SCIENCE  AND  PHILOSOPHY

         By    Franz J. T. Lee

PANDEMONIUM  BOOKS & PUBLICATIONS.

Merida, Venezuela, 1999.    COPYRIGHT: Franz J. T. Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    CHAPTER  SIX

           The Calm before the Brain Storm

 

 
 
 

Before we embark on the tremendous task to elaborate the Gegensatz "Einai-for-Itself", let us recollect some important aspects with which we have dealt until now.

"THE TEN COMMANDMENTS "

1. In previous lectures we have illustrated our Method, which de facto is our Logical Method, is our Logic. It does not operate in a "closed system", also not in an "open system"; it encompasses these and it includes more, i.e., it is neither a closed nor an open Logical Method. Until now, we have elaborated our Unilogic; furthermore, at present we are expounding our Dialogic; later, we will proceed with our Trialogic ; and there are still much more to come.

 2. We have illustrated our unilogical percepts, levels. Unigories and Sätze, for example, Cosmos, "and", Essence, Rest, Nature and Praxis.

3. Also, we have elaborated our dialogical concepts, degrees, Diagories and "Gegensätze", for example, Einai, "a n d", Existence, Motion, Society and Theory. Also, it has to be noted that a Diagory Concept or Gegensatz are depicted as follows : Cosmos a n d Einai, Essence a n d Existence, Rest a n d Motion, Nature a n d Society, Praxis a n d Theory, Satz a n d Gegensatz, Level a n d Degree, "and" a n d "a n d", Unilogic a n d Dialogic. Thus, if we speak about "Einai", we always think "Cosmos a n d Einai"; if we discuss "Theory", we always analyse "Praxis a n d Theory".

 4. Similarly, we have introduced our trialogical transcepts, mensions, Triagories and "Entgegensätze" , for example, Nothing, "AND", Transcendence, Bezug, History, Emancipy. Also, in this case, it is worthwhile to note that a Transcept is always reasoned as a Triagory, for example, as "Cosmos a n d Einai AND Nothing", as "and" a n d "a n d " AND "AND", as Essence a n d Existence AND Transcendence, as Rest a n d Motion AND Bezug, as Nature a n d Society AND History, as Praxis a n d Theory AND Emancipy.

 5. Also, we have underlined that, on a Level, Acting is Acting, that Thinking is Thinking, that Reasoning is Reasoning ; but, on a Degree, that Thinking exists as Acting a n d Thinking; and, on a Mension, that Reasoning surpasses as "Acting a n d Thinking AND Reasoning".

 6. We have emphasized that Acting is simple, that it has to be done like that, and that it must be expressed as such in words and language. We have stressed the necessity to understand that Thinking is complex, that Thought is an endeavour which implies immense mental difficulties, and that it has to be elucidated as such in words and language.

7. Again: We use Words and Language as Tools for Action, Thinking and Excellence; but we have to develop more precise methods of expression and
communication, of inter-relation.

 8. We have deduced that Transcending surpasses on the apeironic frontiers of human imagination and daydreams; thus it excels in a foggy, opaque and vague manner, precisely as such it must be focussed in words and language.

 9. These explanations indicate that logically levels, degrees and mensions should not be mixed up: Neither in Deed, nor in Thought, nor in Reason.

 10. Similarly, Sätze, Gegensätze and Entgegensätze, which correspond to Levels, Degrees and Mensions, and also to Acts, Thoughts and Reasons, must not be expressed in Words and Language as if they were ingredients of a roly-poly, even if the proof of this pudding is in the eating of it.

(CHAPTER  SEVEN)