TOPIC:  E-COLI, MIND CONTROL, EMANCIPATION
                                                  AND SOMETHING MORE. ...
 

Watch out the e.coli, mon!

What a wonderful world in which we live! Just be at the wrong place at the
wrong moment and ... chao pescado! The only solution, the only defense in
this case, is to surpass the limits of formal logic time-space parameters
and to transform oneself with anticipation in a huge, big e.coli bacteria,
I bet the 'comrades' won't attack then...

Take care and have a nice, e.coli-free weekend...

Iris

Iris,

Thanks very much for your very "nice" alert. I always boil my water before I drink it but even that didn't save the lives of the people that were affected in Walkerton. The sad thing of this tragedy is that those most effected are kids and older adults above 60 years. Up to late tonight other surrounding areas are now on an alert because of similar outbreaks. I will write to you later today my comments on this situation linking it 'probably' to the "Community Power" studies which you just did. On the news on Venezuela I am not really surprised I have been following the events there, as regularly as I could.

Until later
Good night

Khalid

From:Iris Buehler

To: Khalid Ali

Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 4:14 PM

Subject: Re: E.coli 'outbreak'...

Khalid,

I'm looking forward reading your comments! Trying hard here to formulate some comments on "Steve's case" .....  Smiles and until later!

Iris

Iris,

Originally I wanted to write to you a detailed analysis of how I view the current outbreak of E. Coli in the town of Walkerton. However, my mum spoilt my plans by inviting to go grocery shopping with her then I ate lunch and felt lazy and fell asleep. when I got up my nieces insisted that I play "snakes and ladders" with them. Afterwards I took them to the park and felt like a little doggie running behind them and having to "bark" at the top of my voice to "stop" "don't run" "wait" "you are going to fall" and eventually ruff! ruff! bow! wow! lets go home.....! "No more park for Uncle!"

On Walkerton briefly this was incident waiting to happen for a very long time. The fact is that one of every five person were affected speaks volumes for the magnitude of the outbreak. Here in North America and in other developed capitalist countries ever since the advent of globalization there has been a deliberate policy by the state to merge various communities and towns into one big city or mega city. (Walkerton was not yet merged but was on the list to be).The reasons are previously the smaller towns and cities were criticized for having to much local control that impedes development; businesses often complained of too many regulatory laws, high taxes and too much spending on social services etc.

Here in Canada like in the U.S the government intervened and took away most of the "previous democratic" control of these towns and cities by centralizing the power to tax and provision of services. It also began mass scale privatization of services including water ( the responsibility for testing water was done before by  government now it is by private companies). Also, most of the previously strict environmental laws were gutted in favor of more business friendly laws. Finally most municipalities were forced to lay-off essential staff and cut services because of inadequate funds. Consequently the disaster of the e-coli outbreak. As far as where the concept  of "community power" is concerned well it was only a theoretical dream...!    Well, it is sunday already here, almost 1o'clock therefore I must say good bye until later. simpre es un placer. I am falling asleep.chao,

chao,until

Khalid

Khalid,

As always it was a great pleasure to hear from you and I enjoyed your comments, and analysis, thanks also for keeping me informed on the latest news of the present stage of 'involution".

The article on food treating made me smoke several cigarillos en vez de comer, man! Caramba, no more food, no more air, no more water but pills against the after-effects of poisoned food/water etc., pills against the after-effects of the pills, against the after-effects of poisoned food/water etc. -

Guinea-pigs pay for dying, and the money flows. What is exactly the idea and task of this global virus? -- global profit, destruction by any means.

Well, Khalid, this is just a very brief note to say hello, and: sorry, can't comment further now the way I wished to, must go to bed, my beloved "political behaviour and correctness" seminar is awaiting me within a few hours - will see if I can learn anything, for example achieving diplomatic tact, this I do need urgently it seems! I tried hard to find out something about this strange thing, but the only 'Diplomatico' I know till now is a quite nice cognac over there at home, in Mérida, stored in Jutta's room.

Then, I thought, well, no diplomatic tact available, so let's try to apply the second one to my comments on Steve's case, "add some milk and sugar", but I failed also, *slap* a substantial quantity of milk-sugar-mix over my lap didn't work either, so finally, I decided to send my mail the way it was...

Cuídate, y no dejes que tus sobrinos te torturen demasiado!
Nos vemos en el chat dentro de unas horas,

Good-night, sweet diplomatic dreams,

Iris

 Subject:
       E.-Coli and "nuked" food...
   Date:
       Mon, 29 May 2000 08:45:18 -0400
  From:
       Jutta Schmitt <juschmi@yahoo.com>
    To:
       Khalid Ali <kh9syl@sprint.ca>
 
 

Khalid,

thanks for keeping us informed on Guyana, Venezuela, the E.-Coli
outbreak in Canada and the radioactively treated food. - First thing
that came to my mind, when reading the two articles on the E.-Coli
outbreak and the treatment of food with radioactive rays in order to
supposedly make food "safer", was, to combine the information given
in both articles. Whatever happened, fact is, that the recent E.-Coli
outbreak is the best "propaganda" imaginable in order to promote
"safe food", that is, the radiation of food in order to prevent exactly
this type of food related epidemics. Once again, here we have two sides of
a perverse labour relation, "the market".

Love,
Jutta.

Iris Buehler wrote:

Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 17:17:50 -0400
From: Iris Buehler <iris@aktionspotenzial.de>
Subject: Re: re: re: wbuzz.com, Barker, re-Barker

Dear Steve, Carl and all:
 

I apologize for not having sent my comments to you
already some days ago as
promised. I must admit that I had and do still have a
serious problem formulating my thoughts on this 'topic',
precisely because, as I
stated some weeks ago, this is much more than a chat
topic, it's highly delicate, complex and does concern us
directly indeed - in
thought (thinking) a n d  in deed (acting) - and maybe
'more', different and 'other' than we might have imagined
at first sight.
 

One of my various questions since I got an insight on
Steve's case, following the discussion and the growing
documentation provided on
Steve's home page, was: What can be done? How could I be
of some help? Can I, can We, be of some help at all?

And if so, which 'kind' or
'direction' of help could we seriously offer?   -

'Within' which parameter setting?

I totally agree with Franz (re: Video arrived! 05/19).
"In fact [Steve's] 8 month experience in that behaviour
modification institute was just a compact mirror of what happened
to all of us..." - needless to mention that here "just" is not being
understood in the sense of "belittling" Steves 'case' or more precisely,
belittling the atrocities Steve has been confronted with.

That is: we know that apart
of the fact that our so called 'individual',
'particular', 'concrete', 'personal' experiences are not
identical, essentially there is a
common factor, the ultima ratio of 'empathic parenting',
which is kind of appearing, expressing, reflecting itself
in different,
changing brains, faces, persons and situations we have
been and are confronted with permanently.

The common factor, this pathetic,
parenting monster, the Labour Process with his respective
by-products according to the needs on a given stage of
accelerating natural-social involution, its multiple manifestations
and appearances in 'everyday life', the internalized /
institutionalized mechanisms in favour and for the sake of (self-)defense
and justification of the status quo - the preservation of
the EDDD-relation at a worlds scale by Law and all (!) means, are, amongst
others, part of our reflection, including the limits and
limitations of the very system, regarding 'thinking', 'acting', 'transcending'.

As I indicated, it's not my intention to go into
'details', all this we are elaborating further in our
chats and debates, but taking
into consideration our discussions, documents,
'objective'  statistics, 'subjective' personal experiences
and the conclusions we have
drawn with reference to the Labour Process and its
implications, for now I'll just add the following thoughts
and questions.

- Please do note that I don't exclude the possibility that the
following might be of no relevance whatsoever regarding
Steve's case, I don't either exclude the possibility that I'm sort of affected by a
too lively imagination, suspecting problems or
difficulties which don't even exist and that consequently the questions raised are
totally out of context.

First of all: What do we expect? How about our Illusions?
Which is the 'problem' - the general goal or task we want
to accomplish? Why?

Which are, in the final analysis, our reasons? How, by
which means and within which parameters we are
thinking/planning/going to act?

Why precisely this way? Why by this means? Why within
this parameters? Can the 'problem', our main task, be
solved within the given
parameters? What do we expect is expecting us? On whose
support, on whose help, if necessary, can we count? In a
given case, what does
make us sure?

For example, to ask somebody (all kind of professionals
and non-professionals)  about the reasons which made them
offering their
support, and let's suppose there would be an answer - at
least for me, for example the following, very simple
questions are raising:

Firstly, Which kind of help do we expect? And,
furthermore: Is the given answer authentic? True? Honest?
Or a lie?  Is the person
authentic? Honest? How can we be sure that we really can
trust in someone's words? Are the 'words' interrelated to
the acts of a given
person? Will the respective acts of the person actually
correspond in the end and final analysis with what he or
she had written or
said? Why should we exclude our doubts?  How, and when
will we find out all this? How many days, months, years
will we need to get the
answer? Maybe we'll 'wake up' too late?  -   In 300
years?   -

Let me remind us in this context of the following, which
you all might have read (posted to delphi-forum 05/09, see
also mail 05/23
(Franz) subject: ' Mind Control & Cult Trauma Forum
Messages') which, in the above indicated context, might
also be read in a figurative
sense replacing 'John' and instead thinking 'The System',
'Illuminati', 'NWO', 'WHO', 'Labour Process' etc.
including the broad variety
of the respective covered and un-covered 'advocates'.
"I used to be close to the main controller, whose name is
John. I was very close to
him once. The same people who are helping John in
torturing me 24 hrs a day, I
thought were my friends with their smiling faces and tea,
were introduced to me by
John. This is what hurts the most...  The same people who
caused this breakdown
pretended to support me through it...  I can't begin to
tell you how I felt the day I
discovered this 'person', who I was close to, with his
'friends' were using my
mind as some sick form of 'entertainment'. It took me 2
years realize that John was
behind these 'voices'..."

I understand that we know what are we dealing
with.Doubtlessly we are considering our thoughts and acts
towards this topic in a most
honest, most serious way. And I do 'hope' that 'the day
is near' where Steve finally can state: "It's over. The
whole damn game is
over." (Carl, 05/25)

Warmest regards

Iris

Hi, all:

I extend my deepest appreciation to Iris for her questions and
comments. I think that Iris, Jutta, Franz, I and others are fighting
mind control by continuously addressing the issue, publicizing
Steve's situation, and developing emancipatory ideas in our chats and
forums. Our main contribution to this fight is showing forum visitors
that mind control is real, not science fiction, and that it is not a
spectator sport, i.e., everyone including them are in the arena. We
are also showing that media manipulation and other mind control
methods split everyone's personalities into different
sub-personalities to do the bidding of the controllers. We are
demonstrating that ritual abuse, in which LSD, other drugs, torture
and hypnosis are used, are extreme forms of these methods. In short,
everyone is subjected to mind control.

In this activity, we will help change the manner in which the
"interpretative community," which includes everyone in the
post-industrial world, looks at mind control. For this, I cite
Stanley Fish's book "Is there a text in this class? (1980).*"
According to Fish, there are obstacles to "objective" vision in the
act of reading itself. The reader reads, or misreads, with his/her
standards and assumptions, usually without even knowing it. He or she
is a member of what Fish calls an "interpretive community," which
governs his or her place in the world. The politically oppressed are
"constructed" through a series of psychological "identifications"
applied by political oppressors whose ideology is often more
effective than its rifle butts. Even the family is used as an
instrument of political oppression. The family isn't just a private
affair, but a microcosm of larger social forces that divide the self
in the act of creating it.

We are taking the lead in fighting mind control by exposing it where
it really lies-in the secret language of the heart-by showing how
mind control affects everyone personally. In this respect we are
taking the lead which African-American criticism of racism originally
took. For example, W.E. Dubois introduced the notion of black
"double-consciousness," i.e.," looking at one's self through the eyes
of others" in the USA in 1903 before Franz Fanon discussed this
concept in "Black Skins, White Masks" in Algeria in the 1950's.

The attorneys and clinical psychiatrists (M.D.'s and Ph.D.'s), of
course will do a lot to bring the controllers to justice and ease the
pain of mind control victims with the use of their skills and high
credibility. However, these professionals, although extremely
valuable, are neither the experts on every subject nor end-alls.

In addition, we should give praise and constructive critics to both
professionals and non-professionals where justified. We should resist
the tendency to praise only professionals and criticize only
non-professionals. Otherwise the professionals might think that are
being manipulated, and the non-professionals might think that they
are unappreciated.

We are reinforcing credibility by providing documentation such as in
Steve's case. The support of everyone involved in this fight will
make a difference. "La lucha continua (Franz)."

Regards.

Carl.

*NY Times Book Review section, 5/28/00, p. 27.

     Date:
         Tue, 30 May 2000 11:25:51 -0700
     From:
         "Steve Smith" <smiths@direct.ca>
       To:
         "Franz Lee / Jutta Schmitt" <franzjutta@cantv.net>, "iris" <iris@aktionspotantial.de>,
         "Khalid" <kh9syl@sprint.ca>, "Carl Zimmerman" <czfz@bellatlantic.net>,
         "Carl Zimmerman" <carlzim@philosophers.net>,
         "Jutta Schmitt" <juschmi@yahoo.com>
 References:
         1

Hi, Folks!

I suppose I have known from the early 70s, Canada is and always has been the laboratory for
American socal engineering.

I am beyond worrying about paranoia. The concept no longer applies. What could be worse than government responsibility in the poisioning of thousands of people. Now we hear the truth about cell phones.."They are perfectly safe"... but not for kids.

To be paranoid is the only sane alternative. I woke up to this reality at an early age ... 1969.
It has taken thirty years for the rest of the population to even begin to question the UN pronouncement
that Canada is the best country in the world.

People in overtly repressive countries are more fortunate than Canadians ... at least they know who the
"bad guy" is. My wife and I have been drinking bottled water for years but I don't even trust that.

I think I'll switch to "Scotch Only".

Regards

Steve

NEXT

BACK TO GEOCITIES

BACK TO PANDEMONIUM

BACK TO STEVE'S PAGE