every thought, word, intent, emotion, and deed generated by that soul. The Akashic Record is supposed to mold and shape levels of human consciousness—to educate, to transform the individual—and as we interact and learn from the data that has already been accumulated, to embody an ever-changing array of possible futures.
      Some physicists believe that as bodies make their way through the universe, not isolated particles moving willy-ninny, but tracing “world lines,” what they trace becomes an elaborate geometric tapestry in a four-dimensional space-time consortium. All sequences of events—world lines that are time-like—describe the history of particles moving at a velocity slower than the speed of light. World lines called light-like move exactly at the speed of light. The world lines of our concern here are world lines outside of light and time, corresponding to “tachyonic” processes.
     Suffice it to say, dogmatic classical physics keeps dogmatic religion in place, but cutting edge science calls subject faster than light world lines a non-local force in no way subject to physical or local forces. We've got a whole new universe to explore.
     How did we get here? Is the universe randem events or is everything in divine order? Is there universal consciousness? Are we the reason for it all? Is each of us here for a special reason? 
See illustrations
     There is a part of the universe we don’t see with our eyes, a part we see in our minds. If there were no immaterial aspect, there would be no life in the universe.  I give you my personal story on how, from the data that has already been accumulated, we learn our spiritual mission in life.
     Newton gave science the laws of motion. They are immutable, quantum physicist Walker agrees, “But these laws leave open a range of happenings that are left to the selection of the mind,” says he. Walker: “In quantum mechanics, the results of any action are determined by the observer rather than any Newtonian law of physics and, if this phenomenon is true in three dimensions, it must also be true in the fourth.”
    4 in numerology, the qualitative, in a state or order, world lines outside of light and time, in the boundless state of mind, this is where it all comes together. Think of space as the time between events. We are capable in our minds of connecting with universal consciousness. Walker informs us, as follows:

          The tests of Bell’s theorem have shown that objective reality as it
          has been conceived is not the true fabric of reality. The observer
          interacts with matter. Consciousness, the substance of this new-
          found reality that defines the observer, has fundamental existence.
          It is the quantum mind that is the basic reality.

     Bill Gates, who used to be called a computer nerd, invented a computer language that starts with ones and zeros. He holds the patent. Gates' weird idea that numbers rule—he wasn't bewitched by the establishment—allowed Gates, the king of numbers, to become the richest man on Earth. The dogmatic legal, scientific and religious establishments clinging to the status quo do not face today's reality. The universe is nothing like they see it. The age of optimization and age-old dogmas are history. Innovators are stealing the show. We, the people, when we are not in a box of our own making, are proven quantifiers; we are capable of turning infinite possibility into quantity.
     In their introduction to
Numerology and the Divine Triangle, Faith Javane and Dusty Bunker wrote: "Somewhere between the microcosmic and the macrocosmic we look for the key that can put our world into logical perspective." Rather than conceive of a desirable end and force the pieces to fit, we now have a basis on which to start.
     Although the microcosmic doesn't behave like the world we know, the question: does it not explain how it all comes together?   In the case for the status quo, the American people becoming evermore dependent on government—caretaker government,
tomorrow's dictatorship—instead of relying on third parties to redistribute our sweat, the individual must be put back in control of his life, as the individual makes his own reality, the government makes the individual its slave.
     One hundred-forty-four million posts on Google on "What happened to my America" says something is wrong here. It is little wonder that the world is in turmoil. Locked in on the status quo, we're at the threshold of a future impossible to imagine. Given the state of things, either the human of the future will be infinitely more conscious of the quality of life, or humankind will bring about its own demise. Mass starvation already is taking place.
     Plutarch (40-120 A.D.), a Greek priest and leading thinker of his day, asserted, “An idea, having no form by itself, but giving figure and form to shapeless matter, becomes the manifestation," I’m merely reiterating what the ancients knew, what quantum physics tells me: we are observers; we individually make our reality.
     The prophet, Habakkuk, asked difficult questions. In 1:2, “O Lord, how long shall I cry, and thou wilt not hear! In Habakkuk 1:4, “Therefore the law is slacked, and judgment doth never go forth: for the wicked doth compass about the righteous; therefore wrong judgement proceedeth.” There you have it from the past. The meek have yet to inherit the earth. Since shaman times, God has been externalized. Humanity has been sacrificed, turned into automatons, imprisoned, tortured, mutilated, killed. Never yet have we understood the power that lies within.
      Some thinkers of the future see a time when computers could take over. They are misguided. Master mathematician John von Neumann built a computer that thinks. Then he became interested in the study of the world of the very small. Von Neumann was forced to admit his thinking computer lacked consciousness.
     The universe has heretofore been a giant clockworks. Quantum physics now admits the mind. We come equipped to see indirectly through the mind’s eye. From the indirect reality quantum physics brings us, we are all actors—here with a purpose. Were it not so, I could not have thought this out.
     The laws of motion are immutable, but what comes around does not necessarily go around in the microcosmic world. It isn’t a Newtonian dog and pony show. Quantum physics adds a probability wave to the mathematics of our lives. Physics has heretofore been a study of matter, motion, and force, but knowledge of the microcosmic world has forced physics to take a look at the way we create our reality. The individual’s consciousness merges quantity with quality. Einstein proved that a quantity can be reduced to vibrations. Human beings have a quality that appreciates music. Music can be reduced to vibrations. Nature, in a great many ways, gives us harmony and symmetry, as seen in the non-local tapestry called world lines. Humans are consciously aware—living our special kind of life—equipped to appreciate the quality of life.
     In Newtonian physics, the “out there” associating with objects and locations, in quantum physics we are now offered a new double-entry accounting system. In cutting edge science, the mind has become associated with matter, energy, motion, and force. The age-old world of conception, placing the control with external authority, denying the fact that we perceive, that we are individually aware of better than this, a new age prophecy from quantum physicist Evan Harris Walker: “Now we see that the independent existence of matter and the absoluteness of space were false dogma.” Walker, pointing out that the observer emerges as “a co-equal in the foundry of creation,” know that the mind exists in a state of infinite possibility. We are observers. Anything is possible.
     After five years of connections, tying together the ages and our increasing purpose mentioned in Scofield’s introduction to the
Scofield Reference Bible,  with quantum physicist Walker’s idea: through observation we make our reality, the two ideas matching biologist Julian Huxley’s thought in his essay, The Future of Man, “Man’s exploration and control of external nature has outdone his exploration and control of his own nature," is not the Age of Aquarius a period when humanity will experience a quantum leap forward in human evolution, to move closer to universal consciousness?
     The New Age challenges you to find your higher self. There is always more to learn. The New Age has no formal religion, creed, membership, philosophy. It believes in a higher state of consciousness. It believes in the total realization of the person we are created to be. The New Age is a reaction against religion and secularism. It believes in nature and reason. I venture to say that we are all unconsciously aware of the greater truth; we know it when it is revealed.
     Perhaps President Lincoln, who was both natively Aquarius and Aquarius rising, was ahead of his time. Perhaps America’s Founding Fathers were ahead of their time.  Since we’ve now learned that we are all part of the act, it is catch-up time. This is the story of how I was programmed. For a change, let us make man in our image.
Continue